These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Restrict NPC Corporation Posting Abilities.

First post First post
Author
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#841 - 2014-07-16 20:22:54 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Questions regarding the CAOD comparisons:

When was the change to CAOD posting ability made and have their been any changes to overall forum moderation since that time?
Was CAOD considered worse, better or about the same as the rest of the forums at that time prior to the change?
CAOD was considered worse. And yes, there have been changes in the way this forum as a whole is moderated in general: In the past three years ISD's CCL division rose to power....Cool


That said, I have also removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.

5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Elfi Wolfe
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#842 - 2014-07-17 01:04:20 UTC
How about a more specific targeting of a sub-set population group of Eve.
Instead of the (NPC), (<10 Corp) sub-set of Eve. A more targeted subgroup of "troll".

To stop disposable trial characters: Characters that are plexed or 22 days old.
To stop disposable alt characters: Characters that are = 1.1 million SP

(age <22days) (SP <1.1m) sub-set (EVE) Restricting to EVE New Citizen's Q&A, Features & Ideas Discussion, Character Bazaar and Alliance & Corporation Recruitment Center.

So to post you need to be 22 days old and have spent about 1.1 plex on SP.

If a person wants to have 1 main and 2 posting alts they need to spend 2.2 months worth of training on the alts or use up 4 plex to train them in addition to main character.

This would remove the character with the stated properties of alt (alts made and never signed into on eve) as well as trial characters. And the restriction will be grown out of by a player at about 32 days. could also just use SP requirement since an average player with no implants should hit that target at about 32 days.

This would not affect the main players that are in the (NPC), (<10 corp) sub-set of EVE and not in the (age <22days) (SP <1.1m) sub-set of EVE

Looked at (active SP plan) and that would be easy to circumvent.

English version:
Restricting characters under 22 days and less than 1.1m SP to EVE New Citizen's Q&A, Features & Ideas Discussion, Character Bazaar and Alliance & Corporation Recruitment Center.

"Please point to the place on the doll where the carebear touched you."

Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#843 - 2014-07-17 22:54:07 UTC
No matter how you shift, slice, reposition, alter or otherwise change this idea the basic concept is flawed and therefore not worthy of implementation. It is flawed because at its core it presupposes that a certain classification of pilot should automatically be punished as a forum troll quite possibly even before making their first forum post.

I have diligently read and posted to the EVE forums for the entire 1.5 years i have played the game and a certain person belonging to one of the most notorious large scale alliances in EVE spends almost all of his time trolling threads. Should we then place posting restrictions on this entire alliance because one of its members is a troll-aholic?

What If 50 members of this alliance are trolls, do we then start banning the entire alliance from posting, I say and I hope you agree it is both unfair and detrimental to those members of this alliance that would post thoughtful and productive threads or responses to threads in any forum of their choosing, regardless that a subset of their number are trolls.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.

Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#844 - 2014-07-17 23:04:29 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:
Make this happen, or at least make it possible check all the pilot names of that account.


This would be a good change, when posting list all of the characters on that account. It makes posting alts completely useless.


This idea is also detrimental In my mind. I am in the process of creating two 'wet work' alts that will be conducting my dirty business when I deem it necessary. They are not in my corp on purpose because I don't want their activities linked directly to me.

Others im sure use alts that do awoxing, spying, etc and they too would rather their alts not be directly linked to them. Yes we play a game of consequences but we also play a game of subterfuge and removing the ability to have both a posting presence and a 'dirty little secret alt' is just not good for the game.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#845 - 2014-07-17 23:07:24 UTC
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
This idea is also detrimental In my mind. I am in the process of creating two 'wet work' alts that will be conducting my dirty business when I deem it necessary. They are not in my corp on purpose because I don't want their activities linked directly to me.

Others im sure use alts that do awoxing, spying, etc and they too would rather their alts not be directly linked to them. Yes we play a game of consequences but we also play a game of subterfuge and removing the ability to have both a posting presence and a 'dirty little secret alt' is just not good for the game.


This would be my objection, too.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#846 - 2014-07-17 23:35:13 UTC
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
No matter how you shift, slice, reposition, alter or otherwise change this idea the basic concept is flawed and therefore not worthy of implementation. It is flawed because at its core it presupposes that a certain classification of pilot should automatically be punished as a forum troll quite possibly even before making their first forum post.

I have diligently read and posted to the EVE forums for the entire 1.5 years i have played the game and a certain person belonging to one of the most notorious large scale alliances in EVE spends almost all of his time trolling threads. Should we then place posting restrictions on this entire alliance because one of its members is a troll-aholic?

What If 50 members of this alliance are trolls, do we then start banning the entire alliance from posting, I say and I hope you agree it is both unfair and detrimental to those members of this alliance that would post thoughtful and productive threads or responses to threads in any forum of their choosing, regardless that a subset of their number are trolls.


How is it any different from something like drone assist being removed because too many people are abusing it? Anyone can make an npc corporation character and start trolling with no consequence. However its nigh-impossible to do that with "one of the most notorious large scale alliances in EVE."

When something is being abused CCP takes measures against it and NPC alts are no exception.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#847 - 2014-07-17 23:39:08 UTC
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:
Make this happen, or at least make it possible check all the pilot names of that account.


This would be a good change, when posting list all of the characters on that account. It makes posting alts completely useless.


This idea is also detrimental In my mind. I am in the process of creating two 'wet work' alts that will be conducting my dirty business when I deem it necessary. They are not in my corp on purpose because I don't want their activities linked directly to me.

Others im sure use alts that do awoxing, spying, etc and they too would rather their alts not be directly linked to them. Yes we play a game of consequences but we also play a game of subterfuge and removing the ability to have both a posting presence and a 'dirty little secret alt' is just not good for the game.


The answer is get a second account. A few tricks of the trade, you can easily train three ganking alts up in a week then train one of them extensively for awoxing until it gets to hot or too much SP then you sell it via character bazaar. Sure you'll have downtime when buyers are not about and plex prices are high enough to consider paying cash for a sub but, that's the best solution to your concern.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Elfi Wolfe
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#848 - 2014-07-17 23:59:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Elfi Wolfe
La Nariz wrote:
When something is being abused CCP takes measures against it and NPC alts are no exception.


But your target is every NPC, not just NPC alts.
And that I think that is getting many of the people against the idea.

"Please point to the place on the doll where the carebear touched you."

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#849 - 2014-07-18 11:49:52 UTC
La Nariz wrote:


How is it any different from something like drone assist being removed because too many people are abusing it? Anyone can make an npc corporation character and start trolling with no consequence. However its nigh-impossible to do that with "one of the most notorious large scale alliances in EVE."

When something is being abused CCP takes measures against it and NPC alts are no exception.

Anyone can make a player corp character and start trolling with no consequence also. Lets remove the forums!
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#850 - 2014-07-18 13:23:42 UTC
Elfi Wolfe wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
When something is being abused CCP takes measures against it and NPC alts are no exception.


But your target is every NPC, not just NPC alts.
And that I think that is getting many of the people against the idea.


Its the same situation, not every drone user or tech moon owner was abusing it but, the change affected all of them. Perhaps you should organize all of the npc corporation members and attempt to clean up the npc corporation image.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Fer'isam K'ahn
SAS Veterinarians
#851 - 2014-07-18 14:01:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Fer'isam K'ahn
This discussion is pointless.

Every restriction will impact the innocent the most and no countermeassure will keep a troll that wants to troll away from pursuing his dream. All you get is the illusion of security.
It is the same all over, like in RL, people chucking out their liberties for the illusion of control and security, but none that is absolutely determined to inflict damaged will ever be truely hindered or deterred. In the meanwhile all bystanders or rather everyone else are labeled potential criminals and treated as such. Their abilities restricted to defend themselves from the true criminals, which are the foreign threads, as well as domestic which might includie your security 'services' in the furture. Good luck forging your own chains ... I will have none.

The only true solution is to educate and raise the level of intelligence and awareness to recognize and ignore trolls and not fall into the same spammed traps of logical fallacies and idiocy. And allowing the ISD to hit with the Anti-Stupidity Hammer - REAL HARD.

As it stands, being a dumb poster is not against the rules, but those reacting to it, as often required to, are in danger of committing at least one offense in regards to them. To change that there should be a rule that states:

#35 - Do not be stupid, commit no fallacies and consider many perspectives and exploits befor posting. Also do not incite others (see#5) to react offensively by formulating in a way that shows ignorance towards the game, styles of playing, the workings of and independent economy in an open sandbox and other peoples considerations and previously metioned ideas (see #16). Remember you are making the claim, the proof to support your observation/conclusion is on you. And consider, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof - link sources if possible. Stupid threads will be locked.
So remember


ISD may rise and shine. You can always appeal to a locked thread by participating in an IQ test, but the test is one time only and final. Deliberatly posting dumb will result in immediate .....
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#852 - 2014-07-18 14:33:58 UTC
Fer'isam K'ahn wrote:
This discussion is pointless.

Every restriction will impact the innocent the most and no countermeassure will keep a troll that wants to troll away from pursuing his dream. All you get is the illusion of security.
It is the same all over, like in RL, people chucking out their liberties for the illusion of control and security, but none that is absolutely determined to inflict damaged will ever be truely hindered or deterred. In the meanwhile all bystanders or rather everyone else are labeled potential criminals and treated as such. Their abilities restricted to defend themselves from the true criminals, which are the foreign threads, as well as domestic which might includie your security 'services' in the furture. Good luck forging your own chains ... I will have none.

The only true solution is to educate and raise the level of intelligence and awareness to recognize and ignore trolls and not fall into the same spammed traps of logical fallacies and idiocy. And allowing the ISD to hit with the Anti-Stupidity Hammer - REAL HARD.

As it stands, being a dumb poster is not against the rules, but those reacting to it, as often required to, are in danger of committing at least one offense in regards to them. To change that there should be a rule that states:

#35 - Do not be stupid, commit no fallacies and consider many perspectives and exploits befor posting. Also do not incite others (see#5) to react offensively by formulating in a way that shows ignorance towards the game, styles of playing, the workings of and independent economy in an open sandbox and other peoples considerations and previously metioned ideas (see #16). Remember you are making the claim, the proof to support your observation/conclusion is on you. And consider, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof - link sources if possible. Stupid threads will be locked.
So remember


ISD may rise and shine. You can always appeal to a locked thread by participating in an IQ test, but the test is one time only and final. Deliberatly posting dumb will result in immediate .....


Its only pointless if people refuse to contribute and instead choose to make bad posts. I never intended for this and explicitly state in the OP that this is not the silver bullet to the problem but, is a part of the solution. It should be clear that totalitarian regimes is a terrible comparison but, maybe with the frequency this garbage comes up it needs to be in the OP.

Saying "its dumb" isn't going to convince anyone to sway to your side of the debate. I still think it will do more good than harm.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Elfi Wolfe
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#853 - 2014-07-18 16:35:05 UTC
La Nariz wrote:

Its the same situation, not every drone user or tech moon owner was abusing it but, the change affected all of them. Perhaps you should organize all of the npc corporation members and attempt to clean up the npc corporation image.


I try both by example and by answering questions in the University of Caille.

I do not have a problem with a target of "troll" but with how it is targeted. It is like taking out a whole town to the trolls in town. That is why I suggested a more defined target. Example of time and skill point level to remove the alts that never log into Eve. It would also affect new people till they got the time and skill points under their belt.

Side note: I think the comparison with this idea to totalitian regimes is due to perceived reputation of GoonWaffle. Goons play the meta game better than anyone else. So people wonder if this is targeted at trools or at hi-sec.

"Please point to the place on the doll where the carebear touched you."

Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#854 - 2014-07-18 18:25:49 UTC
Elfi Wolfe wrote:
La Nariz wrote:

Its the same situation, not every drone user or tech moon owner was abusing it but, the change affected all of them. Perhaps you should organize all of the npc corporation members and attempt to clean up the npc corporation image.


I try both by example and by answering questions in the University of Caille.

I do not have a problem with a target of "troll" but with how it is targeted. It is like taking out a whole town to the trolls in town. That is why I suggested a more defined target. Example of time and skill point level to remove the alts that never log into Eve. It would also affect new people till they got the time and skill points under their belt.

Side note: I think the comparison with this idea to totalitian regimes is due to perceived reputation of GoonWaffle. Goons play the meta game better than anyone else. So people wonder if this is targeted at trools or at hi-sec.




couldn't a person that plex's just make 51 day accounts to meet the requirements and every new plex needed for the main just make another 51 day account? or this just considered to much work for the ability to post anonymously and wouldn't matter in the scheme of things.
Elfi Wolfe
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#855 - 2014-07-18 19:19:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Elfi Wolfe
Lady Rift wrote:
Elfi Wolfe wrote:
La Nariz wrote:

Its the same situation, not every drone user or tech moon owner was abusing it but, the change affected all of them. Perhaps you should organize all of the npc corporation members and attempt to clean up the npc corporation image.


I try both by example and by answering questions in the University of Caille.

I do not have a problem with a target of "troll" but with how it is targeted. It is like taking out a whole town to the trolls in town. That is why I suggested a more defined target. Example of time and skill point level to remove the alts that never log into Eve. It would also affect new people till they got the time and skill points under their belt.

Side note: I think the comparison with this idea to totalitian regimes is due to perceived reputation of GoonWaffle. Goons play the meta game better than anyone else. So people wonder if this is targeted at trools or at hi-sec.




couldn't a person that plex's just make 51 day accounts to meet the requirements and every new plex needed for the main just make another 51 day account? or this just considered to much work for the ability to post anonymously and wouldn't matter in the scheme of things.


From what I understand the reason to target NPC corps is to stop the alts that are made but never used in eve. So they have no skill points, and are used to only posted on the forums. So by changing to a skill point, then the owner of that account is not using free alts to post on the forums but alts that plex have been spent on. So not free tossable forum alts, but alts that have taken morethan one pled worth of training time.

Nothing will stopped a determined troll. But with a higher entry cost, it will take time/plex/effort. One side wants a blanket van of NPC, one side wants a more specific targeting of "troll" and one side wants no forum ban.

Me, I do not want to be banned from most of the forums.

"Please point to the place on the doll where the carebear touched you."

Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#856 - 2014-07-18 21:03:47 UTC
Elfi Wolfe wrote:
Lady Rift wrote:
Elfi Wolfe wrote:
La Nariz wrote:

Its the same situation, not every drone user or tech moon owner was abusing it but, the change affected all of them. Perhaps you should organize all of the npc corporation members and attempt to clean up the npc corporation image.


I try both by example and by answering questions in the University of Caille.

I do not have a problem with a target of "troll" but with how it is targeted. It is like taking out a whole town to the trolls in town. That is why I suggested a more defined target. Example of time and skill point level to remove the alts that never log into Eve. It would also affect new people till they got the time and skill points under their belt.

Side note: I think the comparison with this idea to totalitian regimes is due to perceived reputation of GoonWaffle. Goons play the meta game better than anyone else. So people wonder if this is targeted at trools or at hi-sec.




couldn't a person that plex's just make 51 day accounts to meet the requirements and every new plex needed for the main just make another 51 day account? or this just considered to much work for the ability to post anonymously and wouldn't matter in the scheme of things.


From what I understand the reason to target NPC corps is to stop the alts that are made but never used in eve. So they have no skill points, and are used to only posted on the forums. So by changing to a skill point, then the owner of that account is not using free alts to post on the forums but alts that plex have been spent on. So not free tossable forum alts, but alts that have taken morethan one pled worth of training time.

Nothing will stopped a determined troll. But with a higher entry cost, it will take time/plex/effort. One side wants a blanket van of NPC, one side wants a more specific targeting of "troll" and one side wants no forum ban.

Me, I do not want to be banned from most of the forums.



I was referring to the fact if you use plex on your main. You can send a buddy invite to another email account. you use buddy invite to start a 21 day trial and use the plex on that account because its a buddy invite your main also gets 30 days of game time.

Yes it would take more work than just doing this once and forgetting about it, one would have to log and find a really long skill to start training right off.

more hassle yes, will some do it im not sure.
Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#857 - 2014-07-18 23:18:39 UTC
La Nariz wrote:


The answer is get a second account. A few tricks of the trade, you can easily train three ganking alts up in a week then train one of them extensively for awoxing until it gets to hot or too much SP then you sell it via character bazaar. Sure you'll have downtime when buyers are not about and plex prices are high enough to consider paying cash for a sub but, that's the best solution to your concern.


Do you have shares in CCP because the only good this would do is make CCP richer. Forum trolling while annoying is tolerable while what you propose is going to make posting a huge ISK sink for people playing the devious parts of this game.

Your support for your ideas is in an epic downward spiral, time to jettison and pull the parachute.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.

Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#858 - 2014-07-18 23:32:24 UTC
La Nariz wrote:


How is it any different from something like drone assist being removed because too many people are abusing it? Anyone can make an npc corporation character and start trolling with no consequence. However its nigh-impossible to do that with "one of the most notorious large scale alliances in EVE."

When something is being abused CCP takes measures against it and NPC alts are no exception.


1. I have no idea what drone assist abuse is but it is an in-game mechanic; whereas, forum trolling is out-game and of no real consequence to the vast majority of EVE online players.

2. Anyone can make a PC alt corp and troll with no consequences either. Even if they put in a mechanic that lets you not see posts by a certain corp, trolls will just pop the million, make a new corp every so often and avoid your filter.

3. if you made a personal filter based on accounts this might work to some degree as only the truly dedicated trollmeister would keep making entirely new accounts just to troll the forums.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#859 - 2014-07-19 01:03:47 UTC
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:

1. I have no idea what drone assist abuse is but it is an in-game mechanic; whereas, forum trolling is out-game and of no real consequence to the vast majority of EVE online players.

2. Anyone can make a PC alt corp and troll with no consequences either. Even if they put in a mechanic that lets you not see posts by a certain corp, trolls will just pop the million, make a new corp every so often and avoid your filter.

3. if you made a personal filter based on accounts this might work to some degree as only the truly dedicated trollmeister would keep making entirely new accounts just to troll the forums.


Maldrio Selkurk wrote:
Do you have shares in CCP because the only good this would do is make CCP richer. Forum trolling while annoying is tolerable while what you propose is going to make posting a huge ISK sink for people playing the devious parts of this game.

Your support for your ideas is in an epic downward spiral, time to jettison and pull the parachute.


People in morally ambiguous professions have always had their lives made harder and there are plenty of examples of this; see: mining barge EHP buff, freighter changes. It's worthy of a thread of its own because I see no reason why the pve centric play style should be constantly catered to but the bad guy play style gets constantly made more difficult. I'm not going to go any further on this part and if you want a conversation about it start a thread.

1. I can tell you haven't read much of the thread by this point, there's a good case for the forums being an in-game resource. Without rehashing the entire thing the biggest point for this is that you must have an active EVE subscription to post here.

2. Yep anyone can make the corporation but, then they need 10 other people in it before they can post. Its a barrier that, has been judged by CCP, to be effective yet not too restrictive.

3. I have no idea what you're trying to get at here, ignore by account?

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#860 - 2014-07-19 01:08:28 UTC
Elfi Wolfe wrote:
La Nariz wrote:

Its the same situation, not every drone user or tech moon owner was abusing it but, the change affected all of them. Perhaps you should organize all of the npc corporation members and attempt to clean up the npc corporation image.


I try both by example and by answering questions in the University of Caille.

I do not have a problem with a target of "troll" but with how it is targeted. It is like taking out a whole town to the trolls in town. That is why I suggested a more defined target. Example of time and skill point level to remove the alts that never log into Eve. It would also affect new people till they got the time and skill points under their belt.

Side note: I think the comparison with this idea to totalitian regimes is due to perceived reputation of GoonWaffle. Goons play the meta game better than anyone else. So people wonder if this is targeted at trools or at hi-sec.


Again this isn't any different than another abused mechanic being changed, take titan tracking for example. PL was abusing it in Rancer and making plenty of people mad. Several others saw this and decided to abuse the mechanic as well so CCP steps in and nerfs titan tracking. Sure there were plenty of people who did not abuse that and also experienced the nerf even though they had not abused it.

Yeah that's called goonspiracy and its basically an indicator that the person who brings it up does not have any sound points to attack the argument with. Keep it out of the thread please.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133