These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Marmite Gets Dunked on by RVB

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sarah xCalibre
Pod Liberation Authority
#121 - 2014-08-05 10:58:35 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Sarah xCalibre wrote:


Thank you for explaining your real life to me Im so interested and actually points to me actually having a point in my post, why the need to be so defensive if else?

God you guys are easy.



Delusional people tend to read thing where they are not written. You should go see a doctor. No where I have been defensive in my posting, so much that I even got a warning earlier for being too offensive ...

Morty Friedman wrote:

See you prove my point again you carry on back chatting because your so hurt.

NEED A BIGGER TEAR JAR


How can I prove your point if you have not yet made a single point in this whole thread? Why a tear jar if we are not crying, why would we be crying.. we are paid dozens of billions per week just to kill people in high sec, we have an over 99% efficiency. We collect another few billion isk in shiny loot every week... We have people from self called PVP corps come at our TS to sing so we drop the war on them.. we play only the most fun PVP in eve.. the small scale one and we are basically undefeated on that... I get paid to make people look dumb in forum threads .. ( and clients are always pleased)...

if anyone is crying in this game.. is not us.


Wait a min Im the delusional one?
You got a 99% effieciency, maybe its cause you to 99% fight pve ships. Boasting about how you are small gang warfare, you got no clue what small gang warfare is, small gang is to actually take your gang up against other pvpers in pvp ships and guess what, they arent in highsec. Its so fun to see how you go on about how you are all pvp then sit and complain about game mechanincs aking it so hard for you to use your OOC pro oneiroses, must really suck being you really. If you are so pro maybe its time to move on and actully get fights instaed, oh wait you might actualy lose your ships then. Pro small gang warfare Alliance? More like small gang risk adverse ganks.

Ill await your wardec and the smallest show of any of you in Ishomilken, then Id welcome you to small gang warfare.
  • Sarah xCalibre
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#122 - 2014-08-05 11:09:33 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
having a positive reputation with goons is FAr from what I would consider a cumpliment. Probably means you are nothign more than a bunch of drones...

Also your lack of knowledge shows.. "it's liek russia" yeah.. you wish ... a country that have more nukes than the whoel world combined , that basically make the europe pee on their pants ... if that is your concept of irrelevance.. then you shoudl look at the mirror to find a better concept of irrelevance.
First off, whats wrong with a positive repuation with goons? I mean other than the "grr goons" mentality which is adopted by people who aren;t very bright, there's no real reason to be hating on any group in the game. We're all just here for fun.

And secondly, nobody is peeing in their pants over Russia. Sure, they have some nukes (less than the US) but then a handful of them is enough. Someone drowning in a lake isn't going to be thinking "thank god I'm not drowning in an ocean", and in the same vein nobody is more scared of Russia because they have more nukes. A country with 10 is just as scary as a country with 1000 if their both willing to use them. But yeah, everyone knows that Russia won't push things too far as if they did, they'd get dunked, so why would Europe be peeing their pants?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#123 - 2014-08-05 11:16:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Kagura Nikon
Sarah xCalibre wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Sarah xCalibre wrote:


Thank you for explaining your real life to me Im so interested and actually points to me actually having a point in my post, why the need to be so defensive if else?

God you guys are easy.



Delusional people tend to read thing where they are not written. You should go see a doctor. No where I have been defensive in my posting, so much that I even got a warning earlier for being too offensive ...

Morty Friedman wrote:

See you prove my point again you carry on back chatting because your so hurt.

NEED A BIGGER TEAR JAR


How can I prove your point if you have not yet made a single point in this whole thread? Why a tear jar if we are not crying, why would we be crying.. we are paid dozens of billions per week just to kill people in high sec, we have an over 99% efficiency. We collect another few billion isk in shiny loot every week... We have people from self called PVP corps come at our TS to sing so we drop the war on them.. we play only the most fun PVP in eve.. the small scale one and we are basically undefeated on that... I get paid to make people look dumb in forum threads .. ( and clients are always pleased)...

if anyone is crying in this game.. is not us.


Wait a min Im the delusional one?
You got a 99% effieciency, maybe its cause you to 99% fight pve ships. Boasting about how you are small gang warfare, you got no clue what small gang warfare is, small gang is to actually take your gang up against other pvpers in pvp ships and guess what, they arent in highsec. Its so fun to see how you go on about how you are all pvp then sit and complain about game mechanincs aking it so hard for you to use your OOC pro oneiroses, must really suck being you really. If you are so pro maybe its time to move on and actully get fights instaed, oh wait you might actualy lose your ships then. Pro small gang warfare Alliance? More like small gang risk adverse ganks.

Ill await your wardec and the smallest show of any of you in Ishomilken, then Id welcome you to small gang warfare.


again.. ignorance.. we have been at war with about every single PVP group of high sec. Every single one that I can remember. We do have wars to kill PVE ships as well because they drop shiny loot. but every single group of manegeable size that said what you said to us and dared us.. was sorry at the end. RvB is probably the only group we could never tame, because of obvious de-proportional size and power.

Risk adverse? Lol We fly ships that usually cost 3-5 bil isk each one in numeric disadvantage. How is tha risk adverse? oo you think not being risk adverse is throwing yourself into a stupid fight where both sides stand still and trade shots liek a 17th century outdated army?

No we are not risk adverse.. we are stupidity adverse.

If you want to post in a forum about someone, learn about that someone, otherwise you just make yoruself look stupid. There is still a thread about a wormhole corp saying exaclty what you said about us.. and at the end of the htread they admit they were wrong.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#124 - 2014-08-05 11:19:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Kagura Nikon
Lucas Kell wrote:


And secondly, nobody is peeing in their pants over Russia. Sure, they have some nukes (less than the US) but then a handful of t


Wrooong... research..... current treaty of reduction limits NATO to 1500 active warheads and russia to 1500 active warheads ( NATO side are USA, France and UK.. spliting those 1500). The official stockpiles declared to UN are around 8K for USA, and 14 K for Russia.


No 10 nukes is not as scary as 1000. 10 nukes can be easily stopped byt he current defense missile treaty that accept 150 ICBM interception missiles for each side. Plus 10 nukes cannot destroy a country completely.. 1500 can....

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"
Sarah xCalibre
Pod Liberation Authority
#125 - 2014-08-05 11:19:30 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Sarah xCalibre wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Sarah xCalibre wrote:


Thank you for explaining your real life to me Im so interested and actually points to me actually having a point in my post, why the need to be so defensive if else?

God you guys are easy.



Delusional people tend to read thing where they are not written. You should go see a doctor. No where I have been defensive in my posting, so much that I even got a warning earlier for being too offensive ...

Morty Friedman wrote:

See you prove my point again you carry on back chatting because your so hurt.

NEED A BIGGER TEAR JAR


How can I prove your point if you have not yet made a single point in this whole thread? Why a tear jar if we are not crying, why would we be crying.. we are paid dozens of billions per week just to kill people in high sec, we have an over 99% efficiency. We collect another few billion isk in shiny loot every week... We have people from self called PVP corps come at our TS to sing so we drop the war on them.. we play only the most fun PVP in eve.. the small scale one and we are basically undefeated on that... I get paid to make people look dumb in forum threads .. ( and clients are always pleased)...

if anyone is crying in this game.. is not us.


Wait a min Im the delusional one?
You got a 99% effieciency, maybe its cause you to 99% fight pve ships. Boasting about how you are small gang warfare, you got no clue what small gang warfare is, small gang is to actually take your gang up against other pvpers in pvp ships and guess what, they arent in highsec. Its so fun to see how you go on about how you are all pvp then sit and complain about game mechanincs aking it so hard for you to use your OOC pro oneiroses, must really suck being you really. If you are so pro maybe its time to move on and actully get fights instaed, oh wait you might actualy lose your ships then. Pro small gang warfare Alliance? More like small gang risk adverse ganks.

Ill await your wardec and the smallest show of any of you in Ishomilken, then Id welcome you to small gang warfare.


again.. ignorance.. we have been at war with about every single PVP group of high sec. Every single one that I can remember. We do have wars to kill PVE ships as well because they drop shiny loot. but every single group of manegeable size that said what you said to us and dared us.. was sorry at the end. RvB is probably the only group we could never tame, because of obvious de-proportional size and power.

Risk adverse? Lol We fly ships that usually cost 3-5 bil isk each one in numeric disadvantage. How is tha risk adverse? oo you think not being risk adverse is throwing yourself into a stupid fight where both sides stand still and trade shots liek a 17th century outdated army?

No we are not risk adverse.. we are stupidity adverse.

If you want to post in a forum about someone, learn about that someone, otherwise you just make yoruself look stupid. There is still a thread about a wormhole corp saying exaclty what you said about us.. and at the end of the htread they admit they were wrong.



Im daring you, so lets get it on.
  • Sarah xCalibre
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#126 - 2014-08-05 11:23:34 UTC
Sarah xCalibre wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Sarah xCalibre wrote:


Wait a min Im the delusional one?
You got a 99% effieciency, maybe its cause you to 99% fight pve ships. Boasting about how you are small gang warfare, you got no clue what small gang warfare is, small gang is to actually take your gang up against other pvpers in pvp ships and guess what, they arent in highsec. Its so fun to see how you go on about how you are all pvp then sit and complain about game mechanincs aking it so hard for you to use your OOC pro oneiroses, must really suck being you really. If you are so pro maybe its time to move on and actully get fights instaed, oh wait you might actualy lose your ships then. Pro small gang warfare Alliance? More like small gang risk adverse ganks.

Ill await your wardec and the smallest show of any of you in Ishomilken, then Id welcome you to small gang warfare.


again.. ignorance.. we have been at war with about every single PVP group of high sec. Every single one that I can remember. We do have wars to kill PVE ships as well because they drop shiny loot. but every single group of manegeable size that said what you said to us and dared us.. was sorry at the end. RvB is probably the only group we could never tame, because of obvious de-proportional size and power.

Risk adverse? Lol We fly ships that usually cost 3-5 bil isk each one in numeric disadvantage. How is tha risk adverse? oo you think not being risk adverse is throwing yourself into a stupid fight where both sides stand still and trade shots liek a 17th century outdated army?

No we are not risk adverse.. we are stupidity adverse.

If you want to post in a forum about someone, learn about that someone, otherwise you just make yoruself look stupid. There is still a thread about a wormhole corp saying exaclty what you said about us.. and at the end of the htread they admit they were wrong.



Im daring you, so lets get it on.


Will forward your request to a director so he can start the procedures (war dec) at his leisure.... your request will be processed soon.
(hope I have cleared the quoted to get into the limit on the right way to not mix our text.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"
Morty Friedman
Mortal Logistics
#127 - 2014-08-05 11:23:34 UTC
There is no point trying to explain anything to Kagura Nikon. Also just reported one of their previous posts that is in breach of game rules not just forum rules. They are like a kid, "HEY LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME". Don't feed the trolls people. :)
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#128 - 2014-08-05 11:25:31 UTC
Morty Friedman wrote:
Your not clever by back chatting acting like your untouchable; if anything it will make people WANT to hunt you guys out 24/7. Your doing your alliance no favours by constantly back chatting acting like your the mafia or something. It's a joke.



We would LOVE people to hunt us... And I have not broken any game rules.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"
Sarah xCalibre
Pod Liberation Authority
#129 - 2014-08-05 11:28:52 UTC
Morty Friedman wrote:
There is no point trying to explain anything to Kagura Nikon. Also just reported one of their previous posts that is in breach of game rules not just forum rules. They are like a kid, "HEY LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME". Don't feed the trolls people. :)


Im not trying to explain anythign to him, I got exactly what I wanted. :)
  • Sarah xCalibre
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#130 - 2014-08-05 11:31:28 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
again.. ignorance.. we have been at war with about every single PVP group of high sec. Every single one that I can remember. We do have wars to kill PVE ships as well because they drop shiny loot. but every single group of manegeable size that said what you said to us and dared us.. was sorry at the end. RvB is probably the only group we could never tame, because of obvious de-proportional size and power.
Did you fight rebirth? Because appraently rebirth won EVE, by defeating everyone in highsec to the point that alliances disbanded and nobody would fight them so they just had to stop. Seems like if you guys were also winning EVE, there must be one or both of you talking out of your ass.

Kagura Nikon wrote:
Risk adverse? Lol We fly ships that usually cost 3-5 bil isk each one in numeric disadvantage. How is tha risk adverse? oo you think not being risk adverse is throwing yourself into a stupid fight where both sides stand still and trade shots liek a 17th century outdated army?
You can fly expensive ships outnumbered and still be risk averse. Basically if you only ever take a fight where you are almost guaranteed to win or get away, you're risk averse.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#131 - 2014-08-05 11:32:00 UTC
Sarah xCalibre wrote:
Morty Friedman wrote:
There is no point trying to explain anything to Kagura Nikon. Also just reported one of their previous posts that is in breach of game rules not just forum rules. They are like a kid, "HEY LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME". Don't feed the trolls people. :)


Im not trying to explain anythign to him, I got exactly what I wanted. :)



If you wanted the war you could have just asked....

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#132 - 2014-08-05 11:33:55 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:


And secondly, nobody is peeing in their pants over Russia. Sure, they have some nukes (less than the US) but then a handful of t


Wrooong... research..... current treaty of reduction limits NATO to 1500 active warheads and russia to 1500 active warheads ( NATO side are USA, France and UK.. spliting those 1500). The official stockpiles declared to UN are around 8K for USA, and 14 K for Russia.


No 10 nukes is not as scary as 1000. 10 nukes can be easily stopped byt he current defense missile treaty that accept 150 ICBM interception missiles for each side. Plus 10 nukes cannot destroy a country completely.. 1500 can....
Screenshots or it never happened. US has more active nuclear missiles than Russia.

And no, 10 nukes would be more than enough to create devastating environmental effects felt world over.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Sarah xCalibre
Pod Liberation Authority
#133 - 2014-08-05 11:34:56 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Sarah xCalibre wrote:
Morty Friedman wrote:
There is no point trying to explain anything to Kagura Nikon. Also just reported one of their previous posts that is in breach of game rules not just forum rules. They are like a kid, "HEY LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME". Don't feed the trolls people. :)


Im not trying to explain anythign to him, I got exactly what I wanted. :)



If you wanted the war you could have just asked....


And lose all he fun on the way? Nah.
  • Sarah xCalibre
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#134 - 2014-08-05 11:36:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Kagura Nikon
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:


And secondly, nobody is peeing in their pants over Russia. Sure, they have some nukes (less than the US) but then a handful of t


Wrooong... research..... current treaty of reduction limits NATO to 1500 active warheads and russia to 1500 active warheads ( NATO side are USA, France and UK.. spliting those 1500). The official stockpiles declared to UN are around 8K for USA, and 14 K for Russia.


No 10 nukes is not as scary as 1000. 10 nukes can be easily stopped byt he current defense missile treaty that accept 150 ICBM interception missiles for each side. Plus 10 nukes cannot destroy a country completely.. 1500 can....
Screenshots or it never happened. US has more active nuclear missiles than Russia.

And no, 10 nukes would be more than enough to create devastating environmental effects felt world over.



Dotn want to make this thread offtopic. But no.. 10 nukes cannot do that. Both sides tested HUNDREDS of nukes on surface and other hundreds on underground durign the 20th century. No tragic worlwide effects. Its not my obligation to educate you. HInt do not trust wikipedia.. Wikipedia sums the nuke shta US have leased to other coutnries...

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#135 - 2014-08-05 11:38:22 UTC
Sarah xCalibre wrote:



If you wanted the war you could have just asked....


And lose all he fun on the way? Nah.[/quote]


Good that both sides can be happy then. If you will excuse me now.. my shift is starting at work...

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#136 - 2014-08-05 12:40:09 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Dotn want to make this thread offtopic. But no.. 10 nukes cannot do that. Both sides tested HUNDREDS of nukes on surface and other hundreds on underground durign the 20th century. No tragic worlwide effects. Its not my obligation to educate you. HInt do not trust wikipedia.. Wikipedia sums the nuke shta US have leased to other coutnries...
Indeed, they've tested many in desolate areas and underground. Yet the 2 they used on populated areas still cause issues today, and the areas they've tested nukes would be uninhabitable if we wanted to go there any time soon. Nobody wants a nuclear war, since it wouldn't end well for anyone, regardless of how many were used. Not to mention, that if Russia ever tried to use them, the response would also be nuclear, again, not ending well for anyone. And I'm fairly sure that if we compared the russian missile technology and their countermeasures vs the US, the chance are russia wouldn't be on the winning team there (not that there would be a winning team).

So yes, I maintain that russia still is in fact irrelevant, since their only advantage could never be used without triggering their own decimation.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#137 - 2014-08-05 12:42:12 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
again.. ignorance.. we have been at war with about every single PVP group of high sec. Every single one that I can remember. We do have wars to kill PVE ships as well because they drop shiny loot. but every single group of manegeable size that said what you said to us and dared us.. was sorry at the end. RvB is probably the only group we could never tame, because of obvious de-proportional size and power.
Did you fight rebirth? Because apparently rebirth won EVE, by defeating everyone in highsec to the point that alliances disbanded and nobody would fight them so they just had to stop. Seems like if you guys were also winning EVE, there must be one or both of you talking out of your ass.
Still waiting for an answer on this one by the way.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
NightmareX
Pandemic Horde High Sec Division
#138 - 2014-08-05 12:55:35 UTC  |  Edited by: NightmareX
Lucas Kell wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
again.. ignorance.. we have been at war with about every single PVP group of high sec. Every single one that I can remember. We do have wars to kill PVE ships as well because they drop shiny loot. but every single group of manegeable size that said what you said to us and dared us.. was sorry at the end. RvB is probably the only group we could never tame, because of obvious de-proportional size and power.
Did you fight rebirth? Because apparently rebirth won EVE, by defeating everyone in highsec to the point that alliances disbanded and nobody would fight them so they just had to stop. Seems like if you guys were also winning EVE, there must be one or both of you talking out of your ass.
Still waiting for an answer on this one by the way.

I'm gonna answer this for you. No they didn't fight us, because POH was 'Founded 2013-10-23'. At that time, Rebirth wasn't active and haven't been that so far after that either.

Outside of the alliance, yes MAD has fought Rebirth.

Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:

1: Asteroid Madness

2: Clash of the Empires

3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#139 - 2014-08-05 13:10:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Leto Thule
Posting in a Lucas Kell argument thread.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#140 - 2014-08-05 13:16:53 UTC
NightmareX wrote:
I'm gonna answer this for you. No they didn't fight us, because POH was 'Founded 2013-10-23'. At that time, Rebirth wasn't active and haven't been that so far after that either.

Outside of the alliance, yes MAD has fought Rebirth.
I wasn't actually asking you. But ok, so rebirth were already dead at that point after failing at EVE. Good to know.

Seems strange that you guys all have the same ideas though, like every merc corp has at some point defeated THE WHOLE OF HIGHSEC and yet still get dunked when going into a real fight. Very strange that.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.