These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

If High Sec Turned Null Sec Over Downtime

Author
Precentor Saggitus
Planet Express Transport
#41 - 2014-04-03 20:10:36 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
I'd honestly probably just unsub.

it would make the game a lot less accessible to those of us that don't want to join a 0.0 alliance and constantly get bothered by pings for fleets we don't want to join, and have to have an extra 30 chat tabs open to figure out if there's a camp on the other side of every gate...

simply too much hassle for me to put up with for something that's meant to be fun.


About the same for me. I don't really find null sec that fun. If you live there its a constant demand. Nice place to visit once in a while. While fighting constant battles is fun sometimes, logging in to a barrage of CTA, CTA! Gets a little old sometimes. I don't want to have to do the same thing day in, day out when I play. Null sec forces you to always be part of a giant group, a small cog in a big machine. Fun sometimes, but in my opinion not all the time, especially if like me you don't have all the time in the world to play, or play on a constant basis. Small group stuff is much more fun, and I enjoy my solo time too.

Few people understand the psycology of a highway traffic cop. Your average speeder will panic and immediately pull over to the side. This is wrong. It arouses contempt in the cop heart. Make the bastard chase you. He will follow.

Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#42 - 2014-04-03 21:09:06 UTC
How would anyone gank without concord protecting them?

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2014-04-03 21:24:36 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
...
Leave pirates alone.... we just want to have fun.


Thing is, Jarod? They've set themselves against us in the most personal way. They've set conditions whereby their "fun" is mutually exclusive with ours. They've long since abandoned "live and let live" as far as it goes in the game. What's worse, they repeatedly state that there can't be a happy medium, and they keep trying to force CCP to choose between the two groups.

If they get their way, you and I, and all of our ilk, won't be able to play the game.

So my attitude is, **** 'em.

You quoted wrong part. What you have just wrote describes pirates and gankers.

I think you even didn't notice Lol

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Ikshuki
Awoken Disintegration Fleet
#44 - 2014-04-06 23:29:57 UTC
LOLOLOLOL i think even goonswarm would get pissed if that happened, because they have so much assets moving in and out of jita they would lose trillions in an hour with all the botter runs they do, but it would be hilarious watching though, i would just sit at 356km from the jita-perimeter stargate in my sniping fitted rattlesnake and just let loose of my sentry drones to one shot anything cruiser sized :)
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#45 - 2014-04-06 23:58:43 UTC
Ikshuki wrote:
LOLOLOLOL i think even goonswarm would get pissed if that happened, because they have so much assets moving in and out of jita they would lose trillions in an hour with all the botter runs they do, but it would be hilarious watching though, i would just sit at 356km from the jita-perimeter stargate in my sniping fitted rattlesnake and just let loose of my sentry drones to one shot anything cruiser sized :)


This, like most of the posts ITT, are misinformed or deluded fantasies. For instance, it should happen so you can find out how silly it is to have a shield expanded battleship "sniper".

The actual answer to OPs question, is that it will become a lot like NPC 0.0, but will happen over time as population stops hanging to <20 systems and spreads out.

Contrary to the belief of highsec dwellers, it's possible to mine, mission, rat, produce and trade in 0.0 space once you've unlearned terrible habits. No, I'm not talking about sov null either; there's plenty of examples of multiple non-blued groups living in close proximity in NPC 0.0 space, and it's not the doom and gloom stay-docked-or-die that you lot seem to think it is.

It would be a much better game, but it won't happen because most people want the easier option.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#46 - 2014-04-07 00:39:47 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
...
Leave pirates alone.... we just want to have fun.


Thing is, Jarod? They've set themselves against us in the most personal way. They've set conditions whereby their "fun" is mutually exclusive with ours. They've long since abandoned "live and let live" as far as it goes in the game. What's worse, they repeatedly state that there can't be a happy medium, and they keep trying to force CCP to choose between the two groups.

If they get their way, you and I, and all of our ilk, won't be able to play the game.

So my attitude is, **** 'em.

You quoted wrong part. What you have just wrote describes pirates and gankers.

I think you even didn't notice Lol


Except I don't want mining or missioning or incursions legislated out of the game to spite a playstyle I don't like.

Big difference between "I like to have fun by shooting people in a videogame" and "I can't EVER have fun if anyone else is allowed to shoot me, ever!".

There's no moral equivalency here, no matter how hard you try to fish for one.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2014-04-07 02:36:47 UTC
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:
What if my wife turned bisexual over night? Makes about as much sense as OP's hypothetical while also being far more entertaining for me.

All these girl-on-girl wife analogies.. I wonder if you're trying to tell us anything.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#48 - 2014-04-07 12:31:30 UTC
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:
What if my wife turned bisexual over night? Makes about as much sense as OP's hypothetical while also being far more entertaining for me.


Yea well, in my case that would simply mean TWO women sleeping in my bed while not giving me any yet still demanding I complete a daily list of general orders chores! Their called 'fantasies' for a reason Twisted
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#49 - 2014-04-07 13:20:55 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
I'd honestly probably just unsub.

it would make the game a lot less accessible to those of us that don't want to join a 0.0 alliance and constantly get bothered by pings for fleets we don't want to join, and have to have an extra 30 chat tabs open to figure out if there's a camp on the other side of every gate...

simply too much hassle for me to put up with for something that's meant to be fun.

Exactly this. So I'd just stay in lowsec.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#50 - 2014-04-07 13:57:12 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
...
Leave pirates alone.... we just want to have fun.


Thing is, Jarod? They've set themselves against us in the most personal way. They've set conditions whereby their "fun" is mutually exclusive with ours. They've long since abandoned "live and let live" as far as it goes in the game. What's worse, they repeatedly state that there can't be a happy medium, and they keep trying to force CCP to choose between the two groups.

If they get their way, you and I, and all of our ilk, won't be able to play the game.

So my attitude is, **** 'em.

You quoted wrong part. What you have just wrote describes pirates and gankers.

I think you even didn't notice Lol


Except I don't want mining or missioning or incursions legislated out of the game to spite a playstyle I don't like.

Big difference between "I like to have fun by shooting people in a videogame" and "I can't EVER have fun if anyone else is allowed to shoot me, ever!".

There's no moral equivalency here, no matter how hard you try to fish for one.


The real things we have here are:
ganker: i only have fun when i blow some unprepared player. I'm too scared of dealing other pvp-oriented players
miner: i like to mine but it is not fun when your ship is getting blown by occasional suicide alts

And you are right: there is no moral equivalency here.

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#51 - 2014-04-07 14:11:02 UTC
March rabbit wrote:

ganker: i only have fun when i blow some unprepared player. I'm too scared of dealing other pvp-oriented players


Subjective and not based in reality.

Shows no understanding of the situation

2/10

Must try harder

(Though I like the use of the word "blow")

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#52 - 2014-04-07 14:15:51 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
March rabbit wrote:

ganker: i only have fun when i blow some unprepared player. I'm too scared of dealing other pvp-oriented players


Subjective and not based in reality.

Shows no understanding of the situation

2/10

Must try harder

(Though I like the use of the word "blow")


I always like turning it back on them, like so.

Miner - whaa whaa I want to be left alone to play 'my way' in a game which has the basic assuption that playing as part of a group is advantageous and that interaction is never purely on your terms.

Ganker - Here is your dose of education for the day.

Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin

you're welcome

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#53 - 2014-04-07 14:18:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Ramona McCandless
Darek Castigatus wrote:

I always like turning it back on them, like so.

Miner - whaa whaa I want to be left alone to play 'my way' in a game which has the basic assuption that playing as part of a group is advantageous and that interaction is never purely on your terms.

Ganker - Here is your dose of education for the day.


Miner - I dont see why I should defend myself in anyway

Ganker - Im taking time out of my Nullops to teach you why, next time I expect you to be harder to kill. GIVE ME A DAMN CHALLENGE YOU ******* ****!!!!1111!¬!

(Edit: of course, this is fantasy as it is usually the Miner who swears)

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Solecist Project
#54 - 2014-04-07 14:20:32 UTC
This thread is full of fail. Only one or two posts are not full of stupid, biased and completely disconnected assumptions about what would happen.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Precentor Saggitus
Planet Express Transport
#55 - 2014-04-07 17:11:41 UTC
Khanh'rhh wrote:

It would be a much better game, but it won't happen because most people want the easier option.


I don't know if it would be a much better game, it would just be a different one. Lets face it, most of the people whom some of the EVE community deride for this, would simply un sub, and one would be left with the remenants of those who preferred the different mode world. All that would happen is that one would lose a sector of players. I personally don't think the game would benefit from that.

You're right, people mission in low sec and null, people mine/harvest in those places as well. I'm one of those people. EVE though is risk/reward intensive though, so its really hard to be upset that those who spend low risk, get low reward. Stuck mining Veldspar, and with largely T1 production. Admittedly, one can play and be pretty happy with this. EVE is still somewhat of a fun game in this regard - I know that's hard to understand for a lot of people, remember, we're in the sandbox here. IF everyone can't play in the sandbox, it ain't a sandbox. One might say that a sandbox should have no rules or prohibitions, but a real sand box does - it has the properties of sand which govern what one can do within, and there in lies the challenge. Every thing you make in the sandbox after all is still sand.

To be honest, sometimes I like the "easier option" curse that if you will. Sometimes I want to play and enjoy the EVE universe with a small bit less of risk. Those "bad habits" one refers to that high sec players have, take a lot of time to adhere to, and frequently if one is super careful, you don't end up doing what you would like to do. Null sec for me just gets old sometimes, especially since the main thing to survive there you need to do is work with others - sometimes the really trying part. For me in MMOs I get along more with my adversaries than I do with my guild mates/corp mates. Your enemies you can at least choose somewhat when to interact with them. But that's my issue with games, not yours, everyone is welcome to get from the game what they want.

The posts above this one with examples of one sector of players against another (where one's always the hardened hero and the other is the whiny aggrieved), are just very limited in their perspective. EVE players are far more varied. Lord knows I've found my share of whiny players and those who get upset and claim things are unfair PvPers and PvEers alike. For every whining miner about sec issues and gankers, there's a whiny ganker who's upset whenever he doesn't get a kill out of a gank. Lots of people think the game should change, in general to favour their own play style.

In my experience there's a lot of "PvPers" who are just as sore when they lose a ship as any ratter or miner, and there are still plenty of mission runners, miners and ratters who are pretty good about the process ending up in a new clone.

In the end ther's players who will continue to whine in this game and unfortunately you won't be able to sort them out. I try just to ignore them they're going to be in every MMO you play.

Few people understand the psycology of a highway traffic cop. Your average speeder will panic and immediately pull over to the side. This is wrong. It arouses contempt in the cop heart. Make the bastard chase you. He will follow.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#56 - 2014-04-07 18:04:15 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Darek Castigatus wrote:

I always like turning it back on them, like so.

Miner - whaa whaa I want to be left alone to play 'my way' in a game which has the basic assumption that playing as part of a group is advantageous and that interaction is never purely on your terms.

Ganker - Here is your dose of education for the day.


Miner - I dont see why I should defend myself in anyway

Ganker - Im taking time out of my Nullops to teach you why, next time I expect you to be harder to kill. GIVE ME A DAMN CHALLENGE YOU ******* ****!!!!1111!¬!

(Edit: of course, this is fantasy as it is usually the Miner who swears)


At the end of the day, this is probably why I like gankers and dislike their 'victims' (which I also strive to never become). It's because they are actually 'teaching' greedy, self absorbed, irrational 'carebears' that they are playing a multiplayer non-consensual pvp game not some themepark 'do whatever you like it's all good, no consequences' crap game.

That miner or mission runner didn't give a single thought to how his activity is negatively affecting others (by lowering the value of those other miners and mission runners ore or LP) yet somehow the loss of his ship is some crime against humanity. That kind of selfishness and oblivious attitude needs to be punished and I'm glad you gankers are here to do that....while I of course spend the time and effort to avoid the loving caresses of you sumbitches Twisted
Precentor Saggitus
Planet Express Transport
#57 - 2014-04-07 18:45:00 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

At the end of the day, this is probably why I like gankers and dislike their 'victims' (which I also strive to never become). It's because they are actually 'teaching' greedy, self absorbed, irrational 'carebears' that they are playing a multiplayer non-consensual pvp game not some themepark 'do whatever you like it's all good, no consequences' crap game.


I have no problems with gankers either for the most part, but I think its unfair to categorize anyone who prefers to do PvE type activity is "greedy" or "self absorbed". Also EVE is (or should) be the ultimate "do whatever you like game" whatever you like includes an array of PvE activities, they just happen not to be of the theme park variety, EVE is wonderful in that there is a lot of ways to do said PvE things. that nothing is ever really PvE is just part of the game.

Personally I can see where lots of players, particularly new ones get upset, unhappy at being ganked. There's lots of players just trying to get a bit of veldspar to sell, another rat's bounty so they can get ahead in the game. Ganking a lower end character might just have annihilated the results of their afternoon's gaming. One must admit that this isn't always directly apparent when one suffers such a loss that this is really the challenge inherent in the game. Its probably debateable that people who play EVE and like it, are a sigma left or right on the bell curve with what they consider "fun". Some will get upset and quit, others will learn and continue. I will say that once the risks are apparent and losses have been suffered, why some continue to play wishing that they weren't so. I guess maybe the internet space ships are just that pretty that some are enthralled.

I do have to question the idea that other players need to be "taught" lessons in such fashion. If that's why one is doing it, then you have issues. If you do it for reputation, reward, or tactical or strategic ends, that's what the game is about (essentially reputation and reward are either tactical or strategic depending on your end goals). I feel no need to teach other players a lesson than I do the other idiots I share the freeway with, or some of the ignorant louts at the mall.

Quote:

That miner or mission runner didn't give a single thought to how his activity is negatively affecting others (by lowering the value of those other miners and mission runners ore or LP) yet somehow the loss of his ship is some crime against humanity. That kind of selfishness and oblivious attitude needs to be punished and I'm glad you gankers are here to do that....while I of course spend the time and effort to avoid the loving caresses of you sumbitches Twisted


I would contend that only bots are really aspects here that really negatively impact the game. An afk player mining away (or ratting away if they can do it) is extrordinarily inefficient, and thus don't profit verses time spent enough to affect the profit of thos ewho are at the keyboard. Bots when discovered should be mercilessly ganked. Average joes just trying to make a few ISK, its really ahrd to resent them just wanting to get somewhere in the game. After all, you don't get very much ISK (if any) from low end frigate PvP. Not enough if one has some sort of desire to fly something other than. Besides, someone's got to be out there to fuel the EVE industry and market, or all anyone would be flying would be a bunch of rookie ships and that would be pretty boring.

Few people understand the psycology of a highway traffic cop. Your average speeder will panic and immediately pull over to the side. This is wrong. It arouses contempt in the cop heart. Make the bastard chase you. He will follow.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#58 - 2014-04-07 18:48:15 UTC
Precentor Saggitus wrote:
I think its unfair to categorize anyone who prefers to do PvE type activity is "greedy" or "self absorbed". .


I dont think either of us meant it like that

Its the ones who rant and rave and stamp their feet and wish RL harm to come to those they hate (and I mean really HATE) that are who we were talking about really

Read some of the EvEmails sent to James315 to see what we mean

I really dont think there is any excuse for some of the things they say

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#59 - 2014-04-07 18:50:24 UTC
Precentor Saggitus wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

At the end of the day, this is probably why I like gankers and dislike their 'victims' (which I also strive to never become). It's because they are actually 'teaching' greedy, self absorbed, irrational 'carebears' that they are playing a multiplayer non-consensual pvp game not some themepark 'do whatever you like it's all good, no consequences' crap game.


I have no problems with gankers either for the most part, but I think its unfair to categorize anyone who prefers to do PvE type activity is "greedy" or "self absorbed". Also EVE is (or should) be the ultimate "do whatever you like game" whatever you like includes an array of PvE activities, they just happen not to be of the theme park variety, EVE is wonderful in that there is a lot of ways to do said PvE things. that nothing is ever really PvE is just part of the game.


Hey guys, someone tell the new guy here what I do in game please.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#60 - 2014-04-07 18:54:50 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Precentor Saggitus wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

At the end of the day, this is probably why I like gankers and dislike their 'victims' (which I also strive to never become). It's because they are actually 'teaching' greedy, self absorbed, irrational 'carebears' that they are playing a multiplayer non-consensual pvp game not some themepark 'do whatever you like it's all good, no consequences' crap game.


I have no problems with gankers either for the most part, but I think its unfair to categorize anyone who prefers to do PvE type activity is "greedy" or "self absorbed". Also EVE is (or should) be the ultimate "do whatever you like game" whatever you like includes an array of PvE activities, they just happen not to be of the theme park variety, EVE is wonderful in that there is a lot of ways to do said PvE things. that nothing is ever really PvE is just part of the game.


Hey guys, someone tell the new guy here what I do in game please.



She farms square pumpkins, does the Klingon raid mission and mines Thorium

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann