Crime & Punishment

I believe he's trying to offer troll services and is failing horribly

The OP is a genius. We have all been so puzzled trying to figure out the meaning of the thread that we forgot to look at the real application.

He has gotten us to waste our time pondering this thread so his psycological warefare (however its spelled) is working. Do the right thing guys and forget this thread.

Your out of your league kid, interpretation is apart of the psychological warfare, failing to grasp the interpretation of the crowd means you have no idea what your doing and your just winging it.

You give it more credit than it deserves.

But..

His threads are like that car accident that you can't look away from. It traps you in its total absense of purpose.... And before you know it... Your clicking his profile in search of more...

Oh god. No.

It's like a radar...
If it's too slow to interpret and misinterprets instead, you end up with seagulls as enemies and what not.

If I was to click the report button to make complaints by posts , it would take more time.
That way, I save time for ccp and the forums staff.

2nd.
Every post is controlled by ccp... Whether they blatantly lie or try to detect activities which are hidden or potential damage.

There is no control over when the players decide to target a poster and abuse him.
They tend to look like if they blame the target to silence the riot and investigate.
I know you won't catch me getting trapped into attacking a fake target like you tried to make me.

erm, I was going to log back in, but I was informed I had to speak with management.
I don't have the time to do that and I already wrote to them about related problems.

That means that my costs to log to EVE now more than doubled.

(btw, I never played the ISK double or participated in it.
The only ISK double that relates to me is the one ISK that has 2 decimal digits after it.)


I used to pay $5 for 3 hours and it now costs me $10 for 3 hours.
Additionally, I was later informed that I could not get time there either.
One failed logic reasoning was that I needed to be away for 12 hours before.
The reason for that being that apparently, since it is legal to make money by misinterpreting a client, they decided that my request for quote was a request for service.

Either way, I left since it would have been more problem and headache for me than the worth of doing business with them.

btw, most of the comments and excuses used on here, false or not, are somewhat used elsewhere.


So, I'll take 2 years off, since it won't be worth it.
I might get a month once in a while when I have enough for PLEX to trade on the Bazaar.
Other than that, I will have little use to fly.
I will probably end up contracting more junk to my trader for him to haul, or...
Perhaps I could make my hauler a trader since he can already haul larger quantities.
That sorts of half my operation costs although that it takes more time to train the one pilot in both fields than to train 2 pilots in each respective fields.


What part of business intelligence do you use as part of psychological warfare?
And if so, what kind of industrial intelligence schemes are you partisan of?


Anyways, I had more to say , but I'll pass, and will use some of the quotes targeted at me for copyright since it tends to come back as excuses for security .
It does make it worthless and vain for me to try, and some people knew it in advance.

Nice try but you stated:
#70 Posted: 2014.05.20 17:53
Lar, if you think I'm waging psychological warfare against you, you are very wrong.

And what if I don't and I'm even more wrong?


btw, you posted as I was about to leave to work.
I have to wake up in 5 hours and travel 2.5 hours.
It's 5 hours round trip.

It's not like if you can give me incentives.


Edit:
One simple thing I forgot to say is:
It would be a waste of time.


The rest of the details, I calculated myself to get the exact ratio at which this was actually going on.

It would be a waste of my time to try to login since I make more buying PLEX.
I may always make more buying PLEX.

Thread closed for further review.