These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The obvious

First post
Author
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#61 - 2014-04-26 19:22:18 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:
LHA Tarawa wrote:

There is nothing CCP can do to get me to accept significant risk.


You do realize you are playing EVE online and are choosing to live in what is supposed to be a dangerous, lawless place. I think it says so on the tin if I can find it.


Except for cloakers who choose to go afk with their cloak on.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#62 - 2014-04-26 19:22:37 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:

So why not save money and move back to high sec if all it takes is a cloaky camper to bring you all to your knees?


Because I'd rather unsub and play EVE offline until my subs run out.


The reason I played high sec was the dream of creating a corp of friends, move to null, have a place of our own....

If I had known it would be so easy to crush that dream by simply logging on, pressing cloak and waling away for 23.5 hours, I wouldn't have gotten into EVE 5 years ago.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#63 - 2014-04-26 19:26:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Fury
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:

So why not save money and move back to high sec if all it takes is a cloaky camper to bring you all to your knees?

Because I'd rather unsub and play EVE offline until my subs run out.
The reason I played high sec was the dream of creating a corp of friends, move to null, have a place of our own....

If I had known it would be so easy to crush that dream by simply logging on, pressing cloak and waling away for 23.5 hours, I wouldn't have gotten into EVE 5 years ago.


Sounds like you were scammed to me, you should ask for a refund.

It can only crush your dream if you let it. If you can't stand being in fear, get out of null, you do not belong there if you can't defend yourself. You bought your ticket, now you takes your chances.

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#64 - 2014-04-26 19:26:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Divine Entervention
Nvm, i don't even want to know what someone thinks who encounters a dilemma posed by his own choices and refuses to accept responsibility for it.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#65 - 2014-04-26 19:26:46 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:
LHA Tarawa wrote:

There is nothing CCP can do to get me to accept significant risk.


And there it is.

You do realize you are playing EVE online and are choosing to live in what is supposed to be a dangerous, lawless place. I think it says so on the tin if I can find it.



That is nothing new. Not only have I admitted that, it is the foundation of my argument!

EVE is a big place, that accommodates a lot of differnt play styles. Yes, there should always be some risk.


But, I'm not going to play a game where my role is to be an easy target for someone else.

I'm not against cloak. I'm not against shutting down all PVE in a system with a single cloaky camper that may or may not have a cyno fit.

I"m ONLY against being able to do that without actually being at the keyboard and turning the cloak back on a handful of times an hour.

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
Sedition.
#66 - 2014-04-26 19:26:48 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:

So why not save money and move back to high sec if all it takes is a cloaky camper to bring you all to your knees?


Because I'd rather unsub and play EVE offline until my subs run out.


The reason I played high sec was the dream of creating a corp of friends, move to null, have a place of our own....

If I had known it would be so easy to crush that dream by simply logging on, pressing cloak and waling away for 23.5 hours, I wouldn't have gotten into EVE 5 years ago.

So you'd just dock up and afk whenever a neut shows up in system?
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#67 - 2014-04-26 19:29:41 UTC
Alright guys, just because LHA's argument has collapsed into a pit of self pity doesn't mean my undefeated argument has magically disappeared.

His reasons for afk cloaking being made obsolete doesn't detract from the one's I've stated.

AFK cloaking needs to be removed because there's too much potential for abuse due to today's technology surrounding the ability to broadcast your ship's point of view even while you're AFK.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#68 - 2014-04-26 19:30:00 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
[
Why are you afraid of risk?


It is my play style. It is my personality.


And guess what. That play style and personality is a HUGE chunk of the EVE player base.

This is why most players are in high sec, and why such a tiny fraction of EVE players show up on the killer side of kill mails. If I recall, something like 5% of players.



You can say that there is no place for us carebears in EVE. I highly doubt CCP feels the same, and if we were all driven from the game, as some desire, then CCP would be bankrupt.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#69 - 2014-04-26 19:30:20 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:

I"m ONLY against being able to do that without actually being at the keyboard and turning the cloak back on a handful of times an hour.


If he's not at the keyboard, how does he light a cyno?

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Cephalopodamus Teuthida
Interstellar Astrometric Survey and Extraction
#70 - 2014-04-26 19:31:44 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Migui X'hyrrn wrote:
The obvious would be that after 11 years of EVE Online people realized that undocking means that you are accepting everyone to shoot at you.

Stop trying to make EVE a Theme Park. It will not happen.


Except for cloakers. People who cloak don't have to worry about the risk of pvp.


I hope the forum will excuse me if I ask an unrelated question about etiquette?

A "friend" of mine thought it might be fun to war-dec the above posters corp. "Abyss Cooperative 3." My "friend" did the briefest research and found that The Kane Inquisition beat him to the war-dec by a few days.

Is there a protocol for this? Is it proper to pile-on and try to join the fun, or would it be considered rude and inconsiderate toward the Kane Inquisition?

thanks for any help.
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#71 - 2014-04-26 19:32:06 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
[
Why are you afraid of risk?


It is my play style. It is my personality.


And guess what. That play style and personality is a HUGE chunk of the EVE player base.

This is why most players are in high sec, and why such a tiny fraction of EVE players show up on the killer side of kill mails. If I recall, something like 5% of players.



You can say that there is no place for us carebears in EVE. I highly doubt CCP feels the same, and if we were all driven from the game, as some desire, then CCP would be bankrupt.


No man, don't answer that question. Delete your answer, I edited my post, I don't want to know what you think.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#72 - 2014-04-26 19:32:56 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Alright guys, just because LHA's argument has collapsed into a pit of self pity doesn't mean my undefeated argument has magically disappeared.

His reasons for afk cloaking being made obsolete doesn't detract from the one's I've stated.

AFK cloaking needs to be removed because there's too much potential for abuse due to today's technology surrounding the ability to broadcast your ship's point of view even while you're AFK.



Your arguemnt is fail, because there is no revenue attached to it for CCP.

No one is going to drop their sub simply because people can AFK stream feeds while cloaky camping.

People DO quit because of the ability of a cloaky camper to totally shut down a system... I know. I've done it and had friends to it too.

Streaming twitch feeds is NOT game breaking. Invulnerable cloaky camping IS game breaking. It DOES cost CCP revenue.
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#73 - 2014-04-26 19:33:30 UTC
Cephalopodamus Teuthida wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
Migui X'hyrrn wrote:
The obvious would be that after 11 years of EVE Online people realized that undocking means that you are accepting everyone to shoot at you.

Stop trying to make EVE a Theme Park. It will not happen.


Except for cloakers. People who cloak don't have to worry about the risk of pvp.


I hope the forum will excuse me if I ask an unrelated question about etiquette?

A "friend" of mine thought it might be fun to war-dec the above posters corp. "Abyss Cooperative 3." My "friend" did the briefest research and found that The Kane Inquisition beat him to the war-dec by a few days.

Is there a protocol for this? Is it proper to pile-on and try to join the fun, or would it be considered rude and inconsiderate toward the Kane Inquisition?

thanks for any help.


You can do what you want.

It will require you coming to Low-Sec though, so I'd advise you to consider if that's a risk you're willing to take. A risk I hope you would be willing to take, in this game of EvE, a game focused on risk.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#74 - 2014-04-26 19:35:38 UTC
Cephalopodamus Teuthida wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
Migui X'hyrrn wrote:
The obvious would be that after 11 years of EVE Online people realized that undocking means that you are accepting everyone to shoot at you.

Stop trying to make EVE a Theme Park. It will not happen.


Except for cloakers. People who cloak don't have to worry about the risk of pvp.


I hope the forum will excuse me if I ask an unrelated question about etiquette?

A "friend" of mine thought it might be fun to war-dec the above posters corp. "Abyss Cooperative 3." My "friend" did the briefest research and found that The Kane Inquisition beat him to the war-dec by a few days.

Is there a protocol for this? Is it proper to pile-on and try to join the fun, or would it be considered rude and inconsiderate toward the Kane Inquisition?

thanks for any help.



No etiquette. I think there is just higher fees for additional war decs.

Either way, it is VERY rare that a war dec actually accomplishes anything.
Cassandra Aurilien
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#75 - 2014-04-26 19:37:24 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Concerning wormholes, let me present a scenario.

I go into your wormhole. I see no one, but you're there and you see me come in. I tool around, get about 20km away from the worm hole, and then poof, i just log out.

I don't log in until the next morning, just after down time. Before work. You're not there to see me log back in.

Now, I turn my cloak on, move around a bit, look at the worm hole entrance/exit. Then I turn my stream on which is being broadcast to a private link that only my corp mates, that you can't find because it's not public. I then go to work.

for 10 hours, my character is logged in, afk, cloaked, broadcasting everything that takes place at that wormhole entrance to my corp mates. While they get to do their own thing, my character is performing work for them, it's providing real, valuable intelligence.

They see a situation that you put yourself in. They know where you turned your cloak on, to watch the hole. Because of this AFK cloaker, they bump you, and kill you. Something that only happened because of the information being provided by an AFK cloaker. Something that would not be able to happen, an offering of an unstoppable advantage being obtained from someone who is AFK in space providing real time intelligence, all because CCP has no mechanism in place to disable the cloaking mechanism of a player who is cloaked while AFK.

Or they see another guy come in, then you uncloak, bubble the hole, and see 3 cruisers of your corpmates show up to help kill the guy when he tries to warp back out of the hole. Upon seeing those 3 cruisers show up to "camp" the hole, 10 corpmates of mine warp in and kill you, all because they knew what that afk cloaker was able to tell them.

Streaming game play exists. It might not have 10 years ago, but this is a very real situation that could be happening now, or very well begin to start happening in the future.

Because there's a potential for this mechanic to be abused in a way that offers ZERO counter play in some situations, completely risk free, a balance needs to be introduced to curb it's potential for abuse.


If we're sending someone to watch the hole, then you are not going to see them, we'd arrive cloaked ourselves.

You might gain a temporary advantage, but in WH space, you really have no idea who or what you're facing, without some actual intel work. Your 10 friends might find themselves attacking 3 cruisers, only to be jumped by Dreads w/ webbing Loki support, or 15-20 cloaked T3's. It's pretty normal to have a trap within a trap. And if we can't match you, then we can let your 10 man gang kill one ship (or in your example 3), and leave, with no idea that our 5 cloaked ships decided we can't match you.

If your corp had a reputation for doing things like that... Then, chances are that people would catch onto it really quickly.

And if we roll that hole before your friends arrive, then it doesn't matter, as you'd be watching empty space.

If I'm running PVE, there is a really good chance I have a friendly cloaked ship or two of my own to back me up. It all comes down to who is more prepared, which is the way it should be.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#76 - 2014-04-26 19:37:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Fury
Cephalopodamus Teuthida wrote:


A "friend" of mine thought it might be fun to war-dec the above posters corp. "Abyss Cooperative 3." My "friend" did the briefest research and found that The Kane Inquisition beat him to the war-dec by a few days.

Is there a protocol for this? Is it proper to pile-on and try to join the fun, or would it be considered rude and inconsiderate toward the Kane Inquisition?

thanks for any help.


Quite considerate of you..

I am uncertain if there is an understood etiquette here. It will certainly be a bit more expensive. You may wish to convo the esteemed Mr Kane, and share your thoughts. I am sure he would be glad to entertain them.

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#77 - 2014-04-26 19:37:56 UTC  |  Edited by: LHA Tarawa
Doc Fury wrote:
LHA Tarawa wrote:

I"m ONLY against being able to do that without actually being at the keyboard and turning the cloak back on a handful of times an hour.


If he's not at the keyboard, how does he light a cyno?



Same fail counter arguments over and over.

He doesn't need to light the cyno. The threat is sufficient to shut down an entire system.

Why should he NOT have to be at the keyboard to present that threat?
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#78 - 2014-04-26 19:45:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Divine Entervention
Cassandra Aurilien wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
Concerning wormholes, let me present a scenario.

I go into your wormhole. I see no one, but you're there and you see me come in. I tool around, get about 20km away from the worm hole, and then poof, i just log out.

I don't log in until the next morning, just after down time. Before work. You're not there to see me log back in.

Now, I turn my cloak on, move around a bit, look at the worm hole entrance/exit. Then I turn my stream on which is being broadcast to a private link that only my corp mates, that you can't find because it's not public. I then go to work.

for 10 hours, my character is logged in, afk, cloaked, broadcasting everything that takes place at that wormhole entrance to my corp mates. While they get to do their own thing, my character is performing work for them, it's providing real, valuable intelligence.

They see a situation that you put yourself in. They know where you turned your cloak on, to watch the hole. Because of this AFK cloaker, they bump you, and kill you. Something that only happened because of the information being provided by an AFK cloaker. Something that would not be able to happen, an offering of an unstoppable advantage being obtained from someone who is AFK in space providing real time intelligence, all because CCP has no mechanism in place to disable the cloaking mechanism of a player who is cloaked while AFK.

Or they see another guy come in, then you uncloak, bubble the hole, and see 3 cruisers of your corpmates show up to help kill the guy when he tries to warp back out of the hole. Upon seeing those 3 cruisers show up to "camp" the hole, 10 corpmates of mine warp in and kill you, all because they knew what that afk cloaker was able to tell them.

Streaming game play exists. It might not have 10 years ago, but this is a very real situation that could be happening now, or very well begin to start happening in the future.

Because there's a potential for this mechanic to be abused in a way that offers ZERO counter play in some situations, completely risk free, a balance needs to be introduced to curb it's potential for abuse.


If we're sending someone to watch the hole, then you are not going to see them, we'd arrive cloaked ourselves.

You might gain a temporary advantage, but in WH space, you really have no idea who or what you're facing, without some actual intel work. Your 10 friends might find themselves attacking 3 cruisers, only to be jumped by Dreads w/ webbing Loki support, or 15-20 cloaked T3's. It's pretty normal to have a trap within a trap. And if we can't match you, then we can let your 10 man gang kill one ship (or in your example 3), and leave, with no idea that our 5 cloaked ships decided we can't match you.

If your corp had a reputation for doing things like that... Then, chances are that people would catch onto it really quickly.

And if we roll that hole before your friends arrive, then it doesn't matter, as you'd be watching empty space.

If I'm running PVE, there is a really good chance I have a friendly cloaked ship or two of my own to back me up. It all comes down to who is more prepared, which is the way it should be.


So because something else COULD happen, doesn't mean what I described COULDN'T happen. You stated alot of "if"s, which is great because while you state your "ifs" and prove they're possibilities, they in turn completely validtate my "if" as a very real possibility.

Also, as these situations you and I are talking about right now ONLY pertains to wormholes, it's not addressing ANYTHING about what could be happening with the rest of space that isn't WORM HOLE.

Here is a situation where this is happening right now on a public channel:
http://www.twitch.tv/fw_subsparx

This could be happening anywhere else, potentially everywhere else, being broadcasted to private channels, all because CCP doesn't have a mechanism in place to disable a cloaker's cloak when he's AFK.
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
Sedition.
#79 - 2014-04-26 19:49:08 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:

I strongly suggest you switch your argument to mine, where it emphasis the potential of an AFK cloaker to be gathering intelligence/reconaissance by streaming his screen's image to his corp mates, much like what's happening on this stream here:
http://www.twitch.tv/fw_subsparx

they can't defeat that argument. And it will better help you in accomplishing your goal of having a mechanism introduced that prevents someone from using a cloaking device indefinitely while AFK.


Divine Entervention wrote:

Now, I turn my cloak on, move around a bit, look at the worm hole entrance/exit. Then I turn my stream on which is being broadcast to a private link that only my corp mates, that you can't find because it's not public. I then go to work.

for 10 hours, my character is logged in, afk, cloaked, broadcasting everything that takes place at that wormhole entrance to my corp mates. While they get to do their own thing, my character is performing work for them, it's providing real, valuable intelligence.

Please, please, please publicly stream yourself doing this in nullsec, preferably somewhere in the vicinity of pure blind.
You know why what you're doing isn't zero risk? Because its extremely easy to decloak a streaming cloaky*. Oh, it's a private stream only for corp? One word: spais. So yeah, not zero risk. If you ever want a demonstration, just drop me a mail with a link to your stream the next time you go afk cloaky off a gate for 10 hours. Cool


*unless of course you park the cloaky in a safe, but then all you can really stream is the local count, not even the entire local window because an afk guy can't scroll, and there are better tools for that.
Cephalopodamus Teuthida
Interstellar Astrometric Survey and Extraction
#80 - 2014-04-26 19:52:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Cephalopodamus Teuthida
(snip snip etc...)

You can do what you want.

It will require you coming to Low-Sec though, so I'd advise you to consider if that's a risk you're willing to take. A risk I hope you would be willing to take, in this game of EvE, a game focused on risk.


(edited for horrible formatting. forgive my weak kung-fu)
Thank you for the warning and your concern for my "friend's" well-being. Ill be sure to pass them along if it comes up.