EVE General Discussion

Where do they talk about the new industry interface using a different core ?

Personally I vote for Crapus.

I understand what CCP was trying to do, and yes I even support it, but this is poorly executed except for the new UI. Well the industry one at least, the new UI for module reprocessing looks cool but fails in that you have to mouse over each spot rather than seeing everything in one glance.

I am waiting for the next survey, and the devs are not going to like my response.

50 runs of Scourge Cruise missile, twice the time and a %1500 increase in install cost. This is not an improvement!

Crius is the culmination of EVE economy changes that I've campaigned for for the last couple of years or so. As such, I feel entirely vindicated in my arguments, and I am confident that these balance changes will result in a better game for those who want to play EVE as an open world competitive PvP-based sandbox experience.

Secondarily, the tear harvest reaped from a demographic of the playerbase, blind to the privilege it has fattened on, obscene in the level of its entitlement, openly contemptuous in their demands to have and retain every possible advantage, has been both highly entertaining and extremely gratifying. I entreat these people to continue making their posts, because this kind of entertainment is both priceless and free.

I passionately hope that Crius represents CCP's acceptance that giving EVE players the easy answers they say they want is to deprive them of the challange and dynamism that they actually need. I can only hope that they carry forward and apply this insight to the upcoming power-projection rebalance. And Sov. And Local. And PvE.

Meanwhile I've liquidated or long term invested most of my assets and dropped both my subscriptions. This has been the best summer in years and I'm going to spend as much as possible of it down at the beach, cycling, BBQing and getting a decent tan for the first time in a damb decade. I greatly look forward to returning to a much improved, more challenging, more dynamic EVE this winter.

If that means an EVE without those people who never wanted to play it in the first place but were just waiting for their WoW-in-Space messiah to come along, then amen, praise God and pass the ammunition.



O God, I could be bounded in a nutshell, and count myself a
king of infinite space—were it not that I have bad dreams.

Love and kisses, you Kings of Infinite Space

Malcanis.

thanks CCP. WAAAAAAY less clicking, my normal business time (industry, PI) just has halved. And all this time won by no longer stupid clicking same buttoms over and over....good change from UI-perspective. What it all brings to the market? i dont know, but a lil change here and there is always good in a game i assume.

First rage post goes to you good sir.

Off to pay that £100 to Mr Braben to play the BETA of his game where you can crash into asteroids for hours?

When did gankers become a term used to cover any general aggression in highsec?

I never understood this point. Traffic between null and high sec creates content because it leads to conflict. If Null was self sufficient, then there would naturally be less traffic through low to high sec which in turns means less conflict. Moreover, lowsec is especially dependent upon the traffic to and from null for its content. If null was suddenly self sufficient it would be a knee capping to low sec, which really needs more help then null.

Entitled thempark carebears are crying like babies. Their lack of knowledge on sandbox mmo-rpg's is staggering. Please never change.

Null sec seems to be the place, the hott spot, the juice box, the upskirt , and the top shot. So some will either die out or head to the dreaded 0.0. what will the future hold?