These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

CCP support school bullying?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Morganta
The Greater Goon
#21 - 2011-12-05 20:20:46 UTC
EVE general discussion nitwit


enjoy your vacation
TuonelanOrja
Doomheim
#22 - 2011-12-05 20:27:08 UTC
Morganta wrote:
EVE general discussion nitwit


enjoy your vacation


we have nice discussion here thank you. You don't have to read , do you. btw, what's wrong with you face? are you some sort of inbred naga from south pool?

Not a veteran, just bitter..
Karn Dulake
Doomheim
#23 - 2011-12-05 20:37:15 UTC
CCP were involved with bringing down the twin towers but whenever anyone asks any searching questions they lock the threads. The evil bullys
I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.
Demarcus
Killjoy.
#24 - 2011-12-05 20:42:31 UTC
I fully support bullying and name calling. That kid was bullied since the 1st grade? You would think he would have eventually learned how to throw a punch. I guess that is what separates the strong from the weak.
TuonelanOrja
Doomheim
#25 - 2011-12-05 20:44:30 UTC
Demarcus wrote:
I fully support bullying and name calling. That kid was bullied since the 1st grade? You would think he would have eventually learned how to throw a punch. I guess that is what separates the strong from the weak.

natural selection ftw

Not a veteran, just bitter..
Maevra
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#26 - 2011-12-05 20:46:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Maevra
EDIT: hrm, this post was supposed to go somewhere else >.<
arcca jeth
Dark Alliance
#27 - 2011-12-05 20:51:26 UTC
so what was the OP's original point anyways? other than being an obvious troll
TuonelanOrja
Doomheim
#28 - 2011-12-05 20:54:07 UTC
arcca jeth wrote:
so what was the OP's original point anyways? other than being an obvious troll

Honestly, I don't remember but it was something important.

Not a veteran, just bitter..
Swordfingers
The Swollen Horse Society
#29 - 2011-12-05 21:00:08 UTC
Aphoxema G wrote:
Indeterminacy wrote:
TuonelanOrja wrote:
And yes, this is general discussion.


No, this is EVE General Discussion. See the difference?

also, ib4tl


As the EVE community, it is we who decide what is relevant to EVE and what is not, not the moderators.


You decide **** about what is relevant to their game on their forums. You even agreed to it by signing the eula.
TuonelanOrja
Doomheim
#30 - 2011-12-05 21:07:27 UTC
Swordfingers wrote:
Aphoxema G wrote:
Indeterminacy wrote:
TuonelanOrja wrote:
And yes, this is general discussion.


No, this is EVE General Discussion. See the difference?

also, ib4tl


As the EVE community, it is we who decide what is relevant to EVE and what is not, not the moderators.


You decide **** about what is relevant to their game on their forums. You even agreed to it by signing the eula.

Are you saying this has nothing to do with EVE?

Not a veteran, just bitter..
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#31 - 2011-12-05 21:11:11 UTC
Swordfingers wrote:
Aphoxema G wrote:
Indeterminacy wrote:
TuonelanOrja wrote:
And yes, this is general discussion.


No, this is EVE General Discussion. See the difference?

also, ib4tl


As the EVE community, it is we who decide what is relevant to EVE and what is not, not the moderators.


You decide **** about what is relevant to their game on their forums. You even agreed to it by signing the eula.



This is correct. Freedom of speech is an arbitrary concept on a privately owned message board.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.
TuonelanOrja
Doomheim
#32 - 2011-12-05 21:11:25 UTC
This is revelant to EVE too, you know why?

Not a veteran, just bitter..
TuonelanOrja
Doomheim
#33 - 2011-12-05 21:12:32 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Swordfingers wrote:
Aphoxema G wrote:
Indeterminacy wrote:
TuonelanOrja wrote:
And yes, this is general discussion.


No, this is EVE General Discussion. See the difference?

also, ib4tl


As the EVE community, it is we who decide what is relevant to EVE and what is not, not the moderators.


You decide **** about what is relevant to their game on their forums. You even agreed to it by signing the eula.



This is correct. Freedom of speech is an arbitrary concept on a privately owned message board.


I agree with this. Freedom of speech comes with responsibility..

Not a veteran, just bitter..
Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#34 - 2011-12-05 21:15:00 UTC
The first thread should not have been locked. It should have been moved to Out of Pod Experience.

See you there.


Slade
CCP Guard
C C P
C C P Alliance
#35 - 2011-12-06 09:36:52 UTC
Please do not repost locked topics.

CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer | @CCP_Guard
Previous page12