These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The real reason PLEX is so expensive

First post First post
Author
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#81 - 2014-04-20 07:18:13 UTC
Also, presumably, PLEX bought to buy any kind of client service are being cashed in very quickly rather than stashed away. The only one I can think of where you might want to have a stockpile of PLEX to be used later is the multi-character training, since you can't apply all at once and have the training permission tick down unprompted for months. And even then, there is an upper limit when dual training no longer becomes a sensible option compared to second account + character transfer, which once again puts the player back on a schedule of (almost) immediately exercise their options.

Speculation on the ISK price seems to be the only PLEX use where there's any real value in holding on to them and causing grey hairs for CCP's accountants.
Jaxon Grylls
Institute of Archaeology
#82 - 2014-04-20 07:44:05 UTC
Soshala Garemoko wrote:
... so they pay more to CCCP

Ah, yes! That's communism for you.

Hint for those too young to remember.

CCCP is the Cyrillic spelling of USSR.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#83 - 2014-04-20 08:10:32 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Also, presumably, PLEX bought to buy any kind of client service are being cashed in very quickly rather than stashed away. The only one I can think of where you might want to have a stockpile of PLEX to be used later is the multi-character training, since you can't apply all at once and have the training permission tick down unprompted for months. And even then, there is an upper limit when dual training no longer becomes a sensible option compared to second account + character transfer, which once again puts the player back on a schedule of (almost) immediately exercise their options.

Speculation on the ISK price seems to be the only PLEX use where there's any real value in holding on to them and causing grey hairs for CCP's accountants.

You can have them tick down now for multiple months. No time limit any more that I am aware of.
Yarda Black
The Black Redemption
#84 - 2014-04-20 08:31:39 UTC
This smells all very overcomplicated to me. Heres what I think happened:

Dude 1 is looking for PLEX. Going rate is 600 mill. He buys it.
Dude 2 is selling PLEX. Has plenty of time, so puts it up for 610
Dude 3 sees selling for 610 and puts it up for 615
Dude 4 only sees the 615 cos all 600 and 610 were sold. He puts it up for 620

In the meantime PLEX is being sold higher and higher. ISK has inflated like mad. It will get worse when refining changes hits. There will be even less goods compared to the total ISK pool. As of summer the prices will rise more.
So CCP has a major influence. But its not directly and its not planned or deliberately used to influence PLEX-pricing.

PLEX price is up so much because ISK is worth alot less.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#85 - 2014-04-20 08:35:25 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
You can have them tick down now for multiple months. No time limit any more that I am aware of.

Neat. So not even that reason exists any more.
Josef Djugashvilis
#86 - 2014-04-20 11:25:56 UTC
Jaxon Grylls wrote:
Soshala Garemoko wrote:
... so they pay more to CCCP

Ah, yes! That's communism for you.

Hint for those too young to remember.

CCCP is the Cyrillic spelling of USSR.


CCCP = Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

A Soviet being roughly equivalent to an English local church parish.

Just me showing off Smile

This is not a signature.

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#87 - 2014-04-20 12:32:28 UTC
Yarda Black wrote:
This smells all very overcomplicated to me. Heres what I think happened:

Dude 1 is looking for PLEX. Going rate is 600 mill. He buys it.
Dude 2 is selling PLEX. Has plenty of time, so puts it up for 610
Dude 3 sees selling for 610 and puts it up for 615
Dude 4 only sees the 615 cos all 600 and 610 were sold. He puts it up for 620

In the meantime PLEX is being sold higher and higher. ISK has inflated like mad. It will get worse when refining changes hits. There will be even less goods compared to the total ISK pool. As of summer the prices will rise more.
So CCP has a major influence. But its not directly and its not planned or deliberately used to influence PLEX-pricing.

PLEX price is up so much because ISK is worth alot less.



Not everything is inflating.

To name just a few thigns that have dropped in price compared to 6-12 months ago ... most Pi items, especially P4s ... many mats including Trit, all of the SOE ships though as predicted they stabilised at 2.0 ISK/LP, the Rattlesnake with BPCs dropping below 250 mill on occasion.
Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#88 - 2014-04-20 13:43:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Liafcipe9000
1 free PLEX for every active character! \Big smile/

BTW I still don't understand how CCP force us to buy PLEX.
Vesago
Doomheim
#89 - 2014-04-20 16:34:42 UTC
I think that if you look at it in the long run you will see that the economy has been growing as time goes by. Back when plex were 300 mil, Trit was trading around the 2-3 isk mark. Since everything in the game is getting more expensive, the cost of Plex is going up as well. I would have to say that on average the plex is staying in line with the rate of inflation in Eve. Recently there has been a spike, and i think that we will see the trading prices of materials and ships go up right along with it.

The market for plex in game isnt a matter of CCP trying to get richer through plex sales. I will concede that plex does offer CCP a bit more revenue, however, Every time they sell a plex, someone doesnt pay thier monthly subscription. It is a way for the players that invest the effort in game can play for free, and those who want to wantonly destroy and be destroyed dont have to spend thier game time grinding out isk to pay for ships.

Kontrapshun
Doomheim
#90 - 2014-04-20 16:39:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Kontrapshun
Let's see.

How can I play this game for free?
1) I will buy Plex with in game ISK. Why pay RL money for something that is earned so easy in game with normal game play. No matter the cost, it's well within reach of any player to earn a months play time in game.


Why would I want to buy a GTC?
1) I'm a new player that has no skills, time or experience and I think getting ahead quickly is buying expensive junk so I throw RL money at this game to get ahead, but quickly realize I was wrong.


Why would Plex be more expensive?
1) Because there are fewer new players buying GTC's.

Expect prices to rise and rise the closer Star Citizen gets to launch.... yes, it's that game that will kill this one, if CCP doesn't change their model and create a better solo experience. CCP has already abandoned any real advancements to this game and only give tiny updates to calm the entrenched Free player base.

Honestly, anyone who pays RL money to play this game as is, is missing the EVE way "the ever popular " Don't pay for, what you can afford to Steal, or let some new player pay for"... It's only required to pay RL money when you first start this game, after that you're just doing it wrong if you do.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#91 - 2014-04-20 16:43:05 UTC
Kontrapshun wrote:

Expect prices to rise and rise the closer Star Citizen gets to launch.... yes, it's that game that will kill this one, if CCP doesn't change their model and create a better solo experience. CCP has already abandoned any real advancements to this game and only give tiny updates to calm the entrenched Free player base.

Honestly, anyone who pays RL money to play this game as is, is missing the EVE way "the ever popular " Don't pay for, what you can afford to Steal, or let some new player pay for"


You have a very myopic view of EvE, old bean

And, you're totes wrong, in my humble opinion

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#92 - 2014-04-20 16:49:11 UTC
When I started playing, a PLEX (actually 30day GTC) cost ~130M and so did a Raven.

But then a Cerberus cost 500M or more so v0v

But the proper comparison to make is how much ISK/hr you could expect to make. In 2006, 20M/hr was considered decent for a tooled up L4 missioner, or maybe 30M if you could belt-rat in good space. So a PLEX took 4-6 hours of effort from accessible income sources.

Now missioning is widely considered to make 50-60M/hr, anomalies 60-80, Incursions and FW 100-150+. So a 700M PLEX takes 4-10 hours from those sources.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#93 - 2014-04-20 17:02:05 UTC
I guess what I'm saying is that CCP have added some new scalable income sources that require either operating in lo-sec or working in groups which significantly outweigh the old solo, minimal interaction sources, and PLEX time cost has become scaled to those rather than the old methods. If you're prepared to engage with the game a little more deeply, then "30 days" costs about the same time to earn as it ever did.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#94 - 2014-04-20 17:12:51 UTC
Vesago wrote:
Back when plex were 300 mil, Trit was trading around the 2-3 isk mark. Since everything in the game is getting more expensive, the cost of Plex is going up as well.


So basically you're saying PLEX is produced from Tritanium?

WELL DAMN WHY DID I NOT SEE THAT, WE CAN MANUFACTURE PLEX INGAME!!! Shocked TIL!!
Master Flakattack
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#95 - 2014-04-20 17:24:28 UTC
Kontrapshun wrote:
Expect prices to rise and rise the closer Star Citizen gets to launch.... yes, it's that game that will kill this one, if CCP doesn't change their model and create a better solo experience. CCP has already abandoned any real advancements to this game and only give tiny updates to calm the entrenched Free player base.

Honestly, anyone who pays RL money to play this game as is, is missing the EVE way "the ever popular " Don't pay for, what you can afford to Steal, or let some new player pay for"... It's only required to pay RL money when you first start this game, after that you're just doing it wrong if you do.

I am very excited about SC, but it is not EVE, nor is it trying to be. They're not the same game and though there is obviously overlapping interest, I doubt it will affect EVE very much at all.
Kontrapshun
Doomheim
#96 - 2014-04-21 04:34:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Kontrapshun
Master Flakattack wrote:
Kontrapshun wrote:
Expect prices to rise and rise the closer Star Citizen gets to launch.... yes, it's that game that will kill this one, if CCP doesn't change their model and create a better solo experience. CCP has already abandoned any real advancements to this game and only give tiny updates to calm the entrenched Free player base.

Honestly, anyone who pays RL money to play this game as is, is missing the EVE way "the ever popular " Don't pay for, what you can afford to Steal, or let some new player pay for"... It's only required to pay RL money when you first start this game, after that you're just doing it wrong if you do.

I am very excited about SC, but it is not EVE, nor is it trying to be. They're not the same game and though there is obviously overlapping interest, I doubt it will affect EVE very much at all.



Don't get me wrong, I do like EVE as it had a great deal going for it at one time.
The point I am making about games like SC, is the direct relationship that the publisher is trying to engage with the players. It's absolutely amazing and that's why so many are investing in their vision. I've bought a Connie, 325A, Cutlass and a Starter ship, since I really want games that have grand dreams to be made.

CCP has lost touch with innovation for EVE and it no longer warrants additional financial support, as they are not expanding it's vision into new areas. It's still a decent game to play much like AOE II or Counter Strike when you're in the mood to take a look at the past, but I can't see a reason to not use the large bank of ISK I've earned in game to pay for continued play as long as that option is available. CCP just does so little to add value to it.


Regarding SC not being EVE, god I hope it's nothing like it... but I do think it will force CCP to change this game, as I and many like me will have no reason to come back to this game. TBH, the only reason I log in anymore is to keep the account going in hopes they do something interesting, but as of the last few years.... it's the same old formula of the same missions and camped gates.... Why bother investing in that?
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#97 - 2014-04-21 07:34:58 UTC
CCP have been focusing on fixing and updating existing content rather than adding sweeping new mechanics lately because that's what we, the playerbase, told them we wanted them to do in the clearest and least ambiguous way possible: when CCP said they were going to do the opposite, they lost 20% of their subscribers in a couple of weeks.

Surely you will concede that EVE, as a piece of software and as a game, works hugely better than it did in 2011? It's faster, more reliable, more polished, more attractive, easier to learn in hundreds of ways. The effects of that polish will be thrown into sharp relief when - if - Star Citizen launches. Surely you're not so naive as to think that it will launch with every feature promised? Or that every feature it does launch with will work properly? Or that all the ships will be balanced?

What CCP are doing now is not the panicked, undirected rush to fix as many minor issues as possible that we saw with Crucible and, and it's not the narrow "fix a broken thing" of Inferno or Retribution. What they've doing for the last year is, to a very large extent, preparing the way to do what you're asking them to do. They're developing EVE with a specific plan now, and that plan most definitely involves adding new content. CCP are laying the foundations for that expansion now in a planned and organised fashion. I know this because they have literally shown me this plan, and convinced me that they're able to deliver it and that they intend to.

Consider this: if the plan is to expand EVE with mechanics such as building new stargates, then don't you think that it is a very good idea to rework how science & industry work in-game before requiring players to take on such titanic building projects in order to access the new content?

The S&I reform will also have considerable "sandbox" effects on the way EVE works long before we get to build stargates. In a game that is primarily built on player interaction, that matters. There are more blogs to come revealing further S&I changes, and some of them are in my opinion specifically intended to change the way we interact with each other and provide gameplay hooks where previously there were there was a lonely, solo "massively singleplayer" experience.

In short: CCP are releasing new content. They're releasing it a little at a time rather than making you wait 4 years to get it all at once.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Josef Djugashvilis
#98 - 2014-04-21 07:45:18 UTC
Kontrapshun wrote:
Let's see.

How can I play this game for free?
1) I will buy Plex with in game ISK. Why pay RL money for something that is earned so easy in game with normal game play. No matter the cost, it's well within reach of any player to earn a months play time in game.


Why would I want to buy a GTC?
1) I'm a new player that has no skills, time or experience and I think getting ahead quickly is buying expensive junk so I throw RL money at this game to get ahead, but quickly realize I was wrong.


Why would Plex be more expensive?
1) Because there are fewer new players buying GTC's.

Expect prices to rise and rise the closer Star Citizen gets to launch.... yes, it's that game that will kill this one, if CCP doesn't change their model and create a better solo experience. CCP has already abandoned any real advancements to this game and only give tiny updates to calm the entrenched Free player base.

Honestly, anyone who pays RL money to play this game as is, is missing the EVE way "the ever popular " Don't pay for, what you can afford to Steal, or let some new player pay for"... It's only required to pay RL money when you first start this game, after that you're just doing it wrong if you do.


The last paragraph of your post is nonsense.

I have a reasonable amount of money in real life and can afford to pay for my two accounts by annual sub without having to actually remember how much the actual cost is, roughly £90.00 per year for one account?

This means that any isk I earn in-game can be lost by me in pvp as I am pretty bad at it, without having to 'grind' isk for PLEX in any way shape or form.

This is not a signature.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#99 - 2014-04-21 07:56:48 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Kontrapshun wrote:
Let's see.

How can I play this game for free?
1) I will buy Plex with in game ISK. Why pay RL money for something that is earned so easy in game with normal game play. No matter the cost, it's well within reach of any player to earn a months play time in game.


Why would I want to buy a GTC?
1) I'm a new player that has no skills, time or experience and I think getting ahead quickly is buying expensive junk so I throw RL money at this game to get ahead, but quickly realize I was wrong.


Why would Plex be more expensive?
1) Because there are fewer new players buying GTC's.

Expect prices to rise and rise the closer Star Citizen gets to launch.... yes, it's that game that will kill this one, if CCP doesn't change their model and create a better solo experience. CCP has already abandoned any real advancements to this game and only give tiny updates to calm the entrenched Free player base.

Honestly, anyone who pays RL money to play this game as is, is missing the EVE way "the ever popular " Don't pay for, what you can afford to Steal, or let some new player pay for"... It's only required to pay RL money when you first start this game, after that you're just doing it wrong if you do.


The last paragraph of your post is nonsense.

I have a reasonable amount of money in real life and can afford to pay for my two accounts by annual sub without having to actually remember how much the actual cost is, roughly £90.00 per year for one account?

This means that any isk I earn in-game can be lost by me in pvp as I am pretty bad at it, without having to 'grind' isk for PLEX in any way shape or form.


To put it another way: if you live in the UK and you cant make at least 500M ISK per hour, then you're working for less than minimum wage if you're PLEXing your accounts.

That's fine if you actively enjoy the method you use to make your ISK. It's even fine if you have no realistic liklehood of finding any paid employment. Otherwise you basically have a very poorly paid part-time job as a PvE grinder.

If you have any kind of job at all, then you're probably better off subscribing.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Kelur Hunter
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#100 - 2014-04-21 08:23:00 UTC
The day a Plex hits a billion so many tears will shed that day