These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

The bane of the "One Medium Slot" ship

Author
David Clausewitz
David Clausewitz Corporation
#1 - 2011-12-02 05:31:54 UTC  |  Edited by: David Clausewitz
Ok, I would like to trade one of the lows on my coercer for another medium because one medium-slot ships are pretty terrible and it's like impossible to kill something without a point and propulsion module. Retribution would be happy with the same deal. Please make it happen so my Coercer (and future Retribution) will actually be able to point something while maintaining a MWD/AB!

Thank you!! Big smile
DarkAegix
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2011-12-02 05:52:12 UTC
Deal with it!

[Retribution, Solo nano gank shield unneutable unkiteable tackler]
Overdrive Injector System II
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Pseudoelectron Containment Field I

Warp Scrambler II

Dual Light Pulse Laser II
Dual Light Pulse Laser II
Dual Light Pulse Laser II
Dual Light Pulse Laser II
Small Nosferatu II

Small Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Small Core Defence Field Extender I



Don't let anything stop you! Fit a shield tackle nano Retribution!
David Clausewitz
David Clausewitz Corporation
#3 - 2011-12-02 06:01:06 UTC  |  Edited by: David Clausewitz
That's not gonna be very good at catching things, and it will be even worse for the destroyer. It's just too hard to function as a small ship with only 1 medium.
DarkAegix
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2011-12-02 06:16:28 UTC
David Clausewitz wrote:
That's not gonna be very good at catching things, and it will be even worse for the destroyer. It's just too hard to function as a small ship with only 1 medium.

Big smile
Roderick Tazinas
24IC 1st Surplus Distribution Company
#5 - 2011-12-02 06:28:18 UTC
Solo -> Vengeance.
In fleet you have tacklers.
You need to use the right tool for the right job.
David Clausewitz
David Clausewitz Corporation
#6 - 2011-12-02 06:45:52 UTC
Roderick Tazinas wrote:
Solo -> Vengeance.
In fleet you have tacklers.
You need to use the right tool for the right job.


Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution.
Salvia Olima
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2011-12-02 09:54:32 UTC
Get a wingman buddy. EvE is not designed to play solo all the time.
AnzacPaul
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#8 - 2011-12-02 10:25:46 UTC
people arguing like they don't need an extra mid.........
Cadius Vect
Tenth Plague of Egypt
#9 - 2011-12-02 11:06:33 UTC
Fit for max damage, get a buddy in a vengeance to do the tackling.
Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#10 - 2011-12-02 16:49:36 UTC
There is no reason for a pvp ship to ever have only 1 midslot. If you don't have a point, most FC's will laugh you out of their fleet. Yes there are ways around it, but realistically all it does is gimp that ship in comparison to other hulls.
Maroxus
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#11 - 2011-12-02 17:49:09 UTC
So .. you want a Catalyst's layout. In that case can the Cormorant trade a mid for a low? To share the same slot layout of the Thrasher? Also change the Flycatcher's layout, the Sabre's 4/2 would be nice. If the Heretic won't stick with the slot layout tradition (It is a heretic after all) with 3/3 instead of 1/5, then there is no reason for the Coercer/Cormorant/Flycatcher to stick with theirs.
IceBergSlim
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2011-12-02 18:18:08 UTC
David Clausewitz wrote:
Roderick Tazinas wrote:
Solo -> Vengeance.
In fleet you have tacklers.
You need to use the right tool for the right job.


Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution.


David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down.

Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol.
David Clausewitz
David Clausewitz Corporation
#13 - 2011-12-02 19:05:49 UTC  |  Edited by: David Clausewitz
IceBergSlim wrote:
David Clausewitz wrote:
Roderick Tazinas wrote:
Solo -> Vengeance.
In fleet you have tacklers.
You need to use the right tool for the right job.


Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution.


David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down.

Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol.


The good old "everything happens for a reason", "everything was designed for a purpose" argument.

No, not everything happens for a reason. Maybe the devs had a purpose in mind when they designed these two ships, but just because they had been designed for a reason doesn't mean they were well-designed.

These "tools" may have been designed with some purpose in mind, but they are poorly designed tools, bent and broken and inferior in their function to alternatives due to the one medium slot.
IceBergSlim
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2011-12-02 19:10:59 UTC
David Clausewitz wrote:
IceBergSlim wrote:
David Clausewitz wrote:
Roderick Tazinas wrote:
Solo -> Vengeance.
In fleet you have tacklers.
You need to use the right tool for the right job.


Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution.


David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down.

Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol.


The good old "everything happens for a reason", "everything was designed for a purpose" argument.

No, these ships were badly designed with one medium slot and need to be fixed if they want to be remotely usable in solo/small group pvp work.


David, quite simply, you are wrong. Several people have posted in a polite manner regarding your semi-rant, myself included. There is no need to be terse. Obviously you won't be swayed, which is of course your perogative. I just cannot see you getting a bandwagon of agreement behind you. Maybe I'm wrong, and if you feel SO strongly, contact the dev's and ask them for their justification of those ships with one mid slot. Good luck with that, lol.
David Clausewitz
David Clausewitz Corporation
#15 - 2011-12-02 19:24:48 UTC  |  Edited by: David Clausewitz
IceBergSlim wrote:
David Clausewitz wrote:
IceBergSlim wrote:
David Clausewitz wrote:
Roderick Tazinas wrote:
Solo -> Vengeance.
In fleet you have tacklers.
You need to use the right tool for the right job.


Every tool can do the same point/propulsion job except the Coercer and the Retribution.


David, what Roderick posted is just about the best - and politest, lol - answer you'll receive in here. Yes, agreed, those ships with one mid slot aren't what you would expect a pvp ship to have. However, what do you think the dev's were thinking when they created those ships? That they were insta-broken? No. They have a role. Just like every ship ingame. You just have to figure out what that role is and how best to utilise your chosen ship. Surely you realised this before training/buying one? I mean absolutely no offence by this, but Roderick has it nailed down.

Everything has a role and/or a purpose in EvE. It's just sometimes we don't see it. believe me, I know, lol.


The good old "everything happens for a reason", "everything was designed for a purpose" argument.

No, these ships were badly designed with one medium slot and need to be fixed if they want to be remotely usable in solo/small group pvp work.


David, quite simply, you are wrong. Several people have posted in a polite manner regarding your semi-rant, myself included. There is no need to be terse. Obviously you won't be swayed, which is of course your perogative. I just cannot see you getting a bandwagon of agreement behind you. Maybe I'm wrong, and if you feel SO strongly, contact the dev's and ask them for their justification of those ships with one mid slot. Good luck with that, lol.


So that was just a combination of ad hominem and straw man and it completely ignored my legitimate concerns that you either failed to comprehend as a valid response to your argument or just refused to acknowledge as legitimate concerns (which they are).

Quite simply, no you're wrong. Small one-medium ships do not function in this game when you only have two of them, and every other small ship is a better alternative simply because of the fact that you need a propulsion mod and you need a point as a bare minimum for a small pvp ship to accomplish anything practically useful.
Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#16 - 2011-12-02 19:29:46 UTC
Their "role", as it functions now and regardless of the dev's intentions, is to sit in the hangar. Or be used in PVE only.

If the problem is slot layout, just increase the base armor HP of the coercer and move a low to medium. Same functionality (for an amarr ship), and the hull is now usable. Retribution has been discussed elsewhere, but suffice to say, it can afford to lose the utility high.
Tarunik Raqalth'Qui
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2011-12-02 19:56:38 UTC
The problem with one-med-slot wonders in PvP combat:


  • FCs will laugh you out of their fleet if you don't have a point or scram fitted.
  • FCs in frigate gangs will also laugh you out of their fleet if you don't have some sort of propulsion module fitted (because you then lose any ability to control range).


Apparently the intent of the Retri or Coercer was to fit a point or scram and just use crystal swaps to counter any opponent trying to pull away. However, this doesn't deal with the problem of speedy, afterburning frigates getting deep under your guns and out-tracking you into oblivion. (A 125mm Gatling AutoCannon II has a base tracking of 0.417 rad/s and a Light Electron Blaster II has a base tracking of 0.438 rad/s, which is a not-exactly-insignificant edge over the 0.308 rad/s base tracking of a Gatling Pulse Laser II especially considering the fact that these ships are unlikely to be fitting high tracking weapons, although the Coercer's 10%/level tracking bonus makes this less problematic.)

As a result, even if you have a scram to shut down MWDs, you are not going to be able to stop AB or dualprop frigates from getting in under your guns, and you will also be unable to kite drones yourself or get in under the guns of larger ships with propmods fitted.


Never mind that the Jag has Minmatar T2 resists AND the speed needed to out-track you (and often fits 125mm/150mm guns due to the fact the only AF with less PG is the Ishkur)...can you see a Holder's bad day in the making?
Captain Nares
O3 Corporation
#18 - 2011-12-02 20:06:01 UTC
One-med ships are OK. They aren't designed for tackling.
Takeshi Yamato
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2011-12-02 20:18:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Takeshi Yamato
The Coercer is kind of okay. You don't expect Destroyers to tackle stuff, but just to kill frigates quickly from range and the Coercer does that well.

The Retribution does roughly half the dps of the Coercer now. At the same ranges, with much better tracking. There is no point to the Retribution. A second mid is WAY more useful than a fifth low slot. It either needs to do a LOT more dps to be worthwhile flying or just get that second mid slot.

"do a LOT more dps" as in: +1 turret, 10% damage bonus instead of 5%, extra grid and especially cpu (so it can actually fit multiple heatsinks and make good use of its low slots). With those bonuses it would just about match a Coercer in dps, and trade tracking for durability and low signature.
Sevgei Ertekin
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2011-12-02 21:27:54 UTC
One medium slot is just dumb. Anyone arguing otherwise, is too.
123Next pageLast page