These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Burn Jita haz a date!!

First post First post
Author
Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#161 - 2014-04-25 19:04:02 UTC
is she hot?
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#162 - 2014-04-25 19:26:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Xen Solarus
Never said i thought that EvE should have non-consensual encounters. I'm a firm believer that people flying around highsec with insane cargo's are just begging to get ganked. I'd also like to point out that i don't live in highsec, people seem to assume that because of my opinions on this subject. When people shoot at me, they do so for free, no concord protection for me.

That being said, EvE is a great game for exactly the reason that it contains so many different play styles. You don't have to love PvP to play EvE. You don't have to be involved in it, at all. Thats what empire is there for, not only as a safe area for new players to learn the game's insane learning curve, but also as an area for those that enjoy all the aspects of the game that have nothing to do with PvP. I know players that literally never undock, and yet they still seem to have fun making stuff and playing with spreadsheets and making isk hand over fist. Personally, i couldn't think of anything more boring, but hey, thats the great thing about EvE, you get what you like out of the sandbox.

I also should make clear that I have nothing against Burn Jita in general. It's a good content generator, and those that are killed, quite frankly, deserve it. What are they doing flying around during such an event? Madness! Plus, it makes me lots of isk. I just have issues with gankers in general, especially the ones that sprout their highsec-hating rhetoric as if to justify their position. Lets face it, they're doing it because it easy, it makes them isk, and collects them tears.

I believe that people that truely embrace PvP do so outside of the confines of highsec. Those that do so within are nothing but gank-bears, playing EvE on easy-mode. Ganking, by its very nature, flies completely in the face of EvE's risk vs reward philosophy. Because highsec ganking, when done right, is completely risk free. No-wonder they love it so much, the majority of them wouldn't know real PvP if it came and smacked them in the face. If they hate highsec so much, what it represents and those that choose to stay there, why are they even there?

Personally, i see no reason for all play styles to exist within EvE. It is the defining factor that makes it special over all over MMO's. Take that away, and EvE would be a shadow of it's former self.

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#163 - 2014-04-25 19:48:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Xen Solarus wrote:
Never said i thought that EvE should have non-consensual encounters. I'm a firm believer that people flying around highsec with insane cargo's are just begging to get ganked. I'd also like to point out that i don't live in highsec, people seem to assume that because of my opinions on this subject. When people shoot at me, they do so for free, no concord protection for me.

That being said, EvE is a great game for exactly the reason that it contains so many different play styles. You don't have to love PvP to play EvE. You don't have to be involved in it, at all.


And that's where you are wrong. In a NON-CONSENSUAL pvp game, it's not always you choice on whether or not you participate in pvp or not (with the exception of not undocking). Thus the words 'non-consensual'.

Quote:

Thats what empire is there for, not only as a safe area for new players to learn the game's insane learning curve, but also as an area for those that enjoy all the aspects of the game that have nothing to do with PvP. I know players that literally never undock, and yet they still seem to have fun making stuff and playing with spreadsheets and making isk hand over fist. Personally, i couldn't think of anything more boring, but hey, thats the great thing about EvE, you get what you like out of the sandbox.


Sandbox doesn't mean yo can do what you want, it means everyone can do what they want, even things you don't like. The people who don't undock are still risking player to player interaction (that's what a market is). you don't get to say 'hey, I don't want that interaction with my market orders, I'm just going to do market pve' lol.

You views of the game go counter not only to the spirit of the game, but to the reality of it as well. High sec isn't there for people to avoid pvp, if it was, guns would not work there. High sec is 'safer' space for those who prefer it that way, but there is always danger.

Quote:

I also should make clear that I have nothing against Burn Jita in general. It's a good content generator, and those that are killed, quite frankly, deserve it. What are they doing flying around during such an event? Madness! Plus, it makes me lots of isk. I just have issues with gankers in general, especially the ones that sprout their highsec-hating rhetoric as if to justify their position. Lets face it, they're doing it because it easy, it makes them isk, and collects them tears.


I bolded the part that this is really about. It's really a personal issue you have with gankers. Ganking is one of the coolest parts of the game that I don't personally enjoy or engage in but it provides content.

I don't understand the underlined part however. We're playing a video game, the ONLY legitimate reason to do that is to have fun. Fun for them is isk and tears (in a game that advertises tear collecting lol). You can undersand how the people who don't undock are having fun but yo can't get how the gankers are having fun?


Quote:

I believe that people that truely embrace PvP do so outside of the confines of highsec. Those that do so within are nothing but gank-bears, playing EvE on easy-mode. Ganking, by its very nature, flies completely in the face of EvE's risk vs reward philosophy. Because highsec ganking, when done right, is completely risk free. No-wonder they love it so much, the majority of them wouldn't know real PvP if it came and smacked them in the face. If they hate highsec so much, what it represents and those that choose to stay there, why are they even there?

Personally, i see no reason for all play styles to exist within EvE. It is the defining factor that makes it special over all over MMO's. Take that away, and EvE would be a shadow of it's former self.


The problem here is that you're making a senseless value judgement. "real pvp" goes on outside of high sec. Someone better tell RvB that lol. You personal hang ups against gankers is the issue clouding your judgement and makes your proclamation of support for non-consensual pvp seem shallow.

PVPing out side of high sec (which I have done fairly extensively,. though not as extensively as a true pvp-lover) does not make you some kind of cool/hip honorable space man. PVPing solo, in a small gang or in a hugh fleet holds NO more value than ganking a freighter with 40 of your best friends in Niarja.

It's the exact same thing as the fact that you choosing to shoot real people in imaginary space ships (PVP) holds no more value than my choice to slaughter NPCs by the boatload every night (PVE)

This is a video game, try getting off that high horse for a bit.
Needmore Longcat
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#164 - 2014-04-25 19:51:21 UTC
http://www.isjitaburning.com/ Obviously, the answer is yes.
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#165 - 2014-04-25 20:22:16 UTC
wow, never had a thread go ten pages deep before XD

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#166 - 2014-04-25 20:26:10 UTC
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
wow, never had a thread go ten pages deep before XD

the op includes the holy trifecta of volatile subject matter

- goons
- highsec
- ganking
Pix Severus
Empty You
#167 - 2014-04-25 21:32:24 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
wow, never had a thread go ten pages deep before XD

the op includes the holy trifecta of volatile subject matter

- goons
- highsec
- ganking


Isn't WiS a part of that?

MTU Hunter: Latest Entry - June 12 2017 - Vocal Local 5

MTU Hunting 101: Comprehensive Guide

PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#168 - 2014-04-25 21:34:46 UTC
Pix Severus wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
wow, never had a thread go ten pages deep before XD

the op includes the holy trifecta of volatile subject matter

- goons
- highsec
- ganking


Isn't WiS a part of that?

Goons ganked WiS in real life.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#169 - 2014-04-25 23:59:00 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.


5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.



Thread unlocked.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Grayson Cole
Doomheim
#170 - 2014-04-26 02:44:31 UTC
Looks like I picked a hell of a time to return after a year long hiatus.

Shocked

.

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#171 - 2014-04-26 04:30:59 UTC
ISD Ezwal wrote:
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.


5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.



Thread unlocked.


you broke my ten pages -.-

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#172 - 2014-04-26 06:47:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Xen Solarus
Jenn aSide wrote:

And that's where you are wrong. In a NON-CONSENSUAL pvp game, it's not always you choice on whether or not you participate in pvp or not (with the exception of not undocking). Thus the words 'non-consensual'.


I literally just said that i've got nothing against non-consensual combat. Did you not read what i'd posted?

Jenn aSide wrote:
Sandbox doesn't mean yo can do what you want, it means everyone can do what they want, even things you don't like.


Lots of contradictions in this one. Of course you can do things to people they don't like, e.g. ganking, and they can do the things you don't like e.g. never undocking industrialist that hates PvP. Thats what makes EvE such a good game! And so, it does mean you can do what you like, hense the sandbox. You just have to accept that someone might try to ruin your fun, and explode your stuff.

Jenn aSide wrote:
You views of the game go counter not only to the spirit of the game, but to the reality of it as well. High sec isn't there for people to avoid pvp, if it was, guns would not work there.


Completely disagree. One of the reasons highsec is there for those that don't have an interest in PvP. It's the only area for players that don't have time to play for long periods, or those that just want to do all the things you label as boring. If CCP were to remove concord and empire, all those players would evaporate, and they are the majority. If EvE was just pure PvP, there would be no reason for them to stay, and EvE would just be you guys shooting eachother and moaning about the lack of targets.

Jenn aSide wrote:
It's really a personal issue you have with gankers. Ganking is one of the coolest parts of the game that I don't personally enjoy or engage in but it provides content.

We're playing a video game, the ONLY legitimate reason to do that is to have fun. Fun for them is isk and tears (in a game that advertises tear collecting lol). You can undersand how the people who don't undock are having fun but yo can't get how the gankers are having fun?


Though i do look down upon gankers (from my high horse, apparently), i consider them to be right down the bottom of EvE professions, I won't go as far to say that they shouldn't exist. I should note that i've never been ganked in highsec. People flying around highsec with large value cargo's should be targets for gankers. The issue i have is the complete lack of risk involved. That, imo, goes against the spirit of EvE. Of course gankers are having fun, with their no risk, maximum reward play style, shooting people that don't want anything to do with PvP, and collecting their tears in a big bucket. It's EvE with easy-mode on.

Of course computer games are about having fun, but in EvE its a balance between the two sides of the argument. Those that want to get their PvP fix have the entire galaxy, but instead choose to stick close to those that have no interest. In this case, one persons fun can ruin anothers, and if done to a too large extent, could lead to people not having fun in their play styles, and leaving the game. That, is not a good thing for EvE, regardless of how many of the highsec hater crowd would claim.

Wardecs are a seperate issue, thats real PvP in highsec. Groups like RvB are awesome in that regard.

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#173 - 2014-04-26 07:03:01 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:


Of course computer games are about having fun, but in EvE its a balance between the two sides of the argument. Those that want to get their PvP fix have the entire galaxy, but instead choose to stick close to those that have no interest. In this case, one persons fun can ruin anothers, and if done to a too large extent, could lead to people not having fun in their play styles, and leaving the game. That, is not a good thing for EvE, regardless of how many of the highsec hater crowd would claim.

Wardecs are a seperate issue, thats real PvP in highsec. Groups like RvB are awesome in that regard.


How disingenuous. We aren't the ones who threw away live and let live, tried to campaign to CCP to legislate other people's playstyles out of existence. That would be your side.

"I want PvP to happen" vs. "I want PvP to NEVER happen" is not this clash of equal philosophies like you would like to portray.

One wants to play the game the way the game exists. The other one wants to change the game, because he has chosen a zero sum equation. He has staked the claim that the way he plays means that other people aren't allowed to have fun the way they want to.

One is a gamer. The other is a petulant child.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#174 - 2014-04-26 07:38:47 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


How disingenuous. We aren't the ones who threw away live and let live, tried to campaign to CCP to legislate other people's playstyles out of existence. That would be your side.

"I want PvP to happen" vs. "I want PvP to NEVER happen" is not this clash of equal philosophies like you would like to portray.

One wants to play the game the way the game exists. The other one wants to change the game, because he has chosen a zero sum equation. He has staked the claim that the way he plays means that other people aren't allowed to have fun the way they want to.

One is a gamer. The other is a petulant child.

Sorry, but petulant children exist on both sides of the argument. Trying to simply belittle anyone on one side of the fence really doesn't win you any points. There are plenty of people that have come to the forum and asked for the ability to force someone docked to eject from a station so that the station camp can pod them while they have no chance for example.

Not to say you are right or wrong in this particular case, didn't bother reading the other guys posting history, but speaking in general terms, which you attempted to speak in you are wrong.
Caldari Citizen 0200123234
Doomheim
#175 - 2014-04-26 08:16:12 UTC
Haz it not been cancled
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#176 - 2014-04-26 11:41:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Xen Solarus
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


How disingenuous. We aren't the ones who threw away live and let live, tried to campaign to CCP to legislate other people's playstyles out of existence. That would be your side.

"I want PvP to happen" vs. "I want PvP to NEVER happen" is not this clash of equal philosophies like you would like to portray.

One wants to play the game the way the game exists. The other one wants to change the game, because he has chosen a zero sum equation. He has staked the claim that the way he plays means that other people aren't allowed to have fun the way they want to.

One is a gamer. The other is a petulant child.


Disagree with this too. Feel free to link info to this "campaign" you speak of. I've not said that the game needs to be changed, certainly not to the extent that one group would be forced out over the other. There are some out there that would think this way, from both sides of this argument, but they are wrong. That would harm EvE as a whole, we need more players, not less. I find its mostly the highsec hating crowd that attempts to force their opinion, the carebears of highsec don't even come onto these forums, for the most part, they just want to be left alone. Those that do are simply trying to defend their solo-play from those that would see it destroyed for their own selfish gratification. I ask again, why do these players even go to highsec, if they hate that area so much? Why become gank-bears?

There are plenty of players that play EvE and achieve zero PvP. You act like it is impossible, and yet it has been the case since day one, as much as it is today, and it will continue to be the case into the future. As i've made clear i think that both hardened PvP players can get their kicks from the game, and so can everyone else that doesn't enjoy that aspect. Thats what makes EvE stand apart from others games, it caters to all play styles. Not everyone enjoys ships exploding!

You'll notice no-one argues against my opinions on ganking, that it's EvE on easy mode, and that its completely risk free. Thats because everyone knows thats the case. It would be refreshing for gankers to admit that, for a change.

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#177 - 2014-04-26 11:46:29 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:
I find its mostly the highsec hating crowd that attempts to force their opinion, the carebears of highsec don't even come onto these forums, for the most part, they just want to be left alone.


Lolwhat.
Quote:

Those that do are simply trying to defend their solo-play from those that would see it destroyed for their own selfish gratification. I ask again, why do these players even go to highsec, if they hate that area so much?


There is no "solo-play" in an MMORPG. It's sheer entitlement to think otherwise, and I will happily continue to disabuse people of that false notion. In fact, to answer your question, that's why I live in highsec. To bring massively multiplayer content to people who try and deny that such a thing exists.

Because I hate the way they bleat and moan about how they think they should be left alone. If they really do think that, then they are playing the wrong game. Star Trek "Online" is: ------> That way.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#178 - 2014-04-26 13:25:09 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

There is no "solo-play" in an MMORPG. It's sheer entitlement to think otherwise, and I will happily continue to disabuse people of that false notion. In fact, to answer your question, that's why I live in highsec. To bring massively multiplayer content to people who try and deny that such a thing exists.

Because I hate the way they bleat and moan about how they think they should be left alone. If they really do think that, then they are playing the wrong game. Star Trek "Online" is: ------> That way.


Well you're entitled to your opinion. Those that play EvE solo for all the things that have nothing to do with PvP will continue to do so regardless. You should continue to express your displeasure with such players in the time honoured EvE fashion, by exploding their ships! You can even consider this to be Elite PvP if you like!

Doesn't change the fact that ganking is nothing but zero-risk, maximum reward EvE on easy-mode. But hey, not everyone plays computer games for the challenge.

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#179 - 2014-04-26 13:30:46 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:

Doesn't change the fact that ganking is nothing but zero-risk, maximum reward EvE on easy-mode. But hey, not everyone plays computer games for the challenge.


Ganking is actually 100% risk. CONCORD will destroy your ship 100% of the time.

Taking steps to mitigate the effect of that risk and profit from it is EVE gameplay in the truest fashion.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#180 - 2014-04-26 13:39:52 UTC
Xen Solarus wrote:

You'll notice no-one argues against my opinions on ganking, that it's EvE on easy mode, and that its completely risk free. Thats because everyone knows thats the case. It would be refreshing for gankers to admit that, for a change.


How is a 100% chance to lose your ship risk free? Just because they choose to legislate for that risk, and factor it in to their "cost of doing buisness" does not make it any less of a ship loss.