These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Renters?

Author
Dakkar Trald
#1 - 2014-06-25 23:01:56 UTC
I'd like to move out and try nullsec, but I don't have the kind of schedule that allows for hours-long fleet engagements on a regular basis. I've been informed by some players that a corp renting space is a good fit for that situation, but others have insisted that renters aren't worth joining. What are some general opinions on this?
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#2 - 2014-06-25 23:33:44 UTC
Generally renting a low-demand system costs 1-2 billion ISK per month, high demand 10 billion.

I would suggest looking into wormholes instead as it's more suited to short to medium length play sessions, and just as dangerous as null.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Dakkar Trald
#3 - 2014-06-25 23:40:47 UTC
I gave some thought to wormholes since I do have a few scanning skills trained, but decided I didn't like the thought of living in a POS instead of a station.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4 - 2014-06-25 23:52:29 UTC
Dakkar Trald wrote:
I'd like to move out and try nullsec, but I don't have the kind of schedule that allows for hours-long fleet engagements on a regular basis. I've been informed by some players that a corp renting space is a good fit for that situation, but others have insisted that renters aren't worth joining. What are some general opinions on this?


As you just found out:

Ask 10 people and you will get 10 different opinions.


---


Renters have some benefits and drawbacks.


As a renter, you have the benefit that homeland security is not your main priority as that is something the overlord is for.
The downside about this is, if they find out that they are struggling against a bigger and better entity, renter space is the first thing they will drop. As a renter, you are considered expandable in the end.

Also, most renters are there for 1 reason for the overlord: Income
So don't expect that because you are a renter of alliance "x" that you are allowed in their fleet or can run with them.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Dakkar Trald
#5 - 2014-06-25 23:54:15 UTC
I don't have any expectations, I was more hoping someone with experience could share what they know. Thanks for your input J.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#6 - 2014-06-25 23:54:27 UTC
Dakkar Trald wrote:
I gave some thought to wormholes since I do have a few scanning skills trained, but decided I didn't like the thought of living in a POS instead of a station.


Then you might have an issue with null too.


Renting a system with a station in it...very very very expansive.

And most day-to-day living in null also involves basing out of POS, mainly because main station systems are often the first the enemy targets.

And with an enemy in local / enemies around using a station is a risk (read: bubbles everywhere - not the soap kind of bubbles though).

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Solai
Doughfleet
Triglavian Outlaws and Sobornost Troika
#7 - 2014-06-25 23:54:49 UTC
Bare in mind not all sov-owning entities do CTA's or have fixed demands on your time. Some can be casual-friendly. Meanwhile, it's always possible to leave a fleet mid-way through. If your group recognized that real-life comes first, then it wont be a problem, socially.

Renter corps get the benefit of higher value space, and don't need to defend their space, but do not have the benefit of impact and meaning. I'd say the former merit doesn't level out the loss in the latter. Better to try out joining a sov-owning alliance, and give it a shot. Eve is much more interesting that way.
Dakkar Trald
#8 - 2014-06-26 00:00:53 UTC
Solai wrote:
Bare in mind not all sov-owning entities do CTA's or have fixed demands on your time. Some can be casual-friendly. Meanwhile, it's always possible to leave a fleet mid-way through. If your group recognized that real-life comes first, then it wont be a problem, socially.


Is there a wasy to quickly identify those corps when I am looking around? I know some explicity advertise themselves as such, but failing that are there certain corps or alliances known to be more laid back?
Ethikos
Doomheim
#9 - 2014-06-26 05:00:30 UTC
First, on the renting front. You will almost certainly not be allowed to join the SOV holders fleets. As for the null sec alliances, there are relatively few that I know that truly have Call to Arms (CTAs) demanding that you log in for them. On the flip side, a portion of them do have other metrics for activity that they check. If your not active enough, out you go. They are usually pretty up front about what those activity requirements are (x number of kills in x number of days, etc). If your looking to go casual mode, I would recommend Brave Newbies and the HERO Coalition. They are focused more on pure fun and very welcoming of new players.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#10 - 2014-06-26 06:15:26 UTC
For what it is worth:
* Brothers of Tangra [B0T] = Pandemic Legion's rental empire
* Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere [PUBLRD] = Goonswarm's rental empire
* Northern Associates. [NA.] = N3's rental empire

I have issue with wearing the tag of "B0T" or "PUBLRD", though I'm sure it brings their landlords endless fits of giggles. Renters are regarded with disdain and disgust by their landlords, so they make renters tattoo their "pubbie" status on their foreheads.

Renters are basically bribing the landlord to leave them alone, but that doesn't mean others will do the same. The landlords will not defend the renters system, unless it is convenient and provides a "gudfight", or there is a valuable moon to defend.

Speaking of which, if there are any valuable moons in the system, renters won't be allowed to mine them. There is a long list of things renters can and can't do, including limiting where renters can rat / travel / dock / use markets. Don't even think of putting-up a CSAA without permission of your landlord (you likely have to pay them an additional fee, plus possibly sell the supers to only them, and they won't necessarily do anything to defend it while it is building - the renters take all the risks, and the landlords get paid regardless if the CSAA survives or not): http://themittani.com/features/alod-because-reading-rental-contracts-hard

I can't decide whether renters are incredibly amazing for being willing to jump through all the hoops just to have a place of their own (admirable), or pathetic for paying the landlords to treat them so poorly.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#11 - 2014-06-26 06:34:59 UTC
Doesn't matter if you are in renting corp or normal sov holding corp or whatever else, pain of null is the same: shopping based on schedule of carrier jumps sucks.

Invalid signature format

Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#12 - 2014-06-26 12:01:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Aralyn Cormallen
Dakkar Trald wrote:
I'd like to move out and try nullsec, but I don't have the kind of schedule that allows for hours-long fleet engagements on a regular basis.


This is often one of the biggest misconceptions of nullsec. Sure, hours-long fleets do occur (and to be fair, the main weight of those occur in weekends, since thats the best time to guarantee large groups of available players), and quite regularly (I shudder at how long I was online during the B-R battle), but very few organisations these days have mandatory "If you are online, you are in fleet or kicked" operation, simply because Darwinism has seen those groups driven out by the more easy-going groups (whose more laid-back approach engendered stronger loyalty in tough times). Granted, organisations will often have participation metrics to ensure you aren't completely leeching off the contributions of others (and of course, this will increase in importance during wartime), but they are far from strict, and those organisations accept that people have different activity windows, and prefer different types of content, so within an organisation, you can easily find a place to enjoy the sort of play you prefer, whilst still contributing to the war machine. For example, within our coalition, the CFC, on top of the alliance-wide and coalition-wide operations, and any corp-specific activities, we have many social and gamestyle-focused groups - capital pilots, black-ops and recon pilots, covert hotdropping (very short-playtime friendly), scouts, those who prefer NPC nullsec small-gang combat, and timezone-centric midsize-gang combat, the list goes on, so you don't have to be sitting in a Battleship for 3 hours shooting inanimate structures to be a contributing member.

Don't rule something out based on the misconceptions fostered by people who tried nullsec for a week five years ago, and tar the organisations that are around now with the same vague brush. If you aren't sure, ask. Any potential recruiter will be fairly up-front about expectations, simply because someone who is a poor fit is as bad for the corp as the corp is as bad for the pilot who wants something different.
Vol Arm'OOO
Central Co-Prosperity Union
#13 - 2014-06-26 13:00:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Vol Arm'OOO
J'Poll wrote:
Dakkar Trald wrote:
I'd like to move out and try nullsec, but I don't have the kind of schedule that allows for hours-long fleet engagements on a regular basis. I've been informed by some players that a corp renting space is a good fit for that situation, but others have insisted that renters aren't worth joining. What are some general opinions on this?


As you just found out:

Ask 10 people and you will get 10 different opinions.


---


Renters have some benefits and drawbacks.


As a renter, you have the benefit that homeland security is not your main priority as that is something the overlord is for.
The downside about this is, if they find out that they are struggling against a bigger and better entity, renter space is the first thing they will drop. As a renter, you are considered expandable in the end.

Also, most renters are there for 1 reason for the overlord: Income
So don't expect that because you are a renter of alliance "x" that you are allowed in their fleet or can run with them.


You should also know that should things go south, the overlord alliance can deny you access to the station. One day everything is going fine, the next day all your assists are locked in station and you cant undock because if you do you wont be able to redock. (If you reach this point and dont have a carrier to load everything into it, all you can do is conduct a firesale or hold on to your stuff in the hopes that you will be able to get into a corp with access to it in the future). Also renting alliances are not necessarily "chill" with no mandatory opps. They got to pay their fees or be kicked, so while you may not be having to deal with deployments, etc. . . you may certainly find that you have to do mandatory ops to help pay bills.

I should add that if you dont have alot of play time and are looking for a causal environment, you should check out lowsec. Lowsec is very conducive to logging on when you want and doing small roams etc...

I don't play, I just fourm warrior.

Woeful Animation
Ascendent.
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#14 - 2014-06-26 13:37:20 UTC
I have been a part of an alliance that rented space. I can give you the benefits of my experiences and you can take those for what they are, just my experiences.

1. The rent isn't normally 1-2 Billion per month. Rents vary depending on the qualities of the system, for example, a dead end system with a station and an upgraded status is more expensive. Landlords are advertising their "wares" on third party sites. Check the math and I think you will see that a system runs more in the 10-30 Billion range.

2. CTA's are the least of your concerns. Generally speaking, the landlord doesn't need your participation they are strong enough without you. The CTA requirement exists because the landlord might want fresh meat, or may want to use the renter in some way to further its own agenda. But remember you are there to make money for the Landlord. CTA's cut down on your ability to pay the rent. Therefore CTAs are used rare.

3. Defense doesn't mean that a friendly fleet is sitting in your system 23/7 to guard against the interruption of your daily activities. It means basically that they will protect their SOV and might show up if a gud fight is to be had. The occasional roam will happen depending on your location and your neighbors. The cloaky camper might show and an entity might decide to give you problems with the occasion hot drop. Again, situations vary. The tactical map changes and the Eve political landscape has a bearing on these issues.

4. Buyer beware. trust your buddies, bros before hoes and be proactive in your defense. Know what your system is capable of generating. The rent comes due and your alliance is short, you reach in your pocket or face eviction. Towards that end, trust your buddies. You need people doing profitable things to make the rent and make a profit on their characters. Trust that your alliance mates are of a like mind, they are active and working. The time clicks by, and before you know it the rent is due again. If your alliance all suddenly gets girlfriends or suddenly start to hate your space, you find yourself in crisis mode in terms of rent.

5. Proactive in your defense deserves its own paragraph. Yes renters are looked down upon and wear the stupid tags brought about by their position in the null sec higharchy. Be proactive in defense of your system. Hold raids, stand up and fight the roaming interceptor gank fleet. Punch the kitchen sink, just passing through fleet in the mouth. Counter drop the hot dropper. Have defense plans and band together. This will eventually get your alliance respect and will help with your own sense of pride in what you accomplish, regardless of what the landlords think.
Qalix
Long Jump.
#15 - 2014-06-26 16:12:27 UTC
It amazes me that there is so much disdain for renters. No one here would think twice about renting office space for our RL businesses. That is what renter corps are: businesses, ISK-printing arrangements. Who gives a rat's ass what people think about your "tattoo" (srsly Tau?)?

1. You don't have to rent yourself. You can join a renter. Most of those with open recruitment can be found in the recruitment forums. They are generally up front about their renter status. Payment plans vary. Some charge a tax (ones that focus on ratting) and some charge flat fees. Mine charges a flat fee that is less than I make in a single hour of running anomalies. Some charge low taxes but require corp ops on some sort of schedule. One I looked at had a Saturday ice mining op. Services also vary. Some will have paid courier services, some free, some on a schedule, etc. Some charge a fee if you want your own POS.

2. There is serious ISK to be made. With 2 ravens and a very relaxed attitude, I pull in about 120mil per hour running anomalies. Multiboxed carriers earn even more. PI is excellent in null and POCOs are typically untaxed for your corp and/or alliance. The ones in our general area are all untaxed. Mining is excellent. A maxed miner with boosts can pull in 55mil or so per hour (depending on variables). If a renter corp wanted, a single upgraded system could support several hundred miners (yes, you read that correctly). Most renter corps have ore buyback programs, so you don't even have to move the stuff to market if you don't want to. Competent corps with industry and spreadsheet-minded members can make many, many times more than the rent.

3. There is some bad info in this thread. Things vary between rental alliances. In BoT, all but the most choice moons are open to mining. Further, corps are permitted to moon mine in unrented systems until someone rents them. They also permit super cap construction for a fee, but will rebate those fees if you sell the super to PL. You can even put up a POS in unrented systems (e.g., for scouts).

4. BoT has a "militia." It's a fleet open to any BoT member and the FC is from PL. I've heard that other renter alliances have similar arrangements. If you want to try flying with a competent FC who is willing to work with those unfamiliar with fleet PvP, it's an excellent opportunity. But you don't have to participate in any way, shape, or form.

5. It's not safe space, but it's a lot less busy than most other space. BoT even has "overflow" systems if your system is being camped.

6. What people won't admit: many, perhaps as much as half, of all renters are actually pvp corps/alliance member alts. They're running their own building projects in alt corps safe from spies. They're operating subletting businesses by bringing in renters and collecting taxes. They're using ratting space free from the hundreds/thousands of other alliance members who can roam freely in their own space. I'm also reasonably certain that alliances have renters in other alliances' space (how better to protect your mining ops!).

There are down sides to renting.
1. The one that annoys me most is limited mobility. Travel through other rented systems has to be "with a purpose." E.g. doing escalations, traveling to a specific destination, shopping, that sort of thing. Believe me, people will CHECK too. "I'm going shopping at this station." "What are you buying?" and so on. Some corps have cleaned out the market in their stations to prevent the use of shopping excuses. On the other hand, many corps don't mind at all. They have set up markets (e.g. minerals or ice products) and want people to buy their stuff. Also, traveling to and from hisec is relatively safe (not actually safe, just relatively). With my BoT tags I can set a route through PL ally space and make 44 jumps unmolested. Though I haven't tried it, I bet you could run freighters all over BoT space without too many issues.

2. War decs galore. This won't affect you most of the time, but it hampers hisec travel. However, this is true for all large alliances, so there is no real difference here.

3. Stigma. As evidenced by some of the answers in this thread, many people look down on renters. Of course, every single one of them lives in a nation state that provides for their common defense and rarely, if ever, requires them to serve in the military. They own or work for companies that rent their work space. They pay their taxes and use public services. The renter does the exact same thing. Why this is distasteful, especially when those renters are paying for their alliance's pvp, is a mystery.

4. Uncertainty. Who knows what the rental or controlling alliance will do in the future? Could they lock you out? Could they lose space? I'm not terribly worried about any of this. All of it is true for PvP alliances too. And since those same alliances are the ones doing the renting, the reality is that your fates are tied together. Personally, I'm not too worried that PL is going to be losing space any time soon. If they do, I can still rent from the new guys. What do I care who owns the space?

I'm generally pleased with my choice to join a renter. I have a character in Brave and getting PvE done in Catch is a gigantic pain in the ass. With this arrangement, I can get my ISK in short, efficient bursts. Then I log on my PvP alt and join a fleet in Brave. It's not like joining a renter is a jail sentence.
Dakkar Trald
#16 - 2014-06-26 18:01:12 UTC
Damn fine post there Qualix, thanks for giving your point of view. I hadn't spoken with many who were actually current renter members and hearing someone on the inside give a complete overview is refreshing.

I'm not totally convinced renting (or not) is the way to go for me yet, but this thread has been a wealth of information, and cleared up a lot of misconceptions for me. So thanks very much for everyone who took the time to comment.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2014-06-26 18:16:14 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Dakkar Trald wrote:
I'd like to move out and try nullsec, but I don't have the kind of schedule that allows for hours-long fleet engagements on a regular basis. I've been informed by some players that a corp renting space is a good fit for that situation, but others have insisted that renters aren't worth joining. What are some general opinions on this?


As you just found out:

Ask 10 people and you will get 10 different opinions.


---


Renters have some benefits and drawbacks.


As a renter, you have the benefit that homeland security is not your main priority as that is something the overlord is for.
The downside about this is, if they find out that they are struggling against a bigger and better entity, renter space is the first thing they will drop. As a renter, you are considered expandable in the end.

Also, most renters are there for 1 reason for the overlord: Income
So don't expect that because you are a renter of alliance "x" that you are allowed in their fleet or can run with them.


Basically this.

The only alliance I know of that is an exception to this is SYJ, though they rent out space in amarr low sec instead of null. They do allow renters to join in for fleets and such, and rental corporations down there might be a good choice for an enterprising new pilot such as yourself.

Another option might be corps based in NPC null sec. These corps are usually smaller, and don't have to worry about controlling space other than keeping others from destroying their poses.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#18 - 2014-06-26 18:48:57 UTC
Qalix wrote:
It amazes me that there is so much disdain for renters. No one here would think twice about renting office space for our RL businesses. That is what renter corps are: businesses, ISK-printing arrangements. Who gives a rat's ass what people think about your "tattoo" (srsly Tau?)?

*shrug* I think renters deserve to be treated better. Seriously.

I don't think of them as just occupying space, but as regular source of needed operations income. In my mind, that makes them a valuable commodity, though a replaceable commodity.

I think if renters were managed better, it would benefit the landlords more as well. Yes, this would require expending some effort to build and maintain a rental community. That would could be a path to getting more people into nulsec.

Having spent so many years in w-space for similar benefits that renters enjoy, and not paying rent, I am quite probably biased on the topic.
Cara Forelli
State War Academy
Caldari State
#19 - 2014-06-26 18:50:51 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
I would suggest looking into wormholes instead as it's more suited to short to medium length play sessions, and just as dangerous as null.


I find this difficult to agree with. I've known quite a few pilots that have actually moved from WH space to renter space for a more casual playstyle. It sort of depends on the size and culture of your corporation, but the result is the same - a lot of time invested.

When you are part of a small WH corp, you'll have to do a fair bit of scanning every day. You may think you are fast at scanning, until you open up to multiple systems with 30 signatures each. Also in any of the upper class wormholes you'll have to wait around for people to be available to run sites. An old corp-mate of mine with sporadic playtimes used to miss out on most of our site running and pvp, as combat in wormhole space is fast and furious, separated by hours of scanning/scouting. "You just missed it" was a running joke with him when he'd log on.

Larger wormhole corps are a bit different, as there is less individual pressure to scan for hours on end. However, they suffer from the same issues as null sec, because trying to cram all those people into mass limited holes becomes a logistical nightmare. Shopping has to be planned around available routes. You'll be pressured into staying on for fleet ops when you really don't have time for it, because otherwise you don't get to participate. There's nothing quite like getting an entire fleet rolled out and having to fly 30 jumps through null/low for a new connection when it's already an hour past reasonable bedtime. Especially when you have capitals involved.

All that said I <3 wormhole space and you should definitely check it out if you have time to invest. It has great small gang combat and very lucrative PVE. It's just, more often than not, time invested is directly proportional to enjoyment.

Want to talk? Join my channel in game: House Forelli

Titan's Lament

Qalix
Long Jump.
#20 - 2014-06-26 19:17:45 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Qalix wrote:
It amazes me that there is so much disdain for renters. No one here would think twice about renting office space for our RL businesses. That is what renter corps are: businesses, ISK-printing arrangements. Who gives a rat's ass what people think about your "tattoo" (srsly Tau?)?

*shrug* I think renters deserve to be treated better. Seriously.

I don't think of them as just occupying space, but as regular source of needed operations income. In my mind, that makes them a valuable commodity, though a replaceable commodity.

I think if renters were managed better, it would benefit the landlords more as well. Yes, this would require expending some effort to build and maintain a rental community. That would could be a path to getting more people into nulsec.

Having spent so many years in w-space for similar benefits that renters enjoy, and not paying rent, I am quite probably biased on the topic.

I'm not sure what life is like in other rental alliances, and I've only been in this one a short while. BoT seems fairly even handed. Many of the restrictions make a certain amount of sense. Obviously you don't want people wandering around in other rental systems; after all, they're paying for their private domain (and I imagine many are building things, have moon mining, whatever they don't want people to know about). I can understand not wanting enemies to build their supers in your backyard. So far I haven't had any issues with people being jerks or pushing around the renters. In fact all blues wave in local and are generally nice guys. Of course, I haven't popped through a WH into one of their cap staging systems yet, so who knows?

12Next page