These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Give The Nestor A Cloak

First post
Author
Alyssa Haginen
Doomheim
#1 - 2014-05-19 16:35:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Alyssa Haginen
The title says it all, the Nestor is nothing right now. It has no role that can't be replaced by other cheaper ships. At it's price point, it would be more logical to use a pair of guardians or a triage carrier. It really needs a covert cloak to open up it's possibilities. It's not going to become some overpowered ship. It doesn't get any capacitor transfer bonuses and with a cloak/full 6 repairs on the highs, it's equal to 2 guardians. However, the Nestor couldn't fit like that due to cap. A fleet Nestor would require 3 energy transfers and a full cap fit in the mids and rigs leaving 4 repairs. It can't align that fast and it would take a ton of fuel to jump one through covert ops portal if it's even possible due to mass. The ship really would be a win with a cloaking device for PvE and PvP players.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#2 - 2014-05-19 17:04:06 UTC
Like... a Covert Ops cloak...? Twisted

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#3 - 2014-05-19 17:10:29 UTC
Yes, the lack of a CovOps cloak is exactly what has been preventing me from dropping coin on and overpriced piece of ****.
Rayzilla Zaraki
Yin Jian Enterprises
#4 - 2014-05-19 17:15:54 UTC
I agree completely that the Nestor should be able to rock a covert ops cloak, but that still isn't enough for me to want to spend 1.5B ISK on one.

Gate campers are just Carebears with anger issues.

Alyssa Haginen
Doomheim
#5 - 2014-05-19 18:03:11 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Like... a Covert Ops cloak...? Twisted


Not only like it but exactly that Twisted
Rayzilla Zaraki wrote:
I agree completely that the Nestor should be able to rock a covert ops cloak, but that still isn't enough for me to want to spend 1.5B ISK on one.



It would be the first battleship able to safely navigate lowsec. Fits a covert ops cloak which can be very useful for some great new logistics tactics. Also, PvE players would be able to take advantage of the covert ship in lowsec. One great example is two Nestors could run level 5 missions in low sec much safer then other battleships.
Sorana Bonzari
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2014-05-19 18:07:06 UTC
I think you need to take rebalance in steps.

Fist thing is raise awareness by answering the following.

What the heck is a Nestor?

Why would I want to fly a Nestor?

Then you can get to the root of the problem and ask the following...

How to balance it for that role?


un-fortunately the Nestor is still stuck on the first question ;)
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#7 - 2014-05-19 19:03:23 UTC
On it's own it would not make it wildly popular, currently it is like a car without wheels. Not a very good one either.
At least wheels would be a good starting point.........
So +1 for the covert ops cloak, maybe we will all be surprised and find a home for it in wormhole space. Sure as hell won't try otherwise.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#8 - 2014-05-19 19:46:41 UTC
Sorana Bonzari wrote:
I think you need to take rebalance in steps.

Fist thing is raise awareness by answering the following.

What the heck is a Nestor?

Why would I want to fly a Nestor?

Then you can get to the root of the problem and ask the following...

How to balance it for that role?


un-fortunately the Nestor is still stuck on the first question ;)


This. I don't think a cov-ops cloak on the Nestor would do much for its usefulness, with its current design.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#9 - 2014-05-19 20:01:48 UTC
Removed some off topic posts.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Rayzilla Zaraki
Yin Jian Enterprises
#10 - 2014-05-19 21:12:32 UTC
Arronicus wrote:


This. I don't think a cov-ops cloak on the Nestor would do much for its usefulness, with its current design.


Yes, but what can be done about its current design to make it useful while still having any semblance of balance?

While a covert ops cloak would go a long way towards making this an excellent exploration craft, the Nestor still falls short in light of its 1.5 billion ISK price tag.

The first two SoE ships had a "Wow" factor to them and their utility was immediately apparent. Even the look of the Nestor falls short of what the first two had.

I like that it has the remote repair bonuses, these are useful for long range exploration groups but, again, utility in that role falls short. After bonuses, the remote armor repairer's range is only about 18km and the ship doesn't have the fitting to run them effectively.

If anything, I'd say move the Nestor to an exploration support role. Put the remote repairers out to 30 km, bonus some tractor beams and salvagers (salvage drone bonus?). In exchange, drop the data/relic bonuses, cut the drone bay but increase cargo or even add a fleet hangar. The cruiser and frigate have the data/relic bonuses plus the speed to cover the distances to the sites. Let the Nestor hang back in a support role.

Finally, give it some sort of unique, really cool exploration tool. I keep going back to the idea of an exploration related bastion or triage mode (probably because I could get a carrier or marauder for the same price or less). Not sure exactly what that would be though. And/or let it fit new exploration related fleet assistance links.

Something...ANYTHING to justify the cost.

Gate campers are just Carebears with anger issues.

Markus45
Doomheim
#11 - 2014-05-19 21:17:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Markus45
- Needs a cov ops cloak
- Needs to drop the RR bonus for something that no other BS can do that fits into the stealth theme
- Needs to be able to align quickly enough so if you warp to celestial the moment an inty appears on full-range dscan, you can escape just in time (might already be able to).

And then it's useful.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#12 - 2014-05-19 23:48:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
The justification for a Covert Ops cloak on the Nestor can be summed up in one argument: it has such horrid maneuverability and is so abysmally slow that even a Covert Ops cloak probably won't help it 95% of the time. It just means that when it finally does lumber into warp it gains a temporary reprieve...

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#13 - 2014-05-20 00:33:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Zan Shiro
Markus45 wrote:
- Needs to drop the RR bonus for something that no other BS can do that fits into the stealth theme


funny thing is people have been asking for an RR BS. CCP gave that. Overpriced, unloved (because of price lol)...but people got what they asked for.


We could also argue RR is what is missing from ninjya gangs. Currently the only solution (not saying its ideal, jsut a solution) is the red headed step child known as Sin. Since guns don't make it a beast some opt to go remote repper heavy on it. Since there is no real good fit for Sin, opting to not fit guns as much has it avoid the tag of fail fit.


Also ccp would need to rebalance blops before they could co cloak this bs. CCP tried to give pirate all the things missing on other ships in the existing classes before. It backfired. I'd be looking at dramiel (pre-nerf) spam. As it had what AF's and inty's did not years ago before their relatively recent buffs. Cyna also fell into this category. Hell so did mach and vindi till CCP got around to maruader redo in some respects.
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#14 - 2014-05-20 00:54:54 UTC
I still say, focus on the Exploration Support Ship as its purpose. Get rid of the hacking bonus and maybe even the scanning bonus. Instead add a fleet hangar of some 1-2k, a maintenance bay for 2 frigates and a role bonus that removes the targeting and resolution penalties of a cloaking device.

Now it can serve as a home away from home, a maintenance and refitting platform for the exploration fleet and it has enough firepower to be of use in a exploration site among the main group.
Cade Windstalker
#15 - 2014-05-20 02:45:50 UTC
Read these two posts from the original thread on the Nestor from CCP Rise:



Basically it's absolutely not happening until after the Black-Ops rebalance and even then it's a long shot. If you want an SMA bring a Mobile Depot.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#16 - 2014-05-20 03:14:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Basically it's absolutely not happening until after the Black-Ops rebalance...

It's an excuse to avoid dealing with an obviously flawed ship design.

Quote:
"After going over a lot of these options in detail (both initially and after reading feedback), we feel happy with the decision to go with a focus in logistics, low mass, and general versatility. "

Boring, ineffective and useless.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#17 - 2014-05-20 03:16:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
Double post, but the Nestor still sucks.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#18 - 2014-05-20 08:45:53 UTC
I would fly a shield version of nestor but because CCP are armor lovers we probably aren't getting one.
No I don't mean rattlesnake, I mean shield logi version of it.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Cade Windstalker
#19 - 2014-05-20 13:27:00 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Basically it's absolutely not happening until after the Black-Ops rebalance...

It's an excuse to avoid dealing with an obviously flawed ship design.


I'm not seeing the issues with the design that you are.

I'm also not seeing the problem with waiting until after the actual cloaky battleships have been balanced as a base-line to consider adding a cloak to this battleship.

Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Quote:
"After going over a lot of these options in detail (both initially and after reading feedback), we feel happy with the decision to go with a focus in logistics, low mass, and general versatility. "

Boring, ineffective and useless.


Your opinion. Not every ship is going to make everyone happy.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#20 - 2014-05-20 15:46:36 UTC
Ok here is a suggestion.
1. Allow the nestor to be invisible on D scan while warping. note NOT a covert ops cloak.
2. Allow the nestor to reduce mass by 90% or multiply its mass by ten fold.
3. Increase agility and reduce time to enter warp in line with the mass change.
4. Drop all the "interesting" bonuses and allow it to be fit as a decent pirate battleship.with slots, PG, and Cpu to work.

That will be a reasonable ship to use in wormholes, not amazing or overpowered, just useful and a good tool for all WH cOrps.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

12Next page