CSM Campaigns

This is the language barrier that I was talking about. Your statement is basically nonsense. You are somehow equating promoting yourself as a candidate with making false statements about the other candidates. I am not sure how you came to this conclusion, but you need to have an earnest discussion with a native English speaker that you trust. There is a serious gap in your understanding of the English language that needs to be corrected.

Can someone that speaks French set this guy straight? He needs to understand the difference between talking himself up (promoting himself as a candidate) and talking badly about others. He has some strange concept in his mind that by saying good things about himself, he is forced to also say bad things about other people.

Thanks!!!

Can you expand on that question? I don't understand why the risk adverse would want highsec nerfed?

I'll address "Nerfing highsec" and "risk adverse players." Separately.

In my view, highsec doesn't need a nerf, what it needs is more things for the casual players to do. I.E. More missions, variety, challenges... Etc etc

For the risk adverse, its their play style, telling someone how to play EVE completely removes the sandbox aspect of the game. I'm 100% for allowing players to play how they want to, not how others want them to.

That, Insta dodge wardec and reform a new corp I'm against. Currently its a viable mechanic. How it should be addressed is currently beyond me. There's a lot of opinions on how it should be addressed. And I will look into that more further!

*sigh* That morning I had to say goodbye to someone, so I wasn't 100% there and did the interview more of a distraction then anything. I should've rescheduled it, but whatever. What's done is done!



That's a much heated debate, with mutilple suggestions on how to handle it. But, you're right, I should...as you put it..."Put my money where my mouth it!" And, you know what? I will!

The debate on cloaks will go on forever! Keep in mind that my ideas are just an idea. There's a lot of conversations going around about what to do about it.

This would affect wormhole space in a number of ways.

It would add greater security to those who live in wormholes. Now you'll have some idea if there's anyone floating around. Thus would make scouting harder aswell.

I've thought of a way to balance it. If (big IF here) my idea was to be tossed into the game, then there should be a scale of difficulty on scanning cloaked ships. For example, a non-covert ops ship with a cloak would be relatively easy to scan down. Covert/Black ops would be much harder to scan down. T3 ships would gain an immunity to this new system if it was implemented. How exactly this would work, would be up for debate and theory crafting so nothing is OP.

If you would like to discuss this, please, feel free to do so! I'd love the conversation with a wormhole resident to make sure it would work with them aswell!

Why do you want to force anyone to do anything? An AFK pilot poses absolutely zero threat to anyone, so why does there need to be a counter to it? "Because you don't know if they're AFK or not!" you might say, to which I say, "so?" It adds an element of risk, or the perception of risk, to the game.

I don't know if there's a big nasty gatecamp on the other side of the gate I'm about to jump through either, should there be a counter to that? What's wrong with the element of the unknown? I believe bringing an element of the unknown to an area is a fundamental and "intended" role of cloaky ships. If you disagree, what exactly do you feel are the roles of cloaky ships?

EDIT: As someone who's playstyle focuses heavily on covops, I'm very concerned about your ideas on it, and I'm interested in your response to my above questions. That said, I'm very happy to hear and in agreement with your above post. You may yet win my vote.

You're welcome!

I am sad, that was a good question...

Thank you for responding to my question about mining.

I am very curious to see how many candidates are active participants in this foundational part of the EVE experience.

Can you go into further detail on the kinds of changes you would like to see made to pve, Jove space, FW, Incarna and carriers in highsec. These have been of great interest to me for a long time so i am really curious to hear your ideas.

Thanks