These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Restrict NPC Corporation Posting Abilities.

First post First post
Author
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#581 - 2014-06-02 01:05:08 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Continuing from here

1) Without further information I can't fully comment on this. Depending on the level of information needed such a situation could be plausible, but since membership of such a corp could boil down to simply existing even if never logging in after the initial app I'm not sure what ways there would be to drive out those that did that.

2) So we're again back to the practical solution being make an alt, since we've established that for those that want the anonymity or don't want to involve their mains in a different corp than current. Which means that for those characters we've accomplished nothing save having a few more alts on the forums in place of these supposedly rare mains in NPC and low count player corps.

3) That "saved work" isn't a real asset in much the same way not being robbed is income. As such it creates no tangible benefit for other areas of development. The efforts of dealing with the likely backlash and fallout regarding such a decision will likely more than make up for any efforts that would have gone into fixing the Bazaar and further.

4) If the forums is gameplay then troll alts and legitimate characters alike should have their access mirrored should they not? If a character can use ships and mod, they should be able to post there, same for Missions, Wormholes, Live events and so on should they mot have access to those boards?

5) Acting on that informaion requires linking that ISD doesn't currently have access to unless I am mistaken, so we still run into it being useless information. Unless something is done to empower the use of that information we still have an issue. Even if they are empowered we create a new issue for spies and awoxers when combined with the potential for volunteer abuse.

6) I have no direct issue with the current state of affairs to address. As such I have no need to make such a thread.



a) Considering I see nothing to resolve I'm not sure we can come to an agreement there.

b) CAOD access in incomparable to the levels of access you propose. Personally I don't have any desire to post in CAOD, my motivation by exclusion there is nonexistent. For the rest of the forums, I'd be first in line for creating alts/corps to bypass the restriction.

c) That just becomes a means of bullying for unpopular ideas, even if well presented. EvE is full of strong ideas of what it should be and what that can and cannot include. Sometimes correct, sometimes hyperbolic hive mind think. Opposing either will have typical reactions, but those reactions are what gives rise to the desire for anonymity in the first place so we again have incentivised dodging the posting requirements with an alt. As far as CCP's part, that's not moderation, it's exclusion.

d) The evidence of them causing degradation is just as great as the evidence that your suggestion will somehow work. Much like your assumption that the drive to reach the :effort: of obtaining posting rights to the entire forum is in any way comparable in value to that of just CAOD, I'm assuming the opposite, that such effort for the entire forum is considerably more worthwhile and thus likely to be sought, eliminating the primary goal, which is to render trolls unable to post.

e) Again every aspect of this solution can be accomplished without needed your suggestion and better can do so without the fallout and negative elements and culture your suggestion will create and to a degree legitimize.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#582 - 2014-06-02 01:06:08 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
So, if you want to troll you make an alt and put him in a one man player corp?

Ok, glad we're solved trolling (trolling in this case = saying things that make poor goonies unhappy)


Interestingly, despite the barrier to entry being as small as that, it has cleaned up CAOD. That's why (no Goon I, by the way) I threw my support behind this.

Because those who truly do want to make their voices heard have a short path to doing so.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#583 - 2014-06-02 01:08:16 UTC
Saisin wrote:
Kaerakh wrote:
CCP does little to cater to lone wolf play styles because that's not what the game is about nor how a vast majority of players play the game.

Can you provide active proof of this anywhere, or are you just making this up out of thin air to support your own view of things and keep lobbying for the game to be more like YOU like it.

I took the personality test CCP provides for new players and it tells me to become a freedom fighter or a bounty hunter, both of which indeed are close to my play style, and are pretty lone Wolfish in play style....
Siphon's and Mobile Depots and even arguably MTU's seem designed around single player use with personal ownership to allow low number or single player interactions and options where they wouldn't have existed before. As such I don't believe we can call that accurate.
Ashlar Maidstone
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings
#584 - 2014-06-02 04:09:32 UTC
I too am disgusted in the way that the GD forums has gone downhill if I may say, I say that because to many times I have seen discussions get totally derailed by these posters from NPC corps and that does NOT contribute to the original ideas of discussion. Many times they make absolutely the worst statements that has nothing to do with the topic at hand and this causes a lot of unfounded reasoning and subjects the OP to unneeded abuse.

I don't post that often but this is one of those times where I agree in the way that this matter should be handled. I am in fact in favour of restricting NPC posters to those areas of the forums and ONLY those areas until they join a player corp, then maybe allow them to access the rest of the forums.

I also believe stronger moderation of such postings by NPC members to the point of an out right banning in those instances where needed.
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#585 - 2014-06-02 08:37:04 UTC  |  Edited by: afkalt
La Nariz wrote:
afkalt wrote:


That's because the ONLY way to moderate forums is with empowered moderators.

COAD is a band aid only because ISD can't do anything - change that and we do not need these hoops to hop through.

However, you seem bent on not letting go of your idea so I suppose there is little point in going round in this circle again. Personally I find your willingness to ignore/sweep concerns aside and unwillingness to consider other alternative ideas an indication you're not actually interested in discourse.

And I see you're still ducking the question of is this about moderation, or the ability to retaliate against posters.


That bolded part is not true at all you cannot state that without support for it.


That's simply ridiculous and you know it. Of course we can state that moderated forums need empowered moderators - otherwise we have a glorified "keep off the grass" sign and nothing more.

I shall take your continued refusal to clarify if this is about trolling or you not being able to retaliate against posters you dislike as confirmation of the latter. You're not interested in letting ISD be given the tools, you're not interested in the fact that we have evidence of player corps crapping all over threads, you're not interested in much it seems - save gagging NPC corps. Of course I expect your powerful goonspiracy rebuttal in 5....4....3....

Oh and you forgot tech support from your original list. That's a big oversight.

There is no point in my replying to you any longer.




Ashlar Maidstone wrote:
I too am disgusted in the way that the GD forums has gone downhill if I may say, I say that because to many times I have seen discussions get totally derailed by these posters from NPC corps and that does NOT contribute to the original ideas of discussion. Many times they make absolutely the worst statements that has nothing to do with the topic at hand and this causes a lot of unfounded reasoning and subjects the OP to unneeded abuse.

I don't post that often but this is one of those times where I agree in the way that this matter should be handled. I am in fact in favour of restricting NPC posters to those areas of the forums and ONLY those areas until they join a player corp, then maybe allow them to access the rest of the forums.

I also believe stronger moderation of such postings by NPC members to the point of an out right banning in those instances where needed.


So what are your thoughts on player corps train wrecking threads?

What do you suggest we do when trollymctrollcorp (I might even make that, for laughs) pops up and craps all over the forums?

Heck, the top two posts around this as I responded are skill refund whines and nerf threads. Both from player corp members.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#586 - 2014-06-02 20:12:53 UTC
afkalt wrote:
[What do you suggest we do when trollymctrollcorp (I might even make that, for laughs) pops up and craps all over the forums?


CAOD posting restrictions would solve this problem.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#587 - 2014-06-02 20:24:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Mallak Azaria wrote:
afkalt wrote:
[What do you suggest we do when trollymctrollcorp (I might even make that, for laughs) pops up and craps all over the forums?


CAOD posting restrictions would solve this problem.
Until he found 9 other characters who were also not able to post under those restrictions.
Anslo
Scope Works
#588 - 2014-06-02 20:37:43 UTC
Good God you people are still feeding the nose troll?

Eve Community pls.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Hakaari Inkuran
State War Academy
Caldari State
#589 - 2014-06-02 21:06:01 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Naomi Hale wrote:

The fact that ISD Ezwal has pointed CCP towards this thread and it's being given consideration is truly troubling.


I betcha you still won't realize yet that you're on the wrong side of this, even if they do take steps toward doing this.

Nobody ever said everything CCP does is smart.


Thanks, random NPC alt! Your participation in these forums is both valued and warranted.

Better than appeal to authority fallacy. Generally speaking I tend not to be impressed with the quality of your posts, either.
Kaerakh
Obscure Joke Implied
#590 - 2014-06-02 21:27:15 UTC
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Naomi Hale wrote:

The fact that ISD Ezwal has pointed CCP towards this thread and it's being given consideration is truly troubling.


I betcha you still won't realize yet that you're on the wrong side of this, even if they do take steps toward doing this.

Nobody ever said everything CCP does is smart.


Thanks, random NPC alt! Your participation in these forums is both valued and warranted.

Better than appeal to authority fallacy. Generally speaking I tend not to be impressed with the quality of your posts, either.


And I post on an anonymous alt because I am wholly confident in the validity and logic of my posts. Oh wai... That's right. I'm an NPC corp alt.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#591 - 2014-06-02 22:05:32 UTC
That entire prior exchange just goes to prove once again that forum behaviors fueled by the incessant need for 1-upmanship in a contest of witty 1 liners, completely removed from the point and serving only to demonstrate the clutter issue, are just as much started and perpetuated by player corp characters as it is by characters in NPC corps.

This is what degrades the forums. And it's not limited to NPC corp players but is as just demonstrated often further fueled by the erroneous idea that for some reason an otherwise sound post is invalidated by a corp ticker.
Kaerakh
Obscure Joke Implied
#592 - 2014-06-02 22:20:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaerakh
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
That entire prior exchange just goes to prove once again that forum behaviors fueled by the incessant need for 1-upmanship in a contest of witty 1 liners, completely removed from the point and serving only to demonstrate the clutter issue, are just as much started and perpetuated by player corp characters as it is by characters in NPC corps.

This is what degrades the forums. And it's not limited to NPC corp players but is as just demonstrated often further fueled by the erroneous idea that for some reason an otherwise sound post is invalidated by a corp ticker.


So what you're telling me is... EVE players are petty, hostile, and sarcastic?
This is truly ground breaking and insightful news! Someone get this man a Nobel Peace Prize!

Seriously, the only argument for NPC corp alts is anonymity. That same anonymity removes any consequence for spamming the forums or posting thoughts that are poorly thought out. Oops, everyone hates me. I better just biomass this alt and make a new one and start my crusade over again.

I just think that if you have some level of investment in your character you'll be less likely to make a needless ass of yourself on the forums. It doesn't eliminate it, but it sure helps and hey maybe people will be forced to have some confidence in their ideas before posting them on this particular board. Long shot, but I bet it helps more than it hinders.

Edit: For the record I don't agree with the OP, but I figure I'll have to justify this every page I post on. Mainly because of the group think us vs them argument.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#593 - 2014-06-03 04:18:55 UTC
Kaerakh wrote:

Edit: For the record I don't agree with the OP, but I figure I'll have to justify this every page I post on. Mainly because of the group think us vs them argument.


If you have an alternative that isn't already in the OP I can place that there.

E: The rest of you awaiting a reply its going to be a day or two.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Kaerakh
Obscure Joke Implied
#594 - 2014-06-03 04:46:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaerakh
La Nariz wrote:
Kaerakh wrote:

Edit: For the record I don't agree with the OP, but I figure I'll have to justify this every page I post on. Mainly because of the group think us vs them argument.


If you have an alternative that isn't already in the OP I can place that there.

E: The rest of you awaiting a reply its going to be a day or two.


Apparently I misunderstood your position looking back at your original post again. For some reason I got it in my head you wanted a minimum member count and a couple of other things I don't remember. Looking back at it I don't see that anymore. I don't see any real significant difference to our stances.

I only ever tro-visit the F&I board so I'm approaching this from that bias, but I'd personally prefer a flat removal of posting rights from NPC corporations. The extra hoop of joining or training corporation management just makes it that little bit more of a pain in the ass to mothball a faceless alt. It has limited impact on the player base, and requires a little more time investment. It makes it even more of a process to retain consequence free posting.

Personally, I post with my main. Mainly because I don't see the point of making the effort of switching to a random NPC corp character. I'm happy with my history on this character and confident in my posting(even though sometimes I'm on the wrong side of the fence). I also really don't care if someone tries to wardec my corp or hunt me down, it just means more interesting PVP content for me and a pain in the ass for anyone trying to use a locator agent on me. I get it that some people are helpless and unwilling to face PVP(care/nullbears). And honestly I have no respect for those players because even if you're no good at PVP or don't want to, there are plenty of options to avoid and minimize your losses if you just simply learn to adapt.

Of course that's a completely biased standpoint, but I very much doubt that my opinion is a minority. Roll
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#595 - 2014-06-03 08:54:22 UTC
Kaerakh wrote:
Apparently I misunderstood your position looking back at your original post again. For some reason I got it in my head you wanted a minimum member count and a couple of other things I don't remember. Looking back at it I don't see that anymore. I don't see any real significant difference to our stances.


That's still in OP.

La Nariz wrote:

-It is easily circumvented by players that wish to have a solo experience in EVE and wish to post via one 10+ man corporations

Kaerakh
Obscure Joke Implied
#596 - 2014-06-03 15:53:48 UTC
afkalt wrote:
Kaerakh wrote:
Apparently I misunderstood your position looking back at your original post again. For some reason I got it in my head you wanted a minimum member count and a couple of other things I don't remember. Looking back at it I don't see that anymore. I don't see any real significant difference to our stances.


That's still in OP.

La Nariz wrote:

-It is easily circumvented by players that wish to have a solo experience in EVE and wish to post via one 10+ man corporations



Yes, that's what I was referring to. That's pretty much to only problem I have with his OP. Some corporations, like mine, are purposefully small. While there is an intent to recruit heavily in the future, I think forcing people to change their play style is wrong. If you want to be a one man operation in EVE and still post on the forums, then you can do that from within your own one man corp.
Hakaari Inkuran
State War Academy
Caldari State
#597 - 2014-06-03 18:50:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Hakaari Inkuran
Kaerakh wrote:
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


I betcha you still won't realize yet that you're on the wrong side of this, even if they do take steps toward doing this.

Nobody ever said everything CCP does is smart.


Thanks, random NPC alt! Your participation in these forums is both valued and warranted.

Better than appeal to authority fallacy. Generally speaking I tend not to be impressed with the quality of your posts, either.


And I post on an anonymous alt because I am wholly confident in the validity and logic of my posts. Oh wai... That's right. I'm an NPC corp alt.

Classic adhominem as well. Almost forgot that, thanks for the reminder.

edit: frankly, you're just further digging your own grave here by making more low-quality posts. Obviously belonging to a player corp doesn't really equate to better posts. As I stated pages ago.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#598 - 2014-06-03 19:09:09 UTC
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:

Classic adhominem as well. Almost forgot that, thanks for the reminder.

edit: frankly, you're just further digging your own grave here by making more low-quality posts. Obviously belonging to a player corp doesn't really equate to better posts. As I stated pages ago.


No one said anything about posting well anyone can post poorly and still be within forum rules. The suggestion adds accountability to actions, reduces ISD/CCP work load and improves the quality of the forum over what we have already. :effort: is a big hurdle whether you want to admit it or not.

Its still going to be a day or two before I have something other than a phone to post on for the the rest of you.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Kaerakh
Obscure Joke Implied
#599 - 2014-06-03 19:14:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaerakh
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:

Classic adhominem as well. Almost forgot that, thanks for the reminder.

edit: frankly, you're just further digging your own grave here by making more low-quality posts. Obviously belonging to a player corp doesn't really equate to better posts. As I stated pages ago.


Ouch, I'm not sure if I can sleep at night knowing you don't like me.

No, but I think there's a correlation between a willingness to spam and post stupid ideas and the ease at which you can abandon your own social history.

I've already posted a great deal before hand. 1 - 2 - 3

If there's any reason for a degradation in my posting quality, it's mainly because I have to reiterate my position to people like you Ad nauseam(see I can latinz too, that makes me smartz).
Hakaari Inkuran
State War Academy
Caldari State
#600 - 2014-06-03 20:42:15 UTC
Kaerakh wrote:
Hakaari Inkuran wrote:

Classic adhominem as well. Almost forgot that, thanks for the reminder.

edit: frankly, you're just further digging your own grave here by making more low-quality posts. Obviously belonging to a player corp doesn't really equate to better posts. As I stated pages ago.


Ouch, I'm not sure if I can sleep at night knowing you don't like me.

No, but I think there's a correlation between a willingness to spam and post stupid ideas and the ease at which you can abandon your own social history.

I've already posted a great deal before hand. 1 - 2 - 3

If there's any reason for a degradation in my posting quality, it's mainly because I have to reiterate my position to people like you Ad nauseam(see I can latinz too, that makes me smartz).

Your points were already made, I just wasn't very impressed with them. If your quality is just going to degrade you can simply stop posting.