These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Market PVP In Crius - Index Bombing and New Reasons for High-Sec War

First post
Author
Adunh Slavy
#21 - 2014-07-24 04:21:11 UTC
Tulber wrote:
What does Jita "exclusively," posses or control? And how does a station "control," anything for that matter?



About the only thing Jita controls is a position on the map. Though its nice to know we humans, our motives, property rights, dreams have been reduced to the same level as an imaginary solar system in a space ship game.

And to you Plleasure Hub, I'll grant you your poetic licence, but this is the MD forum, we speak economics and trade in here, and some of us are sticklers when it comes to definitions and terms. Misuse a word and expect to be taken to task on it, simple as that.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Plleasure Hub
Municorn
#22 - 2014-07-24 04:25:10 UTC
Tulber wrote:
I don't think people are going to walk away from the huge convenience of centralized trade hubs because they've got to ship things a few more jumps.

Very true. And maybe they do not have to. Perhaps spreading out any amount will help the situation. The more populated the suburbs of the galaxy become, the better life will be for capsuleers who want to live there. If a Jita producer moves out to a backwater system with some miners, he can buy up their ore. Maybe he will decide to sell a few items there. A lot could evolve from that kind of movement.

Tulber wrote:
Oh and Jita still doesn't have a "monopoly," on anything. You should stick with "most popular," hth.

We will have to agree to disagree there. I think monopoly is an apt description of the situation. Particularly because there is not a single other system that compares. Jita is the only one.

If you want to get super-technical about it, look at the etymology of the word monopoly.

"mono-" word-forming element meaning "one, alone; containing one (atom, etc.),"
"poly" from Proto-Indo-European root *pel- (5) "to sell"

So one way to say it is that Jita is the "one place to sell." That is what you will read in beginner industrial guides for EVE. "You need to find a trade hub to sell to. Jita is the best one. Amarr might work, too, but it isn't as good."

Adunh Slavy wrote:
Oh, the context of poetic license, aka fluff.

I will seriously nerd fight you guys over this. Meet me on EVE Reddit tomorrow at noon.

"There's no meaningful difference between a real and a virtual world. It's pointless to ask anyone who they really are. All you can do is accept and believe in them, because whoever they are in your mind, is their true identity." — Kazuto Kirigaya

Plleasure Hub
Municorn
#23 - 2014-07-24 04:32:45 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
And to you Plleasure Hub, I'll grant you your poetic licence, but this is the MD forum, we speak economics and trade in here, and some of us are sticklers when it comes to definitions and terms. Misuse a word and expect to be taken to task on it, simple as that.

And so you should. But if I am using a word correctly, and you accuse me of misusing it, you can expect to be taken to task for that, too. I mean, if I were wrong in this case, I would admit it. But I am never wrong. About anything, really. I rest my fedora.

"There's no meaningful difference between a real and a virtual world. It's pointless to ask anyone who they really are. All you can do is accept and believe in them, because whoever they are in your mind, is their true identity." — Kazuto Kirigaya

Adunh Slavy
#24 - 2014-07-24 05:00:36 UTC
Plleasure Hub wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:
And to you Plleasure Hub, I'll grant you your poetic licence, but this is the MD forum, we speak economics and trade in here, and some of us are sticklers when it comes to definitions and terms. Misuse a word and expect to be taken to task on it, simple as that.

And so you should. But if I am using a word correctly, and you accuse me of misusing it, you can expect to be taken to task for that, too. I mean, if I were wrong in this case, I would admit it. But I am never wrong. About anything, really. I rest my fedora.



You're horribly wrong, but it is not a fight worth having.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Plleasure Hub
Municorn
#25 - 2014-07-24 05:03:45 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
You're horribly wrong, but it is not a fight worth having.

Mmk. But seriously, if you want to PM me a link to something or give an explanation as to how my use of the word is incorrect, I would be curious to know. I like words and meanings. :) And now back to plotting my takeover of New Eden.

"There's no meaningful difference between a real and a virtual world. It's pointless to ask anyone who they really are. All you can do is accept and believe in them, because whoever they are in your mind, is their true identity." — Kazuto Kirigaya

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#26 - 2014-07-24 05:18:23 UTC
The reason why saying Jita 4-4 has a "monopoly" on sales is wrong is that a monopoly in the way you're using it is the result of actions taken by those in control of the monopoly to establish and preserve it (or occasionally by being awarded the monopoly by the government). None of that is the case with Jita 4-4.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Plleasure Hub
Municorn
#27 - 2014-07-24 05:37:26 UTC
mynnna wrote:
The reason why saying Jita 4-4 has a "monopoly" on sales is wrong is that a monopoly in the way you're using it is the result of actions taken by those in control of the monopoly to establish and preserve it (or occasionally by being awarded the monopoly by the government). None of that is the case with Jita 4-4.

Ah, so it is the part about a specific person, company, or government that has to be in control and taking action that we are differing on. I do not see why the collective actions of a group of people (all of us guilty Jita traders) establishing and preserving the monopoly is all that different than a company or government doing it. But I do see why you would say I am not using the word in the traditional fashion, if you insist the control element has to meet that strict definition.

Regarding the main topic, I might do some tinkering later with the system cost index figures and try to figure some things out. One thing I was wondering is about the formula for cost index:
system cost index = square root ( activity hours in system / global activity hours )

Does that mean if you take the sum of the squares of every system's cost index, you should get the value 1?

If so, could you then calculate the distribution of activity throughout the entire galaxy on a system-by-system basis?

I also want to run the numbers of some items to determine some low base cost to build time items. Using a system's % of global manufacturing activity, I should be able to generate an estimate of exactly how much ISK it would cost to increase a system's cost index by a set amount.

"There's no meaningful difference between a real and a virtual world. It's pointless to ask anyone who they really are. All you can do is accept and believe in them, because whoever they are in your mind, is their true identity." — Kazuto Kirigaya

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#28 - 2014-07-24 05:59:18 UTC
Plleasure Hub wrote:
mynnna wrote:
The reason why saying Jita 4-4 has a "monopoly" on sales is wrong is that a monopoly in the way you're using it is the result of actions taken by those in control of the monopoly to establish and preserve it (or occasionally by being awarded the monopoly by the government). None of that is the case with Jita 4-4.

Ah, so it is the part about a specific person, company, or government that has to be in control and taking action that we are differing on. I do not see why the collective actions of a group of people (all of us guilty Jita traders) establishing and preserving the monopoly is all that different than a company or government doing it. But I do see why you would say I am not using the word in the traditional fashion, if you insist the control element has to meet that strict definition.


We're each making the individual choice to buy and sell in Jita. We do so because it's convenient, because we can buy and sell everything there, because the prices are usually better. But we are not forced to do so, the barriers to entry are not high (they're non-existant, really), there is no single seller, and if we wanted to we could just as easily go to Rens, Hek, Dodixie or Amarr if it happens to be more advantageous to do so. To further the example, we have one of if not the largest market hub in nullsec up in Deklein (currently in flux as it moves to our new capital...) and, now that local production is more feasible, are seeking to expand it by adding more raw materials for industry to the mix.

If Jita were a monopoly that wouldn't be possible, none of the smaller regional hubs would exist, etc etc.

What Jita is, really, is collective tradition. The advantages of the location that caused the hub to form there in the first place are almost entirely gone (all that's left of that is location at this point - it's on a crossroads on the map), but they don't matter anyway. As far as most players are concerned, Jita as a hub is just the way it is, the way it always has been.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#29 - 2014-07-24 14:02:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Plleasure Hub wrote:
If a Jita producer moves out to a backwater system with some miners, he can buy up their ore. Maybe he will decide to sell a few items there. A lot could evolve from that kind of movement.
One thing you seem to have missed is that the cost index hasn't introduced a "new" way to move people out of Jita. Prior to Crius, manufacture and research lines were already limited as there were only so many slots, and to force people out of their use it was a simple as queuing a job for 30 days then cancelling it and queuing another. Cancelled jobs didn't free up their time, so it was theoretically possible for a single character to tie up every queue in a given system solo.

So if anything, this change has made it harder to do that, since now you would need to actually run your jobs through, pay more to do it, and run a hell of a lot more jobs through to bring the production down to 0%.

To break up Jita, you need to stop it being a place to trade, which is what it is used for. Destroying freighters in and out is one way to do it, but you would need to do so on a huge scale.

Groups with numbers could actually shut down Jita though. If a group like BNI or RVB coordinated a group of a few thousand people to simultaneously log in to Jita right after downtime and not log off all day, they'd fill most of the population cap with their own, preventing people getting in.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Previous page12