These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM 9

First post First post
Author
Arkady Vachon
The Gold Angels
Sixth Empire
#141 - 2014-04-08 21:19:56 UTC
Threw some vote love your way, based on what I have read so far.

By the way, what is your views on Planetary Interaction?

Nothing Personal - Just Business...

Chaos Creates Content

PaulsAvatar
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#142 - 2014-04-08 21:49:43 UTC
Only thing I disagree with is the cloaking stance. Everything else seems excellent. You sir get my #1 spot for votes. Now to finish bumping this thread by posting and go find two more decent characters to vote for.
Volar Kang
Kang Industrial
#143 - 2014-04-08 22:16:01 UTC
I love your tools and dedication to the game. Two votes entered for you my friend.
Doctor Deichscheich
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#144 - 2014-04-09 17:34:59 UTC
Here's hoping that voting you into the CSM won't hurt my own interests, as you will have less time for developing the tools we need to actually play this game. J/k, voting for you anyway.
SeneschaI
Ordo Arcana
#145 - 2014-04-09 18:58:33 UTC
Question
How could CREST replace the corporate beta-level programming? Give me an example, say in the area of corporate manufacturing.
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#146 - 2014-04-09 19:33:34 UTC
SeneschaI wrote:
Question
How could CREST replace the corporate beta-level programming? Give me an example, say in the area of corporate manufacturing.



Manufacturing is one of the places you'd have to be very careful with CREST (unless there are changes to how manufacturing works, like making it process based, rather than job based).

I really don't want to see people requiring a third party program to be competitive. That would mean there have to be limits for how many times you can do particular activities.



CREST has the potential to be very useful when it comes to management of the corporations. Like automation of SRP payouts, management of contacts, renting programs, and so on. More for control, rather than things which directly create value.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

SeneschaI
Ordo Arcana
#147 - 2014-04-09 22:46:27 UTC
Steve Ronuken wrote:
]CREST has the potential to be very useful when it comes to management of the corporations. Like automation of SRP payouts, management of contacts, renting programs, and so on. More for control, rather than things which directly create value.

Sounds exciting. currently the only way i can make all BPOs available to early corp members is to have 'view only' hangars ('other' access setting) of the blueprints, with one 'take+view' hangar (division 7 hangar) for input/output.
obviously, i have to deal with the annoying 'lockdown' mechanic to boot.
It's a pretty cool system that can get fledgling industrialists access to upgraded blueprints to copy to their hearts content.

It would be nice if this CREST idea of yours means i can have an alternative...or are we talking about two different things here?
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#148 - 2014-04-09 23:46:35 UTC
SeneschaI wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
]CREST has the potential to be very useful when it comes to management of the corporations. Like automation of SRP payouts, management of contacts, renting programs, and so on. More for control, rather than things which directly create value.

Sounds exciting. currently the only way i can make all BPOs available to early corp members is to have 'view only' hangars ('other' access setting) of the blueprints, with one 'take+view' hangar (division 7 hangar) for input/output.
obviously, i have to deal with the annoying 'lockdown' mechanic to boot.
It's a pretty cool system that can get fledgling industrialists access to upgraded blueprints to copy to their hearts content.

It would be nice if this CREST idea of yours means i can have an alternative...or are we talking about two different things here?



CREST won't touch that unfortunately. It's basically there to do the same things you can do in client, from out side of the client. So, with someone that knows what they're doing, they can put together an application to do things for you.

Now, it was said at Eve Vegas that they'd be working on corp roles at some point, as a prereq for the 3 year plan (iirc).

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#149 - 2014-04-10 01:00:27 UTC
Steve, you're the only candidate that's not a pirate type to get on my ballots.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Crasniya
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#150 - 2014-04-10 01:06:13 UTC
My Twitter question wasn't worthwhile enough to get answered. :'(

Soraya Xel - Council of Planetary Management 1 - soraya@biomassed.net

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#151 - 2014-04-10 01:25:03 UTC
Crasniya wrote:
My Twitter question wasn't worthwhile enough to get answered. :'(


Uh.. twitter question?

Must have been lost in the sea on (fun) inainity that is tweetfleet.

Ask it here?

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Quazal Atreides
StarTrucks
Prometheus Allegiance
#152 - 2014-04-10 16:29:47 UTC
you good sir are getting the vote of the 'atreides' house, Good too see some good ole fashioned carebear CSM and not a wanna be indi guy pretending for votes

Still the only person to offer corp creation free of charge. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=35634#post35634 Created over 200 was 3rd on the all time corporation job history on eve-board. This service is in stasis due to personal game time...

Crasniya
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#153 - 2014-04-10 16:44:19 UTC
I tweeted to ask you, if elected, how much interaction would you expect or like to have with the CPM?

https://twitter.com/ocdtrekkie/status/453654796528918528

Soraya Xel - Council of Planetary Management 1 - soraya@biomassed.net

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#154 - 2014-04-10 16:47:35 UTC
Crasniya wrote:
I tweeted to ask you, if elected, how much interaction would you expect or like to have with the CPM?

https://twitter.com/ocdtrekkie/status/453654796528918528



Huh. Don't know how I missed that.

Anyway: I'd say, in general, not that much interaction? But that's mostly because flying in space, and running on the ground are very different topics.

Where the two worlds come together (FW. possibly Sov. The market. possibly manufacturing. Molden Heath) then collaboration is very important so that both games get something useful and meaningful out of it.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Crasniya
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#155 - 2014-04-10 17:07:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Crasniya
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Anyway: I'd say, in general, not that much interaction? But that's mostly because flying in space, and running on the ground are very different topics.

Where the two worlds come together (FW. possibly Sov. The market. possibly manufacturing. Molden Heath) then collaboration is very important so that both games get something useful and meaningful out of it.


Of course, CSM is EVE stuff, and CPM is DUST stuff, but any hope of a further link will require both working together. My concern is that last year, several candidates noted support for DUST integration. However, a CPM member did tell me that nobody from CSM8 ever personally reached out to them. So apart from a single summit session on DUST, which CCP has still not seen fit to release the minutes for, there has been no or almost no interaction.

Soraya Xel - Council of Planetary Management 1 - soraya@biomassed.net

Mynxee
Signal Cartel
EvE-Scout Enclave
#156 - 2014-04-11 00:27:17 UTC
Good luck in the election. I included you on my slate because those oh-so-vital third party apps need an informed voice on the council!

Lost in space, looking for sigs...

Blog: Cloaky Wanderer

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#157 - 2014-04-11 07:24:14 UTC
Crasniya wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Anyway: I'd say, in general, not that much interaction? But that's mostly because flying in space, and running on the ground are very different topics.

Where the two worlds come together (FW. possibly Sov. The market. possibly manufacturing. Molden Heath) then collaboration is very important so that both games get something useful and meaningful out of it.


Of course, CSM is EVE stuff, and CPM is DUST stuff, but any hope of a further link will require both working together. My concern is that last year, several candidates noted support for DUST integration. However, a CPM member did tell me that nobody from CSM8 ever personally reached out to them. So apart from a single summit session on DUST, which CCP has still not seen fit to release the minutes for, there has been no or almost no interaction.


Your information is inaccurate. There is a dedicated CSM:CPM channel on skype; we're all in it and we regularly talk to each other in there.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Crasniya
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#158 - 2014-04-11 14:23:59 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Your information is inaccurate. There is a dedicated CSM:CPM channel on skype; we're all in it and we regularly talk to each other in there.


Good to know, thank you. :)

Soraya Xel - Council of Planetary Management 1 - soraya@biomassed.net

Wendy Holl
Jita Investing Compagny
#159 - 2014-04-11 23:19:32 UTC
As a highsec trader and producer i am fully aware of the risks. Highsec isnt as save as it used to be. Mostly due
to the now virtually risk free ganking of freighters and miningships, sure CONCORD jumps in and shoots the gankers which then gets a slap on the hand, standing wise.
But when you the next moment can dock up at a station and turn in some tag to restore a negative standing i think it has gone to far.

What good is a standing system if you can just buy your way into good standing?

What is your stance on this?
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#160 - 2014-04-12 01:18:47 UTC
Wendy Holl wrote:
As a highsec trader and producer i am fully aware of the risks. Highsec isnt as save as it used to be. Mostly due
to the now virtually risk free ganking of freighters and miningships, sure CONCORD jumps in and shoots the gankers which then gets a slap on the hand, standing wise.
But when you the next moment can dock up at a station and turn in some tag to restore a negative standing i think it has gone to far.

What good is a standing system if you can just buy your way into good standing?

What is your stance on this?



Afraid I have to disagree with you.

Sure, you can buy sec status. Effectively you're outsourcing the grinding.

tbh, it's not having a major effect on people who gank mining barges. They're still able to do it with their -10 characters in catalysts, because most miners they gank fit next to no tank.

As for freighter ganks, yes, it might help the gankers recover a little sec status. But it takes a fair amount to drop below -5, and didn't take a lot of effort to chain back up to above -5. Avoiding a freighter gank, if it's being done for profit, is easy. Don't fly a freighter with more than a billion, to a billion and a half.

Aside from that, the tags aren't a cheap option. https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/sectags/

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter