These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Vote power of shareholders

Author
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#21 - 2014-06-16 16:41:59 UTC
Quant Predictorian wrote:
J'Poll wrote:

So, please, go ahead with your plan. I will be watching it with hawk eyes to see when you lose your entire corp.


You don't know this bank and its shares. Don't you?: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=322582

The guy leading the bank sold shares at the start. When it reaches the certain level (5% below), he stopped and two ways he have: stock dilution or change business plan (instead of selling shares, he started selling corp bonds). I know this thread requires more than average knowledge of RL business and economics. Sorry to not mention at the start of the thread. I've just started this thread to know corp share mechanics of the game, and I've enlightened now. Thanks everyone, especially J'Poll to add additional paranoia on my business plan. But no I don't buy it.




You are not getting it.

If you as CEO has 95% of the shares, and you gave out 5% for whatever reason, yoru corp is still at risk.

"but why? when I have the most shares" This is how I would do it... I would have an alt join your corp and wait. I'd wait for you to make an announcement 'hey guys, i'm going to be on vacation for xxx I may not be on eve, such and such is in charge" if I knew enough about you, and your play patterns and if you checked daily while on vacation, I would time it. Send my single alt a share, and start a vote. You would lose CEO for 24h (a friend did this to me with his one share, due was being a ****) then I would vote you out. IF you don't log in in 24h to vote, and if say the other people with shares ignore the vote, or assume you will vote, then my alt becomes CEO.

You could have all the shares in the world, but if you are not there to vote, then you are screwed.

I could also do some nasty grief type stuff with a single share, and timing. I could remove your power for 24hours, which depending on the situation could f you up. The point is, if you are going to give out shares, make an alt corp. If the shares are for profit sharing, then no one needs to join said alt corp. If your giving out shares just because, then you are an idiot.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Quant Predictorian
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2014-06-16 19:24:47 UTC
DaReaper, these are manageable paranoias. I'll go with my business plan. Thanks for all inputs.

Investor, ancap, correspondence chess player, Fischer random fan (http://www.chess959.com)

Solai
Doughfleet
Triglavian Outlaws and Sobornost Troika
#23 - 2014-06-16 20:42:01 UTC
Quant Predictorian wrote:
I know this thread requires more than average knowledge of RL business and economics.

As someone with some economics education - This is nonsense, within the context of Eve. It's mechanics are the important part. Real life economics have only partial relevance to Eve.

But at this point I'm also morbidly curious to find out what happens to your corp, even though I regret the bad experience it will likely generate in the newbies that join you.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#24 - 2014-06-16 22:00:42 UTC
Quant Predictorian wrote:
J'Poll wrote:

So, please, go ahead with your plan. I will be watching it with hawk eyes to see when you lose your entire corp.


You don't know this bank and its shares. Don't you?: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=322582

The guy leading the bank sold shares at the start. When it reaches the certain level (5% below), he stopped and two ways he have: stock dilution or change business plan (instead of selling shares, he started selling corp bonds). I know this thread requires more than average knowledge of RL business and economics. Sorry to not mention at the start of the thread. I've just started this thread to know corp share mechanics of the game, and I've enlightened now. Thanks everyone, especially J'Poll to add additional paranoia on my business plan. But no I don't buy it.



Again. Go ahead. Even if YOU have good intentions I can promise most others dontn

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Zaxix
State War Academy
Caldari State
#25 - 2014-06-23 14:55:23 UTC
Quant Predictorian wrote:
DaReaper, these are manageable paranoias. I'll go with my business plan. Thanks for all inputs.

You seem resistant to good information. Here's some advice: google Titans4U, Bad Bobby, and Brock Nelson.

What isn't mentioned here, possibly because many people aren't aware of it, is what all of this means in the context of an alliance. People forget that Directors have the power to set a corporation's support for the executor corporation. They also forget how corporations are accepted into an alliance. Throw in some shares, a CEO on vacation, and a single crafty director and you've got the recipe for some serious mayhem. If that character also has roles in other corporations in that alliance or is working with someone who does, you are screwed.

Bokononist

 

Quant Predictorian
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2014-06-23 18:01:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Quant Predictorian
Zaxix wrote:
Quant Predictorian wrote:
DaReaper, these are manageable paranoias. I'll go with my business plan. Thanks for all inputs.

You seem resistant to good information. Here's some advice: google Titans4U, Bad Bobby, and Brock Nelson.

What isn't mentioned here, possibly because many people aren't aware of it, is what all of this means in the context of an alliance. People forget that Directors have the power to set a corporation's support for the executor corporation. They also forget how corporations are accepted into an alliance. Throw in some shares, a CEO on vacation, and a single crafty director and you've got the recipe for some serious mayhem. If that character also has roles in other corporations in that alliance or is working with someone who does, you are screwed.


This is why you shouldn't give director position to someone else. Right? Its like you're giving banking information to hackers in RL. So, you should know your directors, possibly face to face connection is better before giving a director position to someone else. And still you won't be safe even if you know your directors in RL.

Investor, ancap, correspondence chess player, Fischer random fan (http://www.chess959.com)

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#27 - 2014-06-23 18:24:48 UTC
its your corp, if you don't wan to take the advice then that's fine and on you.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#28 - 2014-06-23 18:52:26 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
its your corp, if you don't wan to take the advice then that's fine and on you.


But why ask for advixce in the first place then.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Zaxix
State War Academy
Caldari State
#29 - 2014-06-23 19:17:28 UTC
Quant Predictorian wrote:
Zaxix wrote:
Quant Predictorian wrote:
DaReaper, these are manageable paranoias. I'll go with my business plan. Thanks for all inputs.

You seem resistant to good information. Here's some advice: google Titans4U, Bad Bobby, and Brock Nelson.

What isn't mentioned here, possibly because many people aren't aware of it, is what all of this means in the context of an alliance. People forget that Directors have the power to set a corporation's support for the executor corporation. They also forget how corporations are accepted into an alliance. Throw in some shares, a CEO on vacation, and a single crafty director and you've got the recipe for some serious mayhem. If that character also has roles in other corporations in that alliance or is working with someone who does, you are screwed.


This is why you shouldn't give director position to someone else. Right? Its like you're giving banking information to hackers in RL. So, you should know your directors, possibly face to face connection is better before giving a director position to someone else. And still you won't be safe even if you know your directors in RL.

If the sole reason you're using shares is to distribute ISK for some sort of investment, you should give serious thought to using a spreadsheet and direct ISK payments instead. There is no real benefit for using shares for that purpose. It's just a really convoluted way to do it. If your corporation has more than one human player in it, there are all sorts of security concerns associated with it as well. It may seem silly, but even giving a directorship to your RL brother, girlfriend, or whoever is potentially problematic. One bad fight, one drunken night, or one breakup could really screw things up.

Unless you're the only person in corp and you're the only person who will EVER be in corp, avoid shares. If you're the only person in corp, why even bother with shares? What advantage do they provide? If you've spent time on the MD subforum, you know almost no one uses them. The one example you chose to link is probably the worst example you could have chosen. "Banks" in EVE are a running MD joke, as they always end in a corp theft/scam. Shares are something of a "bait" item, as they give the appearance of owning something.

Shares, shareholding, and stock markets have never really caught on in EVE for many of the reasons in this thread. Take a look at Block Ukx (and BSAC); it's the only shares-based business I've ever seen succeed on any level in EVE. However, a lot of what made/makes that work has to do with power brokering behind the scenes. Again, google Titans4U for just how wrong things can go. If your goal is to make offerings on MD, shares aren't going to get you any more traction than a straight up bond.

Bokononist

 

Li Quiao
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2014-06-23 19:38:23 UTC
Zaxix wrote:

Unless you're the only person in corp and you're the only person who will EVER be in corp, avoid shares. If you're the only person in corp, why even bother with shares? What advantage do they provide?


Well, advantage or no, you can't avoid them. When you create a corp, there will be 1000 shares which start out owned by the corp itself. Of course, you can immediately award them all to yourself.
Zaxix
State War Academy
Caldari State
#31 - 2014-06-23 19:57:02 UTC
Li Quiao wrote:
Zaxix wrote:

Unless you're the only person in corp and you're the only person who will EVER be in corp, avoid shares. If you're the only person in corp, why even bother with shares? What advantage do they provide?


Well, advantage or no, you can't avoid them. When you create a corp, there will be 1000 shares which start out owned by the corp itself. Of course, you can immediately award them all to yourself.

If you'd read the thread, you'd know that's been addressed. The point is obvious: avoid using them.

Bokononist

 

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#32 - 2014-06-23 20:03:19 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
p.s. Directors don't need shares

As far as I know:
* Only the CEO and directors can start votes (see exception below).
* Only the CEO and directors can perform sanction-able actions if votes pass.
* The CEO and directors however do not get to vote unless they have shares.
* Anyone with a share can vote, regardless if they are in the corp or not.
* Only the majority of cast votes matter. A vote can be won with 1 share if nobody else votes.

There is one exception to the above: corp members with 5% or more of total shares can start a CEO replacement vote.

Note that wardecs don't require a vote.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#33 - 2014-06-23 23:40:44 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
J'Poll wrote:
p.s. Directors don't need shares

As far as I know:
* Only the CEO and directors can start votes (see exception below).
* Only the CEO and directors can perform sanction-able actions if votes pass.
* The CEO and directors however do not get to vote unless they have shares.
* Anyone with a share can vote, regardless if they are in the corp or not.
* Only the majority of cast votes matter. A vote can be won with 1 share if nobody else votes.

There is one exception to the above: corp members with 5% or more of total shares can start a CEO replacement vote.

Note that wardecs don't require a vote.


Correct.

I meant that anybody can place an alt in the corp and gain director roles eventually if done properly (or use the main and buy shares with an alt).

And thus can start their own run for CEO (with or without forwarding their own shares to the director).

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#34 - 2014-06-24 08:25:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Inxentas Ultramar
Quant Predictorian, ever heard of shell corps? If you really want to make use of shares make a seperate corporation, and do all your voting / dividents via that shell corp. Do not put the assets and investments of your members at risk, do not use shares, do not expose your corps newbis to these risks. You have been warned in a few threads on the forums now, I'd heed this advice if I were you. Again, eve corps do not function like IRL businesses, but more or less like a -surprise surprise- guild in any run-of-the-mill MMO.
Koniforous
Tauren Transit
#35 - 2014-06-24 21:44:51 UTC
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
Quant Predictorian, ever heard of shell corps? If you really want to make use of shares make a seperate corporation, and do all your voting / dividents via that shell corp. Do not put the assets and investments of your members at risk, do not use shares, do not expose your corps newbis to these risks. You have been warned in a few threads on the forums now, I'd heed this advice if I were you. Again, eve corps do not function like IRL businesses, but more or less like a -surprise surprise- guild in any run-of-the-mill MMO.

Funny I stumbled through the forums today to see my name brought up here.

This is essentially what TAUTX is, a shell corporation. No other pilots other than my alts will ever be a member of TAUTX, and so CREATION of corporate votes is limited to just me. However, all share holders can use their shares to vote whenever I create a new vote. This is the reason that I will always hold at least 51,000 shares in TAUTX (which has a total of 100,000 shares).

Aside from all of the headache shares can* cause, assuming you're using them like I am through a shell corporation, they make paying investors extremely easy and traceable by using the dividends system.
Quant Predictorian
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2014-06-26 08:34:34 UTC
Yes, shell corps are important. ISK transfers between the shell corp and an active corp should be well-documented via quarterly or monthly financial reports for shareholders and possible new investors. According to Koniforous, non-member of a corp can't start a vote, only can participate the existing votes. So, no more paranoia. Is that correct? Are shell corps safe with that setup Koniforous mentioned?

Investor, ancap, correspondence chess player, Fischer random fan (http://www.chess959.com)

Koniforous
Tauren Transit
#37 - 2014-06-26 08:58:10 UTC
Yes. Create 2 alts, and 1 corp, and play with transferring all and some of the shares of the new corp between your alts to see how the mechanics work. Try keeping one alt in the corp, one out. Then try keeping both in the corp, to get a hands on feel for share mechanics.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#38 - 2014-06-26 19:36:27 UTC
Quant Predictorian wrote:
Are shell corps safe with that setup Koniforous mentioned?

"Nothing is fool-proof, as fools can be so damn clever."

If losing control of a shell corp not in an alliance is acceptable, then I think it will minimize one's exposure.

Of course, it might open one to claims of mismanagement if anything goes wrong, regardless of the reason being game mechanics or a weekend away from the computer.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#39 - 2014-06-26 20:57:26 UTC
Quant Predictorian wrote:
Yes, shell corps are important. ISK transfers between the shell corp and an active corp should be well-documented via quarterly or monthly financial reports for shareholders and possible new investors. According to Koniforous, non-member of a corp can't start a vote, only can participate the existing votes. So, no more paranoia. Is that correct? Are shell corps safe with that setup Koniforous mentioned?


If it is just YOU and nobody else in the shell corp, yes.

But as Tau said, nothing is Idiot proof, idiots will always find a way to break something.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Benetavo Saraki
Kaede Industries
#40 - 2014-07-27 17:45:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Benetavo Saraki
I admit to some confusion after reading all these comments. People are saying anyone with a single share can force a CEO replacement vote. Yet all the reference material (from eve-uni wiki and evelopedia) says that a corp member requires 5% of shares in order to propose a vote for new CEO. Why wouldn't keeping at least 95.1% of shares for yourself and only distributing 4.9% or less of shares prevent someone being able to force a CEO replacement vote? (Edit: assuming you also did not set directors)
Previous page123Next page