These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

James 315 is a cyberbully and it's hurting the New Order

First post
Author
Tony Almayda
Doomheim
#1 - 2014-07-29 15:31:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Tony Almayda
What does a bully do?
. Searches around for weak people to become his victims
. Upon finding a victim insults, attacks and/or humiliates the person
. Does so to look cool to his peers and/or project his personal issues onto others

What does James do?
. Waits to receive mails about weak players to become his victims
. Upon finding a victim insults and humiliates the person
. Does so to look cool to his peers

I am a big fan of ganking and emergent gameplay. Whether it's scamming or mission griefing or suicide ganking for the lulz, I believe these are all things that make EVE great. Please do not confuse this with a cry about game mechanics. I wish capsuleer death upon whining nerfing carebears as much as anyone.

It's not about the gameplay or about the CODE. It's about the social conduct. As we stand here today, irrelevant of motivations of the past, James uses the New Order as a tool to engage in cyberbullying against other players.
This is proven easily when there is a lack of material to blog about; James will get desperate and arbitrarily pick a target to insult even though that target hasn't presented anything that is really insult worthy.
Beyond that we've all seen this one time and time again: Random player loses his ship with a standard fitting, docks up, says absolutely nothing. James still writes a full paragraph about how the player is a bot-aspirant carebear who must be losing his mind and messaging Ripard Teg as we speak.
When this kind of stuff happens it goes to show James' motivations are not to fight bot aspirancy, but in fact to gain fame and popularity by cyberbullying players from the game for the amusement of the community.
The blog is highly amusing, and the affects of The New Order on highsec are mostly positive. I think because of that a lot of people choose to ignore his behaviour.

Support of James 315 is support of cyberbullying. I have watched more than one prominent member of CODE. walk away over this - yes you guys know who I'm talking about. Perhaps more of you will see the light upon keeping an open mind. You don't have to believe me right now, but if you consider it going forward you will see exactly what I mean each time you read the blog.

So why is this worth mentioning? After all there are many players in the game that have far worse social conduct than James... the thing is, they don't matter. The New Order does.

The New Order can be something great, something far greater than it is right now. It starts with motivating the larger player base to join up. I think you guys in CODE. would be utterly surprised how many of us enjoy the entire concept but simply won't join up due to the rather indecent nature of your leader. The New Order is probably the most famous player entity in high-sec, and yet your fleets rarely ever top 25 pilots. Why is that the case when groups like RvB can easily sport 150+ pilots for their planned events? It's because RvB isn't lead by a cyberbully that lacks real leadership skills.

Regards!
Tony
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2014-07-29 16:05:28 UTC
My anonymous sources tell me that the rot of bot spirancy has even found it's way into the very heart of the New Order itself - that many of those catalysts are nothing more than PvP bots (the most devious kind!) and that James 315 is aware of this.

I hope that these rumors are untrue and that the glorious New Order can rise stronger than it was in the past.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2014-07-29 16:14:49 UTC
the ignorant often rail against the correction of their ignorant behaviors, because they are not yet enlightened enough to understand the punishment has purpose
Lord Whisker
NetFlix Whilst Playing Eve
#4 - 2014-07-29 16:30:55 UTC
No one cares about the *new order* or *code*, you're a joke, u don't do anything to hurt people, ur just gankers who are to scared to fleet up and go look for a real fight.

Ive been a miner for years n tbfh, u have tried so many times and failed to take me out.

Your a joke, end of story
Revis Owen
Krigmakt Elite
Safety.
#5 - 2014-07-29 16:32:51 UTC
There, there.

Agent of the New Order http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html If you do not have a current Mining Permit, please contact me for issuance.

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2014-07-29 16:39:35 UTC
Yeah, you lost me around the time you tried to compare "lol, you're a bot aspirant" to **** that makes teenagers hang themselves.
You're perfectly allowed to usurp real social maladies for your own purposes, but be aware that most people will think you an idiot for doing so.
Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2014-07-29 16:42:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Gallowmere Rorschach
Doublepost, ftl.
Eldwinn
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#8 - 2014-07-29 18:41:11 UTC
o look. this thead again.
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#9 - 2014-07-29 19:12:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Leto Thule
Mixing is an energy demanding process which has been previously shown to affect enzymatic hydrolysis. Concentrated biomass slurries are associated with high and non-Newtonian viscosities and mixing in these systems is a complex task. Poor mixing can lead to mass and/or heat transfer problems as well as inhomogeneous enzyme distribution, both of which can cause possible yield reduction. Furthermore the stirring energy dissipation may impact the particle size which in turn may affect the enzymatic hydrolysis. The objective of the current work was to specifically quantify the effects of mixing on particle-size distribution (PSD) and relate this to changes in the enzymatic hydrolysis. Two rather different materials were investigated, namely pretreated Norway spruce and giant reed.


Results


Changes in glucan hydrolysis and PSD were measured as a function of agitation during enzymatic hydrolysis at fiber loadings of 7 or 13% water-insoluble solids (WIS). Enzymatic conversion of pretreated spruce was strongly affected by agitation rates at the higher WIS content. However, at low WIS content the agitation had almost no effect on hydrolysis. There was some effect of agitation on the hydrolysis of giant reed at high WIS loading, but it was smaller than that for spruce, and there was no measurable effect at low WIS loading. In the case of spruce, intense agitation clearly affected the PSD and resulted in a reduced mean particle size, whereas for giant reed the decrease in particle size was mainly driven by enzymatic action. However, the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis was not increased after size reduction by agitation.

Conclusions

The impact of agitation on the enzymatic hydrolysis clearly depends not only on feedstock but also on the solids loading. Agitation was found to affect the PSD differently for the examined pretreated materials spruce and giant reed. The fact that the reduced mean particle diameter could not explain the enhanced hydrolysis rates found for spruce at an elevated agitation suggests that mass transfer at sustained high viscosities plays an important role in determining the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

Lady Ayeipsia
BlueWaffe
#10 - 2014-07-29 19:27:48 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Mixing is an energy demanding process which has been previously shown to affect enzymatic hydrolysis. Concentrated biomass slurries are associated with high and non-Newtonian viscosities and mixing in these systems is a complex task. Poor mixing can lead to mass and/or heat transfer problems as well as inhomogeneous enzyme distribution, both of which can cause possible yield reduction. Furthermore the stirring energy dissipation may impact the particle size which in turn may affect the enzymatic hydrolysis. The objective of the current work was to specifically quantify the effects of mixing on particle-size distribution (PSD) and relate this to changes in the enzymatic hydrolysis. Two rather different materials were investigated, namely pretreated Norway spruce and giant reed.


Results


Changes in glucan hydrolysis and PSD were measured as a function of agitation during enzymatic hydrolysis at fiber loadings of 7 or 13% water-insoluble solids (WIS). Enzymatic conversion of pretreated spruce was strongly affected by agitation rates at the higher WIS content. However, at low WIS content the agitation had almost no effect on hydrolysis. There was some effect of agitation on the hydrolysis of giant reed at high WIS loading, but it was smaller than that for spruce, and there was no measurable effect at low WIS loading. In the case of spruce, intense agitation clearly affected the PSD and resulted in a reduced mean particle size, whereas for giant reed the decrease in particle size was mainly driven by enzymatic action. However, the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis was not increased after size reduction by agitation.

Conclusions

The impact of agitation on the enzymatic hydrolysis clearly depends not only on feedstock but also on the solids loading. Agitation was found to affect the PSD differently for the examined pretreated materials spruce and giant reed. The fact that the reduced mean particle diameter could not explain the enhanced hydrolysis rates found for spruce at an elevated agitation suggests that mass transfer at sustained high viscosities plays an important role in determining the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis.


What part of "you put the lime in the coconut and shake them both up" was so hard to understand?
Tyyler DURden
Mordechai and Sons Distribution Co.
#11 - 2014-07-29 19:30:19 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Mixing is an energy demanding process which has been previously shown to affect enzymatic hydrolysis. Concentrated biomass slurries are associated with high and non-Newtonian viscosities and mixing in these systems is a complex task. Poor mixing can lead to mass and/or heat transfer problems as well as inhomogeneous enzyme distribution, both of which can cause possible yield reduction. Furthermore the stirring energy dissipation may impact the particle size which in turn may affect the enzymatic hydrolysis. The objective of the current work was to specifically quantify the effects of mixing on particle-size distribution (PSD) and relate this to changes in the enzymatic hydrolysis. Two rather different materials were investigated, namely pretreated Norway spruce and giant reed.


Results


Changes in glucan hydrolysis and PSD were measured as a function of agitation during enzymatic hydrolysis at fiber loadings of 7 or 13% water-insoluble solids (WIS). Enzymatic conversion of pretreated spruce was strongly affected by agitation rates at the higher WIS content. However, at low WIS content the agitation had almost no effect on hydrolysis. There was some effect of agitation on the hydrolysis of giant reed at high WIS loading, but it was smaller than that for spruce, and there was no measurable effect at low WIS loading. In the case of spruce, intense agitation clearly affected the PSD and resulted in a reduced mean particle size, whereas for giant reed the decrease in particle size was mainly driven by enzymatic action. However, the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis was not increased after size reduction by agitation.

Conclusions

The impact of agitation on the enzymatic hydrolysis clearly depends not only on feedstock but also on the solids loading. Agitation was found to affect the PSD differently for the examined pretreated materials spruce and giant reed. The fact that the reduced mean particle diameter could not explain the enhanced hydrolysis rates found for spruce at an elevated agitation suggests that mass transfer at sustained high viscosities plays an important role in determining the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis.

So... You think the carpet pissers did this?

Tyyler DURden says "use soap"

Eldwinn
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#12 - 2014-07-29 19:31:08 UTC
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:
What part of "you put the lime in the coconut and shake them both up" was so hard to understand?


All of it
Christopher Mabata
Northern Accounts and Systems
#13 - 2014-07-29 19:33:08 UTC
I fail to see a connection between high sec ganking for Glorious purpose and cyer bullying, even when there's a blog about all the hilarity, tears, and horribile fits that occur in the process.

Cyber bullying would mean the targeted aggression was towards one person or a small group of people of which this is not. Agents and their targets come from every walk of life in eve and miners and the bot aspirants do too. and half the time there aren't even people there when these ships die, they sure like to type when they're on the forums crying about make High sec 100% safe, yet when the PVP comes to them they are nowhere to be found!

Protect your own assets its your prerogative not CCP's.

♣ Small Gang PVP, Large Fleet PVP, Black Ops, Incursions, Trade, and Industry ♣ 70% Lethal / 30% Super-Snuggly / 110% No idea what im doing ♣

This Message Brought to you by a sweet and sour bittervet

Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#14 - 2014-07-29 19:34:04 UTC
When metals are near the bottom of the reactivity series, their compounds generally decompose easily at high temperatures. This is because stronger bonds form between atoms towards the top of the reactivity series, and strong bonds break less easily. For example, copper is near the bottom of the reactivity series, and copper sulfate (CuSO4), begins to decompose at about 200°C, increasing rapidly at higher temperatures to about 560°C. In contrast potassium is near the top of the reactivity series, and potassium sulfate (K2SO4) does not decompose at its melting point of about 1069°C, nor even at its boiling point.


Duh.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

Michele Bachmann
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2014-07-29 19:34:42 UTC
Reporting James to tips.fbi.gov

Oh wait cyber bullying is a made up word Cool
Christopher Mabata
Northern Accounts and Systems
#16 - 2014-07-29 19:35:03 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
When metals are near the bottom of the reactivity series, their compounds generally decompose easily at high temperatures. This is because stronger bonds form between atoms towards the top of the reactivity series, and strong bonds break less easily. For example, copper is near the bottom of the reactivity series, and copper sulfate (CuSO4), begins to decompose at about 200°C, increasing rapidly at higher temperatures to about 560°C. In contrast potassium is near the top of the reactivity series, and potassium sulfate (K2SO4) does not decompose at its melting point of about 1069°C, nor even at its boiling point.


Duh.


Oh dear god chem 101 came back to haunt me afterall

♣ Small Gang PVP, Large Fleet PVP, Black Ops, Incursions, Trade, and Industry ♣ 70% Lethal / 30% Super-Snuggly / 110% No idea what im doing ♣

This Message Brought to you by a sweet and sour bittervet

Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#17 - 2014-07-29 19:35:50 UTC
Michele Bachmann wrote:
Reporting James to tips.fbi.gov


rofl

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#18 - 2014-07-29 19:41:24 UTC
Tony Almayda wrote:
...stuff...

Oh look, a day old forum alt.

On a more important note, given its summer...

1 oz. Liqueur, melon
1 oz. Rum, coconut (Malibu)
2 oz. Cranberry Juice
2 oz. Pineapple Juice

Mix ingredients over ice in glass. Shake if preferred.

F
Eldwinn
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#19 - 2014-07-29 19:44:39 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Tony Almayda wrote:
...stuff...

Oh look, a day old forum alt.

On a more important note, given its summer...

1 oz. Liqueur, melon
1 oz. Rum, coconut (Malibu)
2 oz. Cranberry Juice
2 oz. Pineapple Juice

Mix ingredients over ice in glass. Shake if preferred.

F


Cheers
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#20 - 2014-07-29 19:50:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Leto Thule
Feyd, that is an ingenious idea.

This thread would serve the community much better with some good drink recipes.

On that note:

The "New Jersey Turnpike" (aka "The mat shot")

1 dirty bar rag
1 drink mat taken from the bar serving station
1 shotglass

Ring out bar rag into shot glass.
Funnel bar mat contents into shot glass.

Do not chill.

Serve.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

123Next page