These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Character Transfer Ban change

First post
Author
Kretan
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#1 - 2014-04-06 20:56:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Kretan
I orginally didn't think this needed to be said but this change would only apply to first time offenders.

Current Rules
First offense - 30 day ban, a permanent ban on character transfers, and loss of all assets gained from botting.
Second offense - Permanent ban

So this is my idea you can write whatever you want in response I will try and answer any questions. My idea is for accounts that have been banmed for the first offense of botting have the ability to transfer characters restored after an active twelve month period. When I say active that means if there is anytime the account goes inactive that timer would stop as well.

Why you might be asking? Well it was originally intended to only last for so long. See https://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/9133. "We'll probably have to come up with some form of timing solution for the future."

So first of all lets look at why ccp would allow this to return to an account that has broken the rules. Simple in brings more money in due to the fact character transfers cost either plexes or real money to transfer. Also requires that person to keep that account active so its another account putting money in there pocket

Okay some problems you might say with this are people will just give the account twelve months and transfer the characters to another account they own and the recycling begins again. Well first of all if you transfer it to another account you if that account isn't flagged you get caught that account would also be banned permanently as it would still be in your name. But about players that transfer to another account that is not in there name and uses different details but is found to being used by the same person? Well that is a violation of the character bazaar rules and will get you a permanent ban for manipulating the character bazaar which is stated on the front page sticky.

Also please see my posts below for why people wouldn't use this for recycling characters.


Will try to respond to all statements and questions.
Ix Method
Doomheim
#2 - 2014-04-07 08:21:44 UTC
Enjoyably desperate, would stare at disbelievingly again.

Travelling at the speed of love.

Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2014-04-07 10:28:54 UTC
Reducing the punishment for botters will be as popular as lowering the punishments for corrupt politicians.

Whilst we believe that you personally have never botted and do indeed lie awake each night worrying about those that do......
wait we do not believe that at all.
We all hope that the banned accounts had a metric ton of isk and assets that can never be accessed again though.

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85

Meandering Milieu
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2014-04-07 15:48:55 UTC
Kretan
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#5 - 2014-04-07 18:11:03 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
*Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.
Anyway I shall continue to fight this righteous war and tell you why people wouldn't use this method to recycle characters. I will even make it multiple choice!

So first time your ban you have two options if you want to be able to do character transfers or recycle your character you can do either -

A) Do as I have stated which is pay 14 plexes or 150 US dollars and wait a year of active game time to recycle your character.

or

B) Just create a new account spend 3 plexes or 45 US dollars then train for two to three months then continue botting.

Now if you were a botter and money was your bottom line which option would you choose?
Noxisia Arkana
Deadspace Knights
#6 - 2014-04-07 18:21:38 UTC
Easy there big guy. The first reply was disagreeing with you, not even in a very negative way.

I also don't think that permanently banned accounts should be able to trade characters. That would kind of defeat the purpose of the life long ban.

Now if you had an argument on why there should be no permanent bans, I'd be willing to listen. I would probably disagree; though I don't think that means I'm a troll.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#7 - 2014-04-07 18:42:46 UTC
Kretan wrote:
To be honest I didn't think there were this many trolls here but I can say I was honestly and happily surprised. Anyway I shall continue to fight this righteous war and tell you why people wouldn't use this method to recycle characters. I will even make it multiple choice!

So first time your ban you have two options if you want to be able to do character transfers or recycle your character you can do either -

A) Do as I have stated which is pay 14 plexes or 150 US dollars and wait a year of active game time to recycle your character.

or

B) Just create a new account spend 3 plexes or 45 US dollars then train for two to three months then continue botting.

Now if you were a botter and money was your bottom line which option would you choose?



well that really depends how valuable the skills and assets on that char are to the player. if hes got 50bil in assets and years worth of SP, then 14 plex isnt that much.

unless the banned char has all its assets removed, wallet reduced to zero or less and SP's to 400k or something. then give him a noob ship with civilian mods and 1 unit of trit and point him towards the tutorial missions. if thats the case, spending plex to get ur characters name, history and likeness back is ok i guess.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Psychoactive Stimulant
#8 - 2014-04-07 18:53:23 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
Don't try to quote someone's own rulebook to them. It never turns out well.

*Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#9 - 2014-04-07 19:43:57 UTC
I can't bring myself to support even the slightest relaxation of the (already to light) consequences for botters.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Cloak n'all
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2014-04-07 23:58:29 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
If you really did want to trade characters for isk, you would not have even mentioned botting in this forum. As botting (from reading your first post) seams like your over all goal in being able to get characters out of bans and that you are quoting botting rules, I would go out on a limb here and say this:

ABSOLUTELY NO ONE WILL SUPPORT THIS THREAD!!

All the personal attacks up top are a little uncalled for *Snip* Please refrain from discussing warnings and bans. ISD Ezwal.
Kretan
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#11 - 2014-04-08 00:28:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Kretan
Okay since I seem to be confusing a lot of people here I will redirect my argument and answer all questions. Will also update the orignal post.

Noxisia Arkana - first I never mentioned anything about permanent banned accounts being able to trade characters. How do you figure permanent banned accounts would be able to use a year of game time? I'm talking about the accounts that have fallen under the first ban of thirty days that also takes away the ability to transfer characters. As the second offense gets you a permanent ban.

Daichi Yamato - I don't see how the assets would be a problem as you would still have access to and be able to log on the character after the thirty day ban. So not really sure what you mean by this. If you are talking about permanent banned accounts that is not what I am trying to discuss.

Psychoactive Stimulant - If I still had a bunch of plexes on my account I could still use them as my account has not been permanent banned please read before you place an arguement. Also in the OP I will post it in big bold letters at the top.

Samillian - Okay thats fine but could you put a reason as for why not?

Cloak n'all - No my account isn't under a ban as I don't think I could still post if it was. Apparently people don't know the rules regarding botting so I will update my post so you guys can understand.
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#12 - 2014-04-08 06:33:46 UTC
Counter proposal; permanent IP bans for anyone caught bottling. No appeals process.

Bots are the scourge of gaming and should be stamped out without mercy.
Kretan
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#13 - 2014-04-08 06:49:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Kretan
ShahFluffers wrote:
Counter proposal; permanent IP bans for anyone caught bottling. No appeals process.

Bots are the scourge of gaming and should be stamped out without mercy.


You do realize most IP address change every couple of days so when you permanently ban an IP an account could get banned for just being moved to a banned IP address. And without an appeals process you would lose some players and you would probably end up with a bad public image which ccp already has a problem with. Also ccp or the company they have overseeing the serenity server allow botting so it must not be all bad...

So for this post I am going to have to put you up with the first guy that posted in this thread and call you a moron. Have a good day and feel free to slam the door on the way out.
Kretan
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#14 - 2014-04-08 06:51:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Kretan
Please continue posting as some of these posts are very entertaining...although I wish more of them actually made a point besides we hate botters. There has been over two hundred views and very few responses. Come on guys that just makes me sad.
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#15 - 2014-04-08 08:32:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Samillian
Kretan wrote:
Samillian - Okay thats fine but could you put a reason as for why not?


Any relaxation of the already overly soft and lenient system already in place will just send the wrong signals to EvEs botters.

Botters degrade the game by their presence, making a mockery of the efforts of those who do actually play the game as intended. On top of that anything that gives succour to the RMT should be stamped out with extreme prejudice.

Maybe that is an old fashioned and clichéd point of view but there you go, you asked.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#16 - 2014-04-08 14:04:44 UTC
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.


5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.

Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.


The above stated rule 10 regards in this case to specific warnings/bans and/or accusations of having received warnings/bans.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#17 - 2014-04-08 14:08:47 UTC
I hope every permabanned botter has 500 PLEX and 100bn ISK on their account, just in case CCP ever has a dire need for "emergency resources" to cool an out-of-control economy with.
Kretan
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#18 - 2014-04-08 19:05:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Kretan
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
I hope every permabanned botter has 500 PLEX and 100bn ISK on their account, just in case CCP ever has a dire need for "emergency resources" to cool an out-of-control economy with.


How does this apply to anything that has been said? I stated in the top in big bold letters this has nothing to do with permanent bans. So can I make that any clearer to you? Also can you please stay on topic?
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#19 - 2014-04-08 19:47:42 UTC

First off, this is what I think you are saying, but you go about it in a befuddling manner.

Quote:
Proposal: Allow a Banned Account to be active for 1 year, after which point they can transfer characters from that banned account to a new account.



1.) Who would pay for 1 year of activity on a banned account? That makes no sense, unless the assets and characters on that account are worth quite a bit of value.

2.) Why? If the account was permabanned, then leave it permabanned. What are you trying to accomplish with this asinine exception to the rule?

At the end of the day, it sounds like you want to "limit" how much harm you can do to an account that is botting. It sounds like a very valuable account should have their punishment limited to a 1-yr-of-plex value lost and a 1-yr-account stasis period. I see no reason for this change.
Kretan
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#20 - 2014-04-09 00:52:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Kretan
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:

First off, this is what I think you are saying, but you go about it in a befuddling manner.

Quote:
Proposal: Allow a Banned Account to be active for 1 year, after which point they can transfer characters from that banned account to a new account.



1.) Who would pay for 1 year of activity on a banned account? That makes no sense, unless the assets and characters on that account are worth quite a bit of value.

2.) Why? If the account was permabanned, then leave it permabanned. What are you trying to accomplish with this asinine exception to the rule?

At the end of the day, it sounds like you want to "limit" how much harm you can do to an account that is botting. It sounds like a very valuable account should have their punishment limited to a 1-yr-of-plex value lost and a 1-yr-account stasis period. I see no reason for this change.


Please read the first two lines of my post very carefully before you write a reply (I bolded it and underlined it just for people like you). It has nothing to do with permabanned accounts as I have said multiple times which you would have know if you read it all the way through.
12Next page