These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

(To EVE UI Staff) The new fitting screen that got scrapped in 2009

First post
Author
DieZor
Offshore Holdings
#21 - 2011-12-02 23:59:03 UTC  |  Edited by: DieZor
CCP karkur wrote:
The fitting window just had a lot of issue before we released Apocrypha. There were all sorts of problems with the left hand side, and the performance of the inventory filter was pretty bad. When it came down to it, that was something we were willing to drop in order to be able to fix all the other issues in the window and deliver a solid fitting window (that's at least how I remember it).
I think there were also some concerns about the window size, but I think the biggest factor was that there was just too much work to make it fully functional and not enough time (even though people were borrowed from other teams to help out with it).


Considering the new possibilities the Carbon UI engine promises, do you see a possible reintroduction of this feature in the near future?

The same question applies to the fancy NeoCom :)

thanks for answering
CCP karkur
C C P
C C P Alliance
#22 - 2011-12-02 23:59:10 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP karkur
Zagdul wrote:

What about the neocom that got scrapped due to people not being able to accept change?

I didn't think it was ready for TQ, but I just don't know enough about this to answer that question.

CCP karkur | Programmer | Team Five 0 | @CCP_karkur

xxxak
Perkone
Caldari State
#23 - 2011-12-03 00:01:54 UTC
CCP karkur wrote:
The fitting window just had a lot of issue before we released Apocrypha. There were all sorts of problems with the left hand side, and the performance of the inventory filter was pretty bad. When it came down to it, that was something we were willing to drop in order to be able to fix all the other issues in the window and deliver a solid fitting window (that's at least how I remember it).
I think there were also some concerns about the window size, but I think the biggest factor was that there was just too much work to make it fully functional and not enough time (even though people were borrowed from other teams to help out with it).


The prototype window looks AMAZING.

Could you guys please add that back to your to-do list! :)

[u]The nerfs to supercaps will cause more super pilots to join the largest alliances who can properly "support" their deployment, further concentrating firepower/wealth in EVE. The end result will be fewer "fun" fights, and will hurt EVE in the long run.[/u]

CCP karkur
C C P
C C P Alliance
#24 - 2011-12-03 00:18:07 UTC
DieZor wrote:

Considering the new possibilities Carbon UI, do you see a possible reintroduction of this feature in the near future?

The same question applies to the fancy NeoCom :)

thanks for answering

Well, of course almost anything is possible, if you just put the time needed into it.
I don't think CarbonUI would really help with the issues we had with the fitting window. I'm pretty sure these were issues that can be solved, but we just ran out of time and if we wanted to bring this feature back we would need to put time into fixing them.
I know it's a cliché, but it just comes down to prioritization (and also just if we really want it back).

CCP karkur | Programmer | Team Five 0 | @CCP_karkur

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#25 - 2011-12-03 00:41:49 UTC
My list of wants
  • Drop and Replace module.
  • When I drag a new module over an already fitted one I would like for it to replace the module on the fitting if its allowed in that slot.

  • Reintroduce the slot filter VIA slot select.
  • A small button would be by each slot level, selecting this enables the filter and only modules allowed for that slot appears.
    Weapons by mount type would have thier own buttons so you can do top guns or missiles.

  • Ammo Magazines for all ships.
  • Extremly annoyed that when I dump my cargo from whatever incursion I went on that my favorite ammo gets dumped with it.
    Unlike Bays they just a partition in the regular cargo bay, just ammo in this partition would not normally be viewed when opening regular cargo. Nothing would automatically dump into the partition anyting put into it has to be manual and only ammo/charges/scripts would be allowed. The partion is dynamic and eats into regular cargo.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#26 - 2011-12-03 05:30:03 UTC
Nova Fox wrote:

  • Ammo Magazines for all ships.
  • Extremly annoyed that when I dump my cargo from whatever incursion I went on that my favorite ammo gets dumped with it.
    Unlike Bays they just a partition in the regular cargo bay, just ammo in this partition would not normally be viewed when opening regular cargo. Nothing would automatically dump into the partition anyting put into it has to be manual and only ammo/charges/scripts would be allowed. The partion is dynamic and eats into regular cargo.

    [/list]

    This indeed.

    It's annoying to always remember to select the ammo and invert selection every single time you want to drop off loot.

    CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

    oldbutfeelingyoung
    Perkone
    Caldari State
    #27 - 2011-12-03 05:32:01 UTC
    Zagdul wrote:

    What about the neocom that got scrapped due to people not being able to accept change?




    Eve is full of players being afraid of change,Always screaming "oh no,they are changing my Flying in SpacegameCry"

    R.S.I2014

    Liam Mirren
    #28 - 2011-12-03 05:42:48 UTC
    CCP karkur wrote:
    I think there were also some concerns about the window size.


    Indeed, people who don't have ridiculously large screens would be severely hampered by it. Admittedly it looks cool but I don't think it's very workable.

    Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.

    Kyra Felann
    The Scope
    Gallente Federation
    #29 - 2011-12-03 06:34:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Kyra Felann
    I remember that too. I wish they would've kept that in. I liked the idea of being able to fit your ship with only one window open.

    Also, please bring back the NeoNeoCom. It needed some work, but the concept was awesome.

    I think the UI needs to be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern day. People who cannot accept change (the same ones whining about the font) will complain, but the game will be improved and they'll stop whining once they get used to it.
    Zagdul
    Federal Navy Academy
    Gallente Federation
    #30 - 2011-12-03 08:17:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Zagdul
    CCP karkur wrote:
    Zagdul wrote:

    What about the neocom that got scrapped due to people not being able to accept change?

    I didn't think it was ready for TQ, but I just don't know enough about this to answer that question.
    You guys were on the right path with what you were building in the new Neocom. I personally liked it, however I'm someone who quickly took a liking to the new Windows 7 peek features in the task bar and the new organization of the system tray and how they organize the start menu. In the IT world, I was a minority on release.

    If you take the taskbar we use in Windows 7 and compare it to what we had back in the early 90's, you'll find that the basic functionality of what's in EVE now, in 2011, is similar to what was in 3.1 almost 20 years ago. What people complained about in the beta thread for the neocom were requests to bring it up to similar standards of technology we're used to now with Windows 7. Shoot, we can even turn off all the "fluff" that is Windows 7 and switch to classic view to dumb it down to what we've been accustomed to in the past. If you did anything in the IT world when the switch from 98/2000 > XP happened and the uproar of this new fangdangeled start menu and fisher price task bar that MS released, so many people quickly turned it all off. Some people have a hard time adapting and adjusting to something new. Please, keep these people in mind when migrating to something new.

    In my opinion, with something as vital as the neocom, you need to keep this principle in mind. Remember when MS changed the start menu in XP, or upgraded that one to Vista. How many people wanted to turn off all those extra things in the XP menu? I adapted and appreciated the new menu, but so many XP computers I worked on removed the XP theme and switched the start menu to classic.

    The idea behind the taskbar and it's basic functionality was to allow for a place to dock programs that you don't need on your current screen. It's functionality is to remove clutter and the future neocom can easily achieve this.

    I currently have over 20 chat channels that open upon launch, this clutter is something I'd like to have cleaned up.

    As it stands, "features" people have requested:
    - Customizable to where we can add/remove and create mini sub-menus (seems you had that down pat in the beta).
    - Ability to lock items to the neocom while not locking the whole thing. "Quick Launch"
    - Ability to "minimize" to it so chat windows become a part of it.
    - Ability to move the bar itself to any side of your monitor
    - The ability to have it auto-hide.
    - Icon Stacking
    - Right click functionality for things which have multiple tabs. I.E: right click map > open system map / star map / auto pilot settings.
    - Skinning via textures stored on my computer.
    - Some kind of integrated assets feature... maybe a search area to where I can type in it and it pops open my assets or something.
    - "Peek" for hover over of minimized chat windows. "Many intel channels, wanna just minimize them all off my screen and hover over to peek at what's going on to remove clutter"


    I can't remember much more that was being requested. But re-inventing windows taskbar may not be far off from what people, considering we're already used to using it, were requesting :)

    Anyway, good luck with building your projects. I don't envy you.

    Dual Pane idea: Click!

    CCP Please Implement

    MotherMoon
    Tribal Liberation Force
    Minmatar Republic
    #31 - 2011-12-03 10:29:10 UTC
    CCP karkur wrote:
    Zagdul wrote:

    What about the neocom that got scrapped due to people not being able to accept change?

    I didn't think it was ready for TQ, but I just don't know enough about this to answer that question.


    please find someone who can/ I went back an counted. there were only 34 charatcers on the old forums that hated the neo neocom. That's less then how many people hate the new font.

    Instead of listening to angry loud people, you should of just polled the community.

    The neo neocom bar lost was one of the biggest deals to eve online in the SEVEN YEARS I've been playing this game.

    I would seriously drop 500$ on eve subs if they brought back the neo neocom.

    All it needed was to go vertical on the side of the screen, which was promised ot be finished. If that was the only unfinished part of it, then well... it took you 4 weeks to make this expansion I think you can manage one tiny feature being wroth my 500$.

    The fitting window makes since I never realize how complex the issues were with it. But it makes sense you wouldn't want to remake something that was flawed, you'd want to make something new from the ground up if you ever go to add that kind of functionality.

    However I have one request....

    If the new assets window can have, tabs for types of items, and a filter for the whole universe. Why can't you just add that to the normal items window? Then you wouldn't need the left window thing, because an in items window filter would be the same functionally. And you already have it running in the game... I mean why have both an assets window way to see your items window and an items window with less functionality. I think that will require a screen shot I'll post it later tommorow no eve on this laptop.

    So please find someone that can honestly give a good back and forth on the neo neocom. Because the 3 page thread got it killed, and there was a 12 page thread asking for it back.

    http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

    MotherMoon
    Tribal Liberation Force
    Minmatar Republic
    #32 - 2011-12-03 10:30:15 UTC
    Zagdul wrote:
    CCP karkur wrote:
    Zagdul wrote:

    What about the neocom that got scrapped due to people not being able to accept change?

    I didn't think it was ready for TQ, but I just don't know enough about this to answer that question.
    You guys were on the right path with what you were building in the new Neocom. I personally liked it, however I'm someone who quickly took a liking to the new Windows 7 peek features in the task bar and the new organization of the system tray and how they organize the start menu. In the IT world, I was a minority on release.

    If you take the taskbar we use in Windows 7 and compare it to the one we had back in the late 90's with 3.1, you'll find that the basic functionality of what's down there is still the same. Shoot, we can even turn off all the "fluff" that is Windows 7 and switch to classic view to dumb it down to what we've been accustomed to in the past. If you did anything in the IT world when the switch from 98/2000 > XP happened and the uproar of this new fangdangeled start menu and fisher price task bar that MS released, so many people quickly turned it all off. Some people have a hard time adapting and adjusting to something new. Please, keep these people in mind when migrating to something new.

    In my opinion, with something as vital as the neocom, you need to keep this principle in mind. Remember when MS changed the start menu in XP, or upgraded that one to Vista. How many people wanted to turn off all those extra things in the XP menu? I adapted and appreciated the new menu, but so many XP computers I worked on removed the XP theme and switched the start menu to classic.

    The idea behind the taskbar and it's basic functionality was to allow for a place to dock programs that you don't need on your current screen. It's functionality is to remove clutter and the future neocom can easily achieve this.

    I currently have over 20 chat channels that open upon launch, this clutter is something I'd like to have cleaned up.

    As it stands, "features" people have requested:
    - Customizable to where we can add/remove and create mini sub-menus (seems you had that down pat in the beta).
    - Ability to lock items to the neocom while not locking the whole thing. "Quick Launch"
    - Ability to "minimize" to it so chat windows become a part of it.
    - Ability to move the bar itself to any side of your monitor
    - The ability to have it auto-hide.
    - Icon Stacking
    - Right click functionality for things which have multiple tabs. I.E: right click map > open system map / star map / auto pilot settings.
    - Skinning via textures stored on my computer.
    - Some kind of integrated assets feature... maybe a search area to where I can type in it and it pops open my assets or something.
    - "Peek" for hover over of minimized chat windows. "Many intel channels, wanna just minimize them all off my screen and hover over to peek at what's going on to remove clutter"


    I can't remember much more that was being requested. But re-inventing windows taskbar may not be far off from what people, considering we're already used to using it, were requesting :)

    Anyway, good luck with building your projects. I don't envy you.


    Zagdul for CSM!

    brillant. CCP listen to this person

    http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

    Zagdul
    Federal Navy Academy
    Gallente Federation
    #33 - 2011-12-03 10:32:02 UTC
    except that should have read: early 90's... whoops.

    Dual Pane idea: Click!

    CCP Please Implement

    Sellendis
    The Ares project
    #34 - 2011-12-03 12:11:51 UTC
    CCP karkur wrote:
    Zagdul wrote:

    What about the neocom that got scrapped due to people not being able to accept change?

    I didn't think it was ready for TQ, but I just don't know enough about this to answer that question.


    Funny thing is, we had the option on SiSi to enable new neocom. Wanna use it, ok, its optional. And some people QQ and it got scrapped. Keyword, OPTIONAL.

    Brilliant, finally a non mandatory change in eve and its gone. Now we get a font some people dislike, they are stuck with it.
    We get a nebula that is honestly great in most locations, but somewhere (Sela region in Lonetrek for example) its right awful, so bright you cant see the white letters in space....stupid really.
    And no option to tone it down...we have been complaining about this since new nebula's hit SiSi, but i guess CCP dont give a damn.

    New fitting window is half working product. It calculates hardeners cap usage, but doesn't show the resistances, to get any values we need to undock...or use FET/Pyfa. Also reported long ago....is CCP even reading into this stuff?

    Solhild
    Doomheim
    #35 - 2011-12-03 12:14:36 UTC
    Way too much common sense being spoken in this thread!

    Neocom was great, different overview icons were great. I missed the fitting filter but that sounds great too, if the option is there to make something slicker and more intuitive, then why not make it happen?
    MotherMoon
    Tribal Liberation Force
    Minmatar Republic
    #36 - 2011-12-03 14:30:45 UTC
    Solhild wrote:
    Way too much common sense being spoken in this thread!

    Neocom was great, different overview icons were great. I missed the fitting filter but that sounds great too, if the option is there to make something slicker and more intuitive, then why not make it happen?


    as long it stays optional like the little tab or whatever, I see no reason to pull it.

    CCP need to listen. Which is my only hope right now.

    back when the neo neocom was canned they were the "old" ccp. But maybe this new listens to the players CCP will notice there is merit and bring back the UI that almost looked like eve gate.

    I mean people said the new forums would be an unused piece of **** because theyt are so terrible. And CCP still made us useit, and look, the new forums are fine. in fact many find it better.

    new font

    new UI

    new forums,

    in the nd, if it's different, and doesn't look the same, you will have people resist, have people... fight back. but honestly, it's it's a no brain features with nothing but usability improvements, then ccp need to ignore the early super angry response, and get a real pool out there or give it time to mature to find out what the majority of normal non 5% forum goers think.

    http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

    Florestan Bronstein
    Ministry of War
    Amarr Empire
    #37 - 2011-12-03 15:37:13 UTC
    Zagdul wrote:
    If you take the taskbar we use in Windows 7 and compare it to the one we had back in the late 90's with 3.1.

    running Windows 3.1 in the late nineties Shocked

    having a taskbar in Windows 3.1 Shocked
    Zagdul
    Federal Navy Academy
    Gallente Federation
    #38 - 2011-12-03 21:31:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Zagdul
    Florestan Bronstein wrote:
    Zagdul wrote:
    If you take the taskbar we use in Windows 7 and compare it to the one we had back in the late 90's with 3.1.

    running Windows 3.1 in the late nineties Shocked

    having a taskbar in Windows 3.1 Shocked
    EDIT: Corrected what I wanted to say in that post. Hope it makes more sense now.


    I wrote it really late and meant to say early 90's.

    I did mention that in my last post in this thread.

    While typing all those words, in my mind, I was thinking about when we had 3.1 and how that relates to EVE right now. There were areas and programs you could install to "dock" commonly used programs. However, our screen was a cluttered mess of things until 95 hit the shelves. Shoot, I remember in 3.1 having small areas of my screen where I'd have my programs folder open, and a shortcut folder... All these things would be pretty much on your desktop. This is what EVE is like right now.

    But I was tired, it was late and I wanted to make a point. By the time I got the words typed out and hit "POST", it got ganked by the site, I lost it, so I threw the words in that one out quickly. I'll make my corrections in a bit.

    ahahhaha, this post got ganked too... (ctrl+a / ctrl+c'd this one though)

    Dual Pane idea: Click!

    CCP Please Implement

    Previous page12