These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

[Suggestion] Shared Hangars for my Alts

Author
Dally Lama
Doomheim
#21 - 2014-06-27 21:47:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Dally Lama
Fer'isam K'ahn wrote:
Don't achorable secure (with password) containers work that way ????'

Same stupid shared wallet principle, I got loads of toons and maybe contract/sent money once every 3-6months. You know, I don't sent 12.000 isk for a skillbook every 20 minutes...
I sent appropirate money for a few months in advance, knowing what is needed. And one industry toon skilled properly for selling gets loot/ore once every few weeks, patience and forthought and planning is really bad i heard.

-1 <<< That's a big super minus btw.


Fer'isam K'ahn wrote:
Fling Salvage wrote:
I am not talking about a shared wallet or rmt here.
Big Minus for what? A COntainer with password is no replacement for what i suggested...


Not ? I am sure your shared hangar has the same possible ability to store stuff as a container and when you log in with your alt, I think you enter a password ... am I wrong ?

Click hangar, add stuff, log out, log in take stuff out.
Click container, add stuff, log out, log in, add password take stuff out. -> one PW more, guess that puts it in line with 4 click contracts, my bad, horrible. And in case there is an 'allow' list, then you can skip that too. And to fill it with ore/loot/stuff from another market, you don't even have to dock up Shocked.

Oh, and I haven't called this thread redundant yet, have I, time to report for 'cloud' exploitism to avoid rule breaking consequences.

@dit: Not to bump this: Yes, I am talking anchoring ... otherwise I would be really stupid. Hint, I talked about not having to dock up, and know about the non-corp alts in regards to station containers Shocked.

*sigh*

You once again base your entire opinion on your own ignorance. It wouldn't be an issue if you weren't so aggressive about it at times... not sure what your deal is with that. You seem like a decent fella half the time, and like a rabid child the other half. I'm really not trying to be mean, just what I've observed. If you would take the time to understand what is being discussed instead of thinking you are always right, you might come out of the experience with new conclusions.

Your suggestion of using a container is not acceptable. There are players whom have many, many alts. A container anchorable in space is not a feasible, reasonable solution to shared hangars.

1) They are in space.
2) Having to type a password each time on a dozen alts
3) They are extremely limited in size
4) Cannot be managed remotely like hangars
5) Space litter is bad

If you want to play the role of forum traffic cop that's fine, it's your life... just try not to be so quick to jump the gun. You seem to think that your own inability to understand why an idea is relevant makes the idea irrelevant. Never has someone's signature applied more to themselves than yours does to you. P



This idea is great, a definite +1 from me. I am guessing the people scolding the idea do not actually have a whole lot of alts, and are just speaking out of their butts as per usual on this forum.

Anyone who actually knows what they are talking about (i.e. has a strong collection of alts) supports this.
Ethenia AD
Doomheim
#22 - 2014-06-28 02:02:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Ethenia AD
Dally Lama wrote:

This idea is great, a definite +1 from me. I am guessing the people scolding the idea do not actually have a whole lot of alts, and are just speaking out of their butts as per usual on this forum.

Anyone who actually knows what they are talking about (i.e. has a strong collection of alts) supports this.

QFT lol. all the multiboxers I know would love this.
Fer'isam K'ahn
SAS Veterinarians
#23 - 2014-06-28 08:48:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Fer'isam K'ahn
Dally Lama wrote:

Never has someone's signature applied more to themselves than yours does to you. P

Touche ,)

But you do misunderstand my arguing, personally as a player I would love this, but game design is not about what single player love personally without considering the possibilities to be exploited, to break certain game mechanics or to further laziness or are simply against the doctrine of how the game was envisioned to function.

The shared hangar as well as the shared wallet concept (other thread) further a 'cloud' principle that is easy to exploit and circumvent certain rules without consequences (not naming them to make ppl aware of them).

The things I mentioned are not the best in performing the same task with equal ease, but do the job with a little annoyance spiced in to make you 'work' for your gains.

And I do understand working with many alts and have no problem whatsoever, there are already multiple ways, which also cater to the roleplaying aspect of the game, meaning flying different chars instead of an account with alts and treating the interaction between them as such.

That said, as a player you would get +1;
as a game designer you would get a -1

So don't get me wrong, if I give mixed signals, I try to listen to both of my aspects, but the developer side usually wins. If my inner dialog shows too much and seems incoherent, then it's my bad Roll

PS: We tend to agree and disagree a lot about multiple issues, which shows we are neither *yay* not *nay* sayer and having actual dialogs, which I think this is a ll about. Blink
Saint Germain
Sekundu
#24 - 2014-06-28 09:10:19 UTC
The whole corporation system is being revamped anyway, maybe we'll get new tools that will apply in these cases, and make life easier for us all.
Previous page12