These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

CSPA, on by default, is a nightmare ...

First post
Author
Antillie Sa'Kan
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2014-06-23 16:33:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Antillie Sa'Kan
Christina Project wrote:
And BESIDES THAT ... the CSPA does NOT prevent anybody from spamming, at all.
All it needs are a few clicks and the cost is irrelevant to any spammer,
because he obviously has enough ISK to spend to make real money.

Most people DON'T actually have a CSPA set high enough that it would matter to them!
It matters to those, though, who don't have money to waste!
And there are a lot of them, even if you wrongly believe otherwise.


Arguments ... people. Not just drivel about the past, without actual thought behind it!

I don't think you understand how multiplication works when spamming a very large number of players. Or what that means when each ISK has a dollar/euro value assigned to it and how that would effect the bottom line of a business that relies on mass "cold calling" as it is known in the sales world with a very low rate of uptake and very thin margins.
Bohneik Itohn
10.K
#22 - 2014-06-23 16:40:12 UTC
Antillie Sa'Kan wrote:

I don't think you understand how multiplication works when spamming a very large number of players. Or what that means when each ISK has a dollar/euro value assigned to it and how that would effect the bottom line of a business that relies on mass "cold calling" as it is known in the sales world with a very low rate of uptake and very thin margins.


This, all the way.

CSPA changes the way RMT spammers work entirely, and gives us a relatively calm and quiet Eve.

Local chat is free. Rookie Help is free and full of hundreds of helpful people. The tutorial missions have rewards of hundreds of thousands of isk and give free ships that allow you to earn more isk. CSPA is not a hindrance to new players, just a one-time annoyance for old players that prevents constant annoyance from RMTers and identity scammers.

Wait, CCP kills kittens now too?!  - Freyya

Are you a forum alt? Have you ever wondered why your experience on the forums is always so frustrating and unrewarding? This may help.

Christina Project
Screaming Head in a Box.
#23 - 2014-06-23 17:08:50 UTC
And still, you have not a single shred of evidence that we'd fall back into the dark ages.


Still waiting for actual arguments.

[i]"Don't look into another human's bowl to see how much he has ... ... look into his bowl to see if he has enough !" - Sol[/i]

Bohneik Itohn
10.K
#24 - 2014-06-23 17:14:28 UTC
Christina Project wrote:
And still, you have not a single shred of evidence that we'd fall back into the dark ages.


Still waiting for actual arguments.



How long have you been playing MMO's? Gold-selling/RMT's is a swift business, and the people doing it are not stupid by any measure, or they wouldn't be making enough of a profit to continue their business even if it is an illegitimate prospect.

RMT's are still very much present in Eve. It's not that they'll suddenly re-appear out of the shadows to claim their former glory, it's that they will suddenly be given a new and effective way to advertise their existence. The fact that you don't understand that they are not gone means that the CSPA is working.

Wait, CCP kills kittens now too?!  - Freyya

Are you a forum alt? Have you ever wondered why your experience on the forums is always so frustrating and unrewarding? This may help.

Antillie Sa'Kan
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2014-06-23 17:21:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Antillie Sa'Kan
Christina Project wrote:
And still, you have not a single shred of evidence that we'd fall back into the dark ages.


Still waiting for actual arguments.

The burden of proof is on you here and so far you have not provided any. Still waiting for actual arguments.

I suggest you take a couple of college level classes in business management and accounting before you propose changes to game mechanics that are rooted in these principals.
Christina Project
Screaming Head in a Box.
#26 - 2014-06-23 17:33:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Christina Project
Antillie Sa'Kan wrote:
Christina Project wrote:
And still, you have not a single shred of evidence that we'd fall back into the dark ages.


Still waiting for actual arguments.

The burden of proof is on you here and so far you have not provided any. Still waiting for actual arguments.

I suggest you take a couple of college level classes in business management and accounting before you propose changes to game mechanics that are rooted in these principals.
No, it's not.

You came up with crap, that doesn't seem to have any base in actual reality anymore.


I don't need to prove that there barely any isk spamming people around,
because it's obviously for literally everybody in space to see.


You come up with your imaginary idea of ISK spammers suddenly coming back,
while ignoring that there aren't any out there anymore.

You just think "Oh wow, CSPA is gone! CSPA was against ISK spammers, so obviously removing it
will magically make them return! Let's ignore all the advances in catching botters and RMT sellers!
Let's ignore the fact that CCP actively buys ISK from these sellers and bans them!"

Yeah I'm sure ISK spammers will be happy to have CCP on their asses,
so obviously they will spam a lot about it ... *nods*



Still waiting for an argument.

[i]"Don't look into another human's bowl to see how much he has ... ... look into his bowl to see if he has enough !" - Sol[/i]

Dyfchris
Doomheim
#27 - 2014-06-23 17:35:56 UTC
keep it like it is & add a tab to configure with standing will be great
Antillie Sa'Kan
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2014-06-23 17:46:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Antillie Sa'Kan
Christina Project wrote:
No, it's not.

You came up with crap, that doesn't seem to have any base in actual reality anymore.


I don't need to prove that there barely any isk spamming people around,
because it's obviously for literally everybody in space to see.


You come up with your imaginary idea of ISK spammers suddenly coming back,
while ignoring that there aren't any out there anymore.

You just think "Oh wow, CSPA is gone! CSPA was against ISK spammers, so obviously removing it
will magically make them return! Let's ignore all the advances in catching botters and RMT sellers!
Let's ignore the fact that CCP actively buys ISK from these sellers and bans them!"

Yeah I'm sure ISK spammers will be happy to have CCP on their asses,
so obviously they will spam a lot about it ... *nods*



Still waiting for an argument.

Actually, yes, it is. You are proposing a change to an already in place system. The burden of proof is on you to show why effort should be expended to make that change.

Also, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. You need to actually show that all MMO RMT companies have vanished. Or at least that they no longer care to try and make money from EVE. Please do so. Oddly enough a quick google search returns five different ISK RMT sites on the first page. So I am not sure they ever really went away.

I would also like to direct you the efforts of other MMO companies to ban RMTs from their games. Blizzard, Square Enix, ect... none of them have been fully successful to this day. Why you think a smaller company with fewer resources like CCP would fair any better is beyond me.

So far the only reason you have come up with for removing the CSPA service charge is "I personally don't like it." I'm sorry, but that just isn't good enough. Make an actual argument or HTFU.
Bohneik Itohn
10.K
#29 - 2014-06-23 17:51:05 UTC
Christina Project wrote:
Antillie Sa'Kan wrote:
Christina Project wrote:
And still, you have not a single shred of evidence that we'd fall back into the dark ages.


Still waiting for actual arguments.

The burden of proof is on you here and so far you have not provided any. Still waiting for actual arguments.

I suggest you take a couple of college level classes in business management and accounting before you propose changes to game mechanics that are rooted in these principals.
No, it's not.

You came up with crap, that doesn't seem to have any base in actual reality anymore.


I don't need to prove that there barely any isk spamming people around,
because it's obviously for literally everybody in space to see.


You come up with your imaginary idea of ISK spammers suddenly coming back,
while ignoring that there aren't any out there anymore.

You just think "Oh wow, CSPA is gone! CSPA was against ISK spammers, so obviously removing it
will magically make them return! Let's ignore all the advances in catching botters and RMT sellers!
Let's ignore the fact that CCP actively buys ISK from these sellers and bans them!"

Yeah I'm sure ISK spammers will be happy to have CCP on their asses,
so obviously they will spam a lot about it ... *nods*



Still waiting for an argument.


They will, because the account typically isn't theirs. It was stolen from a legitimate player with a weak password with an active account or it is someone's inactive account that was hacked and activated with the 4 hour to plex feature. A bot program runs through the account transferring the wallet's isk and any easily translated assets to mules which then work it down a laundering chain during the period that an alt is being created on the account and used to spam the players. Whether minutes or hours pass before CCP notices that someone is spamming and acts accordingly, the account has been cleaned of anything valuable which increases the seller's profit margin and used to spread knowledge of the seller's existence to 1000's of people. Only one person needs to buy to make it profitable to hack the accounts, if CSPA is removed.

Wait, CCP kills kittens now too?!  - Freyya

Are you a forum alt? Have you ever wondered why your experience on the forums is always so frustrating and unrewarding? This may help.

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#30 - 2014-06-23 17:52:46 UTC
Christina Project wrote:
t's hilarious that people assume that,
when CSPA is gone,
suddenly the ISK spammers will come back.

Okay... I'll bite... mostly because I'm curious...

What makes you think that ISK spammers WILL NOT come back?

Because the last time I checked, Real Money Traders still exist and spamming is a part of what they do in other games. And the CSPA charge DID stop them from spamming in THIS game.

You may call history irrelevant. It isn't. It is what helps us make better informed decisions about the future. And history shows that ISK spammers are heartless, relentless, and VERY predictable.

Moving on...
Christina Project wrote:
And BESIDES THAT ... the CSPA does NOT prevent anybody from spamming, at all.
All it needs are a few clicks and the cost is irrelevant to any spammer,

2,950 CSPA charge X 100 people = 295,000 ISK for one mass spam.

That isn't bad is it? No... however...

Do this 10 times an hour. That is almost 3 million ISK. Now do this for the whole day (24 hours)... that's 70 million ISK. Now have 4 characters do this in the major trade hubs of the game... that is 283 million ISK.

And this is assuming that everyone has the MINIMUM charge set... quite often you will find someone with a 1 or 10 million charge set (which completely offsets those with no charge set). This just adds on to the cost.

For a business that is trying to sell ISK, spending as little as possible in operational cost is the main goal. And the CSPA charge DOES hurt that "bottom line."

Christina Project wrote:
create a new character and feel the limitation of the CSPA,
as you want to try to talk to other new players.

Unless you are trying to start a conversation with EVERYONE you bump into, no... it does not limit who you talk to. An annoyance, yes... but it is not prohibitively expensive if you only convo or mail 5 or 6 people here and there.

Here is an idea... chat in local first. See who wants to talk before opening a private convo.
Christina Project
Screaming Head in a Box.
#31 - 2014-06-23 18:03:29 UTC
ShahFluffers wrote:
Christina Project wrote:
t's hilarious that people assume that,
when CSPA is gone,
suddenly the ISK spammers will come back.

Okay... I'll bite... mostly because I'm curious...

What makes you think that ISK spammers WILL NOT come back?
Yay, a proper response! :D

The fact that there are barely any visible left. I haven't seen one in ages.

Then the fact that PLEX prices are high, thus their income is small,
so there aren't that many around either.

Then the fact that CCP actively pursues them and buys ISK from them,
just to slap the banhammer onto them.

How many people spam in game, when they know that'll just make it easier
for CCP to kill them off completely?

See?



Quote:
Because the last time I checked, Real Money Traders still exist and spamming is a part of what they do in other games. And the CSPA charge DID stop them from spamming in THIS game.

What they do in other games is completely irrelevant for EVE ONLINE.
We have PLEX, unlike all the others and we have devs buying ISK to kill them off.
Not sure if other companies do this as well, but I'd assume so.

> You may call history irrelevant. It isn't. It is what helps us make better informed decisions about the future.
> And history shows that ISK spammers are heartless, relentless, and VERY predictable.
It's fine to learn from history, but not being stuck in it.


Quote:
2,950 CSPA charge X 100 people = 295,000 ISK for one mass spam.

That isn't bad is it? No... however...

Do this 10 times an hour. That is almost 3 million ISK. Now do this for the whole day (24 hours)... that's 70 million ISK. Now have 4 characters do this in the major trade hubs of the game... that is 283 million ISK.

And this is assuming that everyone has the MINIMUM charge set... quite often you will find someone with a 1 or 10 million charge set (which completely offsets those with no charge set). This just adds on to the cost.

For a business that is trying to sell ISK, spending as little as possible in operational cost is the main goal. And the CSPA charge DOES hurt that "bottom line."
Fine.

Yes. That would be a point, if it made any sense to mass spam in the game,
which it doesn't, because that would only help CCP catch them.


Christina Project wrote:
create a new character and feel the limitation of the CSPA,
as you want to try to talk to other new players.

Unless you are trying to start a conversation with EVERYONE you bump into, no... it does not limit who you talk to. An annoyance, yes... but it is not prohibitively expensive if you only convo or mail 5 or 6 people here and there.

Here is an idea... chat in local first. See who wants to talk before opening a private convo.
[/quote]
Local is worthless there. Almost nobody is talking in the starter systems, unless it's an older player.
Exceptions are rare.

A new player can contact ONE person before he has to do something to make money, which is ridiculous.


That's the whole point.


Do whatever with the CSPA, but new players should be able to contact others with no cost involved,
and also should be taught that the CSPA actually exists, because many people have never heard of it.

[i]"Don't look into another human's bowl to see how much he has ... ... look into his bowl to see if he has enough !" - Sol[/i]

Antillie Sa'Kan
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#32 - 2014-06-23 18:18:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Antillie Sa'Kan
Christina Project wrote:
Yay, a proper response! :D

The fact that there are barely any visible left. I haven't seen one in ages.

Then the fact that PLEX prices are high, thus their income is small,
so there aren't that many around either.

Then the fact that CCP actively pursues them and buys ISK from them,
just to slap the banhammer onto them.

How many people spam in game, when they know that'll just make it easier
for CCP to kill them off completely?

See?

This does not make sense.

1. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
2. ISK RMTs don't care about PLEX at all.
3. Please see "disposable character" and "disposable account".
4. You seem to think that CCP has more people to examine and ban accounts than the RMTs have people to make accounts.



Christina Project wrote:
It's fine to learn from history, but not being stuck in it.

You have a funny way of learning from history. I guess we should tell all the big office buildings that they don't need to bother to maintain their fire alarms since major fires are less common now.

Christina Project wrote:
Fine.

Yes. That would be a point, if it made any sense to mass spam in the game,
which it doesn't, because that would only help CCP catch them.

Please learn some basic marketing and see the terms "disposable character" and "disposable account".

Christina Project wrote:
Local is worthless there. Almost nobody is talking in the starter systems, unless it's an older player.
Exceptions are rare.

A new player can contact ONE person before he has to do something to make money, which is ridiculous.


That's the whole point.


Do whatever with the CSPA, but new players should be able to contact others with no cost involved,
and also should be taught that the CSPA actually exists, because many people have never heard of it.

Local works fine. There is nothing wrong with explaining how local works to new players in local. However CCP could mention it in the tutorials.

Also, since the very first thing any new player does is going to be the tutorial 99% of the time they will have money to contact plenty of people. They also have NPC corp chat and new players chat. Private conversations are totally unnecessary.

Could you please explain why a new toon needs to be able to open private conversations with a bunch of people without receiving some ISK from your main or spending a few minutes earning some ISK in the tutorial?
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#33 - 2014-06-23 18:42:41 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
Quote:
The fact that there are barely any visible left. I haven't seen one in ages.

Then the fact that PLEX prices are high, thus their income is small,
so there aren't that many around either.

Then the fact that CCP actively pursues them and buys ISK from them,
just to slap the banhammer onto them.

How many people spam in game, when they know that'll just make it easier
for CCP to kill them off completely?

- They are not visible in this way because it is no longer profitable to mass spam... because of the CSPA charge.

- the in-game prices of PLEX are set by player purchasing power (supply vs. demand)... not RMT.

- If I recall correctly, CCP have to manually look for RMTers (they do not have automated software). And a company with an employee roster of less than 600 (with probably 20 or so people dedicated to game security) managing 500,000 players is no small task. Quite often things slip under their radar. Especially since alt characters/accounts can be easily made.

- Assuming there is no CSPA charge? A lot will. Because you can always create a new character and/or account and start all over again.

Quote:
What they do in other games is completely irrelevant for EVE ONLINE.
We have PLEX, unlike all the others and we have devs buying ISK to kill them off.
Not sure if other companies do this as well, but I'd assume so.

- What other game companies do in terms of security (or lack of) is in all game developer's interests. In fact, there are various conferences around the world where game developers can talk with each other and compare notes... because the tactics that RMTs use are pretty consistent, widespread, and damn near impossible to completely root out.

- Yep, we have PLEX. And other games are actually copying this mechanism because it is so organically effective against RMTers. However, it is not a magic bullet. It just means RMTer profit margins are cut.

Quote:
It's fine to learn from history, but not being stuck in it.

Just because a problem is no longer evident, it does not mean the problem no longer exists.

Again, it is like being vaccinated against something like Polio. Most people think the disease does not exist anymore (because they do not see it) so there is no point in getting the vaccine.
Unfortunately, the sickness still exists and it is now on the rise.

Quote:
if it made any sense to mass spam in the game,
which it doesn't, because that would only help CCP catch them.

Hahahahaha. Kid... I was THERE. My newbie system had multiple spammers in the system. Ban two and two more would pop up 5 minutes later. Rinse and repeat. The GMs simply could not keep up or be everywhere at the same time. It was that bad.



The CSPA charge is to protect newbies from spammers. I was a newbie once... and I remember how bad it was. The problem is not gone, it will never be gone... welcome to the brave new world we live in. Now take your shots.


PS: the perverse side of my mind totally wants to drop the CSPA charge for everyone for a month.... just to show you how wrong you are and how bad, bad can get.
*Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal..
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#34 - 2014-06-23 22:16:44 UTC
As apparently the OP is not interested in a civilised pro/contra discussion of the proposal, this thread gets a lock.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Previous page12