These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

CODE's code?

Author
YariLei
The Asteroid is Depleted
#1 - 2014-06-06 06:28:04 UTC
Ganking for profit has always been a part of Eve and I endorse it; you should never fly what you can't afford to lose. I learned it the hard way and that's fine. It's Eve so I got what I deserved. However, I received a letter saying why CODE picks their targets and there's a point I'd like to get an honest answer to from CODE, if you may? The letter claims autopiloting is an AFK activity and therefore botting; hence bannable by their code of conduct. I'm simply wondering, by this reasoning, is all AFK activity considered botting?

When you sell something in local market, you put it up and leave it there. Likewise, Buy Orders exist until they're fulfilled, requiring little input from you as a player, other than occasionally fixing the price. By not directly selling to open Buy Orders but putting something up as a Sales Order, you're relying on game mechanics to do the sale for you. Just like autopiloting would do when you click the button in Eve client.

If a pilot purchases a Catalyst from a sell order from local market, wouldn't that be seen as endorcing AFK activity? Where would you draw a line?

Therefore, wouldn't it be easier to just come out straight, "honest-to-god" gankers, since the "ban-all-AFK-activity" approach seems -to me- a little questionable?
Fragglewump
Dust514.
#2 - 2014-06-06 06:56:20 UTC
lol well they all so should stop people from going afk in station as well because people waiting out side of station to kill them. CODE are just weak pilots that dont have the minerals to go up against PVP pilots. they are just gankers
Paranoid Loyd
#3 - 2014-06-06 07:04:59 UTC
Dryson? Is that you?

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Edmond Lewis
Of Tears and ISK
ISK.Net
#4 - 2014-06-06 07:44:28 UTC
YariLei wrote:
Ganking for profit has always been a part of Eve and I endorse it; you should never fly what you can't afford to lose. I learned it the hard way and that's fine. It's Eve so I got what I deserved. However, I received a letter saying why CODE picks their targets and there's a point I'd like to get an honest answer to from CODE, if you may? The letter claims autopiloting is an AFK activity and therefore botting; hence bannable by their code of conduct. I'm simply wondering, by this reasoning, is all AFK activity considered botting?

When you sell something in local market, you put it up and leave it there. Likewise, Buy Orders exist until they're fulfilled, requiring little input from you as a player, other than occasionally fixing the price. By not directly selling to open Buy Orders but putting something up as a Sales Order, you're relying on game mechanics to do the sale for you. Just like autopiloting would do when you click the button in Eve client.

If a pilot purchases a Catalyst from a sell order from local market, wouldn't that be seen as endorcing AFK activity? Where would you draw a line?

Therefore, wouldn't it be easier to just come out straight, "honest-to-god" gankers, since the "ban-all-AFK-activity" approach seems -to me- a little questionable?


their code is petty extortion, nothing more, nothing less
412nv Yaken
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5 - 2014-06-06 07:52:03 UTC
Fragglewump wrote:
lol well they all so should stop people from going afk in station as well because people waiting out side of station to kill them. CODE are just weak pilots that dont have the minerals to go up against PVP pilots. they are just gankers


I'm sorry our game play troubles you so deeply. However PvP is player vs player, seeing as we are killing players, not npcs you are incorrect. I belive we have some of the most elite pvpers in the game and this has been covered in many threads before.

As for op, I don't understand ur question, the market is like a shop where people go to buy things, think sitting on a shelf. This cannot be compared to Autopiloting through space or afk mining. As you are letting the game do all the work for you. The market player has already done the work to get to that point for their potential reward, where by autopikoting is letting the game get the reward for you .

let's be honest the only reason you think you can autopilot is because u feel highsec is safe, we are the reminder it isn't and shouldn't be. I would suggest 're reading the code for your answers, as they are found in there.

http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html

A True Champion of High Security Space

YariLei
The Asteroid is Depleted
#6 - 2014-06-06 08:24:11 UTC
Alright, thank you for clearing that up a bit. When you're hauling stuff to make a profit, autopiloting would definitely be a case where you let the game give you reward while being AFK, and I suppose there's nothing wrong with ganking in such an instance, and it would definitely make highsec an unsafe place.

As you say, a market player has done the work of obtaining the goods, either by manufacturing them, looting them or buying them. But the reward itself is generated only when another player buys said goods and that requires afk game mechanics to work, part of which is that the goods be retained on a shelf. The game is keeping the goods on the shelf for other players to see and buy, without active player activity.

Also, related to topic, what if you're not flying for a reward? Are such pilots considered simply collateral damage if they happen to be ganked? How would you define reward, in a sense where a market player wouldn't also get rewarded by ending up being afk? Is getting from A to B a reward unlike getting, lets say, a contract sold? Wouldn't you have to invest to a ship to be able to fly it from A to B, just like you would need to invest in goods to get them sold?
loyalanon
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#7 - 2014-06-06 11:15:21 UTC
I don't even.

Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2014-06-06 11:31:41 UTC
read this
http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/06/no-solitude-in-mmo-part-1.html

and then this
http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/06/no-solitude-in-mmo-part-2.html

and you will see code exist to help people enjoy eve more.
whether they want to or not.
All hail James 315 and his loyal followers for making high sec a better place.

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#9 - 2014-06-06 13:32:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Serendipity Lost
OP - I've been trying to understand the deep immersion role player angle since I've started playing. I don't think I'll ever get it.

It's harmless until they start believing their made up play rules. It's hard to tell with the code guys. Most of them are deep immersion role players. I think most of them just enjoy the pretend space police thing. I don't think more that half actually believe in it. It's one of those things where you'll never be able to tell the role players for the true believers.

Big picture - they don't really matter. There are far more serious space ships issues than a bunch of empire role players in catalysts. If they really bother you - just leave empire - they won't come after you. Jump out of empire and watch their little role player faces get smashed up against the low sec window as they watch you pilot away into dangerous places they fear to go.
Komi Toran
Perkone
Caldari State
#10 - 2014-06-06 14:01:04 UTC
From what I gather, CODE is James315's way of making ISK while AFK. P
YariLei
The Asteroid is Depleted
#11 - 2014-06-06 14:04:58 UTC  |  Edited by: YariLei
Thank you for the links and posts so far!

The question above is pretty much all about how you define yourself and your principles. Simply the contradiction where CODE guidelines criminalize botting is a little vague, if you define autopiloting as botting because the pilot that is on autopilot is taking advantage of a game mechanism that doesn't require any input from the user, other than clicking the button to turn it on. Similarly, a market player clicks "sell"-button and then waits for game mechanics to work. Defining AFK activity (instead of, lets say, the loot value of your ship which in the case of a mining ship might be reasonable) as a reason to shoot, it incriminates yourselves as pretty much every player in Eve takes part in some form of AFK activities every day, including yourselves.

As I've said, I don't mind ganking for the benefit of all players in Eve when it's done with proper principles. It's just that the way it is played out with all the letters and such lacks credibility. I've seen CODE open fire on empty shuttles and rookie frigates just because they were AFK, which just seems odd.
John XIII
The Carnifex Corp
#12 - 2014-06-06 14:53:33 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
OP - I've been trying to understand the deep immersion role player angle since I've started playing. I don't think I'll ever get it.

It's harmless until they start believing their made up play rules. It's hard to tell with the code guys. Most of them are deep immersion role players. I think most of them just enjoy the pretend space police thing. I don't think more that half actually believe in it. It's one of those things where you'll never be able to tell the role players for the true believers.

Big picture - they don't really matter. There are far more serious space ships issues than a bunch of empire role players in catalysts. If they really bother you - just leave empire - they won't come after you. Jump out of empire and watch their little role player faces get smashed up against the low sec window as they watch you pilot away into dangerous places they fear to go.


You are correct, low and null scares us... Roll

Between Ignorance and Wisdom

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#13 - 2014-06-06 15:13:10 UTC
it is, sadly, a defect of the game that people roleplaying as market bots can't be ganked because they literally never undock
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#14 - 2014-06-06 15:15:06 UTC
code does their fine work within the constraints the game places on them: it is a defect of the game, not CODE, when the code cannot be properly enforced against station afking
Azov Rassau
Iron Destiny
#15 - 2014-06-06 15:29:33 UTC
YariLei wrote:
I've seen CODE open fire on empty shuttles and rookie frigates just because they were AFK, which just seems odd.

What seems odder is those AFKers who complain after losing ships and stuff.

It is up to the ship's captain and crew to be cautious.

Imagine a real merchant ship sailing through the Gulf of Aden to reach the great exotic lands of Asia. The open sea might look safe, but it is not %100 safe. if the crew goes Away From the Bridge (aka going AFK in eve) and relies on Autopilot (yes, there is 'Autopilot' in real ships too), then a potential piracy situation might occur succesfully.

In addition to that, there's always some risk of accident (collision, pollution), and that risk can be highly reduced by actually being At The Helm (aka being At The Keyboard in eve).

Alertness and cautiousness are extremely important for a safer navigation, and that includes EVE navigation. It's really odd to go AFK and then complain.

also;

Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Dryson? Is that you?

Be the change you want to see in Highsec.

Anti-Ganking Fun: www.gankerjamming.com

Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters
Rote Kapelle
#16 - 2014-06-06 15:45:44 UTC
Ganking can happen at any time, for any reason.

Maybe you got ganked because they didn't like your portrait.

Maybe you got ganked because they like pretty explosions.

Maybe you got ganked because they're hoping you'll cry hot bitter tears.

Maybe you got ganked because they wanted your cargo.

Maybe you got ganked because.

These are all valid reasons to gank. There is no such thing as an invalid reason.

"EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for." -CCP Wrangler

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2014-06-06 17:00:28 UTC  |  Edited by: BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
YariLei wrote:
Ganking for profit has always been a part of Eve and I endorse it; you should never fly what you can't afford to lose. I learned it the hard way and that's fine. It's Eve so I got what I deserved. However, I received a letter saying why CODE picks their targets and there's a point I'd like to get an honest answer to from CODE, if you may? The letter claims autopiloting is an AFK activity and therefore botting; hence bannable by their code of conduct. I'm simply wondering, by this reasoning, is all AFK activity considered botting?

When you sell something in local market, you put it up and leave it there. Likewise, Buy Orders exist until they're fulfilled, requiring little input from you as a player, other than occasionally fixing the price. By not directly selling to open Buy Orders but putting something up as a Sales Order, you're relying on game mechanics to do the sale for you. Just like autopiloting would do when you click the button in Eve client.

If a pilot purchases a Catalyst from a sell order from local market, wouldn't that be seen as endorcing AFK activity? Where would you draw a line?

Therefore, wouldn't it be easier to just come out straight, "honest-to-god" gankers, since the "ban-all-AFK-activity" approach seems -to me- a little questionable?

Uh, not sure how you came to the conclusion that Auto-piloting is botting. It is however bot-aspirant in nature and involves your ship being in space unattended. The general rule is that if you wouldn't do it in low/null/wormhole space, you shouldn't be doing it in high sec.

Perhaps station trading should be replaced with in space agents that have to be interacted with to use the market? Would that make you happy? I assure you, I would be fine with this.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Logan PewPew
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2014-06-06 18:03:22 UTC
YariLei wrote:
Ganking for profit has always been a part of Eve and I endorse it; you should never fly what you can't afford to lose. I learned it the hard way and that's fine. It's Eve so I got what I deserved. However, I received a letter saying why CODE picks their targets and there's a point I'd like to get an honest answer to from CODE, if you may? The letter claims autopiloting is an AFK activity and therefore botting; hence bannable by their code of conduct. I'm simply wondering, by this reasoning, is all AFK activity considered botting?

When you sell something in local market, you put it up and leave it there. Likewise, Buy Orders exist until they're fulfilled, requiring little input from you as a player, other than occasionally fixing the price. By not directly selling to open Buy Orders but putting something up as a Sales Order, you're relying on game mechanics to do the sale for you. Just like autopiloting would do when you click the button in Eve client.

If a pilot purchases a Catalyst from a sell order from local market, wouldn't that be seen as endorcing AFK activity? Where would you draw a line?

Therefore, wouldn't it be easier to just come out straight, "honest-to-god" gankers, since the "ban-all-AFK-activity" approach seems -to me- a little questionable?


i think you miss the point...the roleplay aspect of it is designed to enfuriate their prey and really in no way is a reflection of their actual views. They might never admit to this but it is without a doubt true.

They really don't care about the catalyst/killmail/your retriever or even making any of the money back it all boils down to you posting on this forum "bitching" or "crying" about their philosophy and goals. You've fufilled one of their goals by behaving this way.

GET THE **** OUT OF CALDARI SPACE

Subject 4927
DPS INC
Probably Up to No Good
#19 - 2014-06-06 19:37:59 UTC
Honestly, the core idea of the CODE is the only reason I can bare them.

Poster boys like loyal and some of the others are killing the ganker image. I know we're all suppose to defend anybody who does what we do, but the CODE is just bad after you move past the core goal, which is something I support. I do it all, I gank, Awox, Spai, WD, and everything else that the masses hate. I try to repair the damaged image that some of those bros have broken. I ventured into their channel to talk up a bit, loyal can't seem to take a joke and kicked me rather quickly. I compare the hierarchy of CODE to most buttmad carebears who are subjected to my services.


I mean... uhh yea you're wrong. code4lyfe

http://subjectandfriends.wordpress.com

YariLei
The Asteroid is Depleted
#20 - 2014-06-06 20:31:08 UTC
Subject 4927 wrote:
Honestly, the core idea of the CODE is the only reason I can bare them.

Poster boys like loyal and some of the others are killing the ganker image. I know we're all suppose to defend anybody who does what we do, but the CODE is just bad after you move past the core goal, which is something I support. I do it all, I gank, Awox, Spai, WD, and everything else that the masses hate. I try to repair the damaged image that some of those bros have broken. I ventured into their channel to talk up a bit, loyal can't seem to take a joke and kicked me rather quickly. I compare the hierarchy of CODE to most buttmad carebears who are subjected to my services.


I mean... uhh yea you're wrong. code4lyfe


This is exactly what I mean. The core goal is exactly right. CCP would've probably made ganking a lot harder if it wasn't part of the game mechanics and an essential part of Eve Online. Ganking is ganking. I just happened to see a mail with a manifestation from CODE that said a ganking occurred because the pilot of the ship was AFK which is considered botting, and that is the thing that strikes me as odd. Why masquerade ganking to such terms? Which is why I ventured into these forums in the first place, looking for answers. Would it be more worthwhile getting better kills than shuttles for an artificial cause that is on the fringes of the core idea of Code? It just gives ganking a bad image, that is all.
123Next pageLast page