These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ganking miners - What do you get from it?

First post
Author
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#141 - 2014-06-22 00:57:20 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:

If you knew me personally you would think otherwise.


I would know that you were honest about supporting bannable actions from someone who claims to want CCP shut down?

Ok bro, whatever you say

I cant say that if you are being truthful Id want to




I don't agree with it, but he's being honest about it. And there are a lot of people, many who will never gank anybody, who also take actions that are damaging to the game through other means. Some would argue that scammers, renters and multi-boxers do more damage. (Key word is "argue" - it's not a matter of being right or wrong).

I don't see anything in his actions that could shut the game down or ultimately lead to it, and layoffs at CPP were due mainly to mismanagement of products and staff allocations. I don't think anybody got a pink slip that started with the text "Because of Herr Wilkus.....". I have seen people quit because they could not work out their DPS tank ratio and got frustrated.

If I had to list what I though was the causes for lack of player retention, I would put gate mechanics at number 1. Not being able to dial in warp from system to system and instead be funneled into traps is a letdown - and even for those who end up having to camp those traps.

Also doing more damage than Herr Wilkus, IMO, is the perceptions or lack thereof around the skill queue. It was years before could be effective at anything but with proper knowledge I got a 3 month noob alt raising hell with 5 million SP. Proper knowledge and application of the skill que from day 1 would do a world of good here. Yeah I know a lot of bitter vets and even myself can look back on the good old days when we were trained how to warp, target, loot, and steer and that was it. We're so hardcore, right? But seriously how many would do it right if they could go back in time?



Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#142 - 2014-06-22 01:03:23 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:

I don't agree with it, but he's being honest about it.


I have no reason to assume he is more honest about what he says than anything anyone says

Being generally unpleasant for no reason isnt a thing I respect

But different people have different values, so you can respect that if you want, truthful or not

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#143 - 2014-06-22 01:09:30 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:

I don't agree with it, but he's being honest about it.


I have no reason to assume he is more honest about what he says than anything anyone says

Being generally unpleasant for no reason isnt a thing I respect

But different people have different values, so you can respect that if you want, truthful or not



And that there is a different wording of the point I'm trying to make. An acceptance of someone else's values, how and why they play the game, and being able to make a decision on how to deal with it if deciding to deal with it or not. Herr Wilkus' ideals don't come to me as a threat to the game because, as you say, truth can be in question in any case. "here is one that says he wants to make people un-sub" - how rare? But was he just saying that or do those who do the same things but say otherwise (or they are trying to help other players) have that goal in mind.

In the end, what does it matter? Getting extracted from one's pod for any reason has the same outcome. It's like the folly of the so-called "hate crime": for what reason for murder does it matter or was it done out of love unless we state otherwise? But the statement changes not the outcome.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Arkady Romanov
Whole Squid
#144 - 2014-06-22 01:10:51 UTC
Domina Trix wrote:
I can see where you are coming from about the afk'ing but what has ganking miners got to do with a single player game?



There are a special breed of players out there who truly believe that they are entitled to play EVE without being influenced by other players in any way shape or form. That is; what they really want is a single player game. These are usually miners, though not always. I would argue that Infinity Ziona was a pretty good example of a ninja missioner/PVPer who felt this way.

Ganking players with this kind of attitude is an education. The lesson to them is; this is a multiplayer game. Other players play this game at the same time as you. This is a sandbox game, which means things can be done to you against your will. It also means defense is your own responsibility.

Some learn, most don't. A few even realise that EVE is not the right game for them, and leave.

Whole Squid: Get Inked.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#145 - 2014-06-22 01:19:48 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:

And that there is a different wording of the point I'm trying to make. An acceptance of someone else's values, how and why they play the game, and being able to make a decision on how to deal with it if deciding to deal with it or not. Herr Wilkus' ideals don't come to me as a threat to the game because, as you say, truth can be in question in any case.


I have not at any stage mentioned that I felt that any angle postulated in this thread was a threat to the game or not. That has never been an issue one way or another.


You made the statement you dont believe anyone except this one person who has stated he would like to take the game away from everyone. I have no reason to doubt his statement, but neither do I have reason to doubt the people you are calling liars.

You say you respect him for telling the truth while pointing a finger at everyone not sharing a particualr point of view (that of the OP in this case) and call them liars.

So, without any reason other than it appeals to you, you respect someone who wants to have the game taken away from all of us because you consider him more truthful for some reason, and so by extention you respect his wish to harm everyone's play, whether you agree with it or not.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#146 - 2014-06-22 01:27:46 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:

I believe this is the first time that I have heard someone say that they attempt to drive other players out of the game.


I'll tell you straight up that I've done it myself. I should clarify however that only twice has it been intentional, to drive out the individual who doxxed me back in 2009. (it's why I post on an alt).

Accidentally, I imagine I've done it a bunch of times. If even a fifth of the people who've claimed they would quit after encountering me actually did, that number is fairly high.


I have done it inadvertently, twice.

First time, was my first corp.

Second time, was my first official awox.

Both times, however, had nothing to do with ganking.

Both times had to do with me recruiting, while in corp, awaiting my kick.

For some reason, that really gets under someone's skin.

vOv

First guy wasn't a friend to his supposed RL friends.

Second guy threatened to plant explosives at CCP HQ...because "anarchy, nihilism, and terrorism" is "obviously what CCP stood for by allowing awoxers into corps." Roll

And I have zero regrets over either of them. Because as long as their characters still exist, they still chance coming back to EvE.

Only a biomass is a guaranteed win in that department.

As for Herzog's statements...

I do not believe I have ever heard any one of the "HS piracy" groups or players claim they play the game specifically grief someone out of the game. Even popping 100+ alpha pods in the Bonus Round, things like this were never mentioned.

Disbelief at a person's willful ignorance. Sure.

Wanting people to learn that EvE is not :srsbsns: Absolutely.

Sitting there and saying..."Well, alright gents, tonight we are going to make this guy quit EvE." Not even once. Ever. Not in BU. Not in MB. Not in the respective BR channels.

No, instead, it is for lolz about 80% of the time. The other 20%...cutting out the competition or wanting to make easy money. I would even break that into a 60/40 split part of the time. Just depends on the general mood of the community subsection.

So don't even go there, Herzog. To claim it "noble" that a person openly admits griefing players out of game, is wrong.

Because anyone who does "knowingly" try to remove players from EvE, is realistically only shooting themselves in the foot. Fewer players means less content, which in turn means less people to extract tears, or loot, or whatever from.

And calling people liars, who obviously are willing to stand by their positions, in about 293,744,923 threads like this that have popped up in the past year, is ludicrous. Unless, by some strange gift bestowed upon you by some random anomaly like a "God" or a radioactive meteorite, or some other crap....

You have no idea what any person's motives are.

So don't pretend to.

Roll




Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.

malcovas Henderson
THoF
#147 - 2014-06-22 02:03:07 UTC  |  Edited by: malcovas Henderson
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
If people could be arsed to tank their ships they'd throw the maths out, and increase the cost of ganking too Shocked .



I hate this argument. I have 23mill SP on my booster / hauler. His sole purpose is to boost, and haul. He cannot use any weapons except the lowest of the low. He cannot fly anything above a frigate. and Caldari Destroyers for combat

I have 18mill of my Mining alt. He can not use T2 tanking fits.

What you are saying, that unless you skill up in combat first, you are not allowed to mine. You know full well that MOST miners and haulers train into the trade they are being used for, and options for fighting back are very limited to them.
Rhiannon Marius
Marius Family Enterprises Unlimited
#148 - 2014-06-22 02:14:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Rhiannon Marius
malcovas Henderson wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
If people could be arsed to tank their ships they'd throw the maths out, and increase the cost of ganking too Shocked .



I hate this argument. I have 23mill SP on my booster / hauler. His sole purpose is to boost, and haul. He cannot use any weapons except the lowest of the low. He cannot fly anything above a frigate. and Caldari Destroyers for combat

I have 18mill of my Mining alt. He can not use T2 tanking fits.

What you are saying, that unless you skill up in combat first, you are not allowed to mine. You know full well that MOST miners and haulers train into the trade they are being used for, and options for fighting back are very limited to them.


You do not have to have t2 fittings to mine. Tier one fittings on a procurer are sufficient to avoid ganks.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#149 - 2014-06-22 02:14:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
malcovas Henderson wrote:
What you are saying, that unless you skill up in combat first, you are not allowed to mine. You know full well that MOST miners and haulers train into the trade they are being used for, and options for fighting back are very limited to them.

It doesn't take long to skill for defence. You don't have to skill to attack, just to survive long enough for Concord to help you out.

As for skilling for your profession, being prepared for the things you face while undocked is part of every profession.

Core skills aren't specific to any one group, they are skills that cross all professions.
Arkady Romanov
Whole Squid
#150 - 2014-06-22 02:17:24 UTC
malcovas Henderson wrote:
What you are saying, that unless you skill up in combat first, you are not allowed to mine. You know full well that MOST miners and haulers train into the trade they are being used for, and options for fighting back are very limited to them.



I was unaware that characters that train into mining barges are physically unable to train into shield upgrades, mechanics, shield operation etc etc. Or is it just that getting these skills takes all of a couple of days to get to IV on PVP characters somehow takes twice as long on a mining character?

This changes everything. CCP buff mining hulls please.


Also to Herzog; no most gankers do not actually want to drive players from the game. Why? Because we don't want to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. Or perhaps more accurately; we don't want to strangle the manbabies that cry the golden tears.

Whole Squid: Get Inked.

Lord LazyGhost
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#151 - 2014-06-22 02:36:50 UTC
I get a warm fuzzy feeling inside.

as it mk
akes people post on the forum like this thread. Therefore creating content for others. Also makes me rich as said miner now has tobuy a new mining ship. And guess who just happens to be selling them on the market. Along with there new impant set they more then llikely need
Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#152 - 2014-06-22 02:39:24 UTC
Lord LazyGhost wrote:
I get a warm fuzzy feeling inside.

as it mk
akes people post on the forum like this thread. Therefore creating content for others. Also makes me rich as said miner now has tobuy a new mining ship. And guess who just happens to be selling them on the market. Along with there new impant set they more then llikely need


honestly if I was a ganker I would make sure I had ships and equipment on sale at the local station before I started ganking.

Bonus points if the miner notices that he bought a mining ship form the guy that ganked him.
Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#153 - 2014-06-22 02:51:15 UTC
Wow, thread after thread like this, nobody factors in the understanding that there is a portion of the community that CAN"T PVP.
They intersect with the larger, but still in the minority, group who think combat should only come to those who deserve it, those who start it.
People like this do not change their attitudes. I've seen a few quit the game, quietly or in a rage. The ones who lose it in a combat setting, becoming physically incapable of pressing the butans f1 to f8. The ones who rage and sperg about the moral inferiority of their attackers. They find somewhere to skulk, or they leave.
ON THE OTHER HAND that post by Herr Wilkus, admitting he hatefully tries to get people to leave, enjoys CCP suffering for it, all that malevolent crap: probably the only post i've ever seen like that. Sustained and contrived hostility towards people, not players and their pixels, is about as pitiful as all the justice herfinblerfers.
EvE PVE turns you into PVE content. Ok.


imma shoot all of you, one-shot your haulers, warp twenty bros onto your 1v1 pvp honore bushido fit faction frigate, light up your unscouted freighter, knock down your pos towers and blap the mods, then stack up all that shiny T2 and faction lewt.
It makes me feel good.



Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#154 - 2014-06-22 03:31:14 UTC
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Wow, thread after thread like this, nobody factors in the understanding that there is a portion of the community that CAN"T PVP.
They intersect with the larger, but still in the minority, group who think combat should only come to those who deserve it, those who start it.
People like this do not change their attitudes. I've seen a few quit the game, quietly or in a rage. The ones who lose it in a combat setting, becoming physically incapable of pressing the butans f1 to f8. The ones who rage and sperg about the moral inferiority of their attackers. They find somewhere to skulk, or they leave.
ON THE OTHER HAND that post by Herr Wilkus, admitting he hatefully tries to get people to leave, enjoys CCP suffering for it, all that malevolent crap: probably the only post i've ever seen like that. Sustained and contrived hostility towards people, not players and their pixels, is about as pitiful as all the justice herfinblerfers.


Good post sir +1

I cant PvP (though I try lol) but I stand by everyone who wants to, but also every one who doesnt but is aware that it is the nature of this particular genre that you will get attacked someday. But I dont try to make people quit. I just fail to understand why some feel the need to "win" all the time. Losing sometimes is good for the soul.

But everyone ends up facing the wrong end of a blaster or bomb someday

Maybe not today

Maybe not tomorrow

But soon

And for the rest of your life

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

ashley Eoner
#155 - 2014-06-22 03:52:39 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
ashley Eoner wrote:

Does anyone actually look at a post like Herr Wilkus' and think "that fellow must have a great life and is well adjusted"?


Compared to these sorry wastes of life?

Yep.

All the same to me.
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#156 - 2014-06-22 04:50:07 UTC
Oh good, another "why gank miners" thread.. Some of the responses have actually come tanalizingly close to answering the op's question. Some people will tell you it's for "tears"..others for "fun". neither is a real answer. There is more than one answer because people are not all the same.. but the reasons may be broken down and simplified as follows:

For Rollplay
For Political , Economic, or Reputation Bump
For Jealousy
For Revenge
To Satisfy a Sadistic Bullying or Serial Killing Urge

Interestingly though ganking exists in many other games, the only place suicide ganking exists besides EVE is real life.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#157 - 2014-06-22 04:51:48 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:

What, exactly, is wrong with miner ganking? Every miner has a choice between mining in safety or mining for max profit. If a miner mines for max profit, than he should expect to be ganked. On the otherhand, if a miner mines in safety, than he doesn't have to continually replace expensive mining barges and exhumers, so makes more isk in the long run.



Nothing is wrong with ganking miners unless you consistently gank week old players in Ventures cos that is just sad.

AND if miners want to tank their barges for the warm fuzzy feeling it gives and the street cred they get oin the forums well and good.

However I would dispute that it saves ISK. With the sole exception of the half dozen systems between Dodi and Hek infested by CODE you are better off fitting for maximum ISK and writing off the occasional loss as an operating expense. This is exactly the approach taken by real life shipping companies and the Somali Pirates, the shiping lines COULD pay for security crews on the ships but its more profitable to not bother and wear the occasional loss.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#158 - 2014-06-22 04:58:36 UTC
malcovas Henderson wrote:
...and options for fighting back are very limited to them.



By their own choice, a choice they make in what they know, one way or another, is a game in which surprise PVP is normal and expected.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#159 - 2014-06-22 05:02:34 UTC
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
...you are better off fitting for maximum ISK and writing off the occasional loss as an operating expense.


If they are making this judgement call, expecting the losses, then why are there so many tears about ganking? Why complain, ***** and moan that 'ganking is bad mmmkay' if they're expecting it? If they're making this judgement, then they're PVP'ers by virtue of understanding the risk they take against other players when weighed against the reward, so while I don't argue that many players don't understand this, I am skeptical that these are the players doing the complaining.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#160 - 2014-06-22 05:09:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
La Rynx wrote:


Only ganking in EvE?

Welcome to the carebear club, you are to afraid or to lazy to get fair fights.


There is no such thing as a fair fight. Maybe you wushu space samurai believe in those, but most people don't.


Fair fights are boring.

I prefer the fights where I'm severely outnumbered and outgunned, completely solo...

And still manage to kill everything P

Although usually I lose, but usually not without taking two or three down with me. Depends on a variety of factors. Once, when I was in TAXU, I jumped into a Nulli gatecamp in lowsec. They had a bit of everything, enough to kill my little Comet but not before I took down the nearby Firetail. Going out in a blaze of glory = just as fun as winning such a fight IMO.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104