These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Anyone else dissapointed industry was not in Kronos?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#21 - 2014-06-09 20:19:39 UTC
No. I'd prefer if it worked rather than came early. And iirc, they started shouting about it being moved during, or very closely to, FF2014, so it's hardly a new and shocking development.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#22 - 2014-06-09 20:24:31 UTC
Tippia wrote:
No. I'd prefer if it worked rather than came early. And iirc, they started shouting about it being moved during, or very closely to, FF2014, so it's hardly a new and shocking development.

Took the words right out of my mouth.
Op, think BF4.

Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

=]|[=
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#23 - 2014-06-09 20:40:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Magnus Orly wrote:
Perhaps...but I think the size of this fall-off well justified an e-mail to all subscribers. I mean Kronos was gonna be "the industry patch" right...

Why would it justify an email? That seems like a rather high sense of entitlement.

CCP published a specific devblg and addressed it in forum posts. If your interested in industry and an active member of the community, there has been a lot of information available to be kept informed.

However if you are not interested in industry or aren't all that active in the community, then an email is little more than spam that would also need to be carried across other issues too, leading to more emails that might or might not be relevant.

If you're concerned about receiving an email, sign up for the newsletter. It normally contains information on key devblogs.
Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2014-06-09 21:04:25 UTC
Magnus Orly wrote:
I am actually even more dissapointed the information about the withdrawal of industry was so non-existant Evil. This information should at least have been pushed with the same vigour as the information about the industry changes initially...


I agree, if only they posted a dev blog about it, like when they announced the industry changes. Roll
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#25 - 2014-06-09 21:10:05 UTC
This is the whole point of the new release cycle. They saw that they needed more feedback, testing, and time to address issues before they put this massive change into effect. This is the new direction of CCP, and it seems to be going ok.

The old way, they would just rammed it in, and went 'ya we will fix it later... OOOOH SHINEY!!!!"

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.
James Archon
Volatile Instability
#26 - 2014-06-09 21:34:52 UTC
I guess the original poster that actually resubbed because of the feature promised by ccp, just have to pay for a month without getting what he wanted to pay for! I would certanly understand it if he wanted his money back. You just don't do that to Your coustomers. There should have been more information for this poor victim of Pshhhhhhh..
Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2014-06-09 21:39:00 UTC
James Archon wrote:
I guess the original poster that actually resubbed because of the feature promised by ccp, just have to pay for a month without getting what he wanted to pay for! I would certanly understand it if he wanted his money back. You just don't do that to Your coustomers. There should have been more information for this poor victim of Pshhhhhhh..



Now call me crazy, but if I am coming back because of a feature that I wanted to try out. I would wait till it went live before I resubbed.
James Archon
Volatile Instability
#28 - 2014-06-09 21:42:10 UTC
Adira Nictor wrote:
James Archon wrote:
I guess the original poster that actually resubbed because of the feature promised by ccp, just have to pay for a month without getting what he wanted to pay for! I would certanly understand it if he wanted his money back. You just don't do that to Your coustomers. There should have been more information for this poor victim of Pshhhhhhh..



Now call me crazy, but if I am coming back because of a feature that I wanted to try out. I would wait till it went live before I resubbed.


he probably would, if the information that it would'nt, was easyly obtained.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2014-06-09 21:44:21 UTC
Yeah its disappointing that it got pushed back, a bigger disappointment is that they did not convert all T2 BPOs to BPCs.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#30 - 2014-06-09 21:53:24 UTC
James Archon wrote:
he probably would, if the information that it would'nt, was easyly obtained.

How was it not easily obtained?
Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2014-06-09 21:53:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Adira Nictor
James Archon wrote:
Adira Nictor wrote:
James Archon wrote:
I guess the original poster that actually resubbed because of the feature promised by ccp, just have to pay for a month without getting what he wanted to pay for! I would certanly understand it if he wanted his money back. You just don't do that to Your coustomers. There should have been more information for this poor victim of Pshhhhhhh..



Now call me crazy, but if I am coming back because of a feature that I wanted to try out. I would wait till it went live before I resubbed.


he probably would, if the information that it would'nt, was easyly obtained.


It was easy to find the info, It was posted 20 days before the release. If the OP signed up before that, then he was planning on subbing for more then a single month anyway. If the OP subbed after that, then its his own fault for not reading the dev blogs. You can't blame CCP when they give you almost a months warning, and ya miss it. Its not like they put it in some obscure subforum as just a normal post.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2014-06-09 22:17:55 UTC
Magnus Orly wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:

After reading the Devblog about why the change was pushed back to Crius, I guess most of us are happy to give CCP some slack to make sure it is right.


Perhaps...but I think the size of this fall-off well justified an e-mail to all subscribers. I mean Kronos was gonna be "the industry patch" right...



Announced in plenty of time via devblog.

Devblogs linked in right on the launcher.

I fail to see the problem.
Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#33 - 2014-06-09 23:25:36 UTC
Christopher AET wrote:
Your failure to read dev blogs is not the fault of CCP.



Or the forums Ugh
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#34 - 2014-06-09 23:44:56 UTC
Neesa Corrinne wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Curse CCP and their free expansions!

I know right? I mean those subs, PLEX and Aurum are all going to charity of course.


Silly sebiestor, you should leave the finances to the real humans

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#35 - 2014-06-09 23:50:41 UTC
After internal testing and verification, it was determined that the industry changes needed a tad more pssssshhhh before release.




Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#36 - 2014-06-10 00:11:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Vortexo VonBrenner
Magnus Orly wrote:
I think the size of this fall-off well justified an e-mail to all subscribers. I mean Kronos was gonna be "the industry patch" right...


Oh nay nay! CCP doesn't get off that easily! Spam is not good enough! I DEMAND a CCP employee personally comes to the residence of every subscriber and begs for forgiveness. Better get going on that CCP.



...and a handwritten note from Hilmar. I think my status as a paid subscriber in good standing entitles me to at least that.

EvE security zones in pictures

EvE quick reference pdf

EvE links
Felicity Love
Doomheim
#37 - 2014-06-10 01:13:39 UTC
Disappointed ? Not really.

This gives CCP time to redress the issue of Standings (positive or negative) as a variable in the costs calculations.

Hopefully.

"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )
Rich Uncle PennyBags
EVE Online Monopoly
#38 - 2014-06-10 05:05:50 UTC
Pretty sure they said it just wasn't ready.

I'd rather it be ready and late than broken and here.
Skurja Volpar
Rattini Tribe
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#39 - 2014-06-10 08:45:01 UTC
better late than ****
Namdor
#40 - 2014-06-10 18:21:32 UTC
No, I am an adult.
Previous page123Next page