These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Don't try this at home!

First post First post
Author
Smarty MacGyver
League of Gentlemen
The Initiative.
#121 - 2014-05-21 15:28:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Smarty MacGyver
Ramona McCandless wrote:

What?

So... the ends never justifies the means?

The money spent cant be cancelled or withheld or frozen for various reasons?

So when the FBI buys drugs from a dealer, the dealer gets to keep the money, right?

Sorry, Im afraid your objection can only weaken attempts to end the problem, not strengthen them


While buying ISK / Plex from an unauthorized merchant is against the EULA ( which btw still has to be clarified in some countries of the EU ) and effectively allows the game company in thise case CCP to block access from the game for an undefined amount of time for the user it is not a crime in any way.

In many European countries it is not allowed to sell the digital goods ( intellectual property of a game company ) but you can create a legit contractual agreement that allows to sell your time to aquire the goods as a service.

It`s the same as a "farming hand" you pay them an agreed amount for getting dirty and harvesting your potatoes for the time he spends doing it. You end up with the potatoes and he with the money.

So if CCP cancelled or withheld the agreed amount of money from the seller agreed to in a legit contract they`d be the ones committing a crime. But maybe a Dev or Team Security can clarify if they indeed cancel or withheld the money after buying ISK from a seller and on what legal base.

Please also keep in mind that CCP is not the FBI and new Eden is not a real country so I don`t see how that example actually applies.


Kijo Rikki wrote:
Yes, because telling people something is bad and supposedly supports terrorism will stop them. Remember the big anti-drug campaign on TV that said buying pot supports terrorism? How well do you suppose that one went over?

Hint: I did not change my habits at the time, nor did anyone I was associated with then either.


Sorry I missed your reply so I`m adding it below.

I am not judging you or anyone else for being ignorant. People are selfish and believe what they believe in.
If you can live with actively supporting these causes and the consequences don`t concern you because you want to keep your habits then so be it.

But I think these people have shown that they are not just a distant threat in Afghanistan / Iraq but willing and able to bring the threat to your front door as they have shown over and over. If that is the world you want to live and raise your kids in ok.

I don`t.
Lady Areola Fappington
#122 - 2014-05-21 15:48:22 UTC
Smarty MacGyver wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:

What?

So... the ends never justifies the means?

The money spent cant be cancelled or withheld or frozen for various reasons?

So when the FBI buys drugs from a dealer, the dealer gets to keep the money, right?

Sorry, Im afraid your objection can only weaken attempts to end the problem, not strengthen them


While buying ISK / Plex from an unauthorized merchant is against the EULA ( which btw still has to be clarified in some countries of the EU ) and effectively allows the game company in thise case CCP to block access from the game for an undefined amount of time for the user it is not a crime in any way.

In many European countries it is not allowed to sell the digital goods ( intellectual property of a game company ) but you can create a legit contractual agreement that allows to sell your time to aquire the goods as a service.

It`s the same as a "farming hand" you pay them an agreed amount for getting dirty and harvesting your potatoes for the time he spends doing it. You end up with the potatoes and he with the money.

So if CCP cancelled or withheld the agreed amount of money from the seller agreed to in a legit contract they`d be the ones committing a crime. But maybe a Dev or Team Security can clarify if they indeed cancel or withheld the money after buying ISK from a seller and on what legal base.

Please also keep in mind that CCP is not the FBI and new Eden is not a real country so I don`t see how that example actually applies.



I'm sure CCP doesn't cancel/chargeback the money, just because of the grey side of legal implications of it.

On the flip side, CCP sends an RMTer $10, then uses that information to track back, and seize (hypothetically) $500,000 worth of in-game items. That's totally legit.

Posts like this also make RMTers a lot more wary. The handover is the most "dangerous" time for the RMT operator. Getting a little psyops into the mix to scare off some exchanges is a good idea. "OMG, is this handover a "CCP sting?"....

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#123 - 2014-05-21 16:03:22 UTC
Smarty MacGyver wrote:


Kijo Rikki wrote:
Yes, because telling people something is bad and supposedly supports terrorism will stop them. Remember the big anti-drug campaign on TV that said buying pot supports terrorism? How well do you suppose that one went over?

Hint: I did not change my habits at the time, nor did anyone I was associated with then either.


Sorry I missed your reply so I`m adding it below.

I am not judging you or anyone else for being ignorant. People are selfish and believe what they believe in.
If you can live with actively supporting these causes and the consequences don`t concern you because you want to keep your habits then so be it.

But I think these people have shown that they are not just a distant threat in Afghanistan / Iraq but willing and able to bring the threat to your front door as they have shown over and over. If that is the world you want to live and raise your kids in ok.

I don`t.


There's alot more to it than what your government tells you. You can link statistics released from any government agency until you are blue in the face, and in fact, if you did so and actually scrutinized them you'd find that there are many discrepancies. That's not to say there isn't truth in them, but facts and figures are skewed to suit an agenda, and if you don't believe that hasn't been happening since before 2001 I'd forgive you, but if you believe that isn't the case these days I daresay it is you who are ignorant.

It's kinda sad that we now live in a world that closely resembles George Orwells 1984 and Huxley's Brave New World but we do. We let it happen for a multitude of reasons but the biggest among them was our willingness to give up alot of our freedoms after 9/11 for a sense of security. A sense of security that can arguably be called misguided and false. Our government has since that day made sure to work the fear among us in the name of preventing terrorism. Ask yourself, are you really safer?

Terrorism is nothing new, they will find funding just like they found it in the 70s before ISK existed. Instead of worrying about how they get funded, the better solution is to find out what motivates them, what makes it so easy for them to recruit and operate on a small budget. Then... then you might do some good. It's easy to buy in to the line our government has told us about their religious fanaticism and hatred for the west because of how we live. If you actually looked into the history of what we have done over there, you'd see they have a valid reason to hate us that has nothing to do with their ideology.

By the way, I wouldnt want to raise kids in this world, and it's not because of terrorism. Something much worse looms overhead.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#124 - 2014-05-21 16:31:50 UTC
Smarty MacGyver wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:

So... the ends never justifies the means?

keep in mind that CCP is not the FBI and new Eden is not a real country so I don`t see how that example actually applies.


I have UTTERLY no idea where these two statements meet

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Smarty MacGyver
League of Gentlemen
The Initiative.
#125 - 2014-05-21 17:02:17 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Smarty MacGyver wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:

So... the ends never justifies the means?

keep in mind that CCP is not the FBI and new Eden is not a real country so I don`t see how that example actually applies.


I have UTTERLY no idea where these two statements meet


Ramona McCandless wrote:

So when the FBI buys drugs from a dealer, the dealer gets to keep the money, right?


I was refering to this.

From my understanding you tried to compare a law enforcement agency investigating drug posession with intent to distribute with a game development studio that has zero competence in investigative jurisdiction of any laws at all. Which made no sense to me.

To answer your question. The end never justify the means.

An example.
Why don't we torture accused criminals in order to find who is guilty? Because the end does not justify the means.
Or more specific the long-term outcome of ignoring principles in order to buy short-term results ends in failure of your own goals.

Also a short reminder, we can have this discussion via Private Message if you want but let`s keep the discussion focused on the topic. Thank you very much.
Prince Kobol
#126 - 2014-05-21 17:08:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Lets try and get back on topic shall we.

Will CCP ever introduce secure login tokens to help combat people being able to create untraceable accounts after untraceable accounts.

I also suspect it will make permanent bannings much more permanent.

Also Naming and shaming will never happens as I said before and no dingleberry, it is not because of the null sec cartels, Secret World Order, the Taliban, IRA, CIA, FBI, NSA or any other organisation, its about the money pure and simple Blink
Karen Avioras
The Raging Raccoons
#127 - 2014-05-21 19:00:01 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Karen Avioras wrote:
Destruction Derpy wrote:

One time, long ago, some guy posted about how he did no wrong, etc. etc.
and a Dev jumped into the thread explaining everything and exposing him as the liar he was.

That was kind of cool. :)

Do you happen to have a link to that thread? :D

http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=592669&page=11


Thank you! Big smile
Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters
Rote Kapelle
#128 - 2014-05-21 19:13:25 UTC
Karen Avioras wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Karen Avioras wrote:
Destruction Derpy wrote:

One time, long ago, some guy posted about how he did no wrong, etc. etc.
and a Dev jumped into the thread explaining everything and exposing him as the liar he was.

That was kind of cool. :)

Do you happen to have a link to that thread? :D

http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=592669&page=11


Thank you! Big smile


There's some vintage Malcanis in that topic there.

"EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for." -CCP Wrangler

SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#129 - 2014-05-21 19:20:13 UTC
Smarty MacGyver wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:

What?

So... the ends never justifies the means?

The money spent cant be cancelled or withheld or frozen for various reasons?

So when the FBI buys drugs from a dealer, the dealer gets to keep the money, right?

Sorry, Im afraid your objection can only weaken attempts to end the problem, not strengthen them


While buying ISK / Plex from an unauthorized merchant is against the EULA ( which btw still has to be clarified in some countries of the EU ) and effectively allows the game company in thise case CCP to block access from the game for an undefined amount of time for the user it is not a crime in any way.

In many European countries it is not allowed to sell the digital goods ( intellectual property of a game company ) but you can create a legit contractual agreement that allows to sell your time to aquire the goods as a service.

It`s the same as a "farming hand" you pay them an agreed amount for getting dirty and harvesting your potatoes for the time he spends doing it. You end up with the potatoes and he with the money.

So if CCP cancelled or withheld the agreed amount of money from the seller agreed to in a legit contract they`d be the ones committing a crime. But maybe a Dev or Team Security can clarify if they indeed cancel or withheld the money after buying ISK from a seller and on what legal base.

Please also keep in mind that CCP is not the FBI and new Eden is not a real country so I don`t see how that example actually applies.


Kijo Rikki wrote:
Yes, because telling people something is bad and supposedly supports terrorism will stop them. Remember the big anti-drug campaign on TV that said buying pot supports terrorism? How well do you suppose that one went over?

Hint: I did not change my habits at the time, nor did anyone I was associated with then either.


Sorry I missed your reply so I`m adding it below.

I am not judging you or anyone else for being ignorant. People are selfish and believe what they believe in.
If you can live with actively supporting these causes and the consequences don`t concern you because you want to keep your habits then so be it.

But I think these people have shown that they are not just a distant threat in Afghanistan / Iraq but willing and able to bring the threat to your front door as they have shown over and over. If that is the world you want to live and raise your kids in ok.

I don`t.



This is what people who are terrible at math actually believe.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#130 - 2014-05-21 23:42:27 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Lets try and get back on topic shall we.

Will CCP ever introduce secure login tokens to help combat people being able to create untraceable accounts after untraceable accounts.

I also suspect it will make permanent bannings much more permanent.

Also Naming and shaming will never happens as I said before and no dingleberry, it is not because of the null sec cartels, Secret World Order, the Taliban, IRA, CIA, FBI, NSA or any other organisation, its about the money pure and simple Blink


I think CCP can achieve this by requiring a credit card authorization before allowing a trial account to be fully activated, even with PLEX. Doesn't even have to be a fee, just a simple no settlement $1 transaction.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#131 - 2014-05-21 23:49:22 UTC
Andski wrote:
I think CCP can achieve this by requiring a credit card authorization before allowing a trial account to be fully activated, even with PLEX. Doesn't even have to be a fee, just a simple no settlement $1 transaction.

I don't know about all places, but I can go down to the local Supermarket and buy a pre-paid credit card that is totally untraceable to me as an individual.

I do it in my house so that our kids can purchase games/music/movies etc. off itunes, appstore and google play.

Aside from narrowing it down to country of origin, pre-paid credit cards mean there isn't really a way for CCP to make all accounts traceable.
Solecist Project
#132 - 2014-05-22 00:49:55 UTC
Besides the fact that demanding people have CCs to play the game is simply ridiculous.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#133 - 2014-05-22 12:19:59 UTC
CCP Grimmi wrote:
Don't try this at home!

STOP TELLING ME WHAT TO DO, CCP!

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.

Meytal
Doomheim
#134 - 2014-05-22 15:19:33 UTC
ISD Ezwal wrote:
Officially this entire thread is against the forum rules, but oh well, even I know my place...Smile

Cagematch: CCP vs ISD
Fanfest 2015

Big smile
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#135 - 2014-05-22 15:25:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Ramona McCandless
Smarty MacGyver wrote:

To answer your question. The end never justify the means.(1)
An example.
Why don't we torture accused criminals in order to find who is guilty? Because the end does not justify the means.(2)
Or more specific the long-term outcome of ignoring principles in order to buy short-term results ends in failure of your own goals.(3)

Also a short reminder, we can have this discussion via Private Message if you want but let`s keep the discussion focused on the topic. Thank you very much. (4)


Ok in order;

1) We fundementally disagree on this point.

2) No, we dont torture criminals to find their accomplices because torture is an extremely unreliable way of extracting accurate information. It is the resort of those who are incompetent in psychology.

3) If one of your principals is, for example, "The needs of the many, outweight the needs of the few" for example, there is no compromise in principles.

4) I don't recall making that offer.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Velicitia
XS Tech
#136 - 2014-05-22 15:49:12 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Ahost Gceo wrote:
Would be nice if PLEX wasn't 723 million. People right now are just going to pay for subs because the prices are ridiculously high. Of those who find "plexing" too daunting a prospect, a good portion are just going to go inactive. Straight


If you want cheaper PLEX then you should support the GM team's campaign against botters and RMTers. Every player that buys ISK from an RMT site is one that doesn't buy a PLEX from CCP to sell for ISK, thus reducing PLEX supply and increasing PLEX prices.

RMTers are literally stealing from you.


Burn them out.


Running locat... wait no, CCP might mistake that as wanting to RMT.

X for CCP Grimmi anti-RMT fleet. will bring tackle or logi.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

SFM Hobb3s
Perkone
Caldari State
#137 - 2014-05-22 16:21:54 UTC
This is not the sting operation we want, but it is the sting operation we need.
Paul Panala
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#138 - 2014-05-22 16:40:25 UTC
Vincent Athena wrote:
CCP Grimmi, does this include "in the family" RMT? That is, when one member of a corp, alliance or coalition gets on TS, says "I could use some ISK" and someone else says "I'll sell you some" and they do the transaction? Is it that, sometimes, one of those two people is actually a CCP employee?


As long as it is a gift and no out-of-game exchanges go along with the transfer of ISK, you should be fine. Any exchange for in-game ISK or items is not allowed, doesn't matter if they are in your corp or someone you found on eBay. As competitive as Eve is, I am sure there are people even in your corp that would smile if they could get you banned, play it safe and play by the rules.
Paul Panala
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#139 - 2014-05-22 16:44:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Paul Panala
Solecist Project wrote:
Besides the fact that demanding people have CCs to play the game is simply ridiculous.


If you do not want CCP to have your CC information, you can buy gametime from Amazon. Works like a charm, and no more international transaction fees or random calls from the fraud department every time you Sub.

If you don't want Amazon to have your CC, then go to any store that sells gift cards and buy an Amazon gift card with cash.

http://www.amazon.com/Month-Subscription-Online-Instant-Access/dp/B00GDHD3LW/ref=sr_1_1

EDIT: CCP also takes PayPal as a form of payment.
Evelyn Meiyi
Corvidae Trading and Holding
#140 - 2014-05-23 08:43:27 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:

Actually in context to what this thread is about, it is GOOD that plex prices are so high. It gives a good return for those willing to legally RMT $$ > ISK.


Did you seriously just suggest that there's a legal way to break the law?

Seriously?