These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Technology and Research Center » Test Server Feedback » Mass-test feedback - December 8

Topic is locked indefinitely.

Mass-test feedback - December 8 First post
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

CCP Habakuk

C C P

C C P Alliance

Likes received: 1,695

#1 - 2011-12-08 19:58:17 UTC

Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th December, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

OS version:
CPU:
GPU:
RAM:
How many clients were you running at the same time?
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
Average FPS - Zoomed in:
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing

DTson Gauur

Underground-Operators

Likes received: 60

#2 - 2011-12-08 21:05:16 UTC

CCP Habakuk wrote:

Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th December, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows Vista 64bit
CPU: Athlon BE 7750 , dualcore 2.8GHz
GPU: NVidia 460GTX 768MB
RAM: 4GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all high, except AA low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 3
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, on the jump to Poitot fight I never fully loaded system, had to relog to solve that issue (Capital jump)

Gaia Ma'chello

Photosynth

Likes received: 155

#3 - 2011-12-08 21:11:35 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: OSX 10.6.8
CPU: Intel core i7, 2.66 GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
RAM: 8 Gig, 1067 MHz
How many clients were you running at the same time? One
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low, trails off, drone models off, effects off

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 1.8
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 2, Bad, but Ive seen Sisi tests worse
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? One during the POS bash
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

McBorsk

Multispace Technologies Inc

Likes received: 72

#4 - 2011-12-08 21:15:00 UTC | Edited by: McBorsk

CCP Habakuk wrote:

Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th December, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: xp sp3
CPU: e8400
GPU: hd4850
RAM: 2gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium

User Experience worst mass test ever. was unable to do anything for 90% of the test. client was using up all the ram.

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 2 frames per minute
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1 frame per minute
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) compared to other mass tests, this was a mess. 2/10
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: boring, wsnt able to do anything really.

Immortal DeathKnight

Bring Da Fire

Likes received: 9

#5 - 2011-12-08 21:15:42 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: win 7 x32
CPU: t4200
GPU: gf 9600 m gs
RAM: 3gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 13-15
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 9
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7, nice dilatation, but needs to be activated sooner, not just then the server clogs
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

time dilatation needs to be activated a bit sooner, can you make the game less demanding GPU wise ? :)

Alteran Nyo

Stargate Universe SGU

Likes received: 0

#6 - 2011-12-08 21:17:14 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium x64
CPU: Amd Athlon 6000+ X2
GPU: Nvidia Geforce 450GTS 1GB GDDR5
RAM: 4 GB Kingston 800MHZ
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 7
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 3
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No

Ryo Ishikawa

Random Shenanigans

Likes received: 1

#7 - 2011-12-08 21:17:22 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Debian Squeeze 32-bit
CPU: i7 920
GPU: 9600gso
RAM: 12gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 56
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 3-10
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - Idk, haven't been in such large battles on TQ
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, an out of memory exception on the npc fight (reported)
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I've survived, hey :)

Iron Civire

Caldari Provisions

Caldari State

Likes received: 4

#8 - 2011-12-08 21:17:23 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: W7
CPU: 8x Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870@2.93GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon HG 5800 Series
RAM: 4GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? One
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30-50+ at gate, 10 during fight, 20 after I disable drone model

Average FPS - Zoomed in: 10-20 at gate, 2-3 during fight

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) No idea, I havent experienced a superblob yet, but zoomed out it was quite the same

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, one crashe 1min after POS shooting

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

InsomniaHUN

Stargate Universe SGU

Likes received: 3

#9 - 2011-12-08 21:17:28 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Win7 64bit Ultimate
CPU: Intel Core i5 2.26Ghz
GPU: Ati HD5470 1Gb
RAM: 4GB DDR3 1066MHz
How many clients were you running at the same time? Just one.
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High except post processing

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 4
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 5 - hundreds of ships at the same location, i expect the same at TQ :D
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Nothing
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Docking and undocking was really slow, but nothing unexpected.

Andrew DuLac

LA MEGADITTA

Likes received: 1

#10 - 2011-12-08 21:17:31 UTC | Edited by: Andrew DuLac

OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
CPU: Core I7 860 @ 2.8 ghz
GPU: Palit GeForce gts 450 (oc)
RAM: 8 gb @ 1333mhz ddr3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 20
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 4
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes one
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: not much playable, dock, undock and warp really slow.

Some times modules don't activate the first time

Ziester

State War Academy

Caldari State

Likes received: 17

#11 - 2011-12-08 21:17:46 UTC | Edited by: Ziester

CCP Habakuk wrote:

Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th December, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Win7 64x (6.1 ver. 7601)
CPU: i7 950 @ 3.07Ghz
GPU: ATi Radeon HD 5870
RAM: Corsair 6Gb DDR3 SDRAM @ 1333 Mhz
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Maxed out

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 13-16 (5-6 w/ brackets on)
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 12-14 (6-10 w/ brackets on)
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Time Dilation seems a little strange as it indeed activates when the server can't handle that lot of people, but didn't in fleet fight which seem really odd. Other than that, everything went smooth, save for the usual traffic control at gates which from what I saw are a lot shorter than before.

Pop, rock, Metal radio station

Mara Rinn

Cosmic Goo Convertor

Likes received: 6,095

#12 - 2011-12-08 21:17:54 UTC | Edited by: Mara Rinn

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows Vista 32-bit
CPU: 2GH Core 2 Duo
GPU: nVidia GeForce 9300 M G
RAM: 3GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low/off

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: ~20 zoomed out, ~2 zoomed in
Average FPS - Zoomed in: somewhere around 20fps with brackets disabled and zoomed out, ~7fps at my "comfort level" with some brackets and looking at space from my ship (low res model, no effects)
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - I can't comment since I've never been in a fleet this size.
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No, but did experience overview problems such as ghost ships
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

[/quote]

Thankyou CCP, this was a heap of fun!

Day 0 Advice for New Players

Origoadam

Stargate Universe SGU

Likes received: 0

#13 - 2011-12-08 21:17:56 UTC

OS version: Windows 7 64bit
CPU: Intel Sandy-Bridge Core i5-2410M (2,30GHz / 2,90GHz Turbo, 3MB Cache);
GPU: Nvidia Geforce GT 540M 2GB
RAM: 6GB ddr3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all high, except AA low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 3
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Jumping to Poitot

Cristalen

Aliastra

Gallente Federation

Likes received: 2

#14 - 2011-12-08 21:18:18 UTC

OS version: Windows 7 (64bit)
CPU: Intel i3 3.2ghz
GPU: Nvidia GTX 460
RAM: 6gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): med on 1 high on the other

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 11
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 7
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3 it was bad but not as bad as last time
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: it was fun, always fun to kill stuff in large fleets.

DeDes

School of Applied Knowledge

Caldari State

Likes received: 56

#15 - 2011-12-08 21:19:02 UTC

CCP Habakuk wrote:

Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th December, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

OS version:
CPU:
GPU:
RAM:
How many clients were you running at the same time?
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
Average FPS - Zoomed in:
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

XP
Q6600
Gforce 9800 GTX+
3.5G
1 client
Low graphics
8FPS
5FPS
5
No dc's or crashes

Ralf Mortimere

The Thirteen Provinces

Likes received: 0

#16 - 2011-12-08 21:19:43 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Win7 x64 Home Extended SP1
CPU: Intel U4100 1.3GHz
GPU: Intel Mobile Express 4 Series
RAM: 3 Gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? one
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: <1
Average FPS - Zoomed in: <1
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1. awful
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes, during the NPC fight at planet 1
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: awfully laggy. lagged like never before, neither on Tranq, nor during earlier masstessts

PredatorGT

The Scope

Gallente Federation

Likes received: 0

#17 - 2011-12-08 21:19:52 UTC

CCP Habakuk wrote:

Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 8th December, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 64bit
CPU: AMD Athlon X2 6000+
GPU: Geforce 9600GT MATRIX 512mb
RAM:4Gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 20-23
Average FPS - Zoomed in:15-17
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)6
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

time dilation needs to be active sooner..

clusidc

DNS Requiem

Likes received: 5

#18 - 2011-12-08 21:20:55 UTC | Edited by: clusidc

OS version: Win 7 Home Premium x64
CPU: i7-920
GPU:2xATI Radeon 4830 2xMonitor(1920x1200)
RAM: 6GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): everything low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: around 9-10
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 6
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) can't compare - this was my first flee fight.
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 time at changing graphic settings
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: some NPC weren't shown on the right place in the overview.

ShortBusss

Aliastra

Gallente Federation

Likes received: 0

#19 - 2011-12-08 21:21:13 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

•OS version: Windows 7 64 Bit
•CPU: i5 2500
•GPU: ATI 6970
•RAM: 8 GB
•How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
•Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

•Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30 FPS
•Average FPS - Zoomed in: 14.8 FPS
•On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6
•Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 2 Crashes, i crashed once on the X-B gate and again after re-logging in.
•Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
I was very unimpressed by you guys this time, this was a test for time dilation however time dilation was not used during the fight. Yea it might have only been like 600 people, but really you should be testing this to make sure it works. Time dilation is great, but it's just taking the lag and making it 20x worse.

My suggestion is that you guys incorporate what you wish to test, it's pretty dull to not test what you want to test fully. Even on the tower it could've been used, however graphic lag and audio lag were apparenty yet again in the pos shooting.

Thanks.

Daniel Souquel

Likes received: 4

#20 - 2011-12-08 21:21:15 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 (x64)
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 955
GPU: AMD/ATI Radeon HD 5670
RAM: 6GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium/High

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 7-14 fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 2-8 fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6, a bit better than my last test
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The client performance was a bit better and i think you finaly fixed the ATI-Lazor-Show. Without time dilation, some modules just buged out and weren't responsive at all, circle overlap and so on...

123Next pageLast page