These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Create new ships instead of ruining Guristas.

First post
Author
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#1 - 2014-04-12 17:49:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
If CCP wants to introduce some "new and interesting" ships with beefed up drones, that is great! But why do Guristas need to be ruined for so many people to do it?

We spent too long training for these versatile and skill-intensive ships for negligent devs to **** all over them due to some ridiculous uncompromising vision.

The concerns on these Guristas pirate faction ships have been ignored in the official 50+ page thread.

These concerns are centered mainly the lack of ability to use sentry drones, and foreseen total ineptness at combating non-specialized targets and possible removal of missile velocity that would greatly effect torpedo and cruise missile fits which the Rattlesnake currently has bonuses for. Countless hours of skill training will be thrown out the window and will force pilots to train in Gallente skills if they want to use sentries.

If this callous trend to Guristas contines, the great versatility Guristas ships once had will be tremendously reduced and a lot of people will be very angry with CCP for letting this happen.

We spent our time and money training for these ships and now you want to drastically change them? Totally unacceptable.

Why not improve the shields and close range missile damage instead of specializing Guristas into medium and heavy drones that have niche applications?

If you are going to force us into specialized drones, the drones at least need the ability to teleport instantly back to the drone bay.
Aducat Ragnarson
Blootered Bastards
#2 - 2014-04-12 17:49:47 UTC
Will you please stop posting already...
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#3 - 2014-04-12 17:50:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
A quote taken from the official thread concerning pirate faction cruisers. Guristas specifically.

Hasril Pux wrote:
I don't like the proposals concerning Guristas ships either. In a Gila or a Rattlesnake I have personally never felt outclassed by Ishtars and Dominixes respectively. I have always felt that the shield tank and use of missiles combined with the supreme versatility of a drone boat has been a big enough difference to make the Guristas line a very unique and intriguing option.

With the current proposal I see the Gila losing all ability to function efficiently in the roles I currently use it in and have planned for the future. As a Gila pilot I use sentry drones and light drones almost exclusively. I barely ever use medium drones at all. I like being able to drop onto the field like a brick ****house, hold position, drop sentries and apply instant reliable damage, while still having the option to switch tactics on the fly and brawl whenever I want.

While the idea of having two super drones is a cool idea, I don't like my Gilas being forced to brawl with medium drones alone.

I agree that Guristas ships need to be changed to bring them up to speed. I disagree with the sentiment that they need to be so drastically different than other drone boats as to sacrifice bandwidth and diminish the effectiveness and variety of tools at their disposal. A Worm can now only field 2 E-war/Repair/Salvage drones, a Gila only 4.


Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2014-04-12 18:07:26 UTC
So we want more Ishtar-like ships?
Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#5 - 2014-04-12 18:11:43 UTC
Has anyone worked up exactly how many HP these medium drones will have, and how that compares to the ship itself?

On the Worm, the lights have a good bit more HP, until you start figuring in resists. It would be wonderful if T2 drones could inherit the resist profiles of their race.

Sentries are not the be-all, end all drone. These ships will be effective.
Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2014-04-12 18:16:34 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Has anyone worked up exactly how many HP these medium drones will have, and how that compares to the ship itself?

On the Worm, the lights have a good bit more HP, until you start figuring in resists. It would be wonderful if T2 drones could inherit the resist profiles of their race.

Sentries are not the be-all, end all drone. These ships will be effective.

Some one I know did the numbers I don't have the exact ones on hand, but it became the equivalent of the raw HP of a T1 cruiser
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#7 - 2014-04-12 18:16:39 UTC
Rowells wrote:
So we want more Ishtar-like ships?


The point is that Guristas pilots are getting **** on, HARD. And there is no reason not to create new ships instead of ruining Guristas for so many people. A rattlesnake is very different than an Ishtar. Guristas are the only shield-tanked drone and missile ships in the game. They are unique as they are and there is no good reason whatsoever to change them so drastically.
Dun'Gal
Myriad Contractors Inc.
#8 - 2014-04-12 18:18:06 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
IIf this callous trend to Guristas contines, the great versatility Guristas ships once had will be tremendously reduced and a lot of people will be very angry with CCP for letting this happen.

No, it will only be you, who is angry. Everyone else will be enjoying the Gurista's line and lamenting the loss of the rest of the pirate ships.
Swiftstrike1
Swiftstrike Incorporated
#9 - 2014-04-12 18:29:29 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Guristas are the only shield-tanked drone and missile ships in the game.

My Ishtar is shield tanked. You got a problem with that?

Casual Incursion runner & Faction Warfare grunt, ex-Wormholer, ex-Nullbear.

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#10 - 2014-04-12 18:33:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
Swiftstrike1 wrote:
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Guristas are the only shield-tanked drone and missile ships in the game.

My Ishtar is shield tanked. You got a problem with that?


Guristas has a shield resistance bonus. Cherry pick harder.

Sad that every first page is filled with these no-life clowns. It takes a while to for someone to come along who has the ability to form a proper argument. They usually don't live on the forums like most of these losers. Sucks to be them.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#11 - 2014-04-12 19:02:56 UTC
do u wonder why i nominated u? Big smile

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Ix Method
Doomheim
#12 - 2014-04-12 20:26:14 UTC
Send us a postcard o/

Travelling at the speed of love.

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#13 - 2014-04-12 21:18:55 UTC
I have nothing against adding new ships.

I have something against people whining about changes outside of the threads specifically designated for their whining, though.

I also have something against people whining about perfectly reasonable and beneficial changes (Worm, Gila) and then going on to whine about changes that haven't even been announced yet (Rattlesnake).

Additionally, I have something against people who are unable to defend their point of view without using personal attacks in every single post that they make.
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#14 - 2014-04-12 21:30:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
I have nothing against adding new ships.

I have something against people whining about changes outside of the threads specifically designated for their whining, though.

I also have something against people whining about perfectly reasonable and beneficial changes (Worm, Gila) and then going on to whine about changes that haven't even been announced yet (Rattlesnake).

Additionally, I have something against people who are unable to defend their point of view without using personal attacks in every single post that they make.


Next time try to contain your personal butthurt since you can't seem to form a proper argument.

Many people aren't happy with these proposed changes and the issues are being totally ignored in the official thread and it is not just about the sentry drones.

Now get back under that rock you crawled out from before you make yourself look even more the blithering idiot.
Gigan Amilupar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2014-04-12 21:38:16 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
I have nothing against adding new ships.

I have something against people whining about changes outside of the threads specifically designated for their whining, though.

I also have something against people whining about perfectly reasonable and beneficial changes (Worm, Gila) and then going on to whine about changes that haven't even been announced yet (Rattlesnake).

Additionally, I have something against people who are unable to defend their point of view without using personal attacks in every single post that they make.


Next time try to contain your personal butthurt since you can't seem to form a proper argument.

Many people aren't happy with these proposed changes and the issues are being totally ignored in the official thread.


So, you just proved his point about personal attacks? Also, it's not "many people aren't happy" it's "a very loud minority aren't happy". Current Guristas ships overlap with Gallente ships in drone use. The only difference is that Guristas are slated towards shields while Gal favor armor on some, but not all, hulls. Oh, and presently Guristas ships also have a fairly ineffective missile bonus. Why do people want the Gila to be an Ishtar clone so badly? Or for the Rattler to be a Domi clone? We're getting shield tanked brawling drone ships with very strong and hard to kill drones, and I'm excited for it. If your flying Guristas you have to have Gallente trained up anyways, just switch to a Gallente ship.
Last Wolf
Umbra Wing
#16 - 2014-04-12 21:39:30 UTC
-1. The new ships are awesome.

That awkward moment at the Gentlemen's Club when you see your sister on the stage....and you're not sure where to put the money....

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#17 - 2014-04-12 21:50:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
Gigan Amilupar wrote:
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
I have nothing against adding new ships.

I have something against people whining about changes outside of the threads specifically designated for their whining, though.

I also have something against people whining about perfectly reasonable and beneficial changes (Worm, Gila) and then going on to whine about changes that haven't even been announced yet (Rattlesnake).

Additionally, I have something against people who are unable to defend their point of view without using personal attacks in every single post that they make.


Next time try to contain your personal butthurt since you can't seem to form a proper argument.

Many people aren't happy with these proposed changes and the issues are being totally ignored in the official thread.


So, you just proved his point about personal attacks? Also, it's not "many people aren't happy" it's "a very loud minority aren't happy". Current Guristas ships overlap with Gallente ships in drone use.


I see you have jumped on the lemming bandwagon of the only pro argument for this change. The weak argument for this change is that they overlap with Gallente. With a more intelligent perspective you would realize they are actually relatively very different since one is shield tanked and uses missiles while the other is armor tanked and uses hybrid weapons in addition to the ships being based on Caldari Hulls and thus have Caldari maneuverability as well. A properly fit Rattlesnake is not a domi clone, it is far better in terms of damage and versatility.

The only commonality between them is their use of drones. This one factor should be an acceptable amount of overlap for a ship that is supposed to be a mix of gallente and caldari. The Guristas are nothing like Gallente except the use of drones.


The overlap argument is utterly ridiculous. There is no good reason to take away the versatility that Guristas pilots have spent time and money training for.

Next.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#18 - 2014-04-12 22:10:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Alvatore DiMarco
Well you see, Mr. Rod, the reason that the devs are changing your Guristas ships is very simple:

They're trolling you.

CCP, along with the Nullsec Cartels who control them, have decided that the time is right to troll all Guristas-flying carebears for their own sadistic pleasure and perverse amusement. The more you wail and gnash your teeth in fury (as well you should, since you're being specifically targeted for unwarranted and unfair cyberbullying), the more you amuse the people who have decided to troll you in this manner.

The rest of us forum-goers here in F&I have been hired by certain members of those Nullsec Cartels to keep you busy here, working you into a frothy-mouthed incoherent babbling rage while they look on in amusement. We get paid per angry post that you make, so please continue to attack each and every one of us individually with separate posts for each half-sentence you write.

We weren't supposed to tell you this, but I decided it was time to bravely step forward and be a slave to Nullsec Cartel ISK no longer. Hopefully you will appreciate the sacrifice I have made for your sake, putting myself in eternal and irrefutable danger like this.
Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2014-04-12 22:40:19 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
Well you see, Mr. Rod, the reason that the devs are changing your Guristas ships is very simple:

They're trolling you.

CCP, along with the Nullsec Cartels who control them, have decided that the time is right to troll all Guristas-flying carebears for their own sadistic pleasure and perverse amusement. The more you wail and gnash your teeth in fury (as well you should, since you're being specifically targeted for unwarranted and unfair cyberbullying), the more you amuse the people who have decided to troll you in this manner.

The rest of us forum-goers here in F&I have been hired by certain members of those Nullsec Cartels to keep you busy here, working you into a frothy-mouthed incoherent babbling rage while they look on in amusement. We get paid per angry post that you make, so please continue to attack each and every one of us individually with separate posts for each half-sentence you write.

We weren't supposed to tell you this, but I decided it was time to bravely step forward and be a slave to Nullsec Cartel ISK no longer. Hopefully you will appreciate the sacrifice I have made for your sake, putting myself in eternal and irrefutable danger like this.

A CFC representative will be contacting you shortly about this little incident...I suggest you pack your things
Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
#20 - 2014-04-12 23:02:34 UTC
It's sad that even an obvious try-hard troll can be successful these days. You people should be ashamed of yourselves for being baited so easily.
123Next pageLast page