These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Combat Drone Operation Being Effectively Removed from the Game

First post First post
Author
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#441 - 2014-05-16 06:46:52 UTC
And in no case did you loose out on training time, and in no case do you loose SP. You keep all abilities you trained for and after the change it will take you longer to train for them than it did before. You have not 'lost' anything.
Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#442 - 2014-05-16 06:54:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Xasnevian
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
a pretty strong sign some other people are lacking common sense.
It's the fact some people are unable or unwilling to respect the point of view of others that makes this thread a long one. Your team has valid points and I respect that (and even agree with some of them). My team has valid points, but you can't stop telling them they're wrong as this quote illustrates.

I don't really see any new arguments popping up, so I'll be in the background until one does. On a sidenote, CCP Fozzie and CCP Rise are still watching: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=344503 (scroll all the way down)
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#443 - 2014-05-16 07:24:39 UTC
What would be really annoying is if they suddenly GAVE the CDO people a refund with no notice.... because I could have trained CDO with its memory/perception requisites on my alts and then allocated those SP to something that doesn't match my skill mapping and picked up an extra day or more in training time :D

Basically CDO is "cheap" to train as perception tends to be bumped in remaps. Thsi means people can train for CDO on the cheap and then allocate those SP to something that is say Charisma based and gain an advantage over people that did not train it.
beakerax
Pator Tech School
#444 - 2014-05-16 07:32:01 UTC
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
Quoting my advantage over future players is also irrelevant.

Well ****, I guess EVE really is dying.
Medalyn Isis
Doomheim
#445 - 2014-05-16 08:51:54 UTC
It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.

To me I would summarise it like this -

Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.

Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)

Both points of view are quite valid.
Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
#446 - 2014-05-16 09:19:21 UTC
Medalyn Isis wrote:
It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.

To me I would summarise it like this -

Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.

Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)

Both points of view are quite valid.

Yes, but I don't see why Side B could not give Side A what it wants, ie refund. Side B loses nothing over that...
Mocam
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#447 - 2014-05-16 09:24:34 UTC
Medalyn Isis wrote:
It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.

To me I would summarise it like this -

Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.

Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)

Both points of view are quite valid.


I'd be in the Side B area - with our without "free SP". The SP means nothing to me and probably anyone who trained the skills up - newer or not (beyond some envy on gains by others).

You train skills to enable styles of play. They are changing around the skills but these changes will not impact your ability with those styles of play.

The fact some may gain or not gain SP is fairly meaningless vs your abilities to use the tools you had trained for when you are *NOT* losing those abilities - simply shuffling them around.

So some gain more than others? Sorry but that shouldn't be a major concern.
Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
#448 - 2014-05-16 09:34:43 UTC
Mocam wrote:
Medalyn Isis wrote:
It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.

To me I would summarise it like this -

Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.

Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)

Both points of view are quite valid.


I'd be in the Side B area - with our without "free SP". The SP means nothing to me and probably anyone who trained the skills up - newer or not (beyond some envy on gains by others).

You train skills to enable styles of play. They are changing around the skills but these changes will not impact your ability with those styles of play.

The fact some may gain or not gain SP is fairly meaningless vs your abilities to use the tools you had trained for when you are *NOT* losing those abilities - simply shuffling them around.

So some gain more than others? Sorry but that shouldn't be a major concern.

Then why do you care if someone gets free SPs? This is why we can't have nice things. Side A wants refund, so why side B is so much against it?
Mocam
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#449 - 2014-05-16 09:41:56 UTC
Walter Hart White wrote:
Mocam wrote:
Medalyn Isis wrote:
It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.

To me I would summarise it like this -

Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.

Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)

Both points of view are quite valid.


I'd be in the Side B area - with our without "free SP". The SP means nothing to me and probably anyone who trained the skills up - newer or not (beyond some envy on gains by others).

You train skills to enable styles of play. They are changing around the skills but these changes will not impact your ability with those styles of play.

The fact some may gain or not gain SP is fairly meaningless vs your abilities to use the tools you had trained for when you are *NOT* losing those abilities - simply shuffling them around.

So some gain more than others? Sorry but that shouldn't be a major concern.

Then why do you care if someone gets free SPs? This is why we can't have nice things. Side A wants refund, so why side B is so much against it?


Umm... That's what I'm saying - I don't care if we get free SP but I do find it fair.

Side A finds it unfair. Side B finds it fair due to SP gains.
Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
#450 - 2014-05-16 10:27:19 UTC
Mocam wrote:
Walter Hart White wrote:
Mocam wrote:
Medalyn Isis wrote:
It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.

To me I would summarise it like this -

Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.

Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)

Both points of view are quite valid.


I'd be in the Side B area - with our without "free SP". The SP means nothing to me and probably anyone who trained the skills up - newer or not (beyond some envy on gains by others).

You train skills to enable styles of play. They are changing around the skills but these changes will not impact your ability with those styles of play.

The fact some may gain or not gain SP is fairly meaningless vs your abilities to use the tools you had trained for when you are *NOT* losing those abilities - simply shuffling them around.

So some gain more than others? Sorry but that shouldn't be a major concern.

Then why do you care if someone gets free SPs? This is why we can't have nice things. Side A wants refund, so why side B is so much against it?


Umm... That's what I'm saying - I don't care if we get free SP but I do find it fair.

Side A finds it unfair. Side B finds it fair due to SP gains.

I mean from refund.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#451 - 2014-05-16 10:34:30 UTC
Walter Hart White wrote:

Then why do you care if someone gets free SPs? This is why we can't have nice things. Side A wants refund, so why side B is so much against it?

Because side A is demanding they get more advantage over someone who hasn't trained any of the skills yet simply because they feel they deserve a larger number. Not because they loose any abilities or anything like that. Remember there is side C. The group who haven't trained drones and will be behind regardless.

Side A already is getting more sp for their time. They just want to take their bonus sp they are already getting and make it an even bigger number that they can allocate to any skill for an even larger time advantage.
Jax Acami
Whatever Brah
#452 - 2014-05-16 11:06:25 UTC
So, a search function did not provide me an answer to the following questions:


1 ) Which skill is going to unlock the Drone Link Augmentors?


2) Now that Sentry Drones will be tied to the Racial Drone skills, what level of Racial Drone skill will be needed in order to be able to use the T2 Sentry Drones?
Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
#453 - 2014-05-16 11:12:24 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Walter Hart White wrote:

Then why do you care if someone gets free SPs? This is why we can't have nice things. Side A wants refund, so why side B is so much against it?

Because side A is demanding they get more advantage over someone who hasn't trained any of the skills yet simply because they feel they deserve a larger number. Not because they loose any abilities or anything like that. Remember there is side C. The group who haven't trained drones and will be behind regardless.

Side A already is getting more sp for their time. They just want to take their bonus sp they are already getting and make it an even bigger number that they can allocate to any skill for an even larger time advantage.

But side B is getting the most of the SPs and yet the bicker at Side A because they want the same amount as Side B?
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#454 - 2014-05-16 11:15:43 UTC
To answer 2)
"CCP Fozzie" wrote:
"Obil Que" wrote:

Can you address the question of access to racial T2 sentries for those with Sentry Drone Interfacing trained to V. As it stands, those with that skill will lose access to existing weapons when the requirement for racial skills is implemented. Will those pilots receive the minimum level of racial skill to compensate?

Players will not be given racial drone spec skills. We're announcing this change early so that players have plenty of time to train the skills before the patch.

And a later quote

For the racial Drone Specialization skill requirements, we're going to be reducing the requirements for all T2 drones to level 1 of the skill.

That means for example Gallente Drone Spec level 1 will unlock Hobgoblin IIs, Hammerhead IIs, Ogre IIs, and Garde IIs (assuming you have the requisite T1 drone skills at level 5). This brings the drone spec skills more in line with the rest of our T2 weapon specialization skills. Training the skill beyond level 1 will still be advisable in order to get the extra damage boost, of course.


DLA's were not answered.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#455 - 2014-05-16 11:17:49 UTC
Walter Hart White wrote:

But side B is getting the most of the SPs and yet the bicker at Side A because they want the same amount as Side B?

Because the SP's are irrelevant, it's keeping the abilities that are the same. Also note that most of the people on side B in the argument actually have the same skills trained as side A.
Mocam
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#456 - 2014-05-16 11:30:10 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Walter Hart White wrote:

But side B is getting the most of the SPs and yet the bicker at Side A because they want the same amount as Side B?

Because the SP's are irrelevant, it's keeping the abilities that are the same. Also note that most of the people on side B in the argument actually have the same skills trained as side A.


That's a tricky question and you're right - they didn't cover that item.

Logically it would be moved under the new "Scout Drone Operations" being renamed to "Drone Avionics" (range based - where this module probably should have been put) but the item is currently attached to Combat Drone Operations - Not SDO.

Being as CDO is being split to light and medium drones, then removed, this module will need a "new home" skill. It looks like some might lose access to a module due to the change.

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#457 - 2014-05-16 11:36:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Nevyn Auscent
Mocam wrote:


That's a tricky question and you're right - they didn't cover that item.

Logically it would be moved under the new "Scout Drone Operations" being renamed to "Drone Avionics" (range based - where this module probably should have been put) but the item is currently attached to Combat Drone Operations - Not SDO.

Being as CDO is being split to light and medium drones, then removed, this module will need a "new home" skill. It looks like some might lose access to a module due to the change.


Unless they leave it at Light Drone 3, but if it only requires lvl 3, it's less than a day training if it's in SDO. And CCP have set a precedent in the past that changes that require only a few hours training won't be compensated with bonus skills, while longer skills will be.
Check on Sisi? Drone changes might be there now
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#458 - 2014-05-16 11:41:02 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Medalyn Isis wrote:
I'll probably get flamed for this, but to me it seems Combat Drone Operation is now being removed from the game although no SP reimbursement as in the case of learning skills.
You're not getting any SP reimbursed because you will be given the same abilities through the new skills that replace CDO (and which are worth more SP).

Both the blog and the subsequent dev posts make this fairly clear.

And when they removed learning skills, they also gave everyone the same abilities.
Yet they still reimbursed the SP.



Because the TOTAL SP of your character back then would diminish if you did nto reinburse. With this NEW change your TOTAL SP will INCREASE!!!

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Vorago Ignius
Chasm of Liberty
#459 - 2014-05-16 11:42:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Vorago Ignius
so before i mention a possible solution for everyone, i do like to state i do have both SDO and CDO at V.

so if you are inclined to see my post as bias, it's your right to do so, of course.


what if they almost kept it, as first stated but.

1. change the new Light drones and medium drones T2 version to only require IV in each skill, and Avionics V.

2. if persons with only SDO trained V, will get Avionics to V, while Light and medium will be IV.

3. if persons have both CDO and SDO at V. will get both Avionics, Light, and Medium at V.

4. if person have SDO V, and CDO I - IV, will get Avionics V, have trained % into IV - V in both Light and medium according to the total progress of CDO was.

so if a person has 20% SP of total CDO skill line, they will be 20% into training Lights and mediums V.

so people with CDO IV and SDO V, will after patch have same stats, and yet also have their CDO SP trained included into the new skills progress towards V, and those who have CDO at V, will have them at V as well, while those with no CDO will have a access to T2 drones of light and medium, while having a clean IV of said skills.


could it work? would no one feel cheated?

i don't know but it's a suggestion.

and sorry if already suggested before.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#460 - 2014-05-16 11:43:46 UTC
Except that makes T2 a trivial train & out of the normal pattern.