These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Combat Drone Operation Being Effectively Removed from the Game

First post First post
Author
Nar' alk Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#401 - 2014-05-16 01:31:32 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
They are not free skill points. They have already been payed for with the time that the person invested.
They are free because the abilities the person invested time in are retained.

They accumulated 256k SP to gain access to T2 drones and +25km control range, and 512k SP to gain access to +25% bonuses.
If they're reimbursed, they will end up with:
• 768k SP to gain access to T2 drones and +25% bonuses.
• 256k SP to gain access to +25km drone control range.
• 512k SP to be applied anywhere.


What you're not doing here is presenting the other side of the story. Everyone with SDO5 gets 1024k SP after the patch. The time that I invested in CDO5 represents more time invested than the SDO5 person yet they are getting the same amount of SP.

SDO5 person before patch:

256k SP

SDO5 and CDO5 person before the patch

768k SP

After the patch:

SDO5 person = CDO5 person.
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#402 - 2014-05-16 01:33:36 UTC
Nar' alk Breau wrote:


SDO5 person = CDO5 person.

Which isn't a problem since the CDO5 person isn't losing any actual bonuses. He's losing advantage, but CCP has a precedent for not reimbursing people for losing advantage.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#403 - 2014-05-16 01:34:28 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Actually there was a preservation of ability, though that ability was training speed, rather than training for training speed.
That's not an ability, though, nor was it preserved. Training is a core mechanic; the ability removed was the method to speed it up.

Quote:
Similarly a person with SDO V loses the ability to train the new skills where they might otherwise have had the ability to do so depending upon CDO level.
So… really, it's the SDO V guys that should be reimbursed because of their lost ability? Blink

Gavin Dax wrote:
But the advantage wasn't eliminated, which is what the problem is here. The skill did not become useless.

It was the exact same kind of “advantage” as people are talking about here, and no skill is being rendered useless. Some advantages were simply had through different means than before and people ended up with equal ability where they previously were equal. Even so, the guiding principle was that no ability was lost — if you happened to gain some in the process, then good for you.
Nar' alk Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#404 - 2014-05-16 01:36:46 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:


SDO5 person = CDO5 person.

Which isn't a problem since the CDO5 person isn't losing any actual bonuses. He's losing advantage, but CCP has a precedent for not reimbursing people for losing advantage.


It isn't a problem if you didn't invest the time into CDO5. I know they have a precedent for it, but that doesn't mean it's THE way or it can't be questioned.
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#405 - 2014-05-16 01:38:26 UTC
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:


SDO5 person = CDO5 person.

Which isn't a problem since the CDO5 person isn't losing any actual bonuses. He's losing advantage, but CCP has a precedent for not reimbursing people for losing advantage.


It isn't a problem if you didn't invest the time into CDO5. I know they have a precedent for it, but that doesn't mean it's THE way or it can't be questioned.

Sure, you can get you CDO reimbursed for lost advantage when my characters get their astrometrics skills reimbursed for lost advantage. Until then, welcome to the club. P
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#406 - 2014-05-16 01:38:55 UTC
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
What you're not doing here is presenting the other side of the story.
That's because there isn't one. The SDO guys are not the ones who are saying that they somehow deserve a “reimbursement” (which is actually a doubling of their SP). I'm simply pointing out that, yes, such a reimbursement would not be a reimbursement at all — it would simply be free SP. Any appeal to “fairness” is nonsensical unless it demands that everyone be given the same amount of free SP… which no-one seems to be doing.

Quote:
SDO5 person = CDO5 person.
That's what happens sometimes when abilities are being switched around. All that matters is that you don't lose any, and if you happen to gain some in the process, then good for you.
Gavin Dax
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#407 - 2014-05-16 01:48:02 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Gavin Dax wrote:
Continue to ignore the main point of the example by focusing on a minor detail that actually has no relevance.
Close but not quite. I'm focusing on a detail that makes your example have no relevance. You're trying to make a RaA argument by increasing the time and SP involved, but since the cases aren't alike, it becomes fallacious.

You're trying to draw parallels to a case that completely lacks the crucial detail that makes this case completely unlike the other one. So the only real observation that can be made is that, as expected, CCP has no problem handing out accidental access to new stuff or massive amounts of SP people haven't trained for. The only thing that's really important is that no-one lose the abilities they had.

Quote:
I did not make a straw man argument, because the way my example differed from this case was not relevant to the outcome.
That's true enough: no matter what, there would be no grounds for reimbursement since everyone kept what they had.


Can you explain how, if say, the destroyer ship class also had a bonus based on the BC skill, that would change the outcome, and thus the relevance of the example, in any way? You can't, because it doesn't change it.

The fact that the skills are coupled is what sparked the proposal to OR the CDO and SDO skills, but it has nothing to do with the new skills that are created or how to best distribute SP after the change.

I'll admit the example wasn't clear. But it is a correct comparison re: what the right thing to do is about reimbursement.
Nar' alk Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#408 - 2014-05-16 01:54:06 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
What you're not doing here is presenting the other side of the story.
That's because there isn't one. The SDO guys are not the ones who are saying that they somehow deserve a “reimbursement” (which is actually a doubling of their SP). I'm simply pointing out that, yes, such a reimbursement would not be a reimbursement at all — it would simply be free SP. Any appeal to “fairness” is nonsensical unless it demands that everyone be given the same amount of free SP… which no-one seems to be doing.


Fairness isn't nonsensical when one of the core elements your money pays for is being altered. I pay a monthly fee to train my alt on a time basis. SDO5 guys are getting a bump in skill points which equates to time which they haven't invested. Likewise, I should get a bump in skill points which I haven't invested.

Quote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:

SDO5 person = CDO5 person.

Tippia wrote:

That's what happens sometimes when abilities are being switched around. All that matters is that you don't lose any, and if you happen to gain some in the process, then good for you.


I suppose that's good enough for you, but not for me. Accepting something without questioning it isn't the best method in my book. You're %100 right, I didn't lose anything but as I've said before, it's not about losing anything. It's about the time I invested in CDO5 being equal to what an SDO5 person invested.
Priestess Lin
Darkfall Corp
#409 - 2014-05-16 01:54:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Priestess Lin
Typical tippia. On every page splitting hairs, arguing endlessly with everyone, saying black is white and unable to see the forest through the trees. Sad way to live a life, on the forums

When discussing weaknesses of heavy drones vs fast frigates: baltec1- " A thanatos with a flight of geckos killed a bomber gang while AFK. So yea, they track frigates just fine." https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4678049#post4678049

Nar' alk Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#410 - 2014-05-16 01:56:51 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:


SDO5 person = CDO5 person.

Which isn't a problem since the CDO5 person isn't losing any actual bonuses. He's losing advantage, but CCP has a precedent for not reimbursing people for losing advantage.


It isn't a problem if you didn't invest the time into CDO5. I know they have a precedent for it, but that doesn't mean it's THE way or it can't be questioned.

Sure, you can get you CDO reimbursed for lost advantage when my characters get their astrometrics skills reimbursed for lost advantage. Until then, welcome to the club. P


Thanks for the invite - finally, I've made it into a corp! I would love to see you get your astrometrics skills reimbursed. It's why I'm posting on the forums so the Devs know that there are those of us who would like to see it changed.
Nar' alk Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#411 - 2014-05-16 01:59:02 UTC
Priestess Lin wrote:
tTypical tippia. On every page splitting hairs, arguing endlessly with everyone and unable to see the forest through the trees. Sad way to live a life, on the forums


In all honesty, would it be as fun if she wasn't here? Twisted
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#412 - 2014-05-16 02:02:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Hasikan Miallok
Mario Putzo wrote:


I think you are missing the point.

Why do we train skills? Its not to have more SP than someone else, its to gain an advantage over someone else.






This is probably the real issue here.

In theory you train SP to gain abilities improve your skills and gain access to things. Much like in real life you do a university degree to gain abilities improve your skills and gain access to things (like a career and better income).

Now sadly in real life SOME unfortunate people do actually do a university degree to gain an advantage over someone else rather than for what the degree actually offers. I suppose if you treat your gaming the same way then you would see the drone skill change as "losing" your 1 week "advantage" over other people.

In the current scenario my attitude is:

1. IF you trained CDO for the legitimate purpose of using the skill there is no need to reimburse.
2. if you trained it as patch speculation hoping to manipulate some sort of SP advantage over newer players well too bad it backfired
Nar' alk Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#413 - 2014-05-16 02:07:01 UTC
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:


I think you are missing the point.

Why do we train skills? Its not to have more SP than someone else, its to gain an advantage over someone else.






This is probably the real issue here.

In theory you train SP to gain abilities improve your skills and gain access to things. Much like in real life you do a university degree to gain abilities improve your skills and gain access to things (like a career and better income).

Now sadly in real life SOME unfortunate people do actually do a university degree to gain an advantage over someone else rather than for what the degree actually offers. I suppose if you treat your gaming the same way then you would see the drone skill change as "losing" your 1 week "advantage" over other people.

In the current scenario my attitude is:

1. IF you trained CDO for the legitimate purpose of using the skill there is no need to reimburse.
2. if you trained it as patch speculation hoping to manipulate some sort of SP advantage over newer players well too bad it backfired


Training skills in eve is all about getting an advantage over another player. Isn't that why you PVP? Because you want to kick the other players butt? The fact that your training of CDO5 no longer gives you any advantage over another player who didn't train CDO5 goes against one of the reasons you train for.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#414 - 2014-05-16 02:15:11 UTC
Gavin Dax wrote:
Can you explain how, if say, the destroyer ship class also had a bonus based on the BC skill, that would change the outcome, and thus the relevance of the example, in any way?
Because then an argument could be made that, yes, letting people keep the abilities they had and handing out four times as much SP would actually be reasonable. It would still not provide any grounds for reimbursement, though.

Nar' alk Breau wrote:
Fairness isn't nonsensical when one of the core elements your money pays for is being altered.
Good thing that nothing of the kind is happening, then.
It is especially nonsensical when the appeal to fairness is is just a hypocritical expression of selfish greed.

SDO V guys are getting a bump in skill points. So are you. Just because your isn't as big as theirs does not mean it's unfair. If you somehow lost something, then we might talk, but you won't — the guiding principles try to avoid it, and the specific implementation of this change makes it impossible to do so.

Quote:
I suppose that's good enough for you, but not for me.
Tough. That's how it is. Advantages are being lost every second you train anything above lvl I and will all be lost before long anyway. What you should never lose, though, is what you have already unlocked. That's what your time is worth: abilities. If those abilities amount to an actual advantage is completely situational and contextual and variable, and as such, they can't really be used as a measure of investment value.

That's why CCP retains and reimburses ability, not advantage. One can trivially and universally be measured and expressed in absolute levels, the other cannot.

Quote:
It's about the time I invested in CDO5 being equal to what an SDO5 person invested.
Good news: it's not, nor should it be since we're talking about vastly different abilities.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#415 - 2014-05-16 02:17:09 UTC
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
Training skills in eve is all about getting an advantage over another player.
…and guess what? You're getting an advantage through this change.

Quote:
The fact that your training of CDO5 no longer gives you any advantage over another player who didn't train CDO5 goes against one of the reasons you train for.
…except that it does. In fact, it will give you even more advantages than it did before.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#416 - 2014-05-16 02:22:29 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Actually there was a preservation of ability, though that ability was training speed, rather than training for training speed.
That's not an ability, though, nor was it preserved. Training is a core mechanic; the ability removed was the method to speed it up.

Quote:
Similarly a person with SDO V loses the ability to train the new skills where they might otherwise have had the ability to do so depending upon CDO level.
So… really, it's the SDO V guys that should be reimbursed because of their lost ability? Blink

Gavin Dax wrote:
But the advantage wasn't eliminated, which is what the problem is here. The skill did not become useless.

It was the exact same kind of “advantage” as people are talking about here, and no skill is being rendered useless. Some advantages were simply had through different means than before and people ended up with equal ability where they previously were equal. Even so, the guiding principle was that no ability was lost — if you happened to gain some in the process, then good for you.
Training is a core mechanic, but that doesn't mean it can't be altered or portions of it changed, nor does it mean it's not an ability. Rather the designation of core mechanic only states that that ability is integral to the working of progression within the game.

The ability to speed up training was separate, but as you said it existed to speed up training, which is what the attribute increase did. No one trained the skills for the sake of training the skills, they trained for the affect and that was preserved without including the SP reimbursement. The SP reimbursement was for time, not the loss of an ability to train for faster training, which doesn't make sense to compensate since it's explicitly being eliminated was the goal of the change.
Nar' alk Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#417 - 2014-05-16 02:28:21 UTC
Tippia wrote:


Nar' alk Breau wrote:
Fairness isn't nonsensical when one of the core elements your money pays for is being altered.
Good thing that nothing of the kind is happening, then.
It is especially nonsensical when the appeal to fairness is is just a hypocritical expression of selfish greed.

You are entitled to your opinion.

Quote:
SDO V guys are getting a bump in skill points. So are you. Just because your isn't as big as theirs does not mean it's unfair. If you somehow lost something, then we might talk, but you won't — the guiding principles try to avoid it, and the specific implementation of this change makes it impossible to do so.

Sure it does. You don't have to lose something for an outcome to be unfair. That's just silly. Refunding SP isn't a very hard thing to do, I'm not sure why you think it's impossible. It's been done before.

Quote:
I suppose that's good enough for you, but not for me.

Tough. That's how it is. Advantages are being lost every second you train anything above lvl I and will all be lost before long anyway. What you should never lose, though, is what you have already unlocked. That's what your time is worth: abilities. If those abilities amount to an actual advantage is completely situational and contextual and variable, and as such, they can't really be used as a measure of investment value.

Again, thank you for your opinion.

Quote:
That's why CCP retains and reimburses ability, not advantage. One can trivially and universally be measured and expressed in absolute levels, the other cannot.

Time is fairly straight forward to measure as are skill points.



Sorry, I deleted your last quote because you took it out of context thus rendering it irrelevant.




Nar' alk Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#418 - 2014-05-16 02:34:26 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
Training skills in eve is all about getting an advantage over another player.
…and guess what? You're getting an advantage through this change.


But there are others who are getting this same advantage who have invested less time.

Quote:
The fact that your training of CDO5 no longer gives you any advantage over another player who didn't train CDO5 goes against one of the reasons you train for.
Quote:
…except that it does. In fact, it will give you even more advantages than it did before.


While I like the quotes being taken out of context as it makes your argument appear stronger, no it doesn't give you an advantage against another player who has trained SDO5 with the coming patch.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#419 - 2014-05-16 02:34:33 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Training is a core mechanic, but that doesn't mean it can't be altered or portions of it changed, nor does it mean it's not an ability.
It definitely keeps it from being an ability, unless you also consider things like opening the market window or looking at the star map an ability. It's not something that characterises a character or account — it's just a basic functionality. And again, the actual ability in question was not preserved. That's why the skills were reimbursed: because the ability they were meant to provide had been removed, and since that rendered the skills pointless, they were removed too.

Quote:
The SP reimbursement was for time, not the loss of an ability to train for faster training.
The SP reimbursement was for skills that no longer provided the ability they were supposed to, since that ability was removed from the game. Had the skills been revamped into something different, there might not have been a reimbursement since your training would still have afforded you some kind of ability that set your character apart from others.
Gavin Dax
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#420 - 2014-05-16 02:34:45 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Nar' alk Breau wrote:
Training skills in eve is all about getting an advantage over another player.
…and guess what? You're getting an advantage through this change.

Quote:
The fact that your training of CDO5 no longer gives you any advantage over another player who didn't train CDO5 goes against one of the reasons you train for.
…except that it does. In fact, it will give you even more advantages than it did before.


I don't get it. The second quote refutes your first argument. Your response to the second quote doesn't make sense.

I assume what you meant here is that you're gaining an advantage vs. future players (well, more of an advantage). The key point is that skills are trained to gain an advantage over *everyone* who does not have that skill. And that advantage is clearly lost.