These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

WH voting ballots for those interested

Author
Bronya Boga
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2014-05-12 09:14:32 UTC
I'm sorry max but that is nonsense. Having two csm wont speed up the pos revamp. it might help avoid some bumps here and there but yeah having two csm doesn't mean CCP changes their roadmap.

At the end of the day we got what we deserved. People are still morons if they didn't educate themselves but however they voted shows how much the wormhole community doesn't get the csm process and just hopes that by throwing votes around they will somehow change CCP time table
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#22 - 2014-05-12 09:22:42 UTC
Bronya Boga wrote:
I'm sorry max but that is nonsense. Having two csm wont speed up the pos revamp. it might help avoid some bumps here and there but yeah having two csm doesn't mean CCP changes their roadmap.

At the end of the day we got what we deserved. People are still morons if they didn't educate themselves but however they voted shows how much the wormhole community doesn't get the csm process and just hopes that by throwing votes around they will somehow change CCP time table


Maybe if you'd done a podcast about it...

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Ilaister
Binary Aesthetics
#23 - 2014-05-12 09:33:02 UTC
My two cents....

I did not vote for all the WH candidates, some when I looked into their platform/hung out in one of the campaign TS chats I felt didn't have a lot to offer. When I talked to my corpies about the CSM the apathy was overwhelming ('they don't matter/my vote means nothing') and the only impact the buildup to the votes had on us as a corp were:

1) Invading a C5 and having Proc and his redcoats roll in, salute our efforts to Bob, anchor a can and spam local with 'Proc4CSM' before rolling back out. Props.

2) Same day as we continued to wait out the reinforcement timers with maybe 4 blokes online, Corbexx and his lot rolling in , nuking the last tower as its timer ended and running like girls out the backdoor they brought their dreads through as soon as a Skyfighter scout popped up in the hole. Fewer props.

Perhaps a greater focus on aligning votes across w-space, and ensuring the campaign trail includes lower class whers, not just C5+ would get us more reps.

My question would be, what made everyone vote for Corbe above Asa, Chitsa, James etc?
Bronya Boga
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2014-05-12 11:04:13 UTC
Ilaister wrote:
My two cents....

I did not vote for all the WH candidates, some when I looked into their platform/hung out in one of the campaign TS chats I felt didn't have a lot to offer. When I talked to my corpies about the CSM the apathy was overwhelming ('they don't matter/my vote means nothing') and the only impact the buildup to the votes had on us as a corp were:

1) Invading a C5 and having Proc and his redcoats roll in, salute our efforts to Bob, anchor a can and spam local with 'Proc4CSM' before rolling back out. Props.

2) Same day as we continued to wait out the reinforcement timers with maybe 4 blokes online, Corbexx and his lot rolling in , nuking the last tower as its timer ended and running like girls out the backdoor they brought their dreads through as soon as a Skyfighter scout popped up in the hole. Fewer props.

Perhaps a greater focus on aligning votes across w-space, and ensuring the campaign trail includes lower class whers, not just C5+ would get us more reps.

My question would be, what made everyone vote for Corbe above Asa, Chitsa, James etc?


Literally just proved my previous post. People don't educate themselves and are ******* dumb.

Anyone who wish to properly educate themselves can look up info or if you are a lazy **** I'll even come to your TS and explain it to ya. But yeah.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2014-05-12 11:42:37 UTC
This year I didn't vote because i didn't even know voting had started. Straight

Let's not kid ourselves. CCP act like we don't exist most of the time so we should just be gland that we have one guy to tell them "i told you so" the next time they **** something up.

At the end of the day, if you don't want anything new added to wormholes, one CSM rep is all you need.
Ilaister
Binary Aesthetics
#26 - 2014-05-12 13:16:45 UTC
Bronya Boga wrote:


Literally just proved my previous post. People don't educate themselves and are ******* dumb.

Anyone who wish to properly educate themselves can look up info or if you are a lazy **** I'll even come to your TS and explain it to ya. But yeah.



Uh... Explain what to me, exactly? And who precisely are you suggesting is '******* lazy and ******* dumb' btw?
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#27 - 2014-05-12 13:25:45 UTC
Popcorn time

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Bronya Boga
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2014-05-12 14:08:34 UTC
Anytime someone says that csm doesnt matter or that their vote doesnt count they are being ignorant or lazy about educating themselves on the subject. I dont know if its Because I get to talk to csm more often then the usual player but they do matter and every vote matters in the STV system especially. Im not saying your dudes arent smart but they might not be educated on the subject if they think that and if you a CEO take the time to educate them.
Meytal
Doomheim
#29 - 2014-05-12 14:37:34 UTC
Believing the CSM can do more than they can do is just as bad as believing they can do less than they can do. We will never know the truth; only CCP will, but maybe CSM has some idea as well. CCP will always spin their pronouncements, and CSM is bound by NDA for most of what they could say. Unless you are one of those two, you really have no true knowledge of what impact the CSM has, and your opinion is no better than anyone else's no matter how many CSMs you talk to.

Personally, I'm disappointed that CCP is incapable of listening to their whole customer base -- or has simply chosen to be this way -- and has to have special appointed customers that they might (hopefully) listen to. That act right there tilts my attitude toward the cynical side.

Regardless of what CCP does or doesn't do as a result of CSM influence, we need to continue to voice our concerns to both CCP and CSM, and support the CSM in the face of impending braindead changes CCP is trying to make, particularly when they're trying to break Wormhole space.
Bronya Boga
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2014-05-12 16:14:50 UTC
Meytal wrote:
Believing the CSM can do more than they can do is just as bad as believing they can do less than they can do. We will never know the truth; only CCP will, but maybe CSM has some idea as well. CCP will always spin their pronouncements, and CSM is bound by NDA for most of what they could say. Unless you are one of those two, you really have no true knowledge of what impact the CSM has, and your opinion is no better than anyone else's no matter how many CSMs you talk to.

Personally, I'm disappointed that CCP is incapable of listening to their whole customer base -- or has simply chosen to be this way -- and has to have special appointed customers that they might (hopefully) listen to. That act right there tilts my attitude toward the cynical side.

Regardless of what CCP does or doesn't do as a result of CSM influence, we need to continue to voice our concerns to both CCP and CSM, and support the CSM in the face of impending braindead changes CCP is trying to make, particularly when they're trying to break Wormhole space.


Honestly post with your main.

Second I dont need to know NDA stuff I do hear a lot of "we helped them with project A and project B"(literally project A and B) and they had bad idea and "we warned them about doing something something" also have you ever visited the features and ideas forum CSM always post there and everythong on there went through CSM and they are there for the community to comment on. So when you say CCP isnt talking to the player base you are way off. Even the recent kill API thing went to the community and I assure you that CSM talked about it. And like I mentioned on some previous thread I support that change and I am sure CSM did aswell. So you are completely wrong.
Meytal
Doomheim
#31 - 2014-05-12 18:25:07 UTC
"I've seen these things that CSM says in public and what CCP allows to be made public by the CSM, even though I don't know anything that happens behind the scenes. I'm also choosing to overlook the instances of CCP repeatedly ignoring player and CSM input, because facts only cloud up the discussion. Therefore I can positively say that your statement claiming ignorance of the CSM's true influence on CCP is patently false, as is your claim that CCP doesn't listen to player input. Futher, I'm more relevant than you because I post on a different character, not necessarily because of the words I use or evidence I provide."

If you require a specific name to attach to a post before the words will matter to you, then there are no words that will matter to you regardless of any name that is attached to them. Troll elsewhere. Thanks.

We only have what CCP tells us, and what they allow the CSM to tell us, about anything that happens there. Now if you completely trust CCP, and if they have never done anything to cause you to even have a shred of doubt in anything they say or do, then I apologize for offending your sensibilities.

But as for me (and maybe others), I've seen CCP ignore player input, implement, and then be surprised that things were broken in exactly the ways players told them things would be broken. I too have read things the CSM has written. However, I also remember rage against CCP misattributing statements and agreements to the CSM that the CSM had no parts of. And I remember reading various members of the CSM unhappy with being ignored, left out of the process, or considered insignificant, promising that they (CSM) were making as much noise as they could to try to get CCP's attention.

If you go back and re-read what I said, if you can be bothered to read something by someone who may or may not be a friend, you'll see that I was saying we don't really know; we need to continue to try and to continue to hope, but we will never be certain.

I'm currently placing all the hope I can be bothered to give that CCP is doing the right thing with the POS redesign. It's old code, it will take a while, and it will affect absolutely everyone in the game in a much more invasive way than new-Inventory did. It needs to be taken slow, and CCP is showing signs that they understand this and are indeed taking things one baby step at a time to get it right. They could very easily destroy much about our way of life in W-space, turning it into a shadow of K-space with even the most minute of changes.


Unless of course you do know all of these things that I claim are unknowable, meaning you are either a past/current CSM or CCP employee.

If not, yours is just an opinion, and you know what they say about opinions...
unimatrix0030
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2014-05-12 18:56:37 UTC
After seeing this and reading Rhavas and jester blog i think we can conclude that not vote or not putting ALL the wormhole candidates ontop is virtualy the same as following the vote of the big voterblocks (null sec mostly in this case).
I can understand that not all candidates are to your liking or you even deam to be good enough.
But not putting all of them in the top of your voting ballot just cost us 1 representative at least.
The facts now are that we won't have a w-space representative on ground in both CSM summits.
Saying that is not important is ignorant . Think of all the things they did put ontop of CCP's list to make.
Not only that as in most things with votes, the one with the most representative and the most vocal supporters then to get more then the others. Why? Because there issues comes up more!

CSM communication might be bether but then again, the NDA holds them back most of the time i geuss(correct me if i am wrong).
Maybe we could have used a c1-c4 profiled w-space representative, but none ever comes out of the woodworks.

Having 2 representatives makes it less likely that a bad change slips through.
It also makes it easier on these guys that put their time in it for us all(by the way did we thank our past representatives?).
Also remember while the feature and idea's discussion is here it is only the stuff that CCP is willing to release from nda!
The CSM is a way they can ask things to their userbase while still being under NDA.

And lets face it on these forums if a CSM member says that they mentioned it to CCP will not be enough for many bittervets on here who just like to rip every one a new one.

And that while we have a lot of thing in the pipeline that will affect us! Like the T3 revamp, the api thingy, the scanner thingy, POS,alliance bookmarks,more content , more reasons to fight,... .

No local in null sec would fix everything!

Bronya Boga
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#33 - 2014-05-12 19:24:35 UTC
Meytal wrote:
"I've seen these things that CSM says in public and what CCP allows to be made public by the CSM, even though I don't know anything that happens behind the scenes. I'm also choosing to overlook the instances of CCP repeatedly ignoring player and CSM input, because facts only cloud up the discussion. Therefore I can positively say that your statement claiming ignorance of the CSM's true influence on CCP is patently false, as is your claim that CCP doesn't listen to player input. Futher, I'm more relevant than you because I post on a different character, not necessarily because of the words I use or evidence I provide."

If you require a specific name to attach to a post before the words will matter to you, then there are no words that will matter to you regardless of any name that is attached to them. Troll elsewhere. Thanks.

We only have what CCP tells us, and what they allow the CSM to tell us, about anything that happens there. Now if you completely trust CCP, and if they have never done anything to cause you to even have a shred of doubt in anything they say or do, then I apologize for offending your sensibilities.

But as for me (and maybe others), I've seen CCP ignore player input, implement, and then be surprised that things were broken in exactly the ways players told them things would be broken. I too have read things the CSM has written. However, I also remember rage against CCP misattributing statements and agreements to the CSM that the CSM had no parts of. And I remember reading various members of the CSM unhappy with being ignored, left out of the process, or considered insignificant, promising that they (CSM) were making as much noise as they could to try to get CCP's attention.

If you go back and re-read what I said, if you can be bothered to read something by someone who may or may not be a friend, you'll see that I was saying we don't really know; we need to continue to try and to continue to hope, but we will never be certain.

I'm currently placing all the hope I can be bothered to give that CCP is doing the right thing with the POS redesign. It's old code, it will take a while, and it will affect absolutely everyone in the game in a much more invasive way than new-Inventory did. It needs to be taken slow, and CCP is showing signs that they understand this and are indeed taking things one baby step at a time to get it right. They could very easily destroy much about our way of life in W-space, turning it into a shadow of K-space with even the most minute of changes.


Unless of course you do know all of these things that I claim are unknowable, meaning you are either a past/current CSM or CCP employee.

If not, yours is just an opinion, and you know what they say about opinions...


The reason I woyld love for you not to hide behind an alt is I would know where you are getting your information from. Are you a member of SSC that was friends with James or are you in some other corp who heard stories or maybe you are an active member of the community and have a lot of people you know. Here is the deal CCP is a business and of course they will sometimes do what they want just like any other business. But they have given us the opportunity to try and make a difference and if you look at the progress CSM has made in influencing CCP in the past 4 terms you will see a hugh change from getting to talk to them twice a year and never hearing from them in between summits to almost daily meeting.

Sure you dont know what they are talking about but do you think CCP would spend money on a project that has proven on multiple occasions that it is useful?

The reason I mentioned me speaking with CSM is because they talk about how much work they did and when a feature comes out you will always hear CSM saying if they supported it or the opposed it or warned CCP of some consequences.

All we can do is hope that more and more teams take advantage of the CSM. But CCP is already involved more then it is given credit to.
Meytal
Doomheim
#34 - 2014-05-12 21:30:45 UTC
Actually, my position is the easiest one to take: uncertainty; it also happens to harmonize with my cynical side.

It's hard to forget CCP's scandals. As recent as the Golden Ammo and Monoclegate, we know upper management is thinking solely about profits, regardless of how it affects the game. Maybe they've changed? Or maybe they're just being more careful now? But their thoughts are certainly not about making the game the best it can be. Maybe they're not satisfied being a niche game anymore? Who knows.

The ones further from the management decisions tend to care the most about the game. Unfortunately, they tend to be the faces connected to upper management's bad decisions, and thus receive the majority of the vitriol as a result of those bad decisions. For example, CCP Support staff is some of the best, friendliest, and most efficient support staff from any company, application provider, game producer, or whatever. There are undoubtedly many fine men and women in other areas within CCP as well, but anyone who has worked in the software industry (or most any industry) knows, management constraints force you to cut corners, or you may be out looking for a new job while they replace you with someone "more efficient."

I do agree that we do at least have the CSM, even if the bulk of it is composed of CCP choir boys who echo CCP's null-centric point of view above all else. It is my fervent wish that CCP integrate the CSM into more and more of its design decisions, though the cynic in me again wonders how many are just in it for the free trip to Iceland to visit the home of their favourite game? And how many are in it for the meta game? What better meta game is there than to hold CCP's ear and then push for minor tweaks that seem innocuous by themselves, but when compared in an obscure way with something else slightly dodgy could throw things out of whack? Remember, EVE and CCP encourage this kind of behaviour.

So while we do have more rhetoric from CCP that they are increasingly integrating the CSM and are often trumpeting their collaborative efforts, the cynic in me is glad that they're telling me things are so great because I might not realize it if they didn't tell me.


I do wish CCP devs were interested in playing in and living in Wormhole space, to enjoy the thrill of the hunt, not knowing whether the target you are stalking already knows you're there and is preparing a counter ambush or not. To know the only resources you have are what you take with you, not the 10,000 of your closest friends who are but a jump bridge away. To wake up each new day and see a different part of the EVE universe, and then figure out how to blow it up. Then they would know why we love where we live so much.

It just doesn't grab the headlines like, "2000-person battle in FU-WHATEVER system results in the largest real world monetary loss in a video game in history".
Previous page12