These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

All Fountain Moon Minerals Mapped and Free

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Evai Tsuki
Something Went Wrong
#41 - 2014-06-20 14:59:03 UTC
You also have to take in account that alot of Alliances have no interest in R4-R16 moons.

For example, Brothers of Tangra policy allows corps to mine all R4-R32 moons in their rented systems, aside from Hafnium.

To me, this suggests that PL thinks that anything R32 and below is not worth their time to manage (since, in some systems, the profit from these moons alone will pay for the rent and then some).

Of course, I bet it varies amongst the alliances.
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#42 - 2014-06-20 16:27:41 UTC
There is a decent amount of systems that are heavy reaction farms. So they are mining everything. A good example is TEG-SD. If you look at that system you can see most of the moons there are towered. I didn't list if they had moon harvesters, but they are there.

Any tab/sheet that is color coded means two things. One the color represents the highest moon category in system. For example red means there is one or more r64 in the system. It also means I have listed which moons have towers and who they belong to along with any notes, like a jump bridge or capital ship assembly array.

Right now I only have about 40% of the systems done that way, but I'm debating on stopping. While flying around and identifying the towers and such is rather easy, the time I spend doing that I could easily be spending probing another region's moons.

Would you all prefer moor moon mineral data which is currently static information that never changes or tower information?
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#43 - 2014-06-20 17:08:11 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
There is a decent amount of systems that are heavy reaction farms. So they are mining everything. A good example is TEG-SD. If you look at that system you can see most of the moons there are towered. I didn't list if they had moon harvesters, but they are there.

Any tab/sheet that is color coded means two things. One the color represents the highest moon category in system. For example red means there is one or more r64 in the system. It also means I have listed which moons have towers and who they belong to along with any notes, like a jump bridge or capital ship assembly array.

Right now I only have about 40% of the systems done that way, but I'm debating on stopping. While flying around and identifying the towers and such is rather easy, the time I spend doing that I could easily be spending probing another region's moons.

Would you all prefer moor moon mineral data which is currently static information that never changes or tower information?


If you do another region, please do Providence so we can have some data, be it real or not, about the narrative going on there.
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#44 - 2014-06-20 18:47:59 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
If you do another region, please do Providence so we can have some data, be it real or not, about the narrative going on there.

I don't have the patience to create fake data. Too much work.
Magnus Cortex
Ginger Industrial Solutions
#45 - 2014-06-20 19:24:09 UTC
Was it worth it?

PS: somebody please invade Fountain
Jen Takhesis
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#46 - 2014-06-20 19:29:49 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
Val'Dore wrote:
What's the reason to release this information?

Place the siphons. Place ALL of the siphons. Thousands per POS, every moon.


And set us up the bomb.
Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar
#47 - 2014-06-20 19:30:47 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Interesting... Can someone confirm this info isn't fabricated?


I can neither confirm nor deny that that is a moon and not a fully operational space station.

Star Jump Drive A new way to traverse the galaxy.

I invented Tiericide
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#48 - 2014-06-20 23:44:50 UTC
Magnus Cortex wrote:
Was it worth it?

PS: somebody please invade Fountain

Easily worth it. What region would you like to see next?
Marsha Mallow
#49 - 2014-06-21 00:00:05 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
What region would you like to see next?

All of them. Come on, if you're going to do a job do it properly Lol

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day
Vyktor Abyss
Abyss Research
#50 - 2014-06-21 11:59:51 UTC
Syndicate, Outer Passage, Omist or any other region not in Dotlan.

If you're doing this to generate content then meh - it wont work - Slean & Paede or whoever published the full lowsec list years ago and it has no impact on fighting.

If you're doing this as an act of altruism then cool - fill in the blanks on the map and push CCP to actually improve the shoddy moon/POS/passive isk junk.

If you're feeding false info then meh, waste of everyone's time.
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#51 - 2014-06-22 05:39:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Il Feytid
All R8-64 moon tower owners have been identified. I thought about trying to do some math on which corps and alliances own what and total value, but I need a break from spreadsheets for a bit. I will tell you that if there is a tower on the R8-64 moon, it is being mined. Tower size varies, but every R64 was sporting a large tower.

Maybe I'll try and do the math in a few days when I can hack together some formula to figure it out somehow. Ugh
Previous page123