These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Order Mining Permits Now Worthless?

First post
Author
Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
#161 - 2014-03-20 05:40:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Arancar Australis
The best quote i have ever heard is 'All rules, laws, fears and boundaries are self imposed"

Yes laws are set up to impose a rule over people, but those laws only work so long as the person accepts the law. If this was not the case there would be no crimes because each person would accept the laws and the consequences for breaking them...ask a murderer next time if he thought about what the consequences of his actions were while in the act. I am fairly sure they were not thinking as they killed a person "Oh no i better stop or i might go to jail or get the death penalty"
Arancar Australis
Dead Sun Rising Enterprises
#162 - 2014-03-20 05:45:26 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Bing Bangboom wrote:
Despite the fine efforts of so many New Order members and supporters there is still such a vast sea of misunderstanding and ignorance out there. I know a lot of it is willfully refusing to accept that we mean what we say because "principle!" and "honor!" but some of it appears to be just plain not-getting-it.

I think no one will argue with the statement that there are players in Eve who believe they should be able to safely PvE in highsec without interference from other players. These players are concentrated in three areas. 1) The players who AFK autopilot between systems, mainly haulers, 2) the players who run missions in expensive, over-fitted non-PvP ships and of course 3) the max yield ice and ore miners. They often compound their stupidity by doing these activities with pods full of expensive implants chosen to maximize their ISK generation. Each of these types of players thumbs their nose at the idea that they are doing something provably stupid, despite Eve's long history of separating these foolish people from their assets.

None of this would be a problem if they didn't fly to the petition page and the forums ( and the comments section of www.minerbumping.com) to demand changes to the game that would prevent them from having to take actual actions themselves to prevent another sudden but justifiable loss of their precious ISK.

And THAT wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't clear that CCP has been listening to them. In what is certainly an attempt to carve out a safe space for the risk adverse (and their subscriptions) we have seen numerous changes to highsec that have been obvious concessions to the "highsec should be safe" crowd. Increased EHP built into the mining ships, massive ore holds, CONCORD response times buffed, can-flipping agro changes, and, of all things, a safety button were put in to save the carebears from themselves and their dumb activities.

And so, there is the New Order of Highsec. Pushing back. Not just against the players but the people who decide the things in the previous paragraphs were good ideas. Somebody care to explain how any of those things made Eve a better game? How it matches with the dark, dangerous universe? How it isn't something Blizzard would do?

We say we are against the AFKers and the bot aspirants. Its what we call people who think highsec is or should be safe. We call them bot aspirants for two reasons. One because what they do is barely different from a bot, ie a click or two every 45 minutes. Two because they WOULD bot if CCP allowed it. I know, they claim they would NEVER bot. But the truth is, if CCP put a macro function into Eve that allowed them to automate their PvE, they would use it. For many, the whole point is to make ISK while doing something else. Many miners have moved so close to being bots they are indistinguishable to the observer. And the bots hide amongst them in clear sight as no one can tell the difference.

So, finally, we get to the permits. Despite the clear history of the New Order where James has told us the permits exist because CCP REQUIRED James to create a profit aspect of the Code it serves another useful purpose. It allows us Agents to tell who is with us and who is against us. Who supports us and who supports the bot aspirants. When I see a miner without a permit I recognize him as someone who supports a safe highsec, afk play and bot aspirancy. I cheerfully bump or gank said player because he is the ENEMY of this game. For his own selfish reasons, he is willing to turn Eve into a theme-park.

I, for one, will hunt down people like this and drive them wailing into the wilderness. Or back to their safe on-line games. Eve is better off without them. And I am definitely not roleplaying when I say this.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

Bing Bangboom
Agent of the New Order of Highsec
Belligerent Undesirable




Exactly this.

I encountered someone mining just a couple days ago on my scout. While slowboating my scout toward them, I looked at their bio and saw a permit listed there.

Solely because of that, I chose to gank a different miner in the same anomoly.

Their permit saved them a 160m Mackinaw plus whatever their fittings were worth (probably 15m) and cost one of their rivals a Covetor (~40m fitted).


This is not ISK Progressquest. And highsec is worth killing for.



I would suggest to Bing that they need to take a chill pill because they are taking a game way too seriously Shocked
Percival Rose
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#163 - 2014-04-09 11:01:52 UTC
Michael Ruckert wrote:
Does anyone know if this is a corp? Anyone seen a mining ship with a New Order permit taken out? Or is this just a propaganda war?

It's mostly propaganda. They don't have the numbers or the ISK New Order has.

Do you know who's going to inherit New Eden? Arms dealers. Because everyone else is too busy killing each other.

Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
#164 - 2014-04-09 13:40:46 UTC
No matter how often I read 'New Order' I can't help but laugh...Lol I am glad they are there just for the comedy of it all, though I think they are a bunch of delusional self important muppets.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#165 - 2014-04-09 14:00:24 UTC
Bunnie Hop wrote:
No matter how often I read 'New Order' I can't help but laugh...Lol I am glad they are there just for the comedy of it all, though I think they are a bunch of delusional self important muppets.


Who, through their actions, have improved the safety and the standards of mining throughout HighSec

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#166 - 2014-04-09 14:04:11 UTC
Posting in the stealth Ero necro thread.
Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
#167 - 2014-04-09 14:08:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Bunnie Hop
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Bunnie Hop wrote:
No matter how often I read 'New Order' I can't help but laugh...Lol I am glad they are there just for the comedy of it all, though I think they are a bunch of delusional self important muppets.


Who, through their actions, have improved the safety and the standards of mining throughout HighSec



I credit CCP with that when they redesigned the barges. Correct me if wrong, but that wasn't the result of N.O. but the Goons with their hulkageddon. N.O. is just...well...a James fan club run amok.
Pytria Le'Danness
Placid Reborn
#168 - 2014-04-09 14:12:45 UTC
Silvetica Dian wrote:

The New Order have provided a vast amount of content for huge numbers of people in high sec.
Content provision is a scam now?
Mind blown.


What's with that "we provide content" that is cited like a mantra by anyone who does anything questionable?

Geez, stand by what you do. You blow up mining ships. While I personally find that boring and think that calling it "PvP" is bordering on offending anyone who ever flew a ship against something that shoots back it's a valid game play and thus your CCP-given right.

There is absolutely no need to hide behind some vague "content creation" excuse.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#169 - 2014-04-09 14:15:34 UTC
Bunnie Hop wrote:


I credit CCP with that when the redesigned the barges. Correct me if wrong, but that wasn't the result of N.O. but the Goons with their hulkageddon. N.O. is just...well...a James fan club run amok.


Bunnie, those barges werent fitted to deal with ganks, only for yield, and the Procurer was underused and now its the single most popular hull due to the infamousness of New Order.

People watch DScan and local now far more than they did before.

You can deny it if you want, but NO is responsible for the mining community actually attempting to look after itself.

I simply dont see the logic in preferring your gankers to come without warning, and not wearing a big badges that says I AM A GANKER

I dont support the NO because I have any love for James (though, I dont have anything against him either, he has organised a better more cohesive group than 99% of the corps or alliances out there), I support it because it is demonstratably a good thing for High Sec industry.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Rikanin
Mining Reloaded
The Commonwealth.
#170 - 2014-04-09 14:23:50 UTC
Anybody who buys a mining permit ... [sigh]

Really?
Alyth Nerun
Foundation for CODE and THE NEW ORDER
#171 - 2014-04-09 14:24:01 UTC
Pytria Le'Danness wrote:

What's with that "we provide content" that is cited like a mantra by anyone who does anything questionable?

Geez, stand by what you do. You blow up mining ships. While I personally find that boring and think that calling it "PvP" is bordering on offending anyone who ever flew a ship against something that shoots back it's a valid game play and thus your CCP-given right.

There is absolutely no need to hide behind some vague "content creation" excuse.


Just compare local chat in a system where a New Order Agent enforces the CODE and compare it to a system full of AFK miners without a New Order Agent. All this people suddenly interact where before was just silence and no one at the keyboards. That's what creating content means. We provide content for the biggest part of space in New Eden with the biggest population. That's why we are so important and well known.

I know that some not so well informed people out there in null think they should be the center of all attention. But who cares about null, the endgame is in highsec.
Oshia Launay
Galactic Fringe Inc
#172 - 2014-04-09 14:55:38 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
People watch DScan and local now far more than they did before.

You can deny it if you want, but NO is responsible for the mining community actually attempting to look after itself.

I'm not sure I get what you are trying to say here.

Praise to the rapists who make their victims carry pepper sprays with them to ward off future aggressions, that kind of thing ?
Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
#173 - 2014-04-09 15:06:15 UTC
Alyth Nerun wrote:
Pytria Le'Danness wrote:

What's with that "we provide content" that is cited like a mantra by anyone who does anything questionable?

Geez, stand by what you do. You blow up mining ships. While I personally find that boring and think that calling it "PvP" is bordering on offending anyone who ever flew a ship against something that shoots back it's a valid game play and thus your CCP-given right.

There is absolutely no need to hide behind some vague "content creation" excuse.


Just compare local chat in a system where a New Order Agent enforces the CODE and compare it to a system full of AFK miners without a New Order Agent. All this people suddenly interact where before was just silence and no one at the keyboards. That's what creating content means. We provide content for the biggest part of space in New Eden with the biggest population. That's why we are so important and well known.

I know that some not so well informed people out there in null think they should be the center of all attention. But who cares about null, the endgame is in highsec.


There can be genuine reasons for suicide ganking. For the New Order it is to stop AFK/ISBoxer/macro miners & mining fleets. For me it is to regulate mining in just one system so the belts are not wiped by, usually AFK, mining fleets operated by one or very few people.

For security reasons local chat isn't usually used for genuine communication so if local is used as you say in New Order systems that is interesting. I don't have a problem with the New Order as long as they only target AFK type miners. The miner bumping website isn't that good a read though although the guides on there are very good.
Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
#174 - 2014-04-09 15:07:43 UTC
Oshia Launay wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
People watch DScan and local now far more than they did before.

You can deny it if you want, but NO is responsible for the mining community actually attempting to look after itself.

I'm not sure I get what you are trying to say here.

Praise to the rapists who make their victims carry pepper sprays with them to ward off future aggressions, that kind of thing ?


That isn't really a true comparison is it.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#175 - 2014-04-09 15:10:44 UTC
Oshia Launay wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
People watch DScan and local now far more than they did before.

You can deny it if you want, but NO is responsible for the mining community actually attempting to look after itself.

I'm not sure I get what you are trying to say here.


Willful ignorance is a poor thing to pretend to have.

I will not answer any comments that compare a video game to a real life situation that is entirely unrelated, sorry.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Tear Jar
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#176 - 2014-04-09 15:13:27 UTC
Arancar Australis wrote:
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Bing Bangboom wrote:
Despite the fine efforts of so many New Order members and supporters there is still such a vast sea of misunderstanding and ignorance out there. I know a lot of it is willfully refusing to accept that we mean what we say because "principle!" and "honor!" but some of it appears to be just plain not-getting-it.

I think no one will argue with the statement that there are players in Eve who believe they should be able to safely PvE in highsec without interference from other players. These players are concentrated in three areas. 1) The players who AFK autopilot between systems, mainly haulers, 2) the players who run missions in expensive, over-fitted non-PvP ships and of course 3) the max yield ice and ore miners. They often compound their stupidity by doing these activities with pods full of expensive implants chosen to maximize their ISK generation. Each of these types of players thumbs their nose at the idea that they are doing something provably stupid, despite Eve's long history of separating these foolish people from their assets.

None of this would be a problem if they didn't fly to the petition page and the forums ( and the comments section of www.minerbumping.com) to demand changes to the game that would prevent them from having to take actual actions themselves to prevent another sudden but justifiable loss of their precious ISK.

And THAT wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't clear that CCP has been listening to them. In what is certainly an attempt to carve out a safe space for the risk adverse (and their subscriptions) we have seen numerous changes to highsec that have been obvious concessions to the "highsec should be safe" crowd. Increased EHP built into the mining ships, massive ore holds, CONCORD response times buffed, can-flipping agro changes, and, of all things, a safety button were put in to save the carebears from themselves and their dumb activities.

And so, there is the New Order of Highsec. Pushing back. Not just against the players but the people who decide the things in the previous paragraphs were good ideas. Somebody care to explain how any of those things made Eve a better game? How it matches with the dark, dangerous universe? How it isn't something Blizzard would do?

We say we are against the AFKers and the bot aspirants. Its what we call people who think highsec is or should be safe. We call them bot aspirants for two reasons. One because what they do is barely different from a bot, ie a click or two every 45 minutes. Two because they WOULD bot if CCP allowed it. I know, they claim they would NEVER bot. But the truth is, if CCP put a macro function into Eve that allowed them to automate their PvE, they would use it. For many, the whole point is to make ISK while doing something else. Many miners have moved so close to being bots they are indistinguishable to the observer. And the bots hide amongst them in clear sight as no one can tell the difference.

So, finally, we get to the permits. Despite the clear history of the New Order where James has told us the permits exist because CCP REQUIRED James to create a profit aspect of the Code it serves another useful purpose. It allows us Agents to tell who is with us and who is against us. Who supports us and who supports the bot aspirants. When I see a miner without a permit I recognize him as someone who supports a safe highsec, afk play and bot aspirancy. I cheerfully bump or gank said player because he is the ENEMY of this game. For his own selfish reasons, he is willing to turn Eve into a theme-park.

I, for one, will hunt down people like this and drive them wailing into the wilderness. Or back to their safe on-line games. Eve is better off without them. And I am definitely not roleplaying when I say this.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

Bing Bangboom
Agent of the New Order of Highsec
Belligerent Undesirable




Exactly this.

I encountered someone mining just a couple days ago on my scout. While slowboating my scout toward them, I looked at their bio and saw a permit listed there.

Solely because of that, I chose to gank a different miner in the same anomoly.

Their permit saved them a 160m Mackinaw plus whatever their fittings were worth (probably 15m) and cost one of their rivals a Covetor (~40m fitted).


This is not ISK Progressquest. And highsec is worth killing for.



I would suggest to Bing that they need to take a chill pill because they are taking a game way too seriously Shocked


Its called roleplaying. We have a cause we agree with and find it fun to support said cause.

People only take it too seriously when they stop having fun.
KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#177 - 2014-04-09 15:18:12 UTC
Tear Jar wrote:

Its called roleplaying.


HAHA! your alliance are roleplayers! *points and laughs*

























...wait ****...

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#178 - 2014-04-09 15:24:51 UTC
/me wonders if N.O members refer to James as 'Dear Leader' ?

/me also wonders if N.O members would wear this if it was available ?
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#179 - 2014-04-09 15:26:18 UTC
Kitty Bear wrote:
/me wonders if N.O members refer to James as 'Dear Leader' ?

/me also wonders if N.O members would wear this if it was available ?


1) Probably

2) Why would they want to associate with those "people" ?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Belt Scout
Thread Lockaholics Anonymous
#180 - 2014-04-09 15:27:31 UTC
It's a joke how NO perceives itself to be relevant. Roll

Just run Proc's and Skiffs and tell the wannabe scientologists to eat sht and die.

They say most of your brain shuts down on the EvE forums. All but the impatient side, and the sarcastic side. No wonder I'm still awake.

**This IS my main so STFU.