These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Plex prices

First post
Author
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#201 - 2014-06-30 09:55:12 UTC
polly papercut wrote:
Accounts are being canceled because of plex prices bottom line and my poll has proven that.


Was anyone ever disputing that people were cancelling accounts due to PLEX prices?
Victor Andall
#202 - 2014-06-30 09:59:15 UTC
Um, so...are we arguing with Divine Entervention's alt or something?

I just undocked for the first time and someone challenged me to a duel. Wat do?

19.08.2014 - Dinsdale gets slammed by CCP Falcon. Never forget.

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#203 - 2014-06-30 10:01:52 UTC
Victor Andall wrote:
Um, so...are we arguing with Divine Entervention's alt or something?

That's being generous to de.
polly papercut
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#204 - 2014-06-30 10:26:02 UTC  |  Edited by: polly papercut
Mara Rinn wrote:
polly papercut wrote:
Accounts are being canceled because of plex prices bottom line and my poll has proven that.


Was anyone ever disputing that people were cancelling accounts due to PLEX prices?

Dave Stark wrote:


i sincerely doubt people will quit if plex prices reach 1bn isk.


Tippia wrote:

…but the assumption is meaningless because we have no way of telling how much larger it is (or, indeed, if it is larger at all).


Yup.
I mean you can sit around and circle jerk each other all you want.
But people canceling accounts because of high plex prices is never a good thing and it is indeed happening.
Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#205 - 2014-06-30 10:31:35 UTC
polly papercut wrote:
You have nothing to back your statements while I have 25 votes. I have 25 times more facts than you . so keep it up you are wrong and you will always be wrong about this.
I suggest you unsub polly to make it 26.

Then we'd all win!

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#206 - 2014-06-30 10:49:39 UTC
polly papercut wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
polly papercut wrote:
Accounts are being canceled because of plex prices bottom line and my poll has proven that.


Was anyone ever disputing that people were cancelling accounts due to PLEX prices?

Dave Stark wrote:


i sincerely doubt people will quit if plex prices reach 1bn isk.


Tippia wrote:

…but the assumption is meaningless because we have no way of telling how much larger it is (or, indeed, if it is larger at all).


Yup.
I mean you can sit around and circle jerk each other all you want.
But people canceling accounts because of high plex prices is never a good thing and it is indeed happening.

In your opinion, which is all you have actually shown.
I could care that high plex prices made you UN sub an alt but no one here will bear to see you mis represent that in a form that's indicitave of a problem for anyone other than yourself.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#207 - 2014-06-30 10:50:40 UTC
polly papercut wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
Was anyone ever disputing that people were cancelling accounts due to PLEX prices?
Tippia wrote:
…but the assumption is meaningless because we have no way of telling how much larger it is (or, indeed, if it is larger at all).

Yup.
Nope.

That's just you not understanding statistics and creating yet another strawman to fill in the gap. If you ask nicely, I'll explain to you what I'm saying because it is not what you want it to be.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#208 - 2014-06-30 10:52:10 UTC
polly papercut wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
polly papercut wrote:
Accounts are being canceled because of plex prices bottom line and my poll has proven that.


Was anyone ever disputing that people were cancelling accounts due to PLEX prices?

Dave Stark wrote:


i sincerely doubt people will quit if plex prices reach 1bn isk.


Well, Dave Stark needs to have a word with himself. People will quit the game for all kinds of reasons: surely everyone who lives in hi sec knows at least one industrialist who plays the market to fund their PLEX subscription and has from time to time quit the game when they couldn't afford another PLEX due to extended absences during their 30 days?

I've dropped two subscriptions simply because I can't afford them anymore. Those subscriptions only existed because I could pay for the subscription with in game currency. Prices went up, my income earning went down, eventually it got to the point where I was spending too much time grinding ISK for the subscriptions for two accounts that I only use for grinding ISK for subscriptions.

So while your poll doesn't show any meaningful distinction between the categories, it should at least challenge Dave's assumptions about the subscriber population. Dave could always qualify his statement with weasel words like "significant number of" ;)
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#209 - 2014-06-30 10:57:24 UTC
polly papercut wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
polly papercut wrote:
Accounts are being canceled because of plex prices bottom line and my poll has proven that.


Was anyone ever disputing that people were cancelling accounts due to PLEX prices?

Dave Stark wrote:


i sincerely doubt people will quit if plex prices reach 1bn isk.


Tippia wrote:

…but the assumption is meaningless because we have no way of telling how much larger it is (or, indeed, if it is larger at all).


Yup.
I mean you can sit around and circle jerk each other all you want.
But people canceling accounts because of high plex prices is never a good thing and it is indeed happening.


You haven't made the case for it being a bad thing. "Not a good thing" is not by virtue of not being good a bad thing. This is called a false dichotomy.

There are two kinds of people in the world: those who think in false dichotomies, and penguins.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#210 - 2014-06-30 11:04:35 UTC
Did Remiel just call us penguin's....
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#211 - 2014-06-30 11:09:37 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Did Remiel just call us penguin's....


Personally, I think I identify closest to Gentoo penguins. I have a bad habit of getting bored with where I'm living and moving spontaneously to some random location that has no rhyme or reason.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#212 - 2014-06-30 11:16:32 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
I've dropped two subscriptions simply because I can't afford them anymore. Those subscriptions only existed because I could pay for the subscription with in game currency. Prices went up, my income earning went down, eventually it got to the point where I was spending too much time grinding ISK for the subscriptions for two accounts that I only use for grinding ISK for subscriptions.
That's the core point right there.

If every single person played EVE just because they can play for free, CCP's revenue would be exactly zero.


CCP's first priority is to make sure the game is worth 15$ a month to a large group of people.

CCP's second priority is to make sure the game is worth 15$ a month plus an additional 20$ from time to time to some other people.


It would be pointless for them to try to keep Mara Rinn's two additional subscriptions, since Mara isn't willing to pay RL cash for them (which is perfectly fine, by the way - you absolutely do what you please with your RL cash).


Instead, they should keep focussing on giving Mr. Busy Rich guy good reasons to buy PLEX with cash. If they succeed, presumably PLEX supply will increase, ISK prices will go down, and Mara will maybe re-sub her alts.

Or alternatively, introduce some cool new feature that would convince Mara to pay cash to sub another alt to try it out (assuming an alt would be useful to enjoy the new feature).

Or alternatively, just forget about Mara because it's only natural to become bored of a game after 7 years, and try to attract some new paying customers instead.


To be clear: Mara, this isn't an ad hominem, I just used your clearly explained case as an example.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#213 - 2014-06-30 11:18:10 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Did Remiel just call us penguin's....


Penguin's what?

Invalid signature format

GreenSeed
#214 - 2014-06-30 11:21:02 UTC
who cares if people cancel accounts due to plex prices? i really cant see the problem with it.

and please don't take me for a simpleminded FOX news brainwashed market loving wacko, who would explain why the water spins when we flush the toilet because of "the market", but if there's one place where we can clearly see market play at its best it has to be here. plex goes up to prohibitive prices, people stop consuming the product. since there's no alternative to plex for some, they stop subbing the account completely. end of story. no one is the bad guy, and eve happened.

the real problem here is the perception some people get that "EVE is free to play" it isn't, it never was, and it never will be.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#215 - 2014-06-30 11:25:26 UTC
Amen.

Invalid signature format

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#216 - 2014-06-30 11:26:14 UTC
Ive finally got around to looking at this poll


It turns out that none of the choices apply to the majority of players AT ALL

Groovy

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#217 - 2014-06-30 11:28:09 UTC
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
If every single person played EVE just because they can play for free, CCP's revenue would be exactly zero.

CCP's first priority is to make sure the game is worth 15$ a month to a large group of people.

CCP's second priority is to make sure the game is worth 15$ a month plus an additional 20$ from time to time to some other people.


Yup.

Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Instead, they should keep focussing on giving Mr. Busy Rich guy good reasons to buy PLEX with cash. If they succeed, presumably PLEX supply will increase, ISK prices will go down, and Mara will maybe re-sub her alts.


I'm not sure how you draw that conclusion, since if there were more ways to spend PLEX (e.g.: the EA folk convince Hilmar that gold ammo is a good thing), those PLEX would never enter the ISK economy.

Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Or alternatively, just forget about Mara because it's only natural to become bored of a game after 7 years, and try to attract some new paying customers instead.


Just don't go chasing new paying customers at the expense of old established customers who happen to be enablers or inciters. If the game is dumbed down or gimmicked-up too much it will cease being fun for the people already playing it. If CCP succumbs to EA-shiny-itis they might see a short term spike in new customers, but a long term net loss because all the people who wanted to try out the shiny game have tried it, gotten bored, and moved on, meanwhile the people who were enjoying the game but find the shininess distracting will leave too.

Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
To be clear: Mara, this isn't an ad hominem, I just used your clearly explained case as an example.


Yup, I have a brain that is switched on for the moment *<:)
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#218 - 2014-06-30 12:06:05 UTC
current buy out at Hek is 723 mill

just saying.
Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#219 - 2014-06-30 12:06:29 UTC
I agree on all points.

And yes, CCP should be very careful about introducing cosmetic junk for PLEX, if it diverts PLEX supply from content-creating subs to accessories that have very little impact beyond single-player fapping.


Player A that buys a PLEX for 20$ and uses it to get 1,000,000 rounds of gold ammo is fine, I guess. No in-game impact for the rest of us, but more money for CCP to hopefully invest on the serious side of spaceship business.

OTOH, Player B that buys a PLEX for 20$, puts it on the market, and is bought for 1 Bil ISK by player C to convert to gold ammo, instead of being bought by player D for 500 Mil ISK to sub his account, is probably bad for the game.


But it's really hard to predict the impact, outside of blatantly bad ideas.

Take PLEX for dual training, for example:

- Good idea so people can train an alt to have social fun in RvB while their main is just logging in twice a month for CTAs?

- Or bad idea because ISK-rich players train alts they ultimately won't actually use much, at the expense of ISK-poorer players that may unsub their active main?


At the end of the day, let's all hope CCP worries less about PLEX and more about continuing to develop a great game.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#220 - 2014-06-30 12:35:39 UTC
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
I've dropped two subscriptions simply because I can't afford them anymore. Those subscriptions only existed because I could pay for the subscription with in game currency. Prices went up, my income earning went down, eventually it got to the point where I was spending too much time grinding ISK for the subscriptions for two accounts that I only use for grinding ISK for subscriptions.
That's the core point right there.

If every single person played EVE just because they can play for free, CCP's revenue would be exactly zero.


CCP's first priority is to make sure the game is worth 15$ a month to a large group of people.

CCP's second priority is to make sure the game is worth 15$ a month plus an additional 20$ from time to time to some other people.


It would be pointless for them to try to keep Mara Rinn's two additional subscriptions, since Mara isn't willing to pay RL cash for them (which is perfectly fine, by the way - you absolutely do what you please with your RL cash).


Instead, they should keep focussing on giving Mr. Busy Rich guy good reasons to buy PLEX with cash. If they succeed, presumably PLEX supply will increase, ISK prices will go down, and Mara will maybe re-sub her alts.

Or alternatively, introduce some cool new feature that would convince Mara to pay cash to sub another alt to try it out (assuming an alt would be useful to enjoy the new feature).

Or alternatively, just forget about Mara because it's only natural to become bored of a game after 7 years, and try to attract some new paying customers instead.


To be clear: Mara, this isn't an ad hominem, I just used your clearly explained case as an example.


This is the thing, a lot of people are mistakenly following the train of "PLEX price rises -> People can no longer afford PLEX -> Accounts lapse -> CCP lose money", however, they are missing the fact that CCP isn't getting their money from those now-lapsed accounts, but from the guys who buy additional PLEX for real money. While the PLEX price continues to soar, the people buying them for money have no reason to stop, since they are selling, and currently selling for much better than they ever have. If you intend to ever buy PLEX for real money, now is the time to do it, lapsing accounts be damned.

Now, granted, there is an arguement that we are living on credit here - if the price of PLEX is a hideously simulated bubble, when it pops, there is suddenly going to be a massive PLEX stockpile going for comparitively peanuts. At that point, all (or certainly a lot of) those lapsed accounts are going to fire up again, but conversely, people who are currently happily paying cash for PLEX will stop, likely hoping for the price to surge again rather than paying twice the real money just to get the same weight of isk you can now.

Oddly, its not the subscription loss from "play for free" players that is the risk, its the "PLEX for real money" players stopping buying that is the risk to CCP's bottom line.