These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

A possible buff to Tech 2 BPOs

First post
Author
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#41 - 2014-05-11 22:34:50 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
Lucas, i like you. You have no idea what you are talking about. However, I like your posts.
Lol, good job buddy. Coming from a guy who's joined an alt alliance of a group that you have to use quotes when calling them "mercs" who seem to be specifically set up to smacktalk badly at the CFC, that means next to nothing. If you like to address any specific points, please go right ahead. If not, just move along.

Agata Matahari wrote:
CCP Fozzie gives him hope concerning the patch that T2 BPOs will get a nice benefit over the BPCs with negative ME and CCP Greyscale did not say ANY word of removal or nerf. He only lost some words to the rageing player to sooth him.
Actually, Greyscale specifically states that their value will go down, and that they have been a problem that has needed a solution for a long time. He also states that they will try not to completely remove them in one hit, and there will be a transitional plan. It clear from this, what's been stated before and how to devs talk about them when you speak to them that they will not be around forever. The current value they have is an collectors value, it's not based on their actual ability to make isk like other BPOs are, so thinking they will maintain or increase in value forever is wishful thinking at best.

Agata Matahari wrote:
All in all T2 bpos will get better. It's about time cause there is a plenty of worthless T2 bpos. Every single player has the tools in hand for making isk and purchase a Tech2 bpo. Those who are not able to are those who are not trying to discuss objectively and rather show envy and rage and crying for removal. so ridiculous kindergarden.
They won;t get better though. CCP do not want them to exist, and the method for T2 manufacture that will be iterated is invention. With these changes, some of them will slightly increase in production ability through better ME differences, but will decrease without considerably higher risk by placing them in a POS. And you can say that anyone can get them however much you like, the fact is though that they are limited, not designed to exist in the current environment, and they will not exist in a functional state forever. Whether they remove them or stop their ability to produce while leaving them as a collectors item is uncertain, but they will be phased out of use in favour of invention.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#42 - 2014-05-12 01:17:24 UTC
Lucas give it a rest, no one here is dumb enough to fool for your master's propaganda Roll.
Big Lynx
#43 - 2014-05-12 05:48:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Big Lynx
Hehe. Lucas the knowsitall forum wizard. To the "they will remove t2 bpos" argument: if they wanted to, they could have done it years before. If they do in some point in future eve would have no value for me anymore for two reasons: 1. Ive invested lots of isk in my collection 2. That would be drastic non-logic move. I have another proposal. Plz remove all limited ships because ppl are paying billions of isk for them only to spin them in station. I want one but have not enough isk, so remove them please.

I cant see the "problem" ppl have with t2 bpos. They take about 2% of market economy. The majority of 98% comes from BPCs. Most bpos dont give u a single isk of profit building them. So where is it OP or where is that great problem?

edit: I think profitable t2 Bpos should be the top aim for any ambitious industrialist ingame. Something that should be worth working for in eve online; another long term goal to reach. I know some industrial players who are doing that and like to do that. Thats the other side of the medal.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#44 - 2014-05-12 07:26:01 UTC
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
Lucas give it a rest, no one here is dumb enough to fool for your master's propaganda Roll.
lol, how is it propaganda?
TBH, I don't care. Go on thinking they are going to increase in value forever regardless. When they inevitably drop, which CCP explicitly stated in the industry panel (go check) you'll be the ones crying on here how you're entitled to refunds because you paid way over the odds for you BPOs that take 20 years to turn a profit on.

Big Lynx wrote:
Hehe. Lucas the knowsitall forum wizard. To the "they will remove t2 bpos" argument: if they wanted to, they could have done it years before. If they do in some point in future eve would have no value for me anymore for two reasons: 1. Ive invested lots of isk in my collection 2. That would be drastic non-logic move. I have another proposal. Plz remove all limited ships because ppl are paying billions of isk for them only to spin them in station. I want one but have not enough isk, so remove them please.
Go watch the videos. Go speak to the devs. Going forward, invention is being iterated, and T2 BPOs will be phased out. You can put your fingers in your ears and say"lalala Lucas is a liar" as much as you want, but it would take you no time at all go watch the industry panel and you'll see they state in there that T2 BPOs have been a problem for a long time they've needed to do something about, that they will do something about it, that they will decrease in value, and that the won't take them away without warning, but will transition them out.

The thing is, this is not new news, this is just the first time they've explicitly stated it. Anyone that thinks that T2 BPOs will continue their upwards spiral of value forever without ever being changed is delusional. Remember, that value is what you guys have placed on it, and nothing to do with it's market value. You can't expect their functional value not to change considering the industry methods they are using avoid their use.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Big Lynx
#45 - 2014-05-12 08:06:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Big Lynx
Lucas Kell wrote:
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
Lucas give it a rest, no one here is dumb enough to fool for your master's propaganda Roll.
lol, how is it propaganda?
TBH, I don't care. Go on thinking they are going to increase in value forever regardless. When they inevitably drop, which CCP explicitly stated in the industry panel (go check) you'll be the ones crying on here how you're entitled to refunds because you paid way over the odds for you BPOs that take 20 years to turn a profit on.

Big Lynx wrote:
Hehe. Lucas the knowsitall forum wizard. To the "they will remove t2 bpos" argument: if they wanted to, they could have done it years before. If they do in some point in future eve would have no value for me anymore for two reasons: 1. Ive invested lots of isk in my collection 2. That would be drastic non-logic move. I have another proposal. Plz remove all limited ships because ppl are paying billions of isk for them only to spin them in station. I want one but have not enough isk, so remove them please.
Go watch the videos. Go speak to the devs. Going forward, invention is being iterated, and T2 BPOs will be phased out. You can put your fingers in your ears and say"lalala Lucas is a liar" as much as you want, but it would take you no time at all go watch the industry panel and you'll see they state in there that T2 BPOs have been a problem for a long time they've needed to do something about, that they will do something about it, that they will decrease in value, and that the won't take them away without warning, but will transition them out.

The thing is, this is not new news, this is just the first time they've explicitly stated it. Anyone that thinks that T2 BPOs will continue their upwards spiral of value forever without ever being changed is delusional. Remember, that value is what you guys have placed on it, and nothing to do with it's market value. You can't expect their functional value not to change considering the industry methods they are using avoid their use.


I watched the stream, but I think you misunderstood the whole situation there. Greyscale stated those vague formulations (like years before) cause this poor guy (who obv overpaid for an acolyte bpo; possible sale from first moon ;) ) almost started to cry and tremble or fall in a shock. If you have listened carefully, 30sec before, Fozzie encouraged him that his bpo will get more competitive through summer patch because of pos. ME and for his specific drone print, due to drone changes. There are far more important things to change in Eve than T2 bpos.
Ccp wont do anything because of one whiner at fanfest who wanted a compensation for his loss because of his own miscalculations. That's utterly ridiculous.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#46 - 2014-05-12 09:09:35 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
I watched the stream, but I think you misunderstood the whole situation there. Greyscale stated those vague formulations (like years before) cause this poor guy (who obv overpaid for an acolyte bpo; possible sale from first moon ;) ) almost started to cry and tremble or fall in a shock. If you have listened carefully, 30sec before, Fozzie encouraged him that his bpo will get more competitive through summer patch because of pos. ME and for his specific drone print, due to drone changes. There are far more important things to change in Eve than T2 bpos.
Ccp wont do anything because of one whiner at fanfest who wanted a compensation for his loss because of his own miscalculations. That's utterly ridiculous.
lol, if that's the way you want to view it, that's fine, but that's a bit of a "hear what I want to hear" approach. Fozzie states that ME would make them better (which is true, but without putting your BPO in a POS, the overall production value change is down, due to differences in time for production). Greyscale reiterated what has been stated for year, which is that T2 BPOs are not ideal. He also explicitly stated in no uncertain terms that their value will go down. He also stated that they wouldn't remove them without a warning, and spoke of a transition period. That all leads to the conclusion that at some point hey will either stop existing or become non functioning. We spoke to the devs following the panel too, and got the same impression there. At present it can take many years to make back the cost of a T2 BPO, so anyone buying one for profit is gambling on CCP not changing that for at least that length of time.

And no, they won't change it because of one whiner, which is why they won't compensate when they make changes because of that whiner. That doesn't mean that T2 BPOs will continue as is, and it certainly doesn't mean they'll value them at the insanely inflated values that you guys value them at. Like extra materials though, T2 BPOs restrict what changes they are able to make to invention mechanics. Since invention mechanics are here to stay and going forward will be iterated on, they will have to phase T2 BPOs out. They are certainly not going to keep working around them forever just to keep a handful of entitled owners happy.

Honestly, what you invest in I couldn't care less about. If you make a bad call because you'd rather bury your head than listen to what is actually being said, that's your problem. I'll make sure to bookmark this post so I can point you to it in the future though.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Big Lynx
#47 - 2014-05-12 09:43:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Big Lynx
Lucas Kell wrote:


.... and it certainly doesn't mean they'll value them at the insanely inflated values that you guys value them at. They are certainly not going to keep working around them forever just to keep a handful of entitled owners happy.



Sounds like you are really jealy. Not a good reason for a T2 Bpo removal.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#48 - 2014-05-12 10:31:12 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
.... and it certainly doesn't mean they'll value them at the insanely inflated values that you guys value them at. They are certainly not going to keep working around them forever just to keep a handful of entitled owners happy.
Sounds like you are really jealy. Not a good reason for a T2 Bpo removal.
LOL
And we roll right back round to why T2 BPO discussions always go off the track. Because the people who bought T2 BPOs automatically assume that everyone else must just be jealous. We all must just be peasants right? We simply can't afford that few billion to get into the T2 market? What are you smoking? You aren't in some exclusive club, you've just bought a few items, that's all. I don't sit around saying "Oh lord, I wish I could afford T2 BPOs". If I wanted them, I'd buy them, but they simply aren't worth the investment. It would just be sunk capital that takes years to become profitable.

And no, the reason for T2 BPO removal is that invention changes are restricted due to the existence of T2 BPOs. It was suggested to separate the two out so T2 BPOs and the invented BPCs don't affect each other, but CCP stated that they wouldn't work around the issue like that. Looking at it the other way, do you think that the fact that you guys paid inflated prices for the BPOs and didn't take into account devaluation is enough of a reason to not remove them?

By the way, I'm not here campaigning for their removal. I don't particularly care about how people want to produce their T2s, so the BPO vs invention argument is not something I care to be involved in (though the more I see you guys kicking and screaming about it, the more I look forward to the explosion of rage when they do make a change). But CCP have made it clear where they stand, and that is with invention which will be iterated. So by all means keep stamping your feet and telling me how jealy I must be, but that wont change what will inevitably come to pass.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Hemmo Paskiainen
#49 - 2014-05-12 12:29:23 UTC
I am so happy that i sold my collection a year ago. I am litterly giggling on the flour due all these entertaining tears here. Hahaha Pirate

If relativity equals time plus momentum, what equals relativity, if the momentum is minus to the time?

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#50 - 2014-05-13 11:32:01 UTC
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.

The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.


26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Big Lynx
#51 - 2014-05-13 15:08:14 UTC
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#52 - 2014-05-13 18:35:29 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
We'll see.
There were no plans to scrap WoD either, 2 days before they announced the scrapping of WoD. What CCP say to cut rumours can differ wildly from fact. And either way, it was stated that they will lose value and they will be doing something about them. Go nuts though and spend all your isk on them if you really want to buddy.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

350125GO
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#53 - 2014-05-13 19:14:03 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Big Lynx wrote:
We'll see.
There were no plans to scrap WoD either, 2 days before they announced the scrapping of WoD.


Somehow I don't think T2 BPOs are the same as a multi-million dollar write down that impacted 90 employees with real life families.

Keep reachin' for the stars...

You're young, you'll adjust. I'm old, I'll get used to it.

Dramaticus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#54 - 2014-05-13 19:22:30 UTC
Hey look at that T2 BPOs are already getting a slight nerf, thanks Greyscale!

The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal

The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them

Zor Iwaira
Doomheim
#55 - 2014-05-13 19:41:04 UTC
Dramaticus wrote:
Hey look at that T2 BPOs are already getting a slight nerf, thanks Greyscale!


Dude... your leaders "Weasel" and "Mymma" are spreading the false rumor that they will be removed, not nerfed. Please keep yourself up to date on the current market manipulation attempts of your puppetmasters. Thank you!
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#56 - 2014-05-13 20:58:38 UTC
Zor Iwaira wrote:
Dramaticus wrote:
Hey look at that T2 BPOs are already getting a slight nerf, thanks Greyscale!


Dude... your leaders "Weasel" and "Mymma" are spreading the false rumor that they will be removed, not nerfed. Please keep yourself up to date on the current market manipulation attempts of your puppetmasters. Thank you!
Actually, it's that they will decrease in value, with the inevitable aim of being removed from the production line. By the way, I think the nerf he is talking about is:
CCP Greyscale wrote:
We are currently of a mind to shift invented BPCs so they have positive (or at worst 0) ME and TE figures. This a) prevents the removal of extra materials giving invention an extra-hard kick, and in particular b) prevents every invented T2 item from requiring two of the relevant T1 items (due to always rounding up materials). This will probably put all invented BPCs in the 1-5% ME/2-10% TE range, with decryptors adjusted to match. We may adjust T2 build costs upwards across the board to put the net T2 resource usage roughly where it is currently, so we don't end up nerfing the demand for T2 components. (This obviously also serves to close the gap somewhat between invention and T2 BPOs; this is not a goal here but it's an acceptable side-effect.)

We are going to unify ME and TE per-level research times on all blueprints. Currently it looks like most T2 and capital BPOs have different TE and ME times. We're planning on kicking T2 BPO times up to the higher of the two values, and capital ones down to the lower of the two.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Big Lynx
#57 - 2014-05-13 21:45:59 UTC
Cool. I kinda like that. They are narrowing the gap but T2 bpos will remain in game as a legitimate part and aint get removed. And they keep their advantage. So I am going on to invest my trillions of isk in those prints.Cool
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#58 - 2014-05-13 22:23:57 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
Cool. I kinda like that. They are narrowing the gap but T2 bpos will remain in game as a legitimate part and aint get removed. And they keep their advantage. So I am going on to invest my trillions of isk in those prints.Cool
Heh, for now Smile. It will mean the margins are likely to shrink however as the BPOs won't have such an aggressive lead. You're likely to need to rik them in a POS to make the most out of them. Considering they already take many years to turn profit, ones bought now may never do so.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Previous page123