These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why crius will reduce the value of decryptors

First post
Author
HeXxploiT
Doomheim
#1 - 2014-06-08 00:16:50 UTC
Curious as to opinions others may have from this article at Eve Manufacturing.

Quote:
With the Crius release just over 6 weeks away we’re starting to get a feel for the impact it will have on the EVE Online markets. One of the biggest changes announced was that invention would only produce positive ME and TE BPOs. This effectively reduces the base gap between invention and T2 BPOs from almost 50% to 10%.

Compare this to the best case for invention scenario which is a +3 ME decryptor which puts ME at -1 previous or 3% ME under the new system, a -1 ME BPC is effectively 20% waste currently. Then for arguments sake we’ll presume that the T2 BPO is almost perfectly researched with zero waste under both the old and new systems so ME 10%.

This means that we’ll be looking at 7% gap between build cost for invention and T2 BPOs, slightly more once you add on invention costs. When you compare this to where we’re currently at with a 20% gap at best case this makes things extremely interesting and it may open up markets that are dominated by BPO owners such as Commandships to invention. The difference will be even more apparent for module invention which on the whole is done at -4ME currently so a 50% waste when compared to the almost 0% waste of T2 BPOs. What this ultimately means is invention gets a massive boost in its effectiveness.

At the same time however we’ll now see decryptors go from improving material requirements for invention from 30% to 3% an extremely large drop. What this will mean is that decryptor traditionally used for Blackops, Marauders and Jump Freighters should begin to fall in price as players no longer need to use them to make a profit. In fact you could easily interchange a Incognito Process for Incognito Accelerant whilst building an Anshar choosing to lose roughly 50mil in profit in exchange for a 10% reduction in build time, this roughly balances out as both Accelerants and Process decryptors being as profitable as each other on an ISK per hour basis.

Ultimately decryptor usage price will drop to reflect the reduction in savings from their usage, so we should expect  to see the prices drop on all ME gaining decryptors which includes Optimized Augmentation, Symmetry, Process, Accelerant, Parity and Optimized Attainment decryptors.

We’re also likely to start to see decryptors such Incognito Augmentation starting to come into play more often with a 2% addition to material costs being covered for by the reduction in invention costs. Take for example Anshar production if each Obelisk BPC costs 20mil after the patch for example then a batch of 10 costs 200mil, with the standard incognito process you will average about 4 successful invention jobs for about 2bil profit. Meanwhile if you do the same with the Incognito Augmentation you’ll get 2 10 run BPCs so 20 ships each at 400mil profit per unit (based on 1% ME being roughly 50mil material costs) so 8bil potential profit from a single batch of invention.

Currently I believe that the most important factors post release will be the run modifier (balanced against the chance modifier) and the final TE which will have a large swing over profit per hour.

Overall there will be a lot of movement in the prices as players begin to adapt I’ve already started to speculate and purchase the decryptors which have a chance of becoming more valuable after the patch and with the decryptors as low as 250k there really is very little risk of getting in getting it wrong. Next week the first of the Crius builds will be hitting Singularity for us to test and it won’t take long for players to start to figure out which decryptors are going to win and lose from these changes and the market will adapt even before release as players learn more of the changes to come in Crius.
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2 - 2014-06-08 07:40:30 UTC
Decryptors are being completely changed/overhauled afaik. First details should arrive on June 10th I believe, so I'm holding off any of my own speculation until at least then.
Adunh Slavy
#3 - 2014-06-08 11:30:30 UTC
Arronicus wrote:
Decryptors are being completely changed/overhauled afaik. First details should arrive on June 10th I believe, so I'm holding off any of my own speculation until at least then.



Probably a good idea. Just too many ways decryptors can be retasked/repurposed in the new system. They could all magically be changed into "Efficiency Engineers" that lower taxes. Not that I think CCP would be that radical, to change a 'metal box' into a 'human being', but it is a game, and it is fiction, who knows what could happen.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#4 - 2014-06-08 13:39:59 UTC
Process decryptors will plummet. I now own none at all.

But throughput oriented decryptors will rise. Look at how efficient using a Parity or Symmetry decryptor becomes for inventing Heavy Assault Cruisers, for example.

I'd buy up Attainment too, but I think the psychological impact of the ME penalty will still stop it seeing widespread use despite likely being the best choice for some tasks.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#5 - 2014-06-08 14:29:53 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Arronicus wrote:
Decryptors are being completely changed/overhauled afaik. First details should arrive on June 10th I believe, so I'm holding off any of my own speculation until at least then.



Probably a good idea. Just too many ways decryptors can be retasked/repurposed in the new system. They could all magically be changed into "Efficiency Engineers" that lower taxes. Not that I think CCP would be that radical, to change a 'metal box' into a 'human being', but it is a game, and it is fiction, who knows what could happen.



Maybe corps will offer tax breaks for utilizing a decryptor that results in a greener production process, although with these changes there's not going to be much waste left over, and if there was it'd be kind of double dipping. We can always get the fiction department to make up some fluff for us.
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#6 - 2014-06-08 16:57:29 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Process decryptors will plummet. I now own none at all.

But throughput oriented decryptors will rise. Look at how efficient using a Parity or Symmetry decryptor becomes for inventing Heavy Assault Cruisers, for example.

I'd buy up Attainment too, but I think the psychological impact of the ME penalty will still stop it seeing widespread use despite likely being the best choice for some tasks.


Except like CCP said, all the decryptors are slated to change, so your decisions are based on invalid data.
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#7 - 2014-06-08 17:51:32 UTC
It would be funny if they swapped all the attributes around so that the preferred decryptors in Crius are the same as they are now.
HeXxploiT
Doomheim
#8 - 2014-06-08 19:06:26 UTC
Asking from an investment standpoint rather than industrial one...

Will decryptors as a whole become any more or less relevant?
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#9 - 2014-06-09 02:47:25 UTC
Arronicus wrote:
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Process decryptors will plummet. I now own none at all.

But throughput oriented decryptors will rise. Look at how efficient using a Parity or Symmetry decryptor becomes for inventing Heavy Assault Cruisers, for example.

I'd buy up Attainment too, but I think the psychological impact of the ME penalty will still stop it seeing widespread use despite likely being the best choice for some tasks.


Except like CCP said, all the decryptors are slated to change, so your decisions are based on invalid data.


Change at a later date when invention is reworked. i.e. not in Crius.

The amount of decryptors in circulation in the economy does not seem to be overly many, judging by how much I can cause prices to change (outside Jita) with my own orders. I've only been able to acquire 5-10b worth of stock.

As such I'm confident that I can liquidate my stock between Crius and the invention overhaul, if that were to make present investments unwise.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
#10 - 2014-06-09 05:08:12 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Arronicus wrote:
Decryptors are being completely changed/overhauled afaik. First details should arrive on June 10th I believe, so I'm holding off any of my own speculation until at least then.



Probably a good idea. Just too many ways decryptors can be retasked/repurposed in the new system. They could all magically be changed into "Efficiency Engineers" that lower taxes. Not that I think CCP would be that radical, to change a 'metal box' into a 'human being', but it is a game, and it is fiction, who knows what could happen.



Robots are people too my friend
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2014-06-12 06:00:12 UTC  |  Edited by: mynnna
I wonder if anyone has actually done the math, gotten into the numbers to see how decryptors - provided they don't get stats changes - will actually affect the numbers?

Personally, I have, and it's "all over the map" enough that I opted to simply take what profit I can now. What's best post-patch winds up far too tied up in how prices move given rebasing as much as anything else.

What can I say, I'm not a gambler. Cool


e: I will say, however, that the author in the OP is wrong, and needs to check the numbers instead of going with the gut feeling.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Lady Zarrina
New Eden Browncoats
#12 - 2014-06-12 21:14:41 UTC
mynnna wrote:
I wonder if anyone has actually done the math, gotten into the numbers to see how decryptors - provided they don't get stats changes - will actually affect the numbers?

Personally, I have, and it's "all over the map" enough that I opted to simply take what profit I can now. What's best post-patch winds up far too tied up in how prices move given rebasing as much as anything else.

What can I say, I'm not a gambler. Cool


e: I will say, however, that the author in the OP is wrong, and needs to check the numbers instead of going with the gut feeling.


Well I am not sure what to think when a CSM goon is telling me they are selling all their decryptors. I am honestly not trolling here, just very torn. LOL.

EVE: All about Flying Frisky and Making Iskie

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#13 - 2014-06-13 07:15:58 UTC
What will happen to T2 module prices more generally?

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2014-06-13 12:40:37 UTC
Lady Zarrina wrote:
mynnna wrote:
I wonder if anyone has actually done the math, gotten into the numbers to see how decryptors - provided they don't get stats changes - will actually affect the numbers?

Personally, I have, and it's "all over the map" enough that I opted to simply take what profit I can now. What's best post-patch winds up far too tied up in how prices move given rebasing as much as anything else.

What can I say, I'm not a gambler. Cool


e: I will say, however, that the author in the OP is wrong, and needs to check the numbers instead of going with the gut feeling.


Well I am not sure what to think when a CSM goon is telling me they are selling all their decryptors. I am honestly not trolling here, just very torn. LOL.


Hey man, all info I used is public and has been the whole time. :) Start with greyscale's blueprint data thread in the S&I forum, modify build cost as discussed in that, calculate the resulting build time as well as total copy/invention (to reflect multiple attempts based on decryptor use) for every decryptor for each class of item, then calculate isk/hr and work out which one is best.

The trick is figuring out how prices will change in light of the materials changes, which is what made me ultimately shy away and decide to take my profit now. Tht assumption you make on price changes changes the decryptor to use.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Lady Zarrina
New Eden Browncoats
#15 - 2014-06-14 01:11:16 UTC
mynnna wrote:


Hey man, all info I used is public and has been the whole time. :) Start with greyscale's blueprint data thread in the S&I forum, modify build cost as discussed in that, calculate the resulting build time as well as total copy/invention (to reflect multiple attempts based on decryptor use) for every decryptor for each class of item, then calculate isk/hr and work out which one is best.

The trick is figuring out how prices will change in light of the materials changes, which is what made me ultimately shy away and decide to take my profit now. Tht assumption you make on price changes changes the decryptor to use.


Yup I was sort of keeping up with the very broad strokes of this industry change. But now my head hurts with all the numbers being thrown around, and the unknown of what is actually correct on the test server :) But I did go and re-read most of the threads and I can see there seems a willingness to have decryptors a little "funky" for a month or two. A future overall of invention will include changing decryptors.

Sure would be nice to know what the future of invention will look like, along with the role decryptors will play.

So to make a long story short, it looks like once again GEWC might actually know what they are talking about. So I guess I have to thank you mynnna.

Okay I have to go shower now :)

EVE: All about Flying Frisky and Making Iskie

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#16 - 2014-06-16 06:21:14 UTC
Zappity wrote:
What will happen to T2 module prices more generally?



I have been theorycrafting on this, and my gut is telling me that the cost to create them will go up, the production margins will go down, and the sum of the two effects will vary from module to module.

There has definitely been speculation on some modules already, most notably those where microprocessors are the major component (such as Drone Damage Amplifier II, 6 Photon Microprocessor now and Magnetic Field Stabilizer II, currently 5 Quantum Microprocessor).

If I had ten trillion, I'd be investing a good deal of it in a few certain categories of tech 2 related products.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com