These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Player Owned Customs Offices: Math, Markets and Design Problems

First post
Author
pmchem
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#181 - 2011-12-03 02:09:49 UTC
Scrapyard Bob wrote:
pmchem wrote:

Your solution is basically just to reduce taxes, because that's what the end result would be. Which would re-introduce the gameplay/design problems which taxes are fixing. POCOs are here to stay -- highsec is low risk and therefore should be low reward, as repeatedly stated by the devs. It's time to adjust.


I think that would depend on how much it reduces the taxes. By 10% at level V? Probably not a big deal. A combination of skills + standing that cuts tariffs by 15%? Could be interesting, a reward for keeping high sec status. The skill would have to only apply to NPC-owned COs.


High sec status the standard in highsec, not the exception. Having something like Caldari Faction standing at 9+ to get good Jita prices is a long, difficult grind which few traders finish. Having good sec status is comparatively trivial and commonplace -- even in nullsec, where pvp doesn't reduce sec status!

I'd preach patience, and revisit the taxes and game mechanic in a few months after the markets and producers have had time to adjust. I think people will be pleasantly surprised.

https://twitter.com/pmchem/ || http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/community-spotlight-garpa/ || Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#182 - 2011-12-03 02:39:56 UTC
pmchem wrote:

High sec status the standard in highsec, not the exception. Having something like Caldari Faction standing at 9+ to get good Jita prices is a long, difficult grind which few traders finish. Having good sec status is comparatively trivial and commonplace -- even in nullsec, where pvp doesn't reduce sec status!

I'd preach patience, and revisit the taxes and game mechanic in a few months after the markets and producers have had time to adjust. I think people will be pleasantly surprised.



I'll be surprised if anyone is still in business.

More than one alliance has recently released information supporting claims against goonswarm and Mittani that the chairman used his foreknowledge of the upcoming expansion to position goonswarm in position to line it's pockets at the expense of other players via the new changes to PI.

How is this ethically different then previous abuses such as the T20 affair which mired the former Band of Brothers alliance in controversy?

Do you feel that goonswarms current flooding of the eve online forums with dismissive, even derisive and insulting, comments on any opposition to the new PI arrangement hurt or help your efforts to bring all of eve under the unified heel of goonswarm?

What's your position of the in-game deletion by CCP that several of your alliance mates have proposed should be done to characters belonging to rival alliances such as TEST who have dared raise questions about the legitimacy of Mittani's own admitted intent to profit heavily at the expense of players in low and high sec? Do you feel that such an exercise of influence with CCP would damage goonswarms claims of being a legitimate alliance?
Diametrix
Absolute Order
Absolute Honor
#183 - 2011-12-03 02:41:29 UTC
pmchem wrote:
Scrapyard Bob wrote:
pmchem wrote:

Your solution is basically just to reduce taxes, because that's what the end result would be. Which would re-introduce the gameplay/design problems which taxes are fixing. POCOs are here to stay -- highsec is low risk and therefore should be low reward, as repeatedly stated by the devs. It's time to adjust.


I think that would depend on how much it reduces the taxes. By 10% at level V? Probably not a big deal. A combination of skills + standing that cuts tariffs by 15%? Could be interesting, a reward for keeping high sec status. The skill would have to only apply to NPC-owned COs.


High sec status the standard in highsec, not the exception. Having something like Caldari Faction standing at 9+ to get good Jita prices is a long, difficult grind which few traders finish. Having good sec status is comparatively trivial and commonplace -- even in nullsec, where pvp doesn't reduce sec status!

I'd preach patience, and revisit the taxes and game mechanic in a few months after the markets and producers have had time to adjust. I think people will be pleasantly surprised.



Hmm, something has changed the temperature in this thread. Given the above, combined with what seems to be a degree of civility from your friend Cygnett [her agreement w/ another poster on common ground], I would suggest there could be a compramise brewing.

We all agree that if we wait and whatch how the current changes actually effect the economy, game environment, etc. that we will have clearer information to act upon?

That, given the very limited exposure we have had, there may value added to the system by building its complexity further (with the intent to increase profit and enjoyment to those willing to pursue it) via skills or standings or other enhancements?

I'm presuming we still agree with some commonly referenced tenats like Risk vs Reward, MMOs = intended multiple player interactions, and The Customer is always Right. All of the customers.

Damn, if we could just get the Legislative branch to play internet spaceships!

Richmond Kings
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#184 - 2011-12-03 03:05:19 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
pmchem wrote:

High sec status the standard in highsec, not the exception. Having something like Caldari Faction standing at 9+ to get good Jita prices is a long, difficult grind which few traders finish. Having good sec status is comparatively trivial and commonplace -- even in nullsec, where pvp doesn't reduce sec status!

I'd preach patience, and revisit the taxes and game mechanic in a few months after the markets and producers have had time to adjust. I think people will be pleasantly surprised.



I'll be surprised if anyone is still in business.

More than one alliance has recently released information supporting claims against goonswarm and Mittani that the chairman used his foreknowledge of the upcoming expansion to position goonswarm in position to line it's pockets at the expense of other players via the new changes to PI.

How is this ethically different then previous abuses such as the T20 affair which mired the former Band of Brothers alliance in controversy?

Do you feel that goonswarms current flooding of the eve online forums with dismissive, even derisive and insulting, comments on any opposition to the new PI arrangement hurt or help your efforts to bring all of eve under the unified heel of goonswarm?

What's your position of the in-game deletion by CCP that several of your alliance mates have proposed should be done to characters belonging to rival alliances such as TEST who have dared raise questions about the legitimacy of Mittani's own admitted intent to profit heavily at the expense of players in low and high sec? Do you feel that such an exercise of influence with CCP would damage goonswarms claims of being a legitimate alliance?


we're not a legitimate alliance because there are no goons
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#185 - 2011-12-03 03:08:05 UTC  |  Edited by: corestwo
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
More than one alliance has recently released information supporting claims against goonswarm and Mittani that the chairman used his foreknowledge of the upcoming expansion to position goonswarm in position to line it's pockets at the expense of other players via the new changes to PI.


So would you care to back that claim up? I bet you can't, since the actual explanation that we obsessively pore over public information (blue posts, patch notes, etc) so as to be well informed speculators.


But go ahead, keep making crazy, Bachmann-esque assertions. They entertain us. Lol

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#186 - 2011-12-03 03:08:31 UTC
Diametrix wrote:


Hmm, something has changed the temperature in this thread. Given the above, combined with what seems to be a degree of civility from your friend Cygnett [her agreement w/ another poster on common ground], I would suggest there could be a compramise brewing.

We all agree that if we wait and whatch how the current changes actually effect the economy, game environment, etc. that we will have clearer information to act upon?

That, given the very limited exposure we have had, there may value added to the system by building its complexity further (with the intent to increase profit and enjoyment to those willing to pursue it) via skills or standings or other enhancements?

I'm presuming we still agree with some commonly referenced tenats like Risk vs Reward, MMOs = intended multiple player interactions, and The Customer is always Right. All of the customers.

Damn, if we could just get the Legislative branch to play internet spaceships!




I never said that I opposed all taxes, I just dislike the overbearing advantage that it gives goonswarm (and to a degree other alliances), with no possible way around it for players who are not like me, and can laugh off 200m isk losses.

It's unfair to the 50% of the in game population who live in high sec, according to CCP's numbers, and it harkens back too much to the bad old days for me to feel comfortable about it.
Richmond Kings
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#187 - 2011-12-03 03:10:10 UTC
pmchem makes a thread to get ccp to change pi taxes and destroy it for all the highsec pubbies and they actually do it

he is literally a wizard
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#188 - 2011-12-03 03:11:29 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
I never said that I opposed all taxes, I just dislike the overbearing advantage that it gives goonswarm (and to a degree other alliances), with no possible way around it for players who are not like me, and can laugh off 200m isk losses.

It's unfair to the 50% of the in game population who live in high sec, according to CCP's numbers, and it harkens back too much to the bad old days for me to feel comfortable about it.


I see words in front of me but all I hear is "I can't make just as much money as people in 0.0 with absolutely zero risk CryCryCry"

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

pmchem
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#189 - 2011-12-03 03:12:55 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:

More than one alliance has recently released information supporting claims against goonswarm and Mittani that the chairman used his foreknowledge of the upcoming expansion to position goonswarm in position to line it's pockets at the expense of other players via the new changes to PI.

How is this ethically different then previous abuses such as the T20 affair which mired the former Band of Brothers alliance in controversy?

Do you feel that goonswarms current flooding of the eve online forums with dismissive, even derisive and insulting, comments on any opposition to the new PI arrangement hurt or help your efforts to bring all of eve under the unified heel of goonswarm?

What's your position of the in-game deletion by CCP that several of your alliance mates have proposed should be done to characters belonging to rival alliances such as TEST who have dared raise questions about the legitimacy of Mittani's own admitted intent to profit heavily at the expense of players in low and high sec? Do you feel that such an exercise of influence with CCP would damage goonswarms claims of being a legitimate alliance?


Your posting, hahaha ohgod. I had copied/pasted prior posts of yours just to give other goons a laugh but now I can't even tell if you're intentionally serving these up to me or just drunk or something.

Mittani foreknowledge of upcoming changes to PI? I did post this thread in public, weeks ago, and CCP replied in public they were looking at the feedback in it. Goons found out about the changes after I saw this post ( https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=415176#post415176 ) the day after Thanksgiving, and that post itself was referencing a different eveo post! Just, comedy. We found out the changes went in at the same time as everyone else, while people like you didn't show up to the discussion until pages of posts after the change went in. Also, please cite sources on that 'released information' thanks, haha.

I would be more dismissive and derisive in this post, but I feel you are attempting to get this thread locked for trolling. A shame. Please stick to economic analysis. Your posts contain nothing but Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD), because they're otherwise just comic relief.

https://twitter.com/pmchem/ || http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/community-spotlight-garpa/ || Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#190 - 2011-12-03 03:15:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Cygnet Lythanea
corestwo wrote:

So would you care to back that claim up? I bet you can't, since the actual explanation that we obsessively pore over public information (blue posts, patch notes, etc) so as to be well informed speculators.


But go ahead, keep making crazy, Bachmann-esque assertions. They entertain us. Lol



Achem:

Extreme wrote:
EOG intelligence knows for a fact that Goonswarm will remove all low-sec customs offices and replace it with their own Goon office.
Plasma, Temperate & Barren planets (P3 and P4 materials)

Question is, did Mittens have "insider trader information" from his function in CSM?

I mean, was he able to plan this ahead due to his function as CSM which gave him a strategical headstart for Goonswarm?

How will CCP deal with CSM in the future preventing such disadvantages for everyone not with contacts in CSM?
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#191 - 2011-12-03 03:16:40 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
I never said that I opposed all taxes, I just dislike the overbearing advantage that it gives goonswarm (and to a degree other alliances), with no possible way around it for players who are not like me, and can laugh off 200m isk losses.

Explain to me, and you can use small words if you think it'll help, why you think this is something that in a major way benefits goonswarm, and apparently just "to a degree" other alliances, and how there's "no way around it" for players who can't laugh off a measly 200m isk loss.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#192 - 2011-12-03 03:18:16 UTC  |  Edited by: corestwo
POCOs and the fact that they would be destructible has been public knowledge for pretty much just as long as we (and I mean "we" as in "everyone in eve" here) have known about POCOs and given our recent interdiction of gallente ice, going out of our way to target certain planets and replace them with our own seems like a pretty obvious move.


Do you have any more hilarious reaching to do, or are you done making unfounded accusations?



And by the way, regarding the whole "insider information" thing? A CSM member took advantage of his inside information quite some time ago, back prior to the dyspro/prom nerf. They removed him from the CSM. Does that answer your questions about "What does CCP do about inside information abuse"?

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

pmchem
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#193 - 2011-12-03 03:22:04 UTC
so you have one post from a guy with incorrect and absurd intelligence (goons shooting all lowsec COs? really? think about that). that guy then asks if mittani knew in advance. this is your "information supporting claims" that "the chairman used his foreknowledge".


yeah seems real solid you should run with that straight to evenews24

https://twitter.com/pmchem/ || http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/community-spotlight-garpa/ || Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#194 - 2011-12-03 03:23:41 UTC
Well considering that evenews24 is the literal equivalent of fox news, they'd probably run with it themselves.

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

pmchem
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#195 - 2011-12-03 03:24:36 UTC
quick someone summon riverini to the thread

https://twitter.com/pmchem/ || http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/community-spotlight-garpa/ || Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#196 - 2011-12-03 03:25:44 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:

Explain to me, and you can use small words if you think it'll help, why you think this is something that in a major way benefits goonswarm, and apparently just "to a degree" other alliances, and how there's "no way around it" for players who can't laugh off a measly 200m isk loss.



Consider the volume of space goonswarm and it's associates currently control. Factor in the number of planets that this gives them near exclusive right to.

Now, compare this to the number of planets, per member, that other groups, such as carebears have access to, and the relative quality of those planets.

By setting the tax at 0 for blues, goonswarm can effectively dictate the price of PI materials, either by underselling on a massive scale, flooding the market to drive under competitors, while still making a profit, albiet a smaller one, and then once those competitors have been eliminated, raising the price to whatever you want.

Effectively, goons would always be able to undersell and make a profit, due to volume and absolute control of the chain of supply.

Even if you have friendly lowsec corps willing to give you 0%, you can't deal in the sort of quantities at the same prices, particularly since the bottleneck on PI infrastructure limiting how much could be harvested at once has been raised.
pmchem
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#197 - 2011-12-03 03:27:44 UTC
haha we're too late, en24 just ran an article on the tax change:
http://www.evenews24.com/2011/12/02/custom-office-taxes-taxes-have-gone-up-yes-please-stop-doing-pi/

even they think cygnet is wrong

Quote:

So there has been a tremendous amount of complaining about the new tax scheme implemented by CCP with regards to Planetary Interaction and Custom Offices. To some extent I can understand it; nobody likes paying taxes. As an economist I can go on ad nauseam about deadweight loss, reduced output, higher prices and so forth that taxes engender, but I’ll save you from that coma inducing boredom.

However, it does seem to me that there is a bit too much whining and crying from the masses over this. With the changes of crucible we have seen PI prices head sharply upwards. So much so, that the increase in taxes are vastly offset by the increase in prices.

Consider an operation that produces 300,000 noble, base, and heavy metals and 300,000 non-chiral structures. This is refined down to 2,000 units each of precious, reactive and toxic metals and chiral structures. These are exported from the mining planet and imported to the production planet to make robotics at a cost of 600,000 isk (400,000 for the export and 200,000 for the import, for simplicity assume the prior cost here was 1/20 of this, or 30,000 isk).

Now those 2,000 units are eventually turned into 75 robotics and exporting this costs 525,000 isk. Last time I looked at Jita prices, probably out of date, these were selling for 80,000/robotics. That translates into 6,000,000 in revenues. After taxes you make 10,350,000 -> 4,875,500 isk. Prior to Crucible and the run in PI prices, let say September, you’d get maybe 50,000/robotics with vastly lower taxes or around 4,875,500 -> 3,693,750 isk. In other words, the price increases as a result of Crucible has been, at least for now, a 32% increase in your PI profits. Sure it would be nice if taxes were merely a 10th of what they are at now. Yeah your returns would be even higher, but it isn’t nearly as bad as some are making it out to be.

So please quit PI if the tax issue sends you into a nerd rage. I for one thank you for reducing the supply on the market and helping to increase prices and drive up my profit margins. Will PI prices come back down? Maybe. With the higher prices some marginal POS’s might be torn down reducing demand. With the higher prices and the use of POCOs in null & low security and wormhole space, more people might enter in those areas thus increasing the supply. The long run impact though is not clear. It is an empirical question and I don’t think anyone out there has done the required analysis yet to figure out where the price will end up. So I plan on sitting back and enjoying the ride.

https://twitter.com/pmchem/ || http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/community-spotlight-garpa/ || Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#198 - 2011-12-03 03:30:30 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:

Explain to me, and you can use small words if you think it'll help, why you think this is something that in a major way benefits goonswarm, and apparently just "to a degree" other alliances, and how there's "no way around it" for players who can't laugh off a measly 200m isk loss.



Consider the volume of space goonswarm and it's associates currently control. Factor in the number of planets that this gives them near exclusive right to.

Now, compare this to the number of planets, per member, that other groups, such as carebears have access to, and the relative quality of those planets.

By setting the tax at 0 for blues, goonswarm can effectively dictate the price of PI materials, either by underselling on a massive scale, flooding the market to drive under competitors, while still making a profit, albiet a smaller one, and then once those competitors have been eliminated, raising the price to whatever you want.

Effectively, goons would always be able to undersell and make a profit, due to volume and absolute control of the chain of supply.

Even if you have friendly lowsec corps willing to give you 0%, you can't deal in the sort of quantities at the same prices, particularly since the bottleneck on PI infrastructure limiting how much could be harvested at once has been raised.


So what would you say if I told you that POS towers get a sov bonus that gives reduced fuel consumption and, obviously, only applies in 0.0?

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#199 - 2011-12-03 03:38:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Cygnet Lythanea
And tell me, again, what goonswarm makes a killing off of atm and dominates the market? Moon goo? Hmmm....

pcchem, btw: you might want to go back, he revised to profit numbers down.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#200 - 2011-12-03 03:41:20 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
Consider the volume of space goonswarm and it's associates currently control. Factor in the number of planets that this gives them near exclusive right to.

Now, compare this to the number of planets, per member, that other groups, such as carebears have access to, and the relative quality of those planets.

And how many systems and planets do we not control? What makes those planets radically better compared to the rest of 0.0? And how many players do we have, vs "the rest of the eve universe"?

Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
By setting the tax at 0 for blues, goonswarm can effectively dictate the price of PI materials, either by underselling on a massive scale, flooding the market to drive under competitors, while still making a profit, albiet a smaller one, and then once those competitors have been eliminated, raising the price to whatever you want.

What's to stop anyone from going "oh hey look, they've raised the prices, I can profit!" and going back to making and selling again?

Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
Effectively, goons would always be able to undersell and make a profit, due to volume and absolute control of the chain of supply.

And the rest of 0.0 and lowsec won't?

Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
Even if you have friendly lowsec corps willing to give you 0%, you can't deal in the sort of quantities at the same prices, particularly since the bottleneck on PI infrastructure limiting how much could be harvested at once has been raised.

Why? Are we some sort of magic faeries that just **** out PI goo at a rate no-one can match?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat