These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

13 Disturbing Facts About McDonald’s

First post
Author
Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#61 - 2014-05-19 23:07:24 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Sibyyl wrote:
bring trail mix in ziploc bags
Yes/no:

  • carob
  • sunflower seeds
  • dried tomato


My answers:
yes, no, and I wish I could get that in a trail mix


Sibyyl wrote:
^^ yes ofc.

And dried pinapple and dates (amongst a million other things).


Go to a local health for store or market and look over their dried fruit nuts bulk section. At whole foods I know they have bulk dried pineapple amongst numerous other non typical trail mix options. Mix and match to your liking.
IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#62 - 2014-05-19 23:07:52 UTC
Slade Trillgon wrote:
I eat their in a pinch when the other options are less desirable.

Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Grimpak wrote:
here in Portugal, the McD franchises are bound by very, very strict food&health legislation, to the point where its standarts are on par with some upper-range restaurants.
That reminds me: the McDonald's in Civitavecchia, Italy is bomb. I would definitely go there again.

Why can't they be like that here in the USA?


Because it would cut their profit margin. McDonalds definitely has policies in practice that are directly related to profit margins. Open up a regular hamburger or cheeseburger and see how much mustard or ketchup is pumped on. Hardly enough to lightly cover the center of one bun. What burns me even more is when you ask for extra ketchup and mustard it is squirting out all along the edges and makes a ridiculous mess.

Once I even ordered a regular hamburger and one with extra ketchup and mustard. I got what I was expecting so I called over the manager and asked him if what I had on the extra burger was really an acceptable delivery considering how little condiments are on their non-special order burger.

He said yes.

I then told him that the extra burger had enough ketchup and mustard to cover 20 burgers done according to protocol. I then asked when is 20 times a condiment considered extra instead of a ridiculously excessive amount. He looked at me like I was from another planet. I then told him that pictures I have been saving over the years, addresses for the worst violators and the names of the active managers will be documented in a message to McD's corporate quality control headquarters. I am still working on the letter.


So not only did they put too much ketchup and mustard on your burger... They put it in the wrong spot! This is horrible! What did you do? I would call my congressman to report this abuse of a food item!
Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#63 - 2014-05-19 23:18:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Slade Trillgon
IIshira wrote:


So not only did they put too much ketchup and mustard on your burger... They put it in the wrong spot! This is horrible! What did you do? I would call my congressman to report this abuse of a food item!



You are missing the point. They did not put it in the wrong place silly. They put so much on it that it was squirting out all along every edge. In other words their protocol is set to put just a little of each condiment on the bun, which is fine and dandy (especially since they are willing to make special orders). The problem that arises is the drastic difference in the quantities. It is horrible quality control to limit usage of condiments to increase profits and then not have an equal quality control measure to control special orders. If the money is there to justify limiting the usage of condiments the money is there to properly distribute extra condiments based on the base protocol, not some subjective he wants extra let me squirt 10 times what should be on the burger.

You strike me as a person that does not even look at their food. Go order a burger regular and order one with extra condiments and tell me if what you get is logical and keeps profits in mind. It is a stupid practice tbh and you either interpreted my post incorrectly or you are being pedantic.


EDIT:

At the end of the day one store can lose the profits the store wants to make, by limiting the base condiment use, just because line prep employees blew the numbers by putting way too much condiments on all the special orders.
Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#64 - 2014-05-19 23:33:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Webvan
Angelique Duchemin wrote:


Nothing in the world is as thoroughly tested before it's released to the public as genetically modified food.

Organic crops(unmodified) are so inefficient that you have to use even more pesticides when growing them because they lack resistance to pests and disease.

Without genetic modification of crops we would only have had enough food to feed about 1.5 billion people on this planet. So which of the remaining 4.5 billion is going to volunteer to go away so the rest can eat "moral food"?

If we want to go further with this then we will have to make a separate topic for it.


Well I stick to my opinion regarding over-regulation of farming, over taxation, market manipulation, there are a lot of factors which drive farmers out of traditional food production. It's a manufactured solution to a manufactured problem.

But regarding your mention of pesticides, GMO's are failing in that, horribly. And with the latent pesticides left behind in the soils, genetically modified organisms let loose into the environment (remember what I said about the new world and it's transformation), super weeds, and the killing off of the bee populations, well if there were ever really intelligent life on mars I would imagine they went out the same way. imo, on this course, we are headed to a massive famine the likes of which we have never seen before.

edit:
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Angelique Duchemin wrote:
Organic crops(unmodified) are so inefficient that you have to use even more pesticides when growing them because they lack resistance to pests and disease.
overwhelmingly true

And this is a good point to make about long-term testing, or the lack thereof and it's failure in doing so. In the beginning, yes it had great benefit, seemingly, but the long-term results are shifting to it being a far worse solution, even devastating. But all we hear is how it was in the beginning, then we forgot to check on it's long-term impact after introducing into the ecosystem, so it's still a rosy picture to most, yet while it fails.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#65 - 2014-05-19 23:57:49 UTC
GMOs can be good. Monsanto isn't releasing good, well tested GMOs, on the contrary, they are poorly tested and apparently produced under an agenda different from actually making decent crops.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#66 - 2014-05-20 00:09:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Webvan
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
GMOs can be good. Monsanto isn't releasing good, well tested GMOs, on the contrary, they are poorly tested and apparently produced under an agenda different from actually making decent crops.


In all honesty (not that it has been anything less), I think this is one of those issues where it's best to step back and take a good hard look at how the situation stands from a unbiased perspective, or try to as unbiased as possible over some time to research the subject. Mostly because this isn't a fixed result never to change, not like buying a gadget and tossing it out when something better comes along. If it breaks the system, we may not be able to just toss it out and replace it with another system as we are used to doing in our daily lives. And the long term impact, and how things progress and change over time, imo is apparent be it even in the slightest, it's hard to deny that at all, but even to the greater and the further trend towards a collapse. Yes, they make a lot of promises with what can be done with the science, but that doesn't guarantee success.

And for me, I'm far from any type of greenpeace environmentalist, not even Sierra club or some such. I do believe that we should conquer our environment, to bring it into submission, to use it to our benefit, yet do see to it that it isn't simply destroyed but preserved for it's function.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#67 - 2014-05-20 00:48:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
In Europe the "meat" is normally sourced within the economic area that the restaurants are operating in. We have different animal health standards and the animal feed is also different which may well affect the taste.

No, you don't understand. It's only McDonald's food here that tastes like that. Many restaurants here have a unique flavor in their food. McDonald's has a lot of unique and very icky flavors in their food. It smells bad, too, and if I eat it for any extended period of time, I begin to feel that I am not getting enough real food and it's like I am filling my gut with paper products. This takes the better portion of a day to accomplish. I usually feel better going hungry than eating that crap.

I have never found such terrible food at any other restaurant, and in the majority of them the meat tastes like the stuff on the market. Home-made beef patties taste much like the beef patties from Arby's, Jack-in-the-Box, Burger King, Carl's Jr., and even Dairy Queen. The patty I had at that McDonald's in Civitavecchia tasted like a patty from back home, just not the McD's patties I am used to. The bun tasted like a bun from back home, just not...yeah you get it. The fries were like Burger King fries, which while not great are a lot better than those nasty spoiled-grease-sticks they call "french fries" at local McDonald's. And this isn't an area phenomenon or a single store. I've eaten food from a variety of these places throughout three US states. It's no different anywhere in the US.

We have standards on what can go into our livestock too. I think McDonald's is adding things to the food to make it taste bad, and that has to be part of their success in the US. Perhaps elsewhere they don't need to add stuff to sell.
I was specifically referring to McDonalds, using british meat is something they push hard in the UK.

I get what you're saying but taste wise a McDonalds burger is pretty meh when compared with what I can get in the local late night takeaway or make for myself. I've only eaten in an american McDs once, and from I remember it tasted like soggy cardboard.


About the only thing I'll eat from there is a double sausage and egg mcmuffin + hashbrown and coffee because it's not bad and convenient if I'm passing, although for what it costs I can get a full english breakfast + coffee or tea elsewhere.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#68 - 2014-05-20 03:40:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Slade Trillgon
Webvan wrote:


And for me, I'm far from any type of greenpeace environmentalist, not even Sierra club or some such. I do believe that we should conquer our environment, to bring it into submission, to use it to our benefit, yet do see to it that it isn't simply destroyed but preserved for it's function.


I like the optimisim, but conquer the environment? The agenda should be to learn to live harmoniously with the environment, capitalize where is it reasonable and to leave well enough alone where we should leave well enough alone where we should. Any agenda other than that makes us 'pure' paraqsites, and we all know what an unnsecusessful parasite do to there hosts
Ugh
Slick Slomopavitz
Doomheim
#69 - 2014-05-20 03:51:55 UTC
YOU FOOLS! IT'S MADE OF PEOPLE! PEEEEEEOPLLLLLE!!!

"Some places got a Murphy bed, this place got a Murphy shower. I still don't know where to hang the towels!"

Zercix
House of Dzur
#70 - 2014-05-20 04:16:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Zercix
Slick Slomopavitz wrote:
YOU FOOLS! IT'S MADE OF PEOPLE! PEEEEEEOPLLLLLE!!!

We make everything :-)
Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#71 - 2014-05-20 04:36:20 UTC
Slade Trillgon wrote:
Webvan wrote:


And for me, I'm far from any type of greenpeace environmentalist, not even Sierra club or some such. I do believe that we should conquer our environment, to bring it into submission, to use it to our benefit, yet do see to it that it isn't simply destroyed but preserved for it's function.


I like the optimisim, but conquer the environment? The agenda should be to learn to live harmoniously with the environment, capitalize where is it reasonable and to leave well enough alone where we should leave well enough alone where we should. Any agenda other than that makes us 'pure' paraqsites, and we all know what an unnsecusessful parasite do to there hosts
Ugh

Yeah, that's where I separate with most modern environmentalist movements, many being rather extreme imo. I view the world as, or potentially as, one big garden for mankind to manage, to improve upon. If forests are littered with now dead growth which poses a fire hazard, we clean it up (big fight in California over that). If changing rivers threaten to destroy fertile valleys, we divert the rivers, change them to what benefits the most. If an asteroid is headed to Earth and threatens to do considerable damage, well hopefully we knock it off course.

Man is no parasite, but part of the system, and thus fully capable of making the Earth a better home for humanity, well if in best intentions which are not always the case. But my point was, this isn't just a topic for such types, in response to what was said in an earlier post as if it's all one sort. It's involvement includes people of all different sorts. And as long as Fast Food joints among others continue to use this stuff, it only adds to the growing problem we have at hand here.

But rather than trying to discredit me on the topic, what of the previous link about GMO's failing? Don't you think a 25% yearly increase in herbicide usage on GMO crops is a bit excessive? Weren't GMO's suppose to use less pesticide & herbicide as part of it's original success story? What do we do when it's at 1000% greater overall and yet has little to no effect? Do we wait for science to save us? What do we eat in the meantime as farms go useless due to being so poisoned and overgrown with weeds?

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#72 - 2014-05-20 04:49:36 UTC
Slick Slomopavitz wrote:
YOU FOOLS! IT'S MADE OF PEOPLE! PEEEEEEOPLLLLLE!!!

Which is amusing... in that many farms use fertilizer made of human waste Big smile
You know what they say, you are what you eat, and farms are pretty much eating people poop and we are eating that food made of people poop. So when you eat your next Big Mac, just remember that lol

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#73 - 2014-05-20 05:24:57 UTC
Removed an off topic post.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#74 - 2014-05-20 06:28:38 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
I've only eaten in an american McDs once, and from I remember it tasted like soggy cardboard.

That's a perfect descriptor for the taste. That's also how it feels in my stomach.

Webvan wrote:
What do we eat in the meantime as farms go useless due to being so poisoned and overgrown with weeds?

We stop using pesticides and eat the weeds. That would make for an interesting movie I think--in 2075 Earth horticulture has reached a cataclysm and all food crops are either extinct or nearing extinction. Humans must learn to consume only the most hardy plants, and they aren't edible without special processing. Watch as our hero subsists on a diet consisting primarily of Scotch Broom and Ivy.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#75 - 2014-05-20 13:22:47 UTC
Webvan wrote:

Yeah, that's where I separate with most modern environmentalist movements, many being rather extreme imo. I view the world as, or potentially as, one big garden for mankind to manage, to improve upon. If forests are littered with now dead growth which poses a fire hazard, we clean it up (big fight in California over that). If changing rivers threaten to destroy fertile valleys, we divert the rivers, change them to what benefits the most. If an asteroid is headed to Earth and threatens to do considerable damage, well hopefully we knock it off course.

Man is no parasite, but part of the system, and thus fully capable of making the Earth a better home for humanity, well if in best intentions which are not always the case. But my point was, this isn't just a topic for such types, in response to what was said in an earlier post as if it's all one sort. It's involvement includes people of all different sorts. And as long as Fast Food joints among others continue to use this stuff, it only adds to the growing problem we have at hand here.

But rather than trying to discredit me on the topic, what of the previous link about GMO's failing? Don't you think a 25% yearly increase in herbicide usage on GMO crops is a bit excessive? Weren't GMO's suppose to use less pesticide & herbicide as part of it's original success story? What do we do when it's at 1000% greater overall and yet has little to no effect? Do we wait for science to save us? What do we eat in the meantime as farms go useless due to being so poisoned and overgrown with weeds?



Not sure where you got the idea I was trying to discredit you Ugh

I agree with a lot of what you say. I was just saying that modifying the environment too much, for any reason, may not always be the best alternative.

For example. The concept of removing debris from forests seems like an extreme option as controlled burns can be used to accomplish the same thing. Which is better imo as that is the natural way forests are cleared and restarted.

A about 25 years ago a massive tornado tore through western Pennsylvania. The science dept at UPitt did a study in one of the damaged national parks. They artificially cleared out one side of the park while letting the other sit and naturally fix itself. They found that the side they left alone recovered more quickly than the cleared side.

But yes, man can learn to work more efficiently and should work the earth as needed...within reason.

P.S. Parasites are part of the larger system and successful parasites are those that learn to live harmoniously with their host. Those that do not learn this harmony kills it host and itself by proxy.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#76 - 2014-05-20 13:46:21 UTC
McDonald's Terrifying New Mascot Will Scare Your Children Away from Happy Meals

"Because nothing says "finish your carrot sticks" like a psychotic stare from the side of a box."

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#77 - 2014-05-20 20:04:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Bagrat Skalski
GMO is nothing, we have oil rigs pumping oil from under the seas, we have tons of different toxins released daily in the air and to the soil, we have people kiling last rhinos and elephants for a couple of bucks, really, GMO is nothing like a next little step towards making mother earth our biatch.

Well, if you could see how earth treated us in the first place, those pesky mosquitos dealing death by malaria and such, it's nothing unusual people are so agressive, we are children of this planet, it's kind of patology as every day ever. Evolution of chaos. Finding a calm place for a living and then the lava flows into the room, or mosquito bites you and it's a death sentence.

Mc Donalds isnt that bad when you look at it that way.
Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#78 - 2014-05-20 22:37:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Webvan
Slade Trillgon wrote:



Not sure where you got the idea I was trying to discredit you Ugh


Oh, just from using an absolute against my goofy footnote opinion. Wasn't offended, it's just opinion vs. opinion. I'm sure we have more common ground than I have with most others outside these forums.
Slade Trillgon wrote:
For example. The concept of removing debris from forests seems like an extreme option as controlled burns can be used to accomplish the same thing. Which is better imo as that is the natural way forests are cleared and restarted.
Yeah well this is a high risk fire region, so we don't get many controlled burns. They will use that tactic sometimes during a fire, but not often, considered more extreme measures. So we rely more on manpower getting in there and clearing fuel before a fire happens.

But even that has become very difficult to do due to environmental regulation. Even on local private property, due to some species of rat, people cant clear their own small homestead property, and people have lost their homes due to wild fires out here, primarily in those designated areas. They have even turned to doing the "just let it burn" thing to appease environmentalists, but that has severely backfired imo. That makes people not evacuate and choose to try to fight the fires themselves, which can be very dangerous to human life.

I could agree with you, but where I live, everything is upside down. We have too many extremists. So I'm all for clearing, cleaning, drilling and digging, while the other side of the fence does what it does. But at least I can seem to agree with them in regards to GMO's, but it is something more so just brought to their attention and really doesn't effect their agenda but to maybe further their other goals by proxy.

I don't even like heavy regulation, I would prefer fast food joints choose to do the right thing or lose business if not doing the right thing. Unfortunately, the problem with GMO's is not a well studied issue among my fellow countrymen as of yet, and is only now starting to emerge on the debate scene, and through legal awareness by the lawsuits being raised. Maybe if more people took it serious enough they would look into the problems and make their own judgements, then if correct, urge those that produce and/or distributing GMO's to change their ways.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Adunh Slavy
#79 - 2014-05-20 22:54:02 UTC
Webvan wrote:
DrSmegma wrote:
because Monsanto are busy successfully killing our planet.

QFT
Even crops that don't use GMO seeds, those GMO crops are tainting the non-GMO crops.


Seems to be a well established part of their business. Sue farms adjacent to GMO farms.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#80 - 2014-05-20 23:44:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Webvan
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Webvan wrote:
DrSmegma wrote:
because Monsanto are busy successfully killing our planet.

QFT
Even crops that don't use GMO seeds, those GMO crops are tainting the non-GMO crops.


Seems to be a well established part of their business. Sue farms adjacent to GMO farms.

Well I mean through cross-pollination primarily. Then they have to contend with increasing amounts of pesticide and herbicide drift. Then additionally the weeds which seem to be becoming more resistant through the heavy use of herbicides. Non-GMO farmers have been given the green light to raise lawsuits over the matter, which is something that caused the USDA to reopen it's study which it had previously closed concerning co-existence between GMO and non-GMO crops.

Yeah, where it gets to the legal process, it gets confusing. Monsanto suing some farmers, other farmer suing Monsanto, others suing the EPA, then international courts all in an uproar, world leaders making threats, it's all a mess.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12