These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So EVE is becoming just a rental universe now is it?

Author
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#61 - 2014-06-03 14:15:17 UTC
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
everyone agrees

Nope

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#62 - 2014-06-03 14:19:54 UTC
If you truly feel that large renter alliances hold too much territory then encourage CCP to make it much more difficult to move large fleets and caps long distances in EvE again.

If you can easily (and instantly) defend large area's of renter filled space you'll go ahead and claim large amounts of space.

If you can't easily move assets to defend those renters it effectively reduces the amount of territory you can effectively control.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Serene Repose
#63 - 2014-06-03 14:44:25 UTC
Fundamentally, I don't see how rental runs contrary to any "intention" of EVE. The OP's first assumption is there is a way EVE is meant to be. Sure, maybe he's been staring at asteroids too long and started to think (an enterprise with which everyone isn't safe.) Or, it could be in his desperate longing for that ideal corp which never manages to materialize, he's let his mind drift into territory interesting only to his shrink and governed only by thorazine. Whatever the case, EVE has no "this is how it's supposed to be" configuration. It sometimes appeals to some folks, while at the same time not to others. Or, things become reversed - vice versa, as it is said.

What bugs people, I guess, who are rampant PvP-ers (and who get actual rashes and a ringing in their ears when the idea of PvE fires what few synapses they do possess) is that someone can come up with methods to productively spend time without running around virtually killing everything in sight (while pretending not to run from things that can virtually kill YOU.) Since PvE-ers comprise a solid majority in gaming, and always will, it's never unusual to see a cooperative venture (such as you see with renting in EVE today) arise and flourish. In fact, it's inevitable when you're dealing with a group with a lot more synapses to fire than rampant PvP-ers can imagine to possess. It's, as we say, a natural function of intelligence!

That itching, and twitching that makes you convulse in your seat as you imagine people actually being cooperative instead of destroying each other; that closing-in of the walls, and ringing in your ears as you see people want to build instead of fight, that's just your brain telling you, you have something out of balance - out of whack - malfunctioning in a major way. Rather than come into this forum and cry, you should seek professional help. There are people out there trained to deal with your problem.

Your alternative (as it will always be with EVE) is to pull together sufficient force to use the slash and burn technique of diplomacy and teach these fools the meaning of life...er, death. After all, this is EVE. Who is there to stop you, hmm?

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

embrel
BamBam Inc.
#64 - 2014-06-03 14:59:25 UTC
Serene Repose wrote:
Fundamentally, I don't see how rental runs contrary to any "intention" of EVE. The OP's first assumption is there is a way EVE is meant to be. Sure, maybe he's been staring at asteroids too long and started to think (an enterprise with which everyone isn't safe.) Or, it could be in his desperate longing for that ideal corp which never manages to materialize, he's let his mind drift into territory interesting only to his shrink and governed only by thorazine. Whatever the case, EVE has no "this is how it's supposed to be" configuration. It sometimes appeals to some folks, while at the same time not to others. Or, things become reversed - vice versa, as it is said.


The same can be said about the world.

Just because there's no defined end-point does not exclude the possibility to think about the current state at all.

Serene Repose wrote:

What bugs people, I guess, who are rampant PvP-ers (and who get actual rashes and a ringing in their ears when the idea of PvE fires what few synapses they do possess) is that someone can come up with methods to productively spend time without running around virtually killing everything in sight (while pretending not to run from things that can virtually kill YOU.) Since PvE-ers comprise a solid majority in gaming, and always will, it's never unusual to see a cooperative venture (such as you see with renting in EVE today) arise and flourish. In fact, it's inevitable when you're dealing with a group with a lot more synapses to fire than rampant PvP-ers can imagine to possess. It's, as we say, a natural function of intelligence!


how this relates to the topic at hand... well it's about Eve I guess.

Serene Repose wrote:

That itching, and twitching that makes you convulse in your seat as you imagine people actually being cooperative instead of destroying each other; that closing-in of the walls, and ringing in your ears as you see people want to build instead of fight, that's just your brain telling you, you have something out of balance - out of whack - malfunctioning in a major way. Rather than come into this forum and cry, you should seek professional help. There are people out there trained to deal with your problem.


A highlight in any post on this forum... the advice to seek professional help. Sometimes I wonder whether this forum is used by a psychiatric society as a PR-platform.

in good ole Eve-style... people who want to build play Lego.

Serene Repose wrote:

Your alternative (as it will always be with EVE) is to pull together sufficient force to use the slash and burn technique of diplomacy and teach these fools the meaning of life...er, death. After all, this is EVE. Who is there to stop you, hmm?



who's there to stop me: RL
Prince Kobol
#65 - 2014-06-03 15:04:38 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Make it harder to move around, making null areas be more localized. This way unless someone is actually active/ability to defend they won't hold it. Occupants who can't defend themselves will lose their space since their pimps can't easily move 3 regions to defend them.



You do realise that what you suggest will make it even harder for the smaller alliances to hold Sov don't you?

With your idea those with more will come out on top and will be even more entrenched.



Larger alliances/coalitions will always have superiority. Making it harder for these coalitions and large alliances to power project, the better it is for smaller/new alliances.



How will it make better for smaller alliances?

If it is that much harder to move around then those smaller alliances are effectively going to be cut off from any kind of support (unless of course they make deals with other entities which will just create a big blue doughnut.. wait a minute) where as the larger alliances are going to both defend their space whilst attacking other space.

Power projection works both ways, it allows you to both defend and attack, if you nerf power projection too much then all you do is make it so the smaller entities can only attack where as the largest will still be able to do both.

Hence the problem that no matter what changes you make, those with more will always come out on top, you can pretty much apply this in all walks of life, those with more money, more power, more people tend to be the victors.
Dorian Wylde
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#66 - 2014-06-03 15:12:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Dorian Wylde
tiberiusric wrote:


Will CCP ever do anything about this? Is it too late to? is eve heading in the wrong direction. Personally i think something needs to change but i think its too late and eve is heading for a disaster.




CCP built the sandbox, they don't hold your hand going into it. It's not their problem to fix. If you don't like the idea of paying rent, then don't pay it. And if you don't outnumber the landlords, they're going to kick you out. That's how EVE works. If you don't like it, get some people together and change things. If you can't, deal with it. Life isn't fair. EVE isn't fair.


EDIT: just because people disagree with you does not mean they are trolling. You are not special. No one cares what your opinion is. Either grow up, build your own alliance, and change the game to suit your needs, or accept it for what it is and play the game the real players have made. Or leave. Those are your options. Whining isn't going to change anything.
Serene Repose
#67 - 2014-06-03 15:13:48 UTC
embrel wrote:
Serene Repose wrote:
Fundamentally, I don't see how rental runs contrary to any "intention" of EVE. The OP's first assumption is there is a way EVE is meant to be. Sure, maybe he's been staring at asteroids too long and started to think (an enterprise with which everyone isn't safe.) Or, it could be in his desperate longing for that ideal corp which never manages to materialize, he's let his mind drift into territory interesting only to his shrink and governed only by thorazine. Whatever the case, EVE has no "this is how it's supposed to be" configuration. It sometimes appeals to some folks, while at the same time not to others. Or, things become reversed - vice versa, as it is said.


The same can be said about the world.

Just because there's no defined end-point does not exclude the possibility to think about the current state at all.

Serene Repose wrote:

What bugs people, I guess, who are rampant PvP-ers (and who get actual rashes and a ringing in their ears when the idea of PvE fires what few synapses they do possess) is that someone can come up with methods to productively spend time without running around virtually killing everything in sight (while pretending not to run from things that can virtually kill YOU.) Since PvE-ers comprise a solid majority in gaming, and always will, it's never unusual to see a cooperative venture (such as you see with renting in EVE today) arise and flourish. In fact, it's inevitable when you're dealing with a group with a lot more synapses to fire than rampant PvP-ers can imagine to possess. It's, as we say, a natural function of intelligence!


how this relates to the topic at hand... well it's about Eve I guess.

Serene Repose wrote:

That itching, and twitching that makes you convulse in your seat as you imagine people actually being cooperative instead of destroying each other; that closing-in of the walls, and ringing in your ears as you see people want to build instead of fight, that's just your brain telling you, you have something out of balance - out of whack - malfunctioning in a major way. Rather than come into this forum and cry, you should seek professional help. There are people out there trained to deal with your problem.


A highlight in any post on this forum... the advice to seek professional help. Sometimes I wonder whether this forum is used by a psychiatric society as a PR-platform.

in good ole Eve-style... people who want to build play Lego.

Serene Repose wrote:

Your alternative (as it will always be with EVE) is to pull together sufficient force to use the slash and burn technique of diplomacy and teach these fools the meaning of life...er, death. After all, this is EVE. Who is there to stop you, hmm?



who's there to stop me: RL

Uhhh....try another game? Something a bit more relaxing? And, stay away from places where sarcasm is used a lot! There you go!

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#68 - 2014-06-03 15:25:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Inxentas Ultramar
I agree with the OP somewhat, in the sense that large coalititions owning all this space and renting it out just creates an even bigger hurlde to act in defiance of the renting principle. When I look at the effort involved in dethroning these alliances I run into a tiny little problem called having a life and basicly not caring enough about a video game to spend the time / effort required to even make a dent in their dominion. I guess it's the same for most other players, so nobody is going to realisticly stop them.

I have started Eve about 3 years ago, and untill this very day you will have to pay me handsomely to bother with anyone else's nullsec power fantasy. The one time I've been in a nullsec alliance I hated everything about it, from the impossible logistics for newbies to the raging sperglords making dubious demands. To me, nullsec isn't even part of the game I play. It's another game that exists next to mine and occasionally spills over. Whatever happens in nullsec... I just don't care, I'm never going back anyway.

Too much of a casual to give a ****. RL says **** nullsec.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#69 - 2014-06-03 15:28:17 UTC
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
I agree with the OP somewhat, in the sense that large coalititions owning all this space and renting it out just creates an even bigger hurlde to act in defiance of the renting principle.


Yes

That's sort of the point

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#70 - 2014-06-03 15:31:33 UTC
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
I agree with the OP somewhat, in the sense that large coalititions owning all this space and renting it out just creates an even bigger hurlde to act in defiance of the renting principle. When I look at the effort involved in dethroning these alliances I run into a tiny little problem called having a life and basicly not caring enough about a video game to spend the time / effort required to even make a dent in their dominion. I guess it's the same for most other players, so nobody is going to realisticly stop them.

I have started Eve about 3 years ago, and untill this very day you will have to pay me handsomely to bother with anyone else's nullsec power fantasy. The one time I've been in a nullsec alliance I hated everything about it, from the impossible logistics for newbies to the raging sperglords making dubious demands. To me, nullsec isn't even part of the game I play. It's another game that exists next to mine and occasionally spills over. Whatever happens in nullsec... I just don't care, I'm never going back anyway.

Too much of a casual to give a ****. RL says **** nullsec.


Are you arguing that because you don't play the game as much as others, CCP should reward you by making it easier for you to take and hold sovereignty? That's a terrible excuse for why you don't do anything in game. The people controlling null sec now put in the time and effort to take control of such huge swathes of space, and you should have to put in at least as much time and effort to take it from them, plain and simple.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#71 - 2014-06-03 15:34:33 UTC
Wait

I thought according to some regular GD posters "most people live in High Sec", "most people dont PvP" and "Most people are not in Nulliances".....

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#72 - 2014-06-03 15:39:41 UTC
tiberiusric wrote:
I dont know about you guys, but this really worries me.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/influence.png

The entire south has become just rental, hundreds and hundreds of systems. Is it just me that sees something fundamentally wrong here?

I dont disagree with renting a few systems out you own, but literally taking over regions purely to rent is another thing. This surely goes against what eve is about? Coalitions just having to do absolute minimum effort to hold these regions, dont even have to live in them! But its only the huge amount of supers and titans that stops anyone else even having a slight chance. Trillions and trillions of isk, and it will only get worse as the more money the more supers and titans etc etc.

Will CCP ever do anything about this? Is it too late to? is eve heading in the wrong direction. Personally i think something needs to change but i think its too late and eve is heading for a disaster.

troll away or not Big smile


0.0 has reached the stable state implied by the combination of Dominion sov mechanics and grossly overpowered force projection.

Force projection needs to be hugely, radically, massively scaled back. At the moment, it is possible move a capital fleet from one end of the map to the other in less than half an hour: the largest ships in EVE are also the quickest to move around. The logical implication of this is that you need to be able to defend yourself from everybody in 0.0; if they're in a coalition, then you have to be in a coalition. If your coalition is weaker than their coalition then there is nowhere to hide, no way to use terrain to meet them on equal terms a la Thermopylae. So you have to join a larger group to fight them. And if your coalition is stronger, then equally they need to increase the size of their coalition to survive.

And so on until... you have two roughly equal size groups.

As we do now.

The Dominion sov system only enables this state of affairs. With remote timer griefing, it takes a week to conquer even an undefended station system. The defender need only win a single fight to reverse all the progress made in that system. Thus large groups can ignore attempts by smaller groups to snipe off chunks of their territory when they're deployed far away; they can ignore the problem for 6 days, jump back on the 7th, restore all damage, then return to the front.

So until CCP strongly reduce power projection and rework the sov system, then 0,0 will be:~~

Two households, both alike in dignity,
In fair Verona, where we lay our scene,
From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,
Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean....

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#73 - 2014-06-03 15:41:51 UTC
Malcanis wrote:

So until CCP strongly reduce power projection and rework the sov system, then 0,0 will be:~~

Two households, both alike in dignity,
In fair Verona, where we lay our scene,
From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,
Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean....


Im sorry but I still dont see whats wrong with any of this

Can someone explain what the problem is?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

embrel
BamBam Inc.
#74 - 2014-06-03 15:41:59 UTC
Serene Repose wrote:

Uhhh....try another game? Something a bit more relaxing? And, stay away from places where sarcasm is used a lot! There you go!


Never stop trying. One day you'll make a joke too.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#75 - 2014-06-03 15:46:50 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
I agree with the OP somewhat, in the sense that large coalititions owning all this space and renting it out just creates an even bigger hurlde to act in defiance of the renting principle. When I look at the effort involved in dethroning these alliances I run into a tiny little problem called having a life and basicly not caring enough about a video game to spend the time / effort required to even make a dent in their dominion. I guess it's the same for most other players, so nobody is going to realisticly stop them.

I have started Eve about 3 years ago, and untill this very day you will have to pay me handsomely to bother with anyone else's nullsec power fantasy. The one time I've been in a nullsec alliance I hated everything about it, from the impossible logistics for newbies to the raging sperglords making dubious demands. To me, nullsec isn't even part of the game I play. It's another game that exists next to mine and occasionally spills over. Whatever happens in nullsec... I just don't care, I'm never going back anyway.

Too much of a casual to give a ****. RL says **** nullsec.


Are you arguing that because you don't play the game as much as others, CCP should reward you by making it easier for you to take and hold sovereignty? That's a terrible excuse for why you don't do anything in game. The people controlling null sec now put in the time and effort to take control of such huge swathes of space, and you should have to put in at least as much time and effort to take it from them, plain and simple.

he didn't say things you arguing with

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#76 - 2014-06-03 15:47:25 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

So until CCP strongly reduce power projection and rework the sov system, then 0,0 will be:~~

Two households, both alike in dignity,
In fair Verona, where we lay our scene,
From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,
Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean....


Im sorry but I still dont see whats wrong with any of this

Can someone explain what the problem is?


De gustibus non est disputandem I suppose. If the current state of 0.0 is to your taste, then no changes need be made, I suppose.

But I and almost everyone I have ever spoken to in 0.0 would prefer a far more finely textured political map, where far smaller group sizes were viable.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

embrel
BamBam Inc.
#77 - 2014-06-03 15:49:15 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:


Im sorry but I still dont see whats wrong with any of this

Can someone explain what the problem is?


It's not "wrong". The question is whether it is right or best.

A system where smaller organizations had the possibility to call something their own just might produce more immersion for these small groups than is the case today thus leading to a stronger customer rentention.

Some people just don't like huge organizations or the feeling that this is a must in order to influence anything.

It's not about me, cause I don't care much either way, but I think to change this (how?) could lead to more activity in Eve.
Black Canary Jnr
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#78 - 2014-06-03 15:53:27 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:


If you think this can't be done, that nobody can carve out Sov without bowing to one of the current super coalitions, then maybe you should go have a chat with the HERO Coalition and the Brave Collective, who have been carving out a nice little piece of the pie for themselves lately. They've succeeded because they want to. They have decided upon goals and they're pursuing them as we speak. They're losing ships right now, and not letting it destroy them. They're winning right now, and yet not becoming arrogant. One day, OP, if your attitude doesn't change you may be on these very forums linking a webpage that shows how the Brave Collective's rental alliance(let's call them the Sorta Brave Associates) controls all of the South.



People actually think BRAVE aren't backed by NC./ N3? That's so cute.
Prince Kobol
#79 - 2014-06-03 16:20:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Malcanis wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

So until CCP strongly reduce power projection and rework the sov system, then 0,0 will be:~~

Two households, both alike in dignity,
In fair Verona, where we lay our scene,
From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,
Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean....


Im sorry but I still dont see whats wrong with any of this

Can someone explain what the problem is?


De gustibus non est disputandem I suppose. If the current state of 0.0 is to your taste, then no changes need be made, I suppose.

But I and almost everyone I have ever spoken to in 0.0 would prefer a far more finely textured political map, where far smaller group sizes were viable.



How will severely nerfing power projection make life better for smaller sized groups?

I'm sorry but even if you half the jump range of Titan Bridges, Supers Carriers, Dreads etc and triple fuel costs all you are doing is giving more power to the bigger alliances as they have the man power / ships / isk to cope where as the smaller groups will not.

How many titans and cyno pilots do the likes of PL, NC, CFC, Solar have?

All they have to do is add a few more Titans in the cyno chain. Even if you half the range and they have to use twice the Titans, they still have the ships and pilots to do this.

Triple fuel costs, again, these entities have 100's of billions of isk and then some, they can absorb it.

So sure, massively nerf Titan Bridges, all Ships with Jump Drives and massively increase fuel costs, all your going to do is hurt the smaller entities as they are the guys who do not have those kind of resources.

Even if you nerf power projection to the point where even the likes of CFC, NC, PL etc go "Jesus" what do you think the smaller guys are going to say?
Serene Repose
#80 - 2014-06-03 16:27:34 UTC
embrel wrote:
Serene Repose wrote:

Uhhh....try another game? Something a bit more relaxing? And, stay away from places where sarcasm is used a lot! There you go!


Never stop trying. One day you'll make a joke too.

Oh. Jokes? I had no idea. Well. Here's some advice. The virtue of a joke is that it's funny. Good luck to you on that.

We must accommodate the idiocracy.