These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Combat Drone Operation Being Effectively Removed from the Game

First post First post
Author
Medalyn Isis
Doomheim
#121 - 2014-05-11 10:05:17 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Scout Drone Operation V will give 3 skills trained to level V.
Combat Drone Operation V will give no skills trained to V.

There is no benefit to those who trained Combat Drone Operation and Scout Operation over those who only trained Scout Drone Operation.

The people who trained Combat Drone Operation to V feel cheated because they are only getting free skills at a ratio of 1.5:1 as opposed to 3:1 for the people who didn't train. This is a big deal because people are getting free stuff which is even more free-er than the free stuff other people are getting.

They aren't getting any free stuff, if anything people who trained CDO to V are getting stuff taken away from them as the Drone Link Augmentor II used to be unlocked by CDO V, and now that is being moved to Drone Avionics.

If you look at this purely in terms of abilities, then like you say, people who didn't train CDO but only SDO are being given all of the abilities of those players who trained CDO. Players who trained CDO are getting abilities taken away from them unless they also have SDO V which is the new pre req for the drone link augmentor II.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#122 - 2014-05-11 10:06:54 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Scout Drone Operation V will give 3 skills trained to level V.
Combat Drone Operation V will give no 2 skills trained to V.
Fixed.

Quote:
There is no benefit to those who trained Combat Drone Operation and Scout Operation over those who only trained Scout Drone Operation.
As a general statement, not true. That's where the confusion lies, I feel. It all depends on how high you trained the two skills.
Dave Stark
#123 - 2014-05-11 10:10:33 UTC
tl:dr, train scout drone operation to V, this close to kronos there are things you can spend your time training that would be vastly more beneficial to you than combat drone operation.

then again if you want to waste time training a skill that will only give you 5% drone damage/level on a x2 skill for the next 3 and a bit weeks... have fun, but you really would be better off training literally any other skill in the game.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#124 - 2014-05-11 10:14:36 UTC
Medalyn Isis wrote:
They aren't getting any free stuff, if anything people who trained CDO to V are getting stuff taken away from them as the Drone Link Augmentor II used to be unlocked by CDO V

Haven't CCP always had a policy of letting people use any ships or module they've already trained before a big change to skills?
Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#125 - 2014-05-11 10:15:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Xasnevian
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:
Frst and foremost, They're not being punished. Punishment is an intentional act. CCP Is not trying to intentionaly punish you.

If they were paying attention, they would know all of the rebalance information is subject to change based on community feedback and review. Therefore, They're not in their situation because they were paying attention, They're in it becuase they weren't paying ENOUGH attention. Also, they were trying to take advantage of the pre-release information to gain an adventage over other players that weren't keeping up. Some people consider this exploitation. I don't think it's epxloitation per say, but I do feel the notion is singificant enough to mention.

People took a chance to get a leg up on other players, We'll call it a gamble if you will, and lost. These things happen. Accept that it happened, accept that your world will keep spinning, EVE will not get any harder for you over it. If something like this is enough to ruin your game, then you've chosen the wrong game to play.


They intentionally changed the skill changes from CCP Rise's proposal to CCP Fozzie's proposal. While it's certainly not meant as punishment, the consequence of this act is that people who were paying attention (and gambled as you will) trained a skill for nothing. Also, I don't think people who started training Combat drone operation to 5 didn't mean to get a "leg up on other players", but to simply prepare in the best way for this change for themselves, i.e. gaining as much SP as possible / not having to train double for something in the future. I think that this reaction to a devblog is a good one. CCP is transparent in their communication and players can decide for themselves if they decide to act on it or not.

I will accept that I trained a skill for nothing if CCP choses to continue with this iteration, but it feels a bit off. I think CCP intents their devblogs to be "true" information and not something that should be taken with a grain of salt. Also, if this Combat drone operation skill would still have a function after the changes, people wouldn't mind. It's the fact that all SP that went into Combat drone operation are useless that makes people feel misled.

Edit: The devblog still hasn't been updated with this information. Also, in previous skill changes or changes of the sort, CCP Rise would put big warning signs next to it, like "THESE CHANGES ARE NOT DEFINITE AND MIGHT CHANGE IN THE FUTURE". This also isn't the case with the information in the devblog.

It's the sum on things that makes me feel odd.
Medalyn Isis
Doomheim
#126 - 2014-05-11 10:16:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Medalyn Isis
Riot Girl wrote:
Medalyn Isis wrote:
They aren't getting any free stuff, if anything people who trained CDO to V are getting stuff taken away from them as the Drone Link Augmentor II used to be unlocked by CDO V

Haven't CCP always had a policy of letting people use any ships or module they've already trained before a big change to skills?

That does not seem to apply to modules. And also it doesn't always apply to ships if the extra training time is negligible.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#127 - 2014-05-11 10:17:20 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
Scout Drone Operation V will give 3 skills trained to level V.
Combat Drone Operation V will give no 2 skills trained to V.
Fixed.

Quote:
There is no benefit to those who trained Combat Drone Operation and Scout Operation over those who only trained Scout Drone Operation.
As a general statement, not true. That's where the confusion lies, I feel. It all depends on how high you trained the two skills.


Yeah, I guess. I don't know if how many people have trained CDO V and neglected to train SCO V though. If they have done that, they're probably not the sort of person who cares about this anyway as I can think of no practical reason to do that.
Beofryn Sedorak
#128 - 2014-05-11 10:21:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Beofryn Sedorak
Xasnevian wrote:
They intentionally changed the skill changes from CCP Rise's proposal to CCP Fozzie's proposal. While it's certainly not meant as punishment, the consequence of this act is that people who were paying attention (and gambled as you will) trained a skill for nothing. Also, I don't think people who started training Combat drone operation to 5 didn't mean to get a "leg up on other players", but to simply prepare in the best way for this change for themselves, i.e. gaining as much SP as possible / not having to train double for something in the future. I think that this reaction to a devblog is a good one. CCP is transparent in their communication and players can decide for themselves if they decide to act on it or not.

I will accept that I trained a skill for nothing if CCP choses to continue with this iteration, but it feels a bit off. I think CCP intents their devblogs to be "true" information and not something that should be taken with a grain of salt. Also, if this Combat drone operation skill would still have a function after the changes, people wouldn't mind. It's the fact that all SP that went into Combat drone operation are useless that makes people feel misled.


They didn't change from one proposal to another. The initial statement that CDO 5 will get you L and MDO is still true. It hasn't changed.

They're just in addition to the initial statement, accomodating a second proposal. Giving you L and MDO based on the higher of EITHER cdo or sdo.

Come on guys, this isn't rocket science here.

CCP Intends their dev blogs to give you a heads up to what's coming. Their purpose is to inform, but more specificaly and IMPORTANTLY, to give players a chance to discuss the changes ahead of time in an effort to let the players help them see things they might have overlooked. This is the system working as intended.

I feel really bad for you that people need to spell these things out for you. They're really not very complicated concepts.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#129 - 2014-05-11 10:32:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Xasnevian wrote:
They intentionally changed the skill changes from CCP Rise's proposal to CCP Fozzie's proposal. While it's certainly not meant as punishment, the consequence of this act is that people who were paying attention (and gambled as you will) trained a skill for nothing.
The people who were paying attention didn't have time to train anything between the blog went up and the clarification came. It was all of two days, not enough to train a 6-7-day skill. If they managed to train the skill, they weren't paying attention.

Also, not only did they not pay attention to what the devs were saying, they also didn't pay attention to the timing of when this was going to happen in relation to when the blog went up, and presumably jumped on finishing a skill ASAP rather than wait a week or three until all the information was out. So no, characterising them as “paying attention” is pretty much completely inaccurate.

Oh, and they didn't change from one to the other: they changed to also include the other, since it made sense from the “you could use it before” standpoint that people who had trained SDO should retain access to their T2 drones. Speaking of which, with all this hoo-ha about CDO not getting you anything… I can only assume that people are saying that those who trained CDO V should not get LDO V or MDO V, since that would give them an “unfair advantage”?
Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#130 - 2014-05-11 10:33:00 UTC
Beofryn Sedorak wrote:
They didn't change from one proposal to another. The initial statement that CDO 5 will get you L and MDO is still true. It hasn't changed.

They're just in addition to the initial statement, accomodating a second proposal. Giving you L and MDO based on the higher of EITHER cdo or sdo.

Come on guys, this isn't rocket science here.

CCP Intends their dev blogs to give you a heads up to what's coming. Their purpose is to inform, but more specificaly and IMPORTANTLY, to give players a chance to discuss the changes ahead of time in an effort to let the players help them see things they might have overlooked. This is the system working as intended.

I feel really bad for you that people need to spell these things out for you. They're really not very complicated concepts.


I agree with everything you say, but if an action causes confusion and disappointment, I don't think it's inappropriate to clear the air. Be it with a SP refund or an acknowledgement that some people trained this skill for nothing.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#131 - 2014-05-11 10:37:12 UTC
Xasnevian wrote:
I agree with everything you say, but if an action causes confusion and disappointment, I don't think it's inappropriate to clear the air.
They did: they were very helpful in the blog thread with clearing up the confusion, and started giving out even more SP than they had originally planned.
Xasnevian
sadfadsfadsadsf
#132 - 2014-05-11 10:46:31 UTC
Tippia wrote:
The people who were paying attention didn't have time to train anything between the blog went up and the clarification came. It was all of two days, not enough to train a 6-7-day skill.


You do have a point here. I didn't notice this. This makes the amount of lost SP smaller for people who were paying attention all the time. I actually wonder why I myself didn't notice this post until after I finished training it...

Tippia wrote:
They did: they were very helpful in the blog thread with clearing up the confusion, and started giving out even more SP than they had originally planned.


You're referring to this thread? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=333958

I see devs clearing confusion, but not on this issue. Also, where do they hand out more SP than planned?
Audrey UntzUntz
Doomheim
#133 - 2014-05-11 12:40:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Audrey UntzUntz
I would argue it's largely irrelevant if they updated the blog thread but did not update the blog itself. We cannot be expected to read through dozens - sometimes hundreds - of pages for any given dev blog or features thread that affects us. There are countless better ways for them to have gotten that message across, but once again they have chosen to communicate in a rather inefficient manner.

When Battlecruiser was split into racial, tons of players made sure to train it up in time when the announcement was made. How many of these people honestly read page 30+ of the forum thread that accompanied it? It wouldn't be hard to believe that the majority of them would be in the same situation too.

If we're on the topic of how they could have informed their player base better, off the top of my head:
1) Update the actual dev blog more than a month later
2) Actually state in the dev blog the changes are not final
3) Allow players to opt into an EVEmail dev blog subscription that would EVEmail them dev blogs and updates to dev blogs

This way people know what's going on and can actually make informed decisions.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#134 - 2014-05-11 12:48:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Audrey UntzUntz wrote:
I would argue it's largely irrelevant if they updated the blog thread but did not update the blog itself. We cannot be expected to read through dozens - sometimes hundreds - of pages for any given dev blog or features thread that affects us.
Yes you can, since you don't have to read through any pages to find the dev updates — they're very neatly linked together and you can go through a whole thread in a matter of minutes.

Quote:
When Battlecruiser was split into racial, tons of players made sure to train it up in time when the announcement was made. How many of these people honestly read page 30+ of the forum thread that accompanied it?
How many started training the instant the blog was out instead of waiting for all the details to be hashed through. That change was far more confusing than this one and people kept asking about it for months (as in: over a year in many cases) before pulling the trigger on their training changes.

Quote:
This way people know what's going on and can actually make informed decisions.
People know what's going on and can make an informed decision regardless.

Point 1 does the exact opposite of what you want. Point 2 is implicit in all dev blogs. Point 3 already exists (using vastly superior methods than evemails).
Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#135 - 2014-05-11 12:55:28 UTC
Medalyn Isis wrote:
it seems Combat Drone Operation is now being removed from the game although no SP reimbursement as in the case of learning skills.

source or I call bullshit
Master Flakattack
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#136 - 2014-05-11 13:18:19 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Audrey UntzUntz wrote:
I would argue it's largely irrelevant if they updated the blog thread but did not update the blog itself. We cannot be expected to read through dozens - sometimes hundreds - of pages for any given dev blog or features thread that affects us.
Yes you can, since you don't have to read through any pages to find the dev updates — they're very neatly linked together and you can go through a whole thread in a matter of minutes.

Quote:
When Battlecruiser was split into racial, tons of players made sure to train it up in time when the announcement was made. How many of these people honestly read page 30+ of the forum thread that accompanied it?
How many started training the instant the blog was out instead of waiting for all the details to be hashed through. That change was far more confusing than this one and people kept asking about it for months (as in: over a year in many cases) before pulling the trigger on their training changes.

Quote:
This way people know what's going on and can actually make informed decisions.
People know what's going on and can make an informed decision regardless.

Point 1 does the exact opposite of what you want. Point 2 is implicit in all dev blogs. Point 3 already exists (using vastly superior methods than evemails).

None of what you're saying changes the fact that it was poorly communicated. Without people posting here in GD most of this thread wouldn't even be aware of the change in requirements to get max light/medium drone ops.

I'm not even sure why you're fighting so vehemently that the entire EVE playerbase is supposed to be aware of a single dev post in a dev blog thread that was quite far in, especially since far more important changes (namely all of industry) have stolen the spotlight. This is not the kind of thing that should be buried deep in a thread, it should be obvious to people who at least care enough to read the dev blog.
Dave Stark
#137 - 2014-05-11 13:21:43 UTC
Liafcipe9000 wrote:
Medalyn Isis wrote:
it seems Combat Drone Operation is now being removed from the game although no SP reimbursement as in the case of learning skills.

source or I call bullshit

the dev blog where they say they're removing it, and replacing it with two separate skills.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#138 - 2014-05-11 14:04:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Master Flakattack wrote:
Without people posting here in GD most of this thread wouldn't even be aware of the change in requirements to get max light/medium drone ops.
The requirements haven't changed — you will still get them the same way as always.

Quote:
I'm not even sure why you're fighting so vehemently that the entire EVE playerbase is supposed to be aware of a single dev post in a dev blog thread that was quite far in
Mainly because it was so trivial to find for anyone interested in the change, and because people are coming up with increasingly silly excuses for why they didn't pay attention and made bad decisions, to say nothing of the increased entitlement that this inattentiveness seems to feed.

Dave Stark wrote:
the dev blog where they say they're removing it, and replacing it with two separate skills.
The blog also points out that the skills SP are being replaced, and even given away, as in the case of any other skill switch-over (since that's what it is, not a skill removal).
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#139 - 2014-05-11 14:15:11 UTC
I dont understand why rumour- and panic mongering threads such as this are allowed to exist at all

Especailly when they are effectively redundant repetitions of previous nonsense

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Dave Stark
#140 - 2014-05-11 14:16:44 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
I dont understand why rumour- and panic mongering threads such as this are allowed to exist at all

Especailly when they are effectively redundant repetitions of previous nonsense


because with every skill change, people fail at basic english and have to have the changes explained to them multiple times in ever simplified words so they understand what's going on.
do you not remember the mewling over the skill changes a while back when people didn't understand how the dessy/bc split worked?