These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

------------

Author
Soylent Jade
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2014-07-07 20:05:05 UTC
Bronson Hughes wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
I'd say that the only thing they really lack is an abundance of drunken comedy fratricide killmails. Blink

Cue the surprise smartie Destroyer, just as the target hits 50% structure, let rip, kill everything.....

I've actually suggested to them that they start dropping one gun for a smartbomb on their gank ships for fleet ops (i.e. freighter ganks) just so they can collect bounties off of each other. Considering that most of the bounties were likely placed there by folks they've ganked, it's just one more way for them to maximize the "tears" harvested.


I think in most cases, the smart bomb won't fit because of the CPU requirements, unless we drop a SEBO/ECCM/scram, but it might be worth considering. However, since in most cases our ships are only going to pay out about $2M in bounties per ship, it probably wouldn't be worth the DPS loss, or needing an extra ganker or two to make up for it. Of course, this would be the FC's call.

Making hisec better...one Catalyst at a time

minerbumping.com

Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#42 - 2014-07-07 20:17:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Bronson Hughes
Soylent Jade wrote:
I think in most cases, the smart bomb won't fit because of the CPU requirements, unless we drop a SEBO/ECCM/scram, but it might be worth considering. However, since in most cases our ships are only going to pay out about $2M in bounties per ship, it probably wouldn't be worth the DPS loss, or needing an extra ganker or two to make up for it. Of course, this would be the FC's call.

From a purely tactical standpoint, you are correct, the drop in overall performance wouldn't likely be offset by the income gained. At the very least, it would certainly make more sense if your fleet is running with some Brutix/Talos fits in the mix.


However, EvE is not all about efficiency:
Leto Thule wrote:
That is hilarious. Bounties now being used to fund the ships of the person you bountied.

Think of the PR opportunity here. It may be worth the loss of efficiency. Blink

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#43 - 2014-07-07 21:25:54 UTC
Tyrone Arran wrote:
Their goal is not 'real' pvp.


You might want to look up what "PvP" means.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Tyrone Arran
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#44 - 2014-07-08 13:56:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyrone Arran
admiral root wrote:
Tyrone Arran wrote:
Their goal is not 'real' pvp.


You might want to look up what "PvP" means.



You may want to look up what quotations are.

Quotation marks can used around a single word or a group of words to indicate use of a borrowed word or phrase. Using this, I was referencing the person's meaning of 'real' pvp and stating that their goal is not what that person deems to be 'real' pvp.

So please, if you are going to criticize anyone for what they think the meaning of pvp is, at least criticize the correct people..
Previous page123