These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Technology and Research Center » Player Features and Ideas Discussion » New clothing items

Topic is locked indefinitely.

New clothing items
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

Kaely Tanniss

The Conference Council

The Conference

Likes received: 1,070

#21 - 2014-06-03 23:45:15 UTC

Erica Dusette wrote:

Stop shitting up this thread you scrubs and take it to captain's quarters.

Danika Princip wrote:

Are you sure it's not a bug? The old structure dresses don't need trousers.

Yeah it's not a bug. The structure skirts are pant-layer items. These new dresses are tops.

Yeah. They need to call them tops then. Very disappointing.

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Erica Dusette

Division 13

Likes received: 58,089

#22 - 2014-06-03 23:47:24 UTC

Danika Princip wrote:

Erica Dusette wrote:

Stop shitting up this thread you scrubs and take it to captain's quarters.

Danika Princip wrote:

Are you sure it's not a bug? The old structure dresses don't need trousers.

Yeah it's not a bug. The structure skirts are pant-layer items. These new dresses are tops.

The image in the OP shows the new ones listed as outer, same as the old ones. I'm talking about the dresses, not the skirts. So maybe it IS a bug?

Not sure I follow, although I have been up for a 12h nightshift. Structure skirts are pant layer items, the dresses are tops (when I say 'tops' I mean any of the three torso layers).

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate ツ Full-Time Supermodel

▷ worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕ ▷ вσss

Danika Princip

GoonWaffe

Goonswarm Federation

Likes received: 5,563

#23 - 2014-06-03 23:49:50 UTC

Erica Dusette wrote:

Danika Princip wrote:

Erica Dusette wrote:

Stop shitting up this thread you scrubs and take it to captain's quarters.

Danika Princip wrote:

Are you sure it's not a bug? The old structure dresses don't need trousers.

Yeah it's not a bug. The structure skirts are pant-layer items. These new dresses are tops.

The image in the OP shows the new ones listed as outer, same as the old ones. I'm talking about the dresses, not the skirts. So maybe it IS a bug?

Not sure I follow, although I have been up for a 12h nightshift. Structure skirts are pant layer items, the dresses are tops (when I say 'tops' I mean any of the three torso layers).

I'm not talking about structure skirts. I'm talking about this: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Women%27s_%27Structure%27_Dress_%28black/white%29

Which is in the same slot as the new ones and does not require pants. I blame CCP's naming scheme for the mixup.

Erica Dusette

Division 13

Likes received: 58,089

#24 - 2014-06-03 23:52:39 UTC

Danika Princip wrote:

Ahhh gotcha!

Yep, my bad then, when you said structure I immediately thought of those skirts.

I'll dye my hair back to blonde next resculpt to represent my lack of reading comprehension.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate ツ Full-Time Supermodel

▷ worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕ ▷ вσss

Kaely Tanniss

The Conference Council

The Conference

Likes received: 1,070

#25 - 2014-06-04 00:00:12 UTC

Any words, thoughts, or comments from CCP devs? Would be very interested to know why the new items were categorized the same as other dresses but with different requirements..and what, if anything, they plan to do about it. Finally a dress in the game I like and I can't wear it the way I want Ugh

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..


Danika Princip GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation Likes received: 5,563	#26 - 2014-06-04 00:03:32 UTC Throw it up in one of the feedback threads up in the information portal. I'd post it, but I can't actually get into the NES store myself.

Erica Dusette

Division 13

Likes received: 58,089

#27 - 2014-06-04 00:04:41 UTC

Kaely Tanniss wrote:

The dress issue has been mentioned in numerous threads about the update, so I'm sure they're aware of it.

And CCP Xhagen did post this earlier today .... so I guess let's wait and see if anything happens in future patches.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate ツ Full-Time Supermodel

▷ worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕ ▷ вσss

Anira Stargazer

EzDuzIt

Likes received: 2

#28 - 2014-06-04 00:08:45 UTC

Erica Dusette wrote:

I fully support this idea. To call these items dresses is a bit of a misnomer as they can't actually be worn without pants.

I would love to see my character like this. http://i.imgur.com/ekCSCH0.png

Risque? A couple people said that to me, especially with the full-frontal version in which the character's underwear layer is just visible. However who is to say that it's not a bodysuit, or even part of the dress? Nothing really risque about it ...

Besides, CCP previously changed the layering rules for tops, allowing toons to show their "bras" under a vest. If that is permissible and not too risque then I cannot see a problem with allowing us to wear these dresses as actual dresses.

+1 Smile

I completely agree with you.

Many +1s

Kaely Tanniss

The Conference Council

The Conference

Likes received: 1,070

#29 - 2014-06-04 00:14:15 UTC

Erica Dusette wrote:

Kaely Tanniss wrote:

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

33,643
Solecist Project Likes received: 33,643	#30 - 2014-06-04 02:38:18 UTC 1 Support! That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Sibyyl

Garoun Investment Bank

Gallente Federation

Likes received: 26,573

#31 - 2014-06-04 13:48:32 UTC

Danika Princip wrote:

Erica Dusette wrote:

Not sure I follow, although I have been up for a 12h nightshift. Structure skirts are pant layer items, the dresses are tops (when I say 'tops' I mean any of the three torso layers).

You are both right. The Structure dress appears as an outer but occupies both the outer and bottom slots (as putting it on will remove what you have on in the bottom slot).

I personally would love to see some more bottom layering options such as having an Impress skirt and Strut pants on at the same time.

In any case, I support this feature.. more avatar customization is a healthy thing for EVE.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Solecist Project

Likes received: 33,643

#32 - 2014-06-04 16:21:52 UTC

We need to get rid of the underwear layer too, somehow,
or at least get more options for that.

Yes, the undies are a seperate layer. When the creator loads up,
sometimes they're not getting loaded ... showing ... parts ... but no nipples. -.-'

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Gully Alex Foyle

The Scope

Gallente Federation

Likes received: 4,497

#33 - 2014-06-04 21:50:37 UTC

Kaely Tanniss wrote:

lol...have you seen what teenage girls wear these days Big smile

And, more importantly:

- Ripley in the final scene of Alien

- Princess Leia in the infamous golden bikini

- River in Serenity

- Cherry in Planet Terror*

- ...

The list goes on and on. Is this not a modern sci-fi game???

+1

*Yeah, not really sci-fi but seriously, who wouldn't want a prosthetic blaster leg loaded with antimatter???

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Rolled Out 1,105
Alundil Rolled Out Likes received: 1,105	#34 - 2014-06-04 21:56:06 UTC Solecist Project wrote: sometimes they're not getting loaded ... showing ... parts ... but no nipples. -.-' It's all the "stress testing" taking place. Causes 'ripples in the Matrix'. I'm right behind you

Guardians of the Underworld 1,552
Little Dragon Khamez Guardians of the Underworld Likes received: 1,552	#35 - 2014-06-04 22:00:44 UTC Soizabas Khatovar wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: I fully support this idea if CCP also introduces boots for men with tiny hidden cameras in them. ^ This, also, don't forget the nude mod. There's a nude mod? Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Kaerakh

Obscure Joke Implied

Likes received: 518

#36 - 2014-06-04 22:02:54 UTC

Alundil wrote:

Solecist Project wrote:

sometimes they're not getting loaded ... showing ... parts ... but no nipples. -.-'

It's all the "stress testing" taking place. Causes 'ripples in the Matrix'.

Read that without my glasses and I was pretty sure that it said nipples not ripples for about 2 seconds.

Well played.

Schrodinger's Hot Dropper

The Fate of Forum Alts

Guaranteed Success


Little Dragon Khamez Guardians of the Underworld Likes received: 1,552	#37 - 2014-06-04 22:06:55 UTC +1 to the op, I fully agree. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Brooks Puuntai

Solar Nexus.

Likes received: 2,030

#38 - 2014-06-04 22:12:27 UTC

Really they need to do away with all "required" articles. It is really pointless in the overall premise of things, since there is still a underwear layer and CQ is still single player.

They also should remove the need to force a portrait change anytime you change clothing, and make portrait change optional, THEN they can require things like tops when in "portrait mode".

But yes like the multitude of other threads that Sol has made, I agree, remove the need for bottoms.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 111
Legion40k School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State Likes received: 111	#39 - 2014-06-05 00:30:11 UTC \| Edited by: Legion40k http://i.imgur.com/mDgmGAA.png Goddamnit can't. press. next.. bug??? =[