These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Star Wars Casting: Where are the Women ??

Author
Ian Morbius
Robby Altair Corporation
#61 - 2014-05-02 22:35:07 UTC
Always liked Gena Rowlands as Gloria Swenson in Gloria (1980). One hard ex-mistress of a mobster.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2014-05-02 23:19:02 UTC
Angelique Duchemin wrote:
As for credible female protagonists. Has there been one since Fargo?
What about Leela or Amy Wong from Futurama?

Angelique Duchemin wrote:
The Bechdel test is overrated. At best a curiosity.
The Bechdel Test is frequently misunderstood. Movies that pass it aren't necessarily gender-equal. Both Anchorman movies pass the Bechdel test, for instance. It's extremely easy to pass it. The point it makes is that any movie that fails the test without a really good reason is filled to the brim with masculist garbage. The most common exceptions are movies with too few characters to require two women to have dialogue with each other. Alien passes, but only barely. There are only two women (7 characters total), and one of the women (Lambert) doesn't talk much at all. At one point she lunges at Ripley and screams "You bítch!!!" which right there passes all 3 clauses of the Bechdel Test. So it doesn't take much. But the rest of the movie gets a pass because it has very little character development due to its focus on the alien, not the characters.

What about JJ Abrams' Star Trek movies? They have lots of characters, and lots of character development. The focus is constantly on the characters and how they interact with each other. The characters are constantly having conversations with each other. The movie would pass the reverse Bechdel test dozens of times throughout the entire thing. But does it pass the Bechdel test?

Debatably. Uhura's roommate is named (Gaila), and they talk about a Klingon transmission. This is while Kirk is naked under the bed, hiding. Knowing Kirk is watching, Uhura strips down to her underwear while talking to Gaila.

What about the rest of the movie?

Nope.

What about Into Darkness?

Nope.

Slade Trillgon wrote:
You want strong female lead you say. I present to you one of the strongest female leads in my mind Big smile

I spit on your grave.
remiscent of Uma Thurman's character in Kill Bill

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#63 - 2014-05-03 00:30:04 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Girls are even a higher percentage of game players than men, for God's sake.

Is this really true? As far as I know from mumble I've been the only girl in fleets I've participated in, except for one. Or maybe EVE isn't representative of this statistic? (Or maybe I haven't been in enough fleets..)

Quote:
BTW, the yammering about this particular point has overshadowed everything else about the announcements earlier in the week. Everyone was just really surprised about the paltry female casting.

I don't know how useful the yammering is. I don't think that a creative process should be hijacked by a requirement for gender equity. Gender equity is not a requirement for a good story (which should be Abrams's primary goal). For example, Seven Samurai and Rashomon are two of my favorite films and neither have any women of significance. Neither would be made any better by trying to shoehorn a strong female lead/support in.

You can't force a writer to create a good female character. I think that if it's forced, the quality of the character may not be something we wanted to see anyway.

I don't think anyone mentioned Geena Davis from Cutthroat Island and Long Kiss Goodnight. I think she's awesome.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#64 - 2014-05-03 01:39:07 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Webvan wrote:
I'm sure that they have binders of women.
In walks Lindsay Lohan.
In walks Miley Cyrus.
In walks Jennifer Love Hewitt.
In walks Britney Spears.
Welcome to yet another Disney movie!


None of these was ever in a Disney film, except Lindsay Lohan in the rather good "Freaky Friday" remake with Jamie Lee Curtis.

Like the original with Jodie Foster, a great kid's film with a cast led by 2 women (well, one woman and one girl).

They were all connected to Disney. So, you have extra tabs in your binders... I'm not impressed. I ignore the tabs and retain equal opportunity across the board if they can fit a position. Men, women, and all the little details that make people seem different. I just don't blare it out from atop the mountain to get people to think I care. It's usually the people that do that - that are the ones that really don't care. Always the contradiction when you look deeper. Then there are of course those that just accept and follow, but usually something going on under the surface nonetheless. When it's pushed to some form of pissing contest to whom cares the most, usually the individuals needing the most caring are dispensed with and forgotten, really. If you want to make change, you do it in your own world, you walk the talk and set an example by your own actions. What other people do, that's their own problems.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#65 - 2014-05-03 02:17:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Reaver Glitterstim
I think the thing people hate most about Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Jennifer Love Hewitt, and Miley Cyrus are that they are strong women who control their own destiny. The patriarchy doesn't like that. It wants only fake strong women who act tough but rely on men every step of the way, like Natalie Portman, Charlize Theron, Reese Witherspoon, and Angelina Jolie.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#66 - 2014-05-03 02:41:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Sibyyl
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
I thinkt he thing people hate most about Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Jennifer Love Hewitt, and Miley Cyrus are that they are strong women who control their own destiny. The patriarchy doesn't like that. It wants only fake strong women who act tough but rely on men every step of the way, like Natalie Portman, Charlize Theron, Reese Witherspoon, and Angelina Jolie.

I don't think there's anything fake or weak about relying on men. It's a very human thing to do and it shouldn't detract from how tough a person might be. Million Dollar Baby is a good example of interdependence between two very tough characters.

I think what people hate about Britney, Lindsay, Jennifer, and Miley is that they don't contribute anything particularly unique or amazing to their chosen professions. People always have the right to produce garbage as art.. no one should ever restrict it, but the Mr. Brainwash's of the world will unfortunately always overshadow the Banksy's or Shepard Fairey's.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#67 - 2014-05-03 02:45:28 UTC
I didn't say there was anything weak about relying on men, and I didn't mean to suggest that either. But the fact is that the patriarchy wants women to rely on specifically men, and so when women don't rely on men, they are hated, despised, and persecuted.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#68 - 2014-05-03 04:26:31 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:
Neither would be made any better by trying to shoehorn a strong female lead/support in.

You can't force a writer to create a good female character. I think that if it's forced, the quality of the character may not be something we wanted to see anyway.

Of course the entire reason for this is because society doesn't equip authors to actually write decent female characters.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#69 - 2014-05-03 04:27:32 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Marsha Mallow wrote:
In a sense complaining about a lack of female stars actually smacks of "we need moar eye-candy" and is a bit insulting.

People want women (and minorities by extension) to have fair representation in film. They don't. It has nothing to do with "eye candy" and if it were then movies would be completely dominated by women.


Whenever people try and tell me that "people want this" about that kind of thing (typically while trying to say the Wonder Woman movie should ever see daylight), I point them at Catwoman.

Nuff said.

People who aren't sexist*.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#70 - 2014-05-03 05:14:07 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Sibyyl wrote:
Neither would be made any better by trying to shoehorn a strong female lead/support in.

You can't force a writer to create a good female character. I think that if it's forced, the quality of the character may not be something we wanted to see anyway.

Of course the entire reason for this is because society doesn't equip authors to actually write decent female characters.

I mostly blame that on the film actors guild and the writers they hire. Yes, they think they are woman-like but they're not.
Then for the rest, well... hehe


I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

jason hill
Red vs Blue Flight Academy
#71 - 2014-05-03 13:35:46 UTC
meh ! I`ll watch anything ..... as long as the female characters have decent jugs I`m a happy bunney Bear
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#72 - 2014-05-03 18:36:12 UTC
Perhaps one of the biggest parts of the problem is that nearly every character in film that is female is a "female character". Most characters that are male are not a "male character". It's easier to write characters for male roles when you have convinced yourself that men are the norm and women are the outsiders. Men can play any role except a woman. Women can only play a woman or some crazy character who is a woman deep down inside but is fighting society over it and making a pitiful attempt at convincing people otherwise.

If the writers could see that men and women aren't so different, they would find it's easy to cast women in roles. You make characters, then you assign actors. It's easier than what they are doing because you never stop and make sure the actors are men.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#73 - 2014-05-03 19:34:14 UTC
Angelique Duchemin wrote:



As for credible female protagonists. Has there been one since Fargo?





I'd go for Uma in Kill Bill. But then, she's not really playing a real human being. She's playing a cartoon. But it's still amazing anyway.

But yes, Marge was an amazing character in Fargo ("Oh, I just thought I was going to barf.....") Lol

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#74 - 2014-05-03 19:36:07 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Girls are even a higher percentage of game players than men, for God's sake.

Is this really true? As far as I know from mumble I've been the only girl in fleets I've participated in, except for one. Or maybe EVE isn't representative of this statistic? (Or maybe I haven't been in enough fleets..)


Kandy Krush Saga.

Farmville.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#75 - 2014-05-03 19:40:09 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:
. For example, Seven Samurai and Rashomon are two of my favorite films and neither have any women of significance. Neither would be made any better by trying to shoehorn a strong female lead/support in.



As far as I know, "aggressive women" were verbotten in old Japan. They would be inaccurate in such historically based stories.

Lets just say SF is quite a bit more flexible. Ripley was changed from male casting to female without one single word change in the script. It's not really that hard.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Eurydia Vespasian
Storm Hunters
#76 - 2014-05-03 19:44:03 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Girls are even a higher percentage of game players than men, for God's sake.

Is this really true? As far as I know from mumble I've been the only girl in fleets I've participated in, except for one. Or maybe EVE isn't representative of this statistic? (Or maybe I haven't been in enough fleets..)


eve is definitely not representative. lol

i, too, have very very often been the single female representative in fleet operations or on comms in general. i don't think any of us need to be reminded of gender percentages in eve. that's been talked about to death. if you do need reminded just watch the fanfest stream lol.

i believe the statistic krix mentioned has a lot to do with mobile app gaming or social media gaming. i do plenty of that myself. it's far more accessible, far more simply designed and just easier to play here and there with no real commitment.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#77 - 2014-05-03 19:54:05 UTC
People say "girls this" and "girls that" in these discussions, but when talking about the males it's "men this" and "men that".
It's such an ingrained piece of sexism in our society that almost nobody ever notices until it's pointed out to them.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#78 - 2014-05-03 19:54:30 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Ripley was changed from male casting to female without one single word change in the script.

So when Lambert lunges at Ripley and screams "You bítch!", that was improv?

It probably was, actually.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#79 - 2014-05-03 21:53:46 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
People say "girls this" and "girls that" in these discussions, but when talking about the males it's "men this" and "men that".
It's such an ingrained piece of sexism in our society that almost nobody ever notices until it's pointed out to them.
hah! someone is catching onto my confusing long winded point? You knew that already no doubt. Girls ≠ Women etc. But it's been a long time, the death of Chivalry.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#80 - 2014-05-03 22:46:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Reaver Glitterstim
Referring to women as girls is not really chauvanism, for the most part. I haven't noticed any trend toward telling women that being girls is immature or not to be desired, rather just the opposite, women are supposed to act young, cute, and childish--while still being encouraged to be mature and (somewhat) self-sufficient. Boys are taught that they need too act older, stronger, and more mature/experienced than they really are. If anything, men are getting the short end of the stick here.

I see lots of examples of people pointing at things as being chauvanist that really aren't. One of the big ones that bugs me a lot is when feminists get mad at female characters discussing sex or sexual topics. Women having sexual thoughts is normal. The belief in our society that sex is a man's thing is one of the most sexist and chauvanistic things you could possibly come up with. To suggest that women in movies should avoid being sexualized at all is tantamount to suggesting that they should only be sexualized as props or plot devices for the male characters. Gender equality is when a female character can do what male characters do in movies: seduce people, control the relationship, and wield the power to end the relationship.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."