These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

So is CCP trying to make inflation as high as possible?

First post
Author
Jackie Fisher
Syrkos Technologies
#21 - 2014-05-20 08:01:39 UTC
Presumably the demise of extra materials will increase the amount of isk entering the economy from insurance.

Fear God and Thread Nought

Adunh Slavy
#22 - 2014-05-20 09:09:04 UTC
Rthor wrote:
So inflation is not just a monetary phenomenon in a vacuum.

The quotation "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon" is from Milton Friedman's Free to Choose.



So you are contradicting your self?

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#23 - 2014-05-20 14:42:46 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Rthor wrote:
So inflation is not just a monetary phenomenon in a vacuum.

The quotation "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon" is from Milton Friedman's Free to Choose.



So you are contradicting your self?


See this is exactly my point regarding your argument. You quote the first sentence of my paragraph only, as if nothing else was written afterwards. And you do exactly the same thing quoting Milton Friedman's sentence as if nothing else was written afterwards by him either.

I really would encourage you strongly irl not to try to draw some kind of "ultimate" wisdom from just one sentence of any paragraph.

But who cares. I just pointed out to you what you should read, or that you have not read, and I have no horse in this race with you other than just correcting you because this talk about inflation due to isk faucets which has not materialized in a decade is a bit annoying.

This is a paragraph that you never read:
If the quantity of goods and services available for purchase— output, for short—were to increase as rapidly as the quantity of
money, prices would tend to be stable. Prices might even fall gradually as higher incomes led people to want to hold a larger fraction of their wealth in the form of money. Inflation occurs when the quantity of money rises appreciably more rapidly than
output, and the more rapid the rise in the quantity of money per unit of output, the greater the rate of inflation. There is probably
no other proposition in economics that is as well established as this one.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#24 - 2014-05-20 15:34:19 UTC
It sure was entertaining to read incident #2,703 of a thread getting derailed by yet another fruitless shouting match over the definition of inflation.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#25 - 2014-05-20 15:55:17 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
It sure was entertaining to read incident #2,703 of a thread getting derailed by yet another fruitless shouting match over the definition of inflation.



But at least we have you being on-topic with your post.
Adunh Slavy
#26 - 2014-05-20 22:31:12 UTC
Rthor wrote:

See this is exactly my point regarding your argument. You quote the first sentence of my paragraph only, as if nothing else was written afterwards. And you do exactly the same thing quoting Milton Friedman's sentence as if nothing else was written afterwards by him either.


And what are you doing? Instead of understanding the difference between monetary inflation and price inflation, you make the error most people do. You equivocate your own arguments. It is this equivocation that allows you and many others to be duped. Frankly, if you don't care to understand the difference, that is on you. Someone else reading this will get it and say "Ah ha!"

Rthor wrote:

I really would encourage you strongly irl not to try to draw some kind of "ultimate" wisdom from just one sentence of any paragraph.


I'm rather familiar with Milton, and much of the Chicago School and other monetarists. Sadly, Friedman was right about a great many things, except monetary policy. He advocates freedom and market solutions to just about everything, except money. But, this whole Milton business is a red herring, so whatever.

Oh and stop projecting, thanks.

Rthor wrote:

But who cares. I just pointed out to you what you should read, or that you have not read, and I have no horse in this race with you other than just correcting you because this talk about inflation due to isk faucets which has not materialized in a decade is a bit annoying.


You are annoyed because you continue to equate monetary inflation with price inflation. They are not the same thing, they are of course related. It is understanding the difference that you refuse to do. Once you understand the difference, then you can begin to understand the relationships much more clearly. Staying in the dark is on you.

Now if you want to talk about how there can be such high monetary inflation in Eve, with out equally high price inflation, then that would be a worth while discussion. There are quite a few factors, one of which is in your paragraph below, the other factors are quite interesting.

Those other factors are however beyond the grasp of sloppy words like, "inflation". more precise terms, like Monetary Inflation and Price Inflation, are required.

Rthor wrote:

This is a paragraph that you never read:
If the quantity of goods and services available for purchase— output, for short—were to increase as rapidly as the quantity of
money, prices would tend to be stable. Prices might even fall gradually as higher incomes led people to want to hold a larger fraction of their wealth in the form of money. Inflation occurs when the quantity of money rises appreciably more rapidly than
output, and the more rapid the rise in the quantity of money per unit of output, the greater the rate of inflation. There is probably
no other proposition in economics that is as well established as this one.


You are either not reading properly; attempting to gain ultimate wisdom from reading one sentence, not paying attention, or just making stuff up if you are under any illusion I do not fully grasp the meaning of that paragraph.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#27 - 2014-05-21 00:07:43 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Rthor wrote:

See this is exactly my point regarding your argument. You quote the first sentence of my paragraph only, as if nothing else was written afterwards. And you do exactly the same thing quoting Milton Friedman's sentence as if nothing else was written afterwards by him either.


And what are you doing? Instead of understanding the difference between monetary inflation and price inflation, you make the error most people do. You equivocate your own arguments. It is this equivocation that allows you and many others to be duped. Frankly, if you don't care to understand the difference, that is on you. Someone else reading this will get it and say "Ah ha!"

Rthor wrote:

I really would encourage you strongly irl not to try to draw some kind of "ultimate" wisdom from just one sentence of any paragraph.


I'm rather familiar with Milton, and much of the Chicago School and other monetarists. Sadly, Friedman was right about a great many things, except monetary policy. He advocates freedom and market solutions to just about everything, except money. But, this whole Milton business is a red herring, so whatever.

Oh and stop projecting, thanks.

Rthor wrote:

But who cares. I just pointed out to you what you should read, or that you have not read, and I have no horse in this race with you other than just correcting you because this talk about inflation due to isk faucets which has not materialized in a decade is a bit annoying.


You are annoyed because you continue to equate monetary inflation with price inflation. They are not the same thing, they are of course related. It is understanding the difference that you refuse to do. Once you understand the difference, then you can begin to understand the relationships much more clearly. Staying in the dark is on you.

Now if you want to talk about how there can be such high monetary inflation in Eve, with out equally high price inflation, then that would be a worth while discussion. There are quite a few factors, one of which is in your paragraph below, the other factors are quite interesting.

Those other factors are however beyond the grasp of sloppy words like, "inflation". more precise terms, like Monetary Inflation and Price Inflation, are required.

Rthor wrote:

This is a paragraph that you never read:
If the quantity of goods and services available for purchase— output, for short—were to increase as rapidly as the quantity of
money, prices would tend to be stable. Prices might even fall gradually as higher incomes led people to want to hold a larger fraction of their wealth in the form of money. Inflation occurs when the quantity of money rises appreciably more rapidly than
output, and the more rapid the rise in the quantity of money per unit of output, the greater the rate of inflation. There is probably
no other proposition in economics that is as well established as this one.


You are either not reading properly; attempting to gain ultimate wisdom from reading one sentence, not paying attention, or just making stuff up if you are under any illusion I do not fully grasp the meaning of that paragraph.


Well you may be on to something. I really do not get what you are saying.

To me your term "monetary inflation" is a synonym for money printing. As such as I said before it is not interesting to me because it is just another way of saying the same thing, which is, if you print money then all money will be worth less. It is like saying 1 plus 1 is 2. It is true but you kind of want the time it took you to read about it back.

Money printing is inflationary pressure, not inflation. Inflation has not occurred despite "monetary inflation" in eve. It is not an interesting concept to grasp because anybody who shoots a rat is causing "monetary inflation." Except that there is no inflation. I'd define inflation as prices going up for an agreeable basket of goods.

So in your forum world you have this massive "monetary inflation" going on for a decade, and then somebody makes a post about runaway inflation in Eve, and then, well, but there is no inflation in Eve. Prices in Eve are not increasing for most things. And it probably has to do with AFK mining for PLEX and such.

Your "price inflation" then is what I would consider my inflation.

So I think that I understand your terms. But, as you say, I do not understand what you are saying, as in what is your point.

My point is that inflationary pressures seems to offset deflationary pressures pretty much perfectly, and as a result prices do not rise. (If prices do rise it has more to do with patch changes than with "monetary inflation").
Adunh Slavy
#28 - 2014-05-21 02:28:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Adunh Slavy
Rthor wrote:

Well you may be on to something. I really do not get what you are saying.

To me your term "monetary inflation" is a synonym for money printing. As such as I said before it is not interesting to me because it is just another way of saying the same thing, which is, if you print money then all money will be worth less. It is like saying 1 plus 1 is 2. It is true but you kind of want the time it took you to read about it back.


That is one way to look at it, money printing. Could also consider an expansion of credit and debasement to also be forms of monetary inflation. But yes, in general, an increase of the supply of money. It is the money supply that 'inflates', hence the original use of the term 'inflation' ... what inflated? The supply of money.

What impact does the size the money supply have on prices? That measurement is price inflation/deflation. How is it measured? Generally with the so called "basket of goods". It is this measurement, of the impact of the money supply upon some arbitrary basket, that leads to the vulgar use.

On a couple of side notes:

Debasement is not a factor in Eve ISK. So no sense in discussing it.

Credit expansion takes two forms in Eve. The smaller of the two is loans and what little banking there is in Eve. They might as well not exist from a macro perspective. The other form of credit expansion is the margin trading skill. How much of a factor it is anyone's guess, but certainly it contributes to more and larger buy orders than would be other wise possible.

Rthor wrote:

Money printing is inflationary pressure, not inflation.


This is where you go off the tracks and where most people get tricked. How inflation of the money supply impacts prices is never even across the board, or if you prefer, across the basket. It is this reliance upon some arbitrary basket and the need for the "basket to move" that allows people to be mislead.

Rthor wrote:

Inflation has not occurred despite "monetary inflation" in eve. It is not an interesting concept to grasp because anybody who shoots a rat is causing "monetary inflation." Except that there is no inflation.


It may not be interesting to you, it is to others. How can Eve have such high monetary inflation with out equally high price inflation? Quite a few things play into this. Certainly the composition of the basket upon which you so eagerly rely, productivity is likely the largest factor, inactive accounts, lack of wealth expressions, lack of monetary utility, lack of capital market, inverted broken window, lack of depreciation upon heterogeneous capital, lack of geographical capital/property and a market for such, etc.. All interesting ideas to economics geeks.

Rthor wrote:

I'd define inflation as prices going up for an agreeable basket of goods.


Agreeably there is not price inflation in Eve for the "basket". But can we say the same for things not in the basket or for individual items in the basket? Would the price of T2 BPOs be as high as they are if there were less ISK in the economy? Would the price of PLEX, be as high if there were less ISK? Rare ships, officer modules, trinkets and odds and ends? Could the price of technetium gotten as high as it did at its peak, if there had been less ISK in the economy?

The basket neglects many of these items. The basket is what Doc E says it is, and tends to be the most commonly used items in the game. That makes a lot of sense for Eve. The same sense does not apply to the basket in the real world, but let's stick to Eve.

Rthor wrote:

So in your forum world you have this massive "monetary inflation" going on for a decade, and then somebody makes a post about runaway inflation in Eve, and then, well, but there is no inflation in Eve. Prices in Eve are not increasing for most things. And it probably has to do with AFK mining for PLEX and such.

Your "price inflation" then is what I would consider my inflation.

So I think that I understand your terms. But, as you say, I do not understand what you are saying, as in what is your point.

My point is that inflationary pressures seems to offset deflationary pressures pretty much perfectly, and as a result prices do not rise. (If prices do rise it has more to do with patch changes than with "monetary inflation").


My forum world eh? Shesh.

The point is, back what I said in post #3,

"It may seem contradictory, that to reduce inflation, CCP must let prices rise by increasing demand (ice) and reduce supply (minerals). As those other prices rise, the activity that produces those resources becomes more attractive relative to shooting rats."

Now if you want to point out that the clause "that to reduce inflation", does not use the specific 'monetary inflation' go ahead. Since you seem to have a reliance on the vulgar use of the term inflation, I suppose you can not be blamed too harshly.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#29 - 2014-05-21 02:49:01 UTC
Well you know we do not disagree too much. At the high end I think that there is inflation, maybe huge inflation, due to isk printing. I would not argue against that.

On average though there is not much inflation. As long as you fly what you can afford to lose then there is no inflation. But if you fly what you cannot afford to lose and there is inflation in that area is that really the fault of inflation or ppl killing rats? Nope.

Also I think that the idea of increasing ice prices is going to be hugely inflationary, almost by definition, but it has not much to do with shooting rats. So shortly you will likely be proven right, though for a wrong reason. That is also a bit annoying too. :-)
Ireland VonVicious
Vicious Trading Company
#30 - 2014-05-21 03:05:07 UTC
Taxes eat inflation in eve.

Every trade on the market gets taxed. Every isk only last so long.

No bigger single factor in Eve on isk to product value.



Adunh Slavy has gone off the rails.

As sound as any part of any of his inflation talk is.....................

It's based on being a snob about how people uses a term.

People use to use it like this and that's how I use it.
The way us cool kids ment to use it before all the lamers started using it.
Now based on you using it the way the government tells you to use it and how they use it in reports and how it's said in other every other modern conversation you have on the subject you are automaticly wrong. Ask any fringe group I listed to see how wrong you are.

Ego much?



Using the term inflation the way the governments with central banks use the term *gaps* Eve has had over all deflation during the course of it's history.
Adunh Slavy
#31 - 2014-05-21 22:08:09 UTC
Rthor wrote:
Well you know we do not disagree too much. At the high end I think that there is inflation, maybe huge inflation, due to isk printing. I would not argue against that.

On average though there is not much inflation. As long as you fly what you can afford to lose then there is no inflation. But if you fly what you cannot afford to lose and there is inflation in that area is that really the fault of inflation or ppl killing rats? Nope.

Also I think that the idea of increasing ice prices is going to be hugely inflationary, almost by definition, but it has not much to do with shooting rats. So shortly you will likely be proven right, though for a wrong reason. That is also a bit annoying too. :-)


Can't get your head out the vulgar use, thanks for the proof.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Adunh Slavy
#32 - 2014-05-21 22:10:12 UTC
Ireland VonVicious wrote:

It's based on being a snob about how people uses a term.

People use to use it like this and that's how I use it.
The way us cool kids ment to use it before all the lamers started using it.
Now based on you using it the way the government tells you to use it and how they use it in reports and how it's said in other every other modern conversation you have on the subject you are automaticly wrong. Ask any fringe group I listed to see how wrong you are.

Ego much?



Using the term inflation the way the governments with central banks use the term *gaps* Eve has had over all deflation during the course of it's history.



Only snoby if you get offended, that is your problem.

All I do is try to bring some clarity to these discussions. Lots of people get it, some don't, like your self for instance. You elect to be a tool of government, that is also on you.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#33 - 2014-05-21 22:46:41 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Rthor wrote:
Well you know we do not disagree too much. At the high end I think that there is inflation, maybe huge inflation, due to isk printing. I would not argue against that.

On average though there is not much inflation. As long as you fly what you can afford to lose then there is no inflation. But if you fly what you cannot afford to lose and there is inflation in that area is that really the fault of inflation or ppl killing rats? Nope.

Also I think that the idea of increasing ice prices is going to be hugely inflationary, almost by definition, but it has not much to do with shooting rats. So shortly you will likely be proven right, though for a wrong reason. That is also a bit annoying too. :-)


Can't get your head out the vulgar use, thanks for the proof.


You are the only one smart and knowledgeable around, and that also justifies you being not very nice to us plebs. Oh Holy Adunh the world does not understand the treasure that it has in you. But I understand you.
Adunh Slavy
#34 - 2014-05-21 23:40:06 UTC
Rthor wrote:
You are the only one smart and knowledgeable around, and that also justifies you being not very nice to us plebs. Oh Holy Adunh the world does not understand the treasure that it has in you. But I understand you.


So this is what you need to stoop to is it?

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#35 - 2014-05-22 00:49:06 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Rthor wrote:
You are the only one smart and knowledgeable around, and that also justifies you being not very nice to us plebs. Oh Holy Adunh the world does not understand the treasure that it has in you. But I understand you.


So this is what you need to stoop to is it?



Well you know, I was around intelligent people in my life, and what struck me is that intelligent people respect each other. I am not really getting the vibe that you respect anybody you talk to around here.
Adunh Slavy
#36 - 2014-05-22 09:30:56 UTC
Rthor wrote:

Well you know, I was around intelligent people in my life, and what struck me is that intelligent people respect each other. I am not really getting the vibe that you respect anybody you talk to around here.



So you want to blame me for your perceptions? And do so after all of your little snide remarks?

I have another word for you to learn, Hypocrite.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#37 - 2014-05-26 05:16:40 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Rthor wrote:

Well you know, I was around intelligent people in my life, and what struck me is that intelligent people respect each other. I am not really getting the vibe that you respect anybody you talk to around here.



So you want to blame me for your perceptions? And do so after all of your little snide remarks?

I have another word for you to learn, Hypocrite.


Every day in Eve isk is being "printed" for the last 10 years. Millions, billions, trillions, maybe more per day. 10 years is 3650+ days or so. Is there a fair basket of goods that you can construct that would show inflation? What is in it?
Adunh Slavy
#38 - 2014-05-26 11:36:25 UTC
Rthor wrote:

Every day in Eve isk is being "printed" for the last 10 years. Millions, billions, trillions, maybe more per day. 10 years is 3650+ days or so. Is there a fair basket of goods that you can construct that would show inflation? What is in it?



If you had been reading, and comprehending, you'd not ned to ask this question. I can only assume you are acting like a brick wall on purpose.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Traedar
InterStellar Trading Syndicate
#39 - 2014-05-26 20:37:49 UTC
Ugh, sorry, I'm really late to this. I just can't resist.

Adunh Slavy wrote:
Guess what time it is, time to define inflation again, the most wrongly used word in Economics.

Inflation has only one meaning, an increase in the supply of money. That's it. The bastardized common usage relates to a general increase in prices caused by ... an increase in the supply of money.



http://lmgtfy.com/?q=definition+of+inflation

Adunh Slavy
#40 - 2014-05-26 21:35:40 UTC
Traedar wrote:
Ugh, sorry, I'm really late to this. I just can't resist.


Never too late to expose your ignorance, pull up a chair.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Previous page123Next page