These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Undo FW station docking rights in opposing systems

First post
Author
Veskrashen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#61 - 2014-06-13 20:58:41 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Looking at the forums I saw many gallente seemed puzzled that Test didn't want to fight in your home systems. Didn't they get it? They were more interested in tiers and lp gains from that than taking some imagined "homeland" that you told them about.

I am just suggesting that perhaps its because you guys have a considerable advantage there. If you didn't have such a big advantage maybe you would have see more offensives. Gallente turtled up and complained that no one wanted to bang their knuckles on your shell. Why should they? You could keep docking there all you wanted but that didn't enable you to prevent them from achieving their goals of taking systems and getting better lp payouts.

What you saw was TEST crowing that they had "won" FW because of the loads of LP/isk they were making, and Gallente saying "we'll agree you won as soon as you can actually take something we defend". There was no confusion over their goals, just smack talk over their level of "success" at FW overall.

And hooo, boy... you should take a stroll down memory lane through our killboards. Eha was a non-stop, 23/7 bloodbath for MONTHS while TEST was in FW. You're out of your mind if you think they didn't try to take our homes - we just decided not to let them, numbers and advantages be damned. Had TEST played things differently, they definitely had the mass along with the rest of CalMil to take the warzone... but we were better, and more determined, so they never could.

As in so many ways, you are ill informed about our warzone and the events in it, and draw incredibly erroneous conclusions from those misconceptions. In short, you're bad and should feel bad about it.

We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..."

Veskrashen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#62 - 2014-06-13 21:00:20 UTC
Muad 'dib wrote:
it just removes pvp ability and is govened by farmers!

if fw is just ment to be pve isk fountain just tell us so we can go pirate. thanks.

Not governed by farmers, we PvP just fine with the mechanic in place. You're doing it wrong.

We Gallente have a saying: "CCP created the Gallente Militia to train the Fighters..."

Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#63 - 2014-06-13 21:02:10 UTC
Veskrashen wrote:
Muad 'dib wrote:
it just removes pvp ability and is govened by farmers!

if fw is just ment to be pve isk fountain just tell us so we can go pirate. thanks.

Not governed by farmers, we PvP just fine with the mechanic in place. You're doing it wrong.


you cannot be serious *throws racket down*

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#64 - 2014-06-13 21:04:23 UTC
Muad 'dib wrote:
Veskrashen wrote:
Muad 'dib wrote:
it just removes pvp ability and is govened by farmers!

if fw is just ment to be pve isk fountain just tell us so we can go pirate. thanks.

Not governed by farmers, we PvP just fine with the mechanic in place. You're doing it wrong.


you cannot be serious *throws racket down*
Chalk flew up!!!

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Vyktor Abyss
Abyss Research
#65 - 2014-06-13 21:18:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Vyktor Abyss
As previously mentioned, docking rights are the only real consequence of Faction Warfare.

The fights over station systems are now the hottest and best (albeit horrible T1 attrition wars) centres for action in the whole FW arena.

Yes, stuff can be slid through the station side door with neutral alts to escape some of the ramifications of losing control of your station which is a good thing unlike being 100% locked out in Null - but it is still a major pain for someone to have to do logistically (which is a nifty consequence/penalty for losing in itself).

Now if only system upgrades actually meant something too there might even be worthwhile fighting over non-station systems too.
Stalking Mantis
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#66 - 2014-06-14 08:20:08 UTC
This is how you keep a system 1

This is how you keep a system 2

Muad you need to get more active on recruiting some quality folk, you can't do it alone trust me.

We Are Recruiting.

Amarr Liason Officer Extraordinare -->Check Out Amarrian Vengeance/Amarr FW History from 2011 to 2014 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=352629&find=unread

Luscar Seneca
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#67 - 2014-06-15 22:08:10 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
Im finding the opinions of the pilots from the amarr/minmatar wz are way off base when it comes to the fw experience in the caldari/gallente wz. To bre honest, the warzone is what you make it. We have plenty of fights because we have willing combatants on both sides of militias. We fight to win without worrying if we lose. We ideally wont suicide welp into eachother but fighting for your home systems forces you to do some crazy ****. Which is a plus for station lockouts being conflict drivers.

*Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.

Use the mechanics to your advantage, recruit hard and make some pushes. Try to get 'even' fights before escalating into shinies and big gangs. Change doctrines to combat numbers, bash poses or resources of the enemy. Theres alot if things that can be done to change that warzone, someone has to just start doing it instead of complaining about it. Go have fun doing something different than youre doing now in the wz. Apparently it couldnt get any worse so why not?

Hope you guys figure out a way to make that wz as good an experience as mine.
Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#68 - 2014-06-15 23:50:56 UTC
Having a bad sec status makes this worse as you cant just pop to high sec for your stuff all the time, so the whole station thing can make picking a good place to hole up a problem.

again, fw is so much about the money now than the pvp - just say it. you have alts of hundreds of people investing nothing and changing a pvp side for any that attempts to take fw vaguely seriously.

Why do i care? Why dont i just go pitate? Because i have played FW when it was about the pvp and that was damned good fun, i apologize if im just being a bit nostalgic.

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.

Luscar Seneca
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#69 - 2014-06-16 00:18:55 UTC
I know plenty of people that say things like, "i dont plex im only here for the pew' and these folks can eventually be convinced to plex because it will bring fights. I used to be one of those guys like 3 years ago. In my wz youre far more likely to get fights if youre plexing or running around chasing guys out of plexes.

When we were fighting in gall systems outnumbered we employed the sniper corm ******* doctrine for smalls, i know youre a vet so youve got plenty of ideas for fighting outnumbered im sure. The real fight for us was convincing our pilots and militia members to get on board and moving to a close staging system, the logistics, powering through the losses and the EU timezone deplexing your efforts.

Taking one step at a time and seeing those small goals reached really brought up the morale and got others to buy in. The real fight was getting people involved.
David Devant
CTRL-Q
#70 - 2014-06-16 07:56:47 UTC
Completely disagree with the op. Now that systems are actually defensible, lockouts have become the most important aspect of sov. If I keep you out of 24th Imperial stations and keep TLF ones open I get access to the isk fountain and you do not. It also means (potentially) that the pvpers can begin to direct the actions of the farmers and not the other way around.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#71 - 2014-06-16 08:40:43 UTC
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)