These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So EVE is becoming just a rental universe now is it?

Author
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2014-06-03 09:49:59 UTC
Karen Avioras wrote:
Why dont you start a crusade against them instead of whining? Smile



Because what he is complainign is that the current system makes too hard to contest that and too easy to keep control and defend a region you do not even live close by.

The game woudl really get more interesting (peopel that played in 0.0 up to the great bob war time know how it was more interesting) if defending a space would need you to be actively at that space.

Reducing power projection massively is one step. Making sov system based on the economic (and other) activities and not te compeltely artificial hub system is another step.

I for once, think the old POS at moons method was far more interesting.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Mithandra
B.O.P Supplication For Glorious
Dracarys.
#22 - 2014-06-03 09:51:14 UTC
tiberiusric wrote:
I dont know about you guys, but this really worries me.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/influence.png

The entire south has become just rental, hundreds and hundreds of systems. Is it just me that sees something fundamentally wrong here?

I dont disagree with renting a few systems out you own, but literally taking over regions purely to rent is another thing. This surely goes against what eve is about? Coalitions just having to do absolute minimum effort to hold these regions, dont even have to live in them! But its only the huge amount of supers and titans that stops anyone else even having a slight chance. Trillions and trillions of isk, and it will only get worse as the more money the more supers and titans etc etc.

Will CCP ever do anything about this? Is it too late to? is eve heading in the wrong direction. Personally i think something needs to change but i think its too late and eve is heading for a disaster.

troll away or not Big smile


Eve is about holding what you have, and beating people around the head who try taking it from you.

If an entity can take a system or systems or region over, and then wishes to rent it out that's fine.

The Malthusian check comes in when someone else eyes that region. Is the original renter strong enough to defend the region? If not the renters start to move out, the region goes in to flux wars break out and new overlords appear, and the renters flood back in.

How is that NOT eve in all its glory?

Eve is the dark haired, totally hot emo gothchild of the gaming community

Kiandoshia
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2014-06-03 09:53:27 UTC
Imagine if the truesec of a system went down (or up I guess) and ice and asteroid belts became less frequent, the more a system is being 'worked' and then it slowly recovers as activity drops....

ShockedLolRoll
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2014-06-03 10:10:13 UTC
tiberiusric wrote:
Will CCP ever do anything about this?


Every time someone asks CCP to do something that is entirely within the control of players, what they are actually doing is losing EVE.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Adira Nictor
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2014-06-03 10:23:30 UTC
tiberiusric wrote:
I dont know about you guys, but this really worries me.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/influence.png

The entire south has become just rental, hundreds and hundreds of systems. Is it just me that sees something fundamentally wrong here?

I dont disagree with renting a few systems out you own, but literally taking over regions purely to rent is another thing. This surely goes against what eve is about? Coalitions just having to do absolute minimum effort to hold these regions, dont even have to live in them! But its only the huge amount of supers and titans that stops anyone else even having a slight chance. Trillions and trillions of isk, and it will only get worse as the more money the more supers and titans etc etc.

Will CCP ever do anything about this? Is it too late to? is eve heading in the wrong direction. Personally i think something needs to change but i think its too late and eve is heading for a disaster.

troll away or not Big smile


Start a corp, we must fight this injustice, I will be happy to join up and help you take back these large areas of 0.0 and make sure others get to enjoy them as well, without renting, but by putting effort into holding their sov.
Silky Cyno
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#26 - 2014-06-03 10:43:14 UTC
Its the cold war again.
Pine Marten
Doomheim
#27 - 2014-06-03 10:49:53 UTC
Adira Nictor wrote:
tiberiusric wrote:
I dont know about you guys, but this really worries me.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/influence.png

The entire south has become just rental, hundreds and hundreds of systems. Is it just me that sees something fundamentally wrong here?

I dont disagree with renting a few systems out you own, but literally taking over regions purely to rent is another thing. This surely goes against what eve is about? Coalitions just having to do absolute minimum effort to hold these regions, dont even have to live in them! But its only the huge amount of supers and titans that stops anyone else even having a slight chance. Trillions and trillions of isk, and it will only get worse as the more money the more supers and titans etc etc.

Will CCP ever do anything about this? Is it too late to? is eve heading in the wrong direction. Personally i think something needs to change but i think its too late and eve is heading for a disaster.

troll away or not Big smile


Start a corp, we must fight this injustice, I will be happy to join up and help you take back these large areas of 0.0 and make sure others get to enjoy them as well, without renting, but by putting effort into holding their sov.


And where will you be getting your supers from and in such supply that the overlords actually view you as a threat? Wont happen.

Nothing will ever change. If anything, get worse.

I believe this is why ccp has never made new regions available, since they will just be claimed for their moongoo and then rented out. whats the point in that? Not worth new regions imo. Situation sucks as is.

Elite: Dangerous all the way.
Xenuria
#28 - 2014-06-03 10:59:21 UTC
Andski wrote:
It's not as if it's untrue

3 of the 4 top alliances by systems held are renter alliances. PBLRD, NA. and B0T combined are nearly equal in membership to the 3 largest PvP alliances.

This is worse than technetium.



Hey, uh...
I think you should look at your corp.
Solecist Project
#29 - 2014-06-03 11:00:08 UTC
Because the whole game is just nullsec. Yeah, right.


Stupid.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

embrel
BamBam Inc.
#30 - 2014-06-03 11:03:28 UTC
Karen Avioras wrote:
Why dont you start a crusade against them instead of whining? Smile


assume he'd do that successfully, don't you think the day would come where he simply had to rent out part of his newfound empire in order to be able to compete with the other superpowers in Eve.

Guess, renting is kind of a game theoretical equilibrium.
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#31 - 2014-06-03 11:07:08 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Every time someone asks CCP to do something that is entirely within the control of players, what they are actually doing is losing EVE.


Pollution or wars are entirely in the hand of us humans too and they won't stop neither. This is because there are different rules governing individuals or groups. So theoretically you're right, practically not.

Game mechanics lead to organizations behaving as they do.

As long as these don't change we'll come to the same result most of the times.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#32 - 2014-06-03 11:16:10 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Hey, uh...
I think you should look at your corp.


The one that you've made a couple dozen attempts to get into without success?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Higgs Foton
Mission And Mining Inc
#33 - 2014-06-03 11:19:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Higgs Foton
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Karen Avioras wrote:
Why dont you start a crusade against them instead of whining? Smile


I for once, think the old POS at moons method was far more interesting.


I agree with this. It was much more interesting then this "shoot several structures which make no sense at all" we have now. Other thing is CCP is implementing stuff which has unforseen consequences. The nerf in moongoo led to the rise of the renter empires. In ye olde days the alliances got their income from that, and you had somewhat more diversity. Take that away, and the alliances look at new ways to get revenue. And such we see large powerblocks take huge swaths of space to rent them out.

One thing which could be done is stop payments to concord. I really see no logical reason why an alliance should pay rent to hold up sov in a region they conquered themselves. Also vastly increasing null sec will help as well.

Thing is, the current mechanics force people to cooperate and organise themself to an level unheard of in other MMORPG's. People in the CFC know to what length Goonswarm went to organise themselves, and when we in 4S joined goons i was quite amazed at the level or organisation. Most alliances i have been in had to organise to a pretty high level, and those who didn't are the ones who dissappeared over time. You can't have an alliance and just go for the lulz if you also want to have sov. The mechanics force you to organise to a (semi) professional level.

CCP seeks the solution in making things harder and more complex, which in turn forces alliances to get more organised. The solution is to make things easier. Not requiring costs to upheld sov is such a method. This would remove the incentive to hold space for renting empires. Going back to the old sov system tied to posses would be another one. If you want people to have fun and happily shoot each other you really shoudl stop forcing them into politics and economics to keep up their empires.
Prince Kobol
#34 - 2014-06-03 11:19:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Pine Marten wrote:


And where will you be getting your supers from and in such supply that the overlords actually view you as a threat? Wont happen.

Nothing will ever change. If anything, get worse.

I believe this is why ccp has never made new regions available, since they will just be claimed for their moongoo and then rented out. whats the point in that? Not worth new regions imo. Situation sucks as is.

Elite: Dangerous all the way.


No, the reason new regions has never introduced is because we already have enough empty space as it is without adding more to it.

You say the situation sucks yet you offer no alternative?

It is easy to something is broke without offering some kind of alternative. What do you think should be changed?

Keep in mind that what ever changes you think should be made these things will still exist

1. Supers and Titans
2. Isk in the wallets of Alliances / Corps
3. Number of Players in Alliances
4. Capital Production Facilities.

So with this in mind short of CCP magically removing all Carriers / Dreads / Supers / Titans / Isk / BPO's from the game what exactly do you want them to do?

Personally I think the situation currently sucks but I am not crying about it because I can appreciate what an amazing difficult job balancing Sov is.

What ever changes you implement those who have more Numbers / Isk / Capitals will always benefit more. I have spoken at length about this with friends in game over the past few years and ever signle alternative that has even been brought up, those with Numbers / Isk / Capitals come out on top.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2014-06-03 11:22:33 UTC
embrel wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Every time someone asks CCP to do something that is entirely within the control of players, what they are actually doing is losing EVE.


Pollution or wars are entirely in the hand of us humans too and they won't stop neither. This is because there are different rules governing individuals or groups. So theoretically you're right, practically not.

Game mechanics lead to organizations behaving as they do.

As long as these don't change we'll come to the same result most of the times.


The cynicism is strong with this one.

Game mechanics allow organisations to behave however they like. They don't lead to or cause anything, because the mechanics are a tool - they are there to allow and restrict, not cause.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#36 - 2014-06-03 11:23:50 UTC
If you don't like renting, go kill some renters.

It really is that simple.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

embrel
BamBam Inc.
#37 - 2014-06-03 11:30:25 UTC  |  Edited by: embrel
Remiel Pollard wrote:
embrel wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Every time someone asks CCP to do something that is entirely within the control of players, what they are actually doing is losing EVE.


Pollution or wars are entirely in the hand of us humans too and they won't stop neither. This is because there are different rules governing individuals or groups. So theoretically you're right, practically not.

Game mechanics lead to organizations behaving as they do.

As long as these don't change we'll come to the same result most of the times.


The cynicism is strong with this one.

Game mechanics allow organisations to behave however they like. They don't lead to or cause anything, because the mechanics are a tool - they are there to allow and restrict, not cause.


If a game is setup a certain way it tends to have a certain result. Prisoners dilemma and such. I truly think this is the case here.

But, you're right, cynicism is strong.
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#38 - 2014-06-03 11:34:54 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
If you don't like renting, buy a house.

It really is that simple.


fixed that.
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#39 - 2014-06-03 12:02:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Remember how the CFC april fools joke was that rental systems were being created...and then it actually happened.

Also remember when Shadoo suggested we should just all forget about sov altogether, go to one region, de blue each other and shoot each other for fun....and everyone laughed at him he had to quit and become a hermit in the Australian outback or something...and now that also is actually happening.

It's like, some people are clairvoyantly gifted, or something.
Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#40 - 2014-06-03 12:04:20 UTC
I don't understand the complaint. If you can't take the systems from the owners of sov by force, you want what? For CCP to just take it away and give it to you? Thats's not how it works. It reminds me exactly of the real life whine of the poor and minimm wage earners. They DEMAND that the government "fix" somethig that really isn't broken and then start throwing around phrases like "re-distribution of wealth".
When the time comes that CCP arbitrarily takes what I have earned and gives it to beggers, thats the day I quit forever and biomass my characters. No chance of returning...

You have 3 choices:

1). Fight for it.

2). Live with it.

3). Quit.