These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

While you're complaining about Hisec PI spare a thought...

Author
Tasko Pal
Spallated Garniferous Schist
#41 - 2011-12-03 02:34:58 UTC
I solved this problem by not caring. While I don't have extensive PI operations, what I do have remains worth the bother.

Cygnet Lythanea wrote:


Not one of them has this advantage on the scale that goons do. And, sure, all the nullsec alliances have the same advantage.. now.


Wait, trash-talking in local generates PI now? Who knew?

More seriously, the goons are pretty smart players and they knocked up the oxytopes market, but let's not get bowled-over stupid here. Anyone with deep blue space will be able to do whatever the Goons currently can do. And there will probably be a bunch of others in null, WH, and low sec that will do well with PI. Finally, I bet we'll see the "my minerals are free" crowd producing gobs of PI in high sec as well. It's not going to be a magic money maker for Goons.
Bloody Wench
#42 - 2011-12-03 03:18:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Bloody Wench
Osunn wrote:
The cost process has just started to run. I use all of my PI for T2 production. My costs for PI have gone up at least five fold maybe more. The T2 on the market right now does not reflect this increase. So I hauled a production run to a market hub but did not put anything up. My best guess is that once a lot of the stored PI is exhausted ALL T2 products will jump in price by quite a lot but the isk generation in game has not changed at all.
Maybe in a month or so we will see the null alliances dominating the market as they did when T2 bpos were released. It may not be quite the cartel it was but similar to rare moon materials today. Sucks if you are a newer player, prices go way up but income stays the same. It won't matter much if you are a large corp drone but if you have actually buy your ships well good luck you are going to need it.



I agree with your sentiments regarding an overall price increase in the areas that have PI as an input.

However I strongly disagree that "ISK generation ingame has not increased at all". One only needs to take a cursory look at all the 'nerf hisec incursions' threads to realise that. You may also not know that a mere 10 anomolies in a C4 will net you close to a billion ISK in blue tags. Blue tags are the only faucets in WH's, everything else is player bought.

I want to be absolutely clear on ISK generation. When you sell stuff to NPCs or get a bounty from an NPC for killing an NPC, this is generating ISK. This is not the same as selling stuff to players.

There are large opportunities to generate vastly more ISK now than there were 'in the old days'. However for the longest time there have been no effective sinks ingame. While I don't have a source onhand, I distinctly remember reading that the majority of PI is done in Hisec. We need some form of effective sink to counter the reletively recent avalanche of ISK that are WHs and incursions, thus we have the PI tax. While not explicitly stated by CCP, that's my theory.

So unless you want to be paying 40 isk per unit of trit, there needs to be a way to keep the overall volume of isk in check. If these taxes are indeed removing large quantities of ISK from circulation, then what will actually happen is that prices will go down numerically, because ISK is worth more per unit. It is sometimes hard to get your head around, but ISK only has value with relation to time. In 04-05 generating a Billion ISK was a big deal and would take a substantial amount of time and effort, then along came Insurance fraud which took entirely too long to get fixed, and generated vast quantities of ISK. I'm deliberately ignoring missions as they have been around for the longest time. Now there is incursions and Wormholes generating vast quantities of ISK and there needs to be some way to remove it.

There needs to be a tax on Hisec to help remove some of the ISK generated by Hisec NPC killing. Null anoms and ratting are offset to some degree by sov and alliance bills. Wormholes seem to be the odd ones out in this respect as there is no sink there, once you replace the Interbus offices. The only way for this to fail completely for CCP is if every Hisec PI operator did indeed cease all PI related activities. CCP has quite reasonably wagered that won't happen.


The people who are blaming goons...I just don't know what to tell you.

[u]**Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote: **[/u]  CCP should not only make local delayed in highsec, but they should also require one be undocked to use it. Then, even the local spammers have some skin in the game. Support a High Resolution Texture Pack

FastJack316
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2011-12-03 03:56:41 UTC  |  Edited by: FastJack316
Scrapyard Bob wrote:
FastJack316 wrote:
It won't effect datacores at all, which being a 100% passive isk source are the actual invention genie that a nerf would need to be aimed at.


Datacores are not an ISK source. They fall into the same bucket as mineral mining, ice mining and loot drops. They only have value because other players will pay for them, there are no NPCs that will buy your datacores so no way to move ISK out of a NPC wallet into your wallet.


We were discussing invention, which exists solely to sell things to players. That I was saying isk source in the sense of 'source of products that never runs out and you can always sell to someone' should be obvious from the context.


Tasko Pal wrote:


Wait, trash-talking in local generates PI now? Who knew?



We cannot allow a local spam gap.
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#44 - 2011-12-03 04:00:49 UTC
The reason that goons are getting the blame is partially due to some things being said by EoG and by being the most prominent supporters of it, who also conveniently stand to make the most isk off high sec getting taxed.

AS fa as an isk sink goes, someone in another thread suggested that the it might be in the spirit of the game if there was a way to bypass it that required a great deal of work (high level skills, a standing of 9 or higher, etc). Personally I support this idea, as it makes it more profitable to players willing ot put the time in, and cuts into big alliances ability to dictate price.
FastJack316
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2011-12-03 04:11:37 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
The reason that goons are getting the blame is partially due to some things being said by EoG and by being the most prominent supporters of it, who also conveniently stand to make the most isk off high sec getting taxed.


I still don't understand why you think goons stand to make the most isk off the PI tax. I would be honestly shocked if any 0.0 alliance (other than PL, maybe TEST) has less investment in PI than we do.

Our membership finds it boring and **** and mostly don't bother with it, in part because it is boring and ****, also in part because you make more money off running complexes and that uses PvP skills that we generally want to train to have fun, rather than requiring that you spend a couple weeks training otherwise useless PI skills to run a robotics farm, or whatever ends up being the most profitable design once prices stabilize.

If anyone stands to gain the most it's probably the Russians.
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#46 - 2011-12-03 04:28:33 UTC
FastJack316 wrote:

I still don't understand why you think goons stand to make the most isk off the PI tax. I would be honestly shocked if any 0.0 alliance (other than PL, maybe TEST) has less investment in PI than we do.

Our membership finds it boring and **** and mostly don't bother with it, in part because it is boring and ****, also in part because you make more money off running complexes and that uses PvP skills that we generally want to train to have fun, rather than requiring that you spend a couple weeks training otherwise useless PI skills to run a robotics farm, or whatever ends up being the most profitable design once prices stabilize.

If anyone stands to gain the most it's probably the Russians.



Fastjack, according to certain sources within your own alliance, the brass feel that moon goo, goonswarms primary source of alliance income, will be nerfed.

Since goons currently hold one of the largest nullsec empires, their ability to turn that simple fact into a unstoppable economic juggernaut cannot be dismissed. Given the number of planets you control, there is a very real possibility, given the relative disunity and disinterest of your opposition, that goonswarm could dictate PI prices, and, from there, T2 prices as a whole, through the simple expedient of flooding the market to drive competitors out of business.
FastJack316
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2011-12-03 04:38:17 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:



Fastjack, according to certain sources within your own alliance, the brass feel that moon goo, goonswarms primary source of alliance income, will be nerfed.

Since goons currently hold one of the largest nullsec empires, their ability to turn that simple fact into a unstoppable economic juggernaut cannot be dismissed. Given the number of planets you control, there is a very real possibility, given the relative disunity and disinterest of your opposition, that goonswarm could dictate PI prices, and, from there, T2 prices as a whole, through the simple expedient of flooding the market to drive competitors out of business.


Well yes, actually. I just said that myself, I'm sure tech will be nerfed because it should be. It will not be nerfed out of existence, and our Alliance takes the income from more than just tech moons, so I have no doubt that it will continue to be far more important than PI.

However you seem to be under the mistaken assumptions that

1) a single character can PI on hundreds of planets somehow to take advantage of all our space, or possibly that there is a cap on how many people can PI a single planet
2) we're the biggest alliance in 0.0
3) we're the richest alliance in 0.0
4) we could somehow insulate ourselves from the impact of PI taxes on T2 production despite nullsec and WH pvp being the consumer base for T2 products, possibly out of a mistaken belief that we build all our own modules rather than buying most of them in Jita the same as everyone else

None of these are true.
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#48 - 2011-12-03 06:32:04 UTC
Fastjack, I know goons hold more solar systems with planets then anyone else. as far as manpower or wealth,well, from an interesting discussion I had a bit ago, the directorate is doing it wrong.

On item 4) I know you're buying in empire. I am, after all, selling it to you and shipping it to you on occasion. However, if you did build your own, then, yes, you would insulate yourselves quite easily.
FastJack316
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2011-12-03 07:25:11 UTC
No, apparently you don't actually no much at all about 0.0 if you think the goons control anywhere near the largest number of planetary systems. This is a straight up simple matter of numbers that you could confirm for yourself if you cared to.

I'm not sure if your determined ignorance of 0.0 or your determined ignorance of the mechanics of PI that is less productive in this discussion, but you should go fix them.
Bloody Wench
#50 - 2011-12-03 13:16:05 UTC
Without turning this into yet another goon thread.

Cygnet, I think you're overestimating goons interest in this. PI is incredibly boring, nothing goes boom, and while it seems that there may indeed be 'tears to be had', they aren't really in the style that goons enjoy.

[u]**Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote: **[/u]  CCP should not only make local delayed in highsec, but they should also require one be undocked to use it. Then, even the local spammers have some skin in the game. Support a High Resolution Texture Pack

Tasko Pal
Spallated Garniferous Schist
#51 - 2011-12-03 13:29:13 UTC
Cygnet, grownups are talking. Fastjack explained quite nicely why null sec PI isn't going to be a windfall for Goons (at least isk-wise, tear-wise might be a different story).
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#52 - 2011-12-03 13:39:55 UTC
Come on now, guys, everyone knows goons are fat neckbearded OCD people who like to do nothing but sit and click in space.

It's literally the only thing we know how to do.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Vigdis Thorisdottir
Doomheim
#53 - 2011-12-03 18:48:16 UTC
Alliances won't make money off taxing poco's. They will make money by not having to pay *any* tax on their poco's.

Stop being dense.
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#54 - 2011-12-03 19:52:57 UTC
Vigdis Thorisdottir wrote:
Alliances won't make money off taxing poco's. They will make money by not having to pay *any* tax on their poco's.

Stop being dense.



It's been goons party line, that they're deliberately not making any money off it by setting tax at 15%. Personally, I find the story hard to swallow.

Tasko Pal wrote:
Cygnet, grownups are talking. Fastjack explained quite nicely why null sec PI isn't going to be a windfall for Goons (at least isk-wise, tear-wise might be a different story).


Tasko, fastjack did nothing of the sort. He just sat there and misrepresented what I said, and then tried to dodge the subject by attacking my knowledge of 0.0. You know, the basic way to try an dodge an issue when you know real answers would hang you out to dry? Just counting the systems goons claim sov in doesn't give you the whole picture, which is what I've been talking about. Goons project power far beyond that.

If this wasn't a big moneymaker for them, then goons wouldn't turn up in every thread about it attacking the posters that dislike the current approach. After all, no other alliance is doing so on such a scale and with such diligence, so goons must have an angle. You don't work it this hard without a reason

Bloody Wench wrote:
Without turning this into yet another goon thread.
Cygnet, I think you're overestimating goons interest in this. PI is incredibly boring, nothing goes boom, and while it seems that there may indeed be 'tears to be had', they aren't really in the style that goons enjoy.


As I said, goons are pushing hard in the forums and trying to derail or discredit any opposition to it. To me, that smells like rat.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#55 - 2011-12-03 19:58:05 UTC
By all means, quit PI in a huff over the tax increase while muttering about the "ebul goonies", all it means is more isk for me when I do sell my PI stuff. vOv

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#56 - 2011-12-03 20:08:16 UTC
Wow, very condescending, and clueless, of you.

As I've said Zim, I'm making a killing on it, it's just bad for the game. It damages the market in the long run and consolidates too much power over the market in the hands of a very few people. This leads to the sort of stagnation that UO underwent.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#57 - 2011-12-03 20:11:44 UTC
Yeah, except it doesn't. It's spreading extraction and profit across more people than moons have, and EVE didn't die because of them, now did it?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

FastJack316
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2011-12-03 21:05:30 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:

Tasko, fastjack did nothing of the sort. He just sat there and misrepresented what I said, and then tried to dodge the subject by attacking my knowledge of 0.0. You know, the basic way to try an dodge an issue when you know real answers would hang you out to dry? Just counting the systems goons claim sov in doesn't give you the whole picture, which is what I've been talking about. Goons project power far beyond that.


No I started attacking your knowledge of 0.0 when you ignored my actual response to you to continue your paranoid rantings.

FastJack316 wrote:


However you seem to be under the mistaken assumptions that

1) a single character can PI on hundreds of planets somehow to take advantage of all our space, or possibly that there is a cap on how many people can PI a single planet
2) we're the biggest alliance in 0.0
3) we're the richest alliance in 0.0
4) we could somehow insulate ourselves from the impact of PI taxes on T2 production despite nullsec and WH pvp being the consumer base for T2 products, possibly out of a mistaken belief that we build all our own modules rather than buying most of them in Jita the same as everyone else

None of these are true.


If you're willing to breakdown what possible advantage there is to having 500 planets over 50 planets to an alliance of any size in your bizzare universe? Because here in reality the game mechanics are that planetary productivity for extraction is so high in 0.0 that there is incredibly minimal negative effects from having hundreds of people doing PI on the same planet, which is why those of us who do PI in 0.0 use the same handful of systems with the best/rarest planetary set ups. If we get another thousand characters doing PI we don't need to conquer another thousand planets, they just use the same ones. (it is also silly to think that we could produce all our own T2 modules with the huge relative disadvantage 0.0 production has compared to hisec, prices would have to absolutely skyrocket to make it sensible, but that's not really on topic)

POCOs actually further disincentivize spreading out our PI since you have to put the custom's offices up.

As for why we'd pay 15% POCO taxes, that's obvious if you've ever actually bothered to read a post from The Mittani: we're space communism here. The government sticks its hose in our pockets in order to shower us in free ships. If the POCO taxes turn out half as much as ratting taxes, it'll be enough to double the ice interdiction/roll out an entirely new fleet doctrine/host a capital ship thunderdome Cool
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#59 - 2011-12-04 02:04:06 UTC
Vigdis Thorisdottir wrote:
Alliances won't make money off taxing poco's. They will make money by not having to pay *any* tax on their poco's.

Stop being dense.


They could do both in low-sec. 0% taxes for corp/alliance members. MASSIVE taxes for everyone else. Assuming they could hold them of course. So bring on the alliance dominated PI, and of course, pirates collecting everyones tears.

I guess high-sec taxes would seem nicer after that! Shocked

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Menrith Hadel
Boop Brigade
#60 - 2011-12-04 03:09:30 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
If this wasn't a big moneymaker for them, then goons wouldn't turn up in every thread about it attacking the posters that dislike the current approach. After all, no other alliance is doing so on such a scale and with such diligence, so goons must have an angle. You don't work it this hard without a reason

We also strongly support the fluoridation of tapwater as a means of mind control.