These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What can Auto Pilot do for you??.... An AP revamp thread

Author
Goose99
#21 - 2011-12-01 19:45:08 UTC
Emperor Salazar wrote:
Goose99 wrote:


Not everyone is macro mining/ratting. Ratting in particular requires far more sophisticated bots. And yes, just about everyone uses travel macros, numerous versions widely available for free, since it's so simple to script. I don't tell you what should be, only what is, since you seem to have you head stuck in the sand just like CCP, and has no idea what's happening.Roll


Confirming I love the taste of sand.

But really....can you show me where you gathered this great intel from? I would love to know your source of information for knowing that JUST ABOUT EVERYONE uses travel macros.

Your argument is literally based 100% on theoretical data. You really think thats....effective?


Chat, metagaming, Google? You know, communicate with ppl, make some friends, troll the forums, get the latest news, and you won't be stuck traveling via clicking...Roll
Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#22 - 2011-12-01 19:49:23 UTC
Goose99 wrote:


Chat, metagaming, Google? You know, communicate with ppl, make some friends, troll the forums, get the latest news, and you won't be stuck traveling via clicking...Roll


Hey man, idk about you, but trolling is wrong and I don't partake in that.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#23 - 2011-12-01 19:52:36 UTC
Goose99 wrote:
Emperor Salazar wrote:
Goose99 wrote:


Not everyone is macro mining/ratting. Ratting in particular requires far more sophisticated bots. And yes, just about everyone uses travel macros, numerous versions widely available for free, since it's so simple to script. I don't tell you what should be, only what is, since you seem to have you head stuck in the sand just like CCP, and has no idea what's happening.Roll


Confirming I love the taste of sand.

But really....can you show me where you gathered this great intel from? I would love to know your source of information for knowing that JUST ABOUT EVERYONE uses travel macros.

Your argument is literally based 100% on theoretical data. You really think thats....effective?


Chat, metagaming, Google? You know, communicate with ppl, make some friends, troll the forums, get the latest news, and you won't be stuck traveling via clicking...Roll


Unfortunately I'm going to have to agree with Sal on this one.
Simply because any time I go travelling around I see tons of people in tons of different ships (mostly indy's and freighters) that are in AP.

However, it still doesn't change the fact the I feel that reducing jump range to 0 for auto pilot does nothing to Eve but increase the quality of life, increase the amount of play time and less afk travel, but also just gets things moving a little faster in Eve, and reduces server load cause now auto pilot won't have to factor approaching a gate.(if even not by much)
Goose99
#24 - 2011-12-01 19:56:28 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Goose99 wrote:
Emperor Salazar wrote:
Goose99 wrote:


Not everyone is macro mining/ratting. Ratting in particular requires far more sophisticated bots. And yes, just about everyone uses travel macros, numerous versions widely available for free, since it's so simple to script. I don't tell you what should be, only what is, since you seem to have you head stuck in the sand just like CCP, and has no idea what's happening.Roll


Confirming I love the taste of sand.

But really....can you show me where you gathered this great intel from? I would love to know your source of information for knowing that JUST ABOUT EVERYONE uses travel macros.

Your argument is literally based 100% on theoretical data. You really think thats....effective?


Chat, metagaming, Google? You know, communicate with ppl, make some friends, troll the forums, get the latest news, and you won't be stuck traveling via clicking...Roll


Unfortunately I'm going to have to agree with Sal on this one.
Simply because any time I go travelling around I see tons of people in tons of different ships (mostly indy's and freighters) that are in AP.

However, it still doesn't change the fact the I feel that reducing jump range to 0 for auto pilot does nothing to Eve but increase the quality of life, increase the amount of play time and less afk travel, but also just gets things moving a little faster in Eve, and reduces server load cause now auto pilot won't have to factor approaching a gate.(if even not by much)


The reason you see them is because they're the ones stuck approaching the gate with freighters. Majority of people just come and go.
Bearilian
Man Eating Bears
#25 - 2011-12-02 05:59:01 UTC
I dont really want to join this arguement, but i cant help myself. Its my general experience that, only people who exploit a game mechanic (gankers in this case), tend to argue against a change that would effect their use of it in the game. if auto pilot was reduced to within 0, then contrary to popular beleif i would game more. i would spend more time searching markets and contracts, I would ballance assets and manage my orders. (before you say anything; yes i can multitask, but if travel was uninterrupted, i could accomplish far more).

+1

If this change when through, it would take less than a month for everyone to never complain about it again... (because I think It's true that ganking would only be reduced by a tiny percentage).

Although I would like to add, (forget who I heard this from) but someone suggested introducing an auto pilot skill, or some similar skill that would reduce the distance from the gate. by lvl 5 have it within 0 km. make it extremely sp extensive so it takes a really long time to train. that way you know the person earned it.

Bear
Rina Asanari
CitadeI
#26 - 2011-12-02 06:56:16 UTC
I think many people already know that I mostly take a stance favouring carebear-y activities.

But this is one of the exceptions.

Combining "Warp to 0" and "Jump" is a nice addition which I gladly use, but people may have noticed that someone may even be a fraction of a second, or maybe up to a second, faster if they still do it by hand. Just because the automatics let the ship decelerate to zero before initiating stargate jump.

I'm fine with that. Less clicking hassle for me and still not as good as if I fly completely manual.

Now comes:

Laziness should not be rewarded. It should be penalized. If you don't watch out and take matters into your own hands, you're fair game. That goes for autopiloting, especially with an expensive ship or during wartimes as same as with maybe warping onto the default warp-in point of an ice belt and simply picking the nearest roid in sight instead of making yourself a less obvious spot. That list goes on and on.

Back to autopiloting:

You're travelling, pure and simple. You're occupied with the process of travelling. An airplane pilot cannot simply switch on autopilot and take a nap somewhere in the rear part of plane as well. As well as you can't simply switch on cruise control and make a coffee in the back of your mobile home, even if the long, straight, empty roads of Canada entice you to do it.

So.... No.
Nestara Aldent
Citimatics
#27 - 2011-12-02 07:50:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Nestara Aldent
Oh my God...

Ganking is not an exploit, it's intended game mechanics. Scamming in character or game time code trade would be an exploit, because it's against rules by CCP.

This game isn't at all for you if you don't have tough enough skin for pvp, or if you don't want to mine in a harsh, realistic environment where you will be ganked, isooner or later.

Ganking isn't an exploit! Ganking AFK pilots who autopilot billions to Jita isn't an exploit!
Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow
#28 - 2011-12-02 10:57:40 UTC
No.

Autopilot warping to 15km working as intended.

Consider the following:

In a high traffic system, you are piloting a freighter, and warp to 0 on the gate utilizing autopilot, and multiple ships come out of warp at approximately the same time, thus slowing down from FTL speeds, and strike your freighter, bumping it off the gate, and a crew of gankers just happen to be floating around (say the Sivala/Uedama bottleneck). Suddenly, multiple alphapests, alphapocs unleash their fury on your autopiloting freighter, all because you're too lazy to actually play the game.

In the end, they profit, as we all know even on AP, a jump isn't immediate as there would be the session change of coming out of warp, and the session change of jumping, which would put more strain on servers, thus creating more lag.

So again, no.

I am the One who exists in Shadow. I am the Devil your parents warned you about.

||CEO: Order of the Shadow||Executor: The Revenant Order||Creator: Bowhead||

Bearilian
Man Eating Bears
#29 - 2011-12-02 19:10:49 UTC
I cant help it, I want to point out that most of the people arguing this proposal are completely missing one of the points that the original posts attempted to make really clear. you can say ganking is not an exploit, and you are entirely correct. that shouldnt have been said in the first place. basically what I got of of this thread was that Joe Risalo, tried to make the arguement that changing auto warp to 0 would not have much effect on whether someone gets ganked. practically nobody commented on this. mostly I beleive its cause either you disagree but realize that if you complained then it would make you sound like a lazy wuss ganker, or you agree but are afraid of the change.

Now the real dificulty is figuring out if this is actually awarding laziness in piloting or not. some of you do make good points thats its in place to make someone actually fly their own ship, but that does not mean the system could not be improved. what do you guys think of the idea of adding a skill that would improve your auto piloting? (it doesnt have to reach 0, mabye it could max out at 5km, I'm pretty sure thats what the guy said where i first saw the idea)

personally i restate that I think this change should go through. and strongly believe that every who disagrees with it, would completly forget about it within a month or two of it being implemented. really think about it. does it matter that much to you? you realize that every one would reap the benefit, not just lazy carebears?

I only use auto pilot when i have to go do something, or when my girl needs me, or when Im leaving the house for a while. being ganked while i'm away is a risk i willingly take. if auto pilot warped to zero, i would actually use it while im playing, like i said before. It might help lazy people, but it would also help multitaskers.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#30 - 2011-12-02 21:35:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Joe Risalo
Bearilian wrote:
I cant help it, I want to point out that most of the people arguing this proposal are completely missing one of the points that the original posts attempted to make really clear. you can say ganking is not an exploit, and you are entirely correct. that shouldnt have been said in the first place. basically what I got of of this thread was that Joe Risalo, tried to make the arguement that changing auto warp to 0 would not have much effect on whether someone gets ganked. practically nobody commented on this. mostly I beleive its cause either you disagree but realize that if you complained then it would make you sound like a lazy wuss ganker, or you agree but are afraid of the change.


Correct.... tbh, there are less people using auto pilot now than ever before... Most of the ships that you see auto piloting are typically small frigs, shuttles, and pods, because they fly quick and hit warp quick.
Most players flying something of value or carrying something of value will not auto pilot.
This has led to most gankers actually catching ships on the receiving end of a gate where they can catch the target before they enter warp. It's a method that is always used in low sec gate camps.
Now, when they catch someone coming out of AP and gank them, well, that's just the topping on the cake.

If AP were able to warp to zero it wouldn't reduce the amount of high sec ganking at all because those who did rely on ganks of AP will simply start ganking on the receiving side of the gate before the target hits warp.

Quote:
Now the real dificulty is figuring out if this is actually awarding laziness in piloting or not. some of you do make good points thats its in place to make someone actually fly their own ship, but that does not mean the system could not be improved. what do you guys think of the idea of adding a skill that would improve your auto piloting? (it doesnt have to reach 0, mabye it could max out at 5km, I'm pretty sure thats what the guy said where i first saw the idea)


I feel the skill would be a good idea, that way it's not just given to people.
Quote:
personally i restate that I think this change should go through. and strongly believe that every who disagrees with it, would completly forget about it within a month or two of it being implemented. really think about it. does it matter that much to you? you realize that every one would reap the benefit, not just lazy carebears?

Agreed, everyone would forget about it....Just like everyone has forgotten that you used to not be able to warp to zero even if you were flying manually, and that if you did want to warp to zero you had to set up bookmarks.
Yet, CCP changing that didn't have people up in arms claiming that it was supporting lazy ppl.(if they were up in arms it's because it took away from their ganks, but since then you haven't heard a peep from those people.)

It's a quality of life issue. Giving players a choice to warp to zero increased the quality of life for everyone. It allowed them to spend less time setting up bookmarks and flying around, and more time actually playing the game.

Everyone in Eve will agree that travelling is the most tedious and annoying part of Eve.
Hell, I hate having to even go over one jump to run a mission.

Allowing AP to warp to zero changes nothing in the amount of ganks in high sec, but instead simply suggest to players to do ganks in a manner similar to low sec gate camps.
This will increase the quality of life for everyone in Eve because you'll spend less time doing the most tedious and boring aspect of eve, and more time actually playing the game the way you want.

Quote:
I only use auto pilot when i have to go do something, or when my girl needs me, or when Im leaving the house for a while. being ganked while i'm away is a risk i willingly take. if auto pilot warped to zero, i would actually use it while im playing, like i said before. It might help lazy people, but it would also help multitaskers.


for those who keep saying it supports laziness, I beg to differ.
I've auto piloted because I had other sh*t to do, but never because I was too lazy.
I actually don't use AP in slow ships because i'm too lazy and impatient to wait to reach my destination.

To me auto pilot is not playing the game. It's moving around to get somewhere so you can play the game.
Kinda like going on vacation.
has anyone here ever considered the drive or flight to your destination as part of your vacation?
If you have, then you either have a crappy job and everything is better than being at work, or you seriously have no idea what the term vacation means.
Most people will take a flight because it's much quick, so you'll get there and be able to enjoy your vacation.

AP is exactly like that. Just cause you're jumping around in game doesn't necessarily mean you're playing the game, but that you're trying to get to a spot so you can play the game, much like even though you're already on vacation, the car ride or plane ride to your location isn't really part of your location.
So if someone on the plane asks you where you're going, you say "I'm taking a vacation to/in Hawaii." Never do you say "I'm on vacation, so I'm going to Hawaii."

Sorry Sal, it's a bit long winded, lol.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#31 - 2011-12-02 21:59:43 UTC
Rina Asanari wrote:
I think many people already know that I mostly take a stance favouring carebear-y activities.


it's really not a carebearish activity to allow auto pilot to warp to zero, because everyone in high sec would use it reguardless of what the primary type of gaming in Eve they chose to get involved in.

Quote:

Now comes:

Laziness should not be rewarded. It should be penalized. If you don't watch out and take matters into your own hands, you're fair game. That goes for autopiloting, especially with an expensive ship or during wartimes as same as with maybe warping onto the default warp-in point of an ice belt and simply picking the nearest roid in sight instead of making yourself a less obvious spot. That list goes on and on.


EVERYONE is fair game reguardless of whether they're in AP or if they're flying manually, and even if AP warps to zero.

Reason why is because EVERYONE is succeptible to being ganked before entering warp.

Quote:
Back to autopiloting:

You're travelling, pure and simple. You're occupied with the process of travelling. An airplane pilot cannot simply switch on autopilot and take a nap somewhere in the rear part of plane as well. As well as you can't simply switch on cruise control and make a coffee in the back of your mobile home, even if the long, straight, empty roads of Canada entice you to do it.

So.... No.


You're correct in terms of cruise control, however, you're incorrect in terms of auto pilot. Commercial jets at this point in history are capable of taking off on their own, flying on their own, and landing on their own. (again, that's commercial jets)

It's even been mentioned by members of the F.A.A. that commercial planes need to become less automated because the pilots are becoming lazy an unknowledgable of how to respond to an emergency situation, which is just short of being the only reason they're even in the cockpit anymore.

I will say for Sal's sake though that both your response and my response are innappropriate because we're compairing a game to rl lf, which he's strongly against, but in my defense it was more a correction towards what you said than it was a comparison of the game to rl.
Zyress
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#32 - 2011-12-02 22:14:59 UTC
As I have said before I support shuttles having warp to zero autopilots, moving from point a to point b in a shuttle can hardly be called playing the game
Hu6upy
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2011-12-03 07:38:42 UTC
Just drop stargates or give jump drive for all ships. Make flight in Eve beter and longer.
Don't touch stargates only between regions (or galaxies!? in future).
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#34 - 2011-12-03 07:46:30 UTC
Hu6upy wrote:
Just drop stargates or give jump drive for all ships. Make flight in Eve beter and longer.
Don't touch stargates only between regions (or galaxies!? in future).


That would suck.

Not only would it hender everyone's attempt at putting ice in low and null only
But it would also force everyone to only fly ships of the faction territory they were in so that they could fuel their jump drives.

Also, jump drives would have to be completely revamped cause as it sits, from what I undestand, you need someone on the other side to open a cyno.
Which means cynos would have to be made legal in high sec. Which means a new cyno type would have to be implemented that only allows high sec allowed ships.

Just sounds like a headache to me really.
Hu6upy
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2011-12-03 08:11:31 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Hu6upy wrote:
Just drop stargates or give jump drive for all ships. Make flight in Eve beter and longer.
Don't touch stargates only between regions (or galaxies!? in future).


That would suck.

Not only would it hender everyone's attempt at putting ice in low and null only
But it would also force everyone to only fly ships of the faction territory they were in so that they could fuel their jump drives.

Also, jump drives would have to be completely revamped cause as it sits, from what I undestand, you need someone on the other side to open a cyno.
Which means cynos would have to be made legal in high sec. Which means a new cyno type would have to be implemented that only allows high sec allowed ships.

Just sounds like a headache to me really.


You don't understand. Space is not a city with metropolitan & campers on some stations :). Read http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=577532
Adding something like "jump tracer" will solve problem.
Marcus Harikari
#36 - 2011-12-03 11:16:39 UTC
Oh God Yes!!! Jumping around is so annoying. Who cares if I'm actually "there" to make the jumps? In fact, we should be able to automate everything we want in EVE. I could set a schedule for the day...mine belts 1-5 using jetcans, if someone steals a can, switch to my Drake and come agress them if they are smaller than BC size. Then refine the stuff I mined, and haul it all to jita and sell it at buy prices or a bit higher, depending on what the sell prices are. Then autopilot-to-0 back to my base station, dock, and wait until i get home from work.

This would be so epic. The people who wanna gank and stuff can still do that, nobody is stopping them. But it wold become more of a game of the mind, rather than time.
el alasar
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2011-12-03 14:27:19 UTC  |  Edited by: el alasar
ganked. moved post to #45.

check the moderated 10000 papercuts evelopedia page! http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Little_things_and_ideas_-_low_hanging_fruit_-_10000_papercuts comment, bump(!) and like what you like

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#38 - 2011-12-03 15:47:36 UTC
No.

Not needed, and removes the benefit you get for doing it manually (beating your lazy-ass competitors).
Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#39 - 2011-12-03 15:51:33 UTC
Tippia wrote:
No.

Not needed, and removes the benefit you get for doing it manually (beating your lazy-ass competitors).


BUT EVERYBODY IS ALREADY USING MACROS TO DO IT, MIGHT AS WELL IMPLEMENT IT

AM I DOING IT RIGHT GOOSE?
Goose99
#40 - 2011-12-03 16:10:49 UTC
Emperor Salazar wrote:
Tippia wrote:
No.

Not needed, and removes the benefit you get for doing it manually (beating your lazy-ass competitors).


BUT EVERYBODY IS ALREADY USING MACROS TO DO IT, MIGHT AS WELL IMPLEMENT IT

AM I DOING IT RIGHT GOOSE?


Exactly. See? Tippia already uses ap macro, and thus, want the stupid ppl to stay gimped. Cool