These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

How should CCP reduce inflation

First post
Author
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#21 - 2014-04-01 12:47:46 UTC
Rthor wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
I'm not really sure how people can continue to state that inflation is an issue when CCP have literally just posted the indices which shows deflation almost entirely across the board (with the exception being the mineral index).
CCP also said that they want ice to be like oil, to be something worth fighting over or something to that effect. Well ice can only become more important if its price goes up, and if ice price goes up then a lot of other things will go up, too. So yes there is not much inflation at the moment and there has not been but CCP's goal of making ice more important will increase inflation. And ice has been steadily on fire in a world of, predominantly, deflation or lack of inflation. Hence it is an issue worth discussing whether this move in ice price indicates arrival of some inflation actually.
Whether or not they plan to in the future is fairly beside the point. Ice has been steadily increasing in price and yet all but one of the indices are down. The crowd that seems to think that inflation is a problem are not basing it off of future speculation, they are basing it off of the price of individual ships increasing in value following the balance.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#22 - 2014-04-01 13:01:47 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Rthor wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
I'm not really sure how people can continue to state that inflation is an issue when CCP have literally just posted the indices which shows deflation almost entirely across the board (with the exception being the mineral index).
CCP also said that they want ice to be like oil, to be something worth fighting over or something to that effect. Well ice can only become more important if its price goes up, and if ice price goes up then a lot of other things will go up, too. So yes there is not much inflation at the moment and there has not been but CCP's goal of making ice more important will increase inflation. And ice has been steadily on fire in a world of, predominantly, deflation or lack of inflation. Hence it is an issue worth discussing whether this move in ice price indicates arrival of some inflation actually.
Whether or not they plan to in the future is fairly beside the point. Ice has been steadily increasing in price and yet all but one of the indices are down. The crowd that seems to think that inflation is a problem are not basing it off of future speculation, they are basing it off of the price of individual ships increasing in value following the balance.


Individual ship price increases do not inflation make. But a spike in ice prices consequences larger may have.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#23 - 2014-04-01 13:05:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Bad Bobby
Lucas Kell wrote:
I'm not really sure how people can continue to state that inflation is an issue when CCP have literally just posted the indices which shows deflation almost entirely across the board (with the exception being the mineral index).
It's just another bandwagon. Many people jumped on it and called out CCP on supposedly out of control inflation. They had no justification or evidence. All they had was innacurate and subjective recollections of past pricing, a flawed understanding of sinks vs faucets, poor grasp of the impact of recent balance changes and a collective dislike for people that were making "too much money" from the twin evils of Incursioning and FW.

Given that their historical viewpoint was based on nothing more than rumour, ignorance and prejudice, what makes you think that they would revise their viewpoint when better information became available? Those people are just as ignorant and full of impotent rage now as they were before. The people haven't changed and so the problem hasn't changed.

Rthor wrote:
CCP also said that they want ice to be like oil, to be something worth fighting over or something to that effect. Well ice can only become more important if its price goes up, and if ice price goes up then a lot of other things will go up, too. So yes there is not much inflation at the moment and there has not been but CCP's goal of making ice more important will increase inflation. And ice has been steadily on fire in a world of, predominantly, deflation or lack of inflation. Hence it is an issue worth discussing whether this move in ice price indicates arrival of some inflation actually.
I agree, that is certainly worth discussing.

The question I would ask is if the increase in value of ice will be a cause or effect in all this. Certainly if ice prices go up due to constrained supply and growing demand it will become more important and may drive additional conflict, but is that the only way this can work? Will ice become more important for other reasons aside from the market price?

Also, how wide will be the inflationary impact of increasing ice prices? Certainly it will have more impact than just increasing the price of one commodity in an index basket, but how much more? Ice prices have been heading upwards for a while now and yet the numbers from our economists show widespread deflation, is the impact of ice less than many believe or is something else cancelling out the impact of ice?
Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#24 - 2014-04-01 16:03:14 UTC
mynnna wrote:
Rthor wrote:
Actually something may have been done by CCP to start inflation. It is pretty obvious. I may be wrong if somebody really really big is manipulating ice. Some people around this forum probably got frostbite trying to manipulate ice.

I think that nobody is capable of manipulating ice at this point.

The chart of nitropes plus some other things show pretty impressive strength and it is pulling a bunch of ice derivatives steadily with it. The ice move is for real.

Don't sell your ice but ice derivatives will do even better for now.


Manipulation != inflation. That said, yes, someone is manipulating ice, but it ain't CCP. Bear


If you are in charge of it then surely you can take the ice market down...so why don't you? Or maybe you are not in charge of this move. Bear
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#25 - 2014-04-02 14:32:27 UTC
Bad Bobby wrote:


The question I would ask is if the increase in value of ice will be a cause or effect in all this. Certainly if ice prices go up due to constrained supply and growing demand it will become more important and may drive additional conflict, but is that the only way this can work? Will ice become more important for other reasons aside from the market price?

Also, how wide will be the inflationary impact of increasing ice prices? Certainly it will have more impact than just increasing the price of one commodity in an index basket, but how much more? Ice prices have been heading upwards for a while now and yet the numbers from our economists show widespread deflation, is the impact of ice less than many believe or is something else cancelling out the impact of ice?


Ice is used as a fuel and acts "like" a fuel. That is, look at what happens in RL when fuel price rises: the ramification are complex and wide and also dependant on a country's economy.

I.e. a country with lots of rail transport will suffer less than a country where trucks provide the most logistics.

But in EvE, fuel is a bit less at the foundation of everything, all those sectors not relying on it will be less affected.
In example, T1 production does not really require anything but initial BPO research (usually done years ago, so POS fuel is a non factor).

But now consider the same industry done outside of hi sec: you'll possibly get fuel derived costs and as they rise it becomes more and more competitive to just do it in hi sec. That's just one of thousands reasons I always said hi sec should not exist at all, it's a powerful economy distortion factor (not counting ships PvP!)

Now, consider this: back at the time I was making freighters and all sorts of large-ish stuff that may affect markets without a need for an ounce of fuel. That's why you see indexes acting up even in counter-intuitive ways.

What's going on for real?

As you know I am fairly "knee deep" into ices. Only one shows true demand outpacing offer and even that one is being abandoned. I have witnessed the same multiboxers stopping mining ice exactly right now that it'd be more profitable.
I have seen my "home ice system" going from 150 in local (pre spawn belts) down to 70+ at beginning of spawned ice belts down to 35 in local even now that ice brings in profits.
There are 2 main reasons for this, evident to anyone who "lives ice" most days. But I'll leave them to be found as exercise to the reader, as I don't want to give Mynna or others the idea I actually (also) perform fundamental analysis on the markets Twisted
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#26 - 2014-04-02 14:33:49 UTC
Rthor wrote:
mynnna wrote:
Rthor wrote:
Actually something may have been done by CCP to start inflation. It is pretty obvious. I may be wrong if somebody really really big is manipulating ice. Some people around this forum probably got frostbite trying to manipulate ice.

I think that nobody is capable of manipulating ice at this point.

The chart of nitropes plus some other things show pretty impressive strength and it is pulling a bunch of ice derivatives steadily with it. The ice move is for real.

Don't sell your ice but ice derivatives will do even better for now.


Manipulation != inflation. That said, yes, someone is manipulating ice, but it ain't CCP. Bear


If you are in charge of it then surely you can take the ice market down...so why don't you? Or maybe you are not in charge of this move. Bear


Don't ask yourself who, but how and why Blink

Why such market may even be manipulated? Here, I have just given you an huge hint.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#27 - 2014-04-02 18:39:39 UTC
Rthor wrote:
mynnna wrote:
Rthor wrote:
Actually something may have been done by CCP to start inflation. It is pretty obvious. I may be wrong if somebody really really big is manipulating ice. Some people around this forum probably got frostbite trying to manipulate ice.

I think that nobody is capable of manipulating ice at this point.

The chart of nitropes plus some other things show pretty impressive strength and it is pulling a bunch of ice derivatives steadily with it. The ice move is for real.

Don't sell your ice but ice derivatives will do even better for now.


Manipulation != inflation. That said, yes, someone is manipulating ice, but it ain't CCP. Bear


If you are in charge of it then surely you can take the ice market down...so why don't you? Or maybe you are not in charge of this move. Bear


Not in charge, never said I was. It's an associate of mine.

That said, two reasons exist not to take it down instead. Well, three, really... Nah, actually four.


  1. Taking it down is much harder to do because it would entail working against natural market motion instead of with it.
  2. Taking it down is both harder and riskier to realize a profit from. If short sells were a thing, that'd be another matter.
  3. It just so happens that CFC space is home to the entire nullsec supply of nitropes bearing ices.
  4. Tears.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#28 - 2014-04-02 18:57:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
mynnna wrote:

It just so happens that CFC space is home to the entire nullsec supply of nitropes bearing ices.


This is the main reason (and one I did not tell in my posts above) why I am usually opposed to blind null sec buffs and improvements.
Because sov is badly designed and thus it's possible for one organization to take control and form a self cartel on a key resource.

(Edit: read it well, I am not blaming you, you are really playing the game by its rules. THOSE are flawed not you)

First it was R64 then Technetium now nitrogen isotopes. You guys (and those who came before you) are GREAT at having earned all that space and are GREAT at manipulating everything and everyone (CSM and who knows who else) into giving you preferred access to the best resources.

But is it good for EvE, when a lone organization can perform a positive feedback process where they become more and more powerful? Positive feedbacks are not bad just for class A hi-fi amplifiers, they are also detrimental to MMOs long term health.

Hi sec noobs are just that: a fragmented and thus powerless bunch of players who can't harm the game because they don't steer all as one, they aren't coordinated to focus and hit like an hammer. You can find the 27B Raven dude but he's irrelevant, which for a MMO is not so bad.

On the other side there are the mega corps like yours that not only get the (deserved) prize for winning the game but also get mechanics that further self-fuel and amplify your power making it harder and discouraging for new "conquerors" to join the game.

This is the "wealth and power divide" that forms the "established elite" that has brought so bad to many MMOs.
Adunh Slavy
#29 - 2014-04-02 21:46:52 UTC
Rthor wrote:

CCP also said that they want ice to be like oil, to be something worth fighting over or something to that effect. Well ice can only become more important if its price goes up, and if ice price goes up then a lot of other things will go up, too. So yes there is not much inflation at the moment and there has not been but CCP's goal of making ice more important will increase inflation. And ice has been steadily on fire in a world of, predominantly, deflation or lack of inflation. Hence it is an issue worth discussing whether this move in ice price indicates arrival of some inflation actually


An increasing price of ice, due to reduced supply, or increased demand because of game mechanics, is not "inflation", much less "price inflation", which is the more common (though inaccurate) use of the term inflation.

How high the price could go, could be attributed to inflation however.

Enjoy the confusion.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#30 - 2014-04-03 01:13:05 UTC
mynnna wrote:
Rthor wrote:
mynnna wrote:
Rthor wrote:
Actually something may have been done by CCP to start inflation. It is pretty obvious. I may be wrong if somebody really really big is manipulating ice. Some people around this forum probably got frostbite trying to manipulate ice.

I think that nobody is capable of manipulating ice at this point.

The chart of nitropes plus some other things show pretty impressive strength and it is pulling a bunch of ice derivatives steadily with it. The ice move is for real.

Don't sell your ice but ice derivatives will do even better for now.


Manipulation != inflation. That said, yes, someone is manipulating ice, but it ain't CCP. Bear


If you are in charge of it then surely you can take the ice market down...so why don't you? Or maybe you are not in charge of this move. Bear


Not in charge, never said I was. It's an associate of mine.

That said, two reasons exist not to take it down instead. Well, three, really... Nah, actually four.


  1. Taking it down is much harder to do because it would entail working against natural market motion instead of with it.
  2. Taking it down is both harder and riskier to realize a profit from. If short sells were a thing, that'd be another matter.
  3. It just so happens that CFC space is home to the entire nullsec supply of nitropes bearing ices.
  4. Tears.


I am on the same side, sort of. Why would you take the trade down if you have wind in your back? But if you guys would do that for some reason that would be great.

But actually I do not think that the trade is in nitropes. I do think that they will punch through 1000 and then run. But it is too risky for me to bet on that because you guys can dump your nitropes on anybody.

If I am getting the summer expansion changes correctly then you will see a compression of racial ice prices differential because you will need ice to refine ores in hi sec. So I am actually buying up cheapest ices over time as I think that this will take 6 months to play out.
Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#31 - 2014-04-03 01:23:37 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Rthor wrote:

CCP also said that they want ice to be like oil, to be something worth fighting over or something to that effect. Well ice can only become more important if its price goes up, and if ice price goes up then a lot of other things will go up, too. So yes there is not much inflation at the moment and there has not been but CCP's goal of making ice more important will increase inflation. And ice has been steadily on fire in a world of, predominantly, deflation or lack of inflation. Hence it is an issue worth discussing whether this move in ice price indicates arrival of some inflation actually


An increasing price of ice, due to reduced supply, or increased demand because of game mechanics, is not "inflation", much less "price inflation", which is the more common (though inaccurate) use of the term inflation.

How high the price could go, could be attributed to inflation however.

Enjoy the confusion.


You know, I do not think that you like me, but I was thinking about all of this. Before ice emphasis turns into inflation it can take years. There are so many steps along the way. The idea is to think of immediate step and do that trade, but know the chain. As I said already, I think that the first step is racial ice price compression. After that it may be same thing with carbides or maybe even something else like sylramic fibers shortage. Or maybe actually tech 1 items requiring mins in high sec instead due to mineral shortage in high sec. And on and on. I do not know yet. I am busy with racial ice compression atm for the next 6 months.
Shizuken
Venerated Stars
#32 - 2014-04-03 06:47:57 UTC
Ibrahim Tash-Murkon wrote:
Aren't inflation rates around where CCP wants them?


I suppose, but as a purveyor of goods on a long term basis I would appreciate some inflation again by dropping the tax back to its preincursion level.
Adunh Slavy
#33 - 2014-04-03 09:29:00 UTC
Rthor wrote:

You know, I do not think that you like me, but I was thinking about all of this. Before ice emphasis turns into inflation it can take years. There are so many steps along the way. The idea is to think of immediate step and do that trade, but know the chain. As I said already, I think that the first step is racial ice price compression. After that it may be same thing with carbides or maybe even something else like sylramic fibers shortage. Or maybe actually tech 1 items requiring mins in high sec instead due to mineral shortage in high sec. And on and on. I do not know yet. I am busy with racial ice compression atm for the next 6 months.


Why would I not like you? I don't like or dislike you.

Anyway, what I am trying to point out is, "inflation" (either definition, monetary or price) always refers to the supply and demand for money, not the supply and demand of anything else.

CCP constraining the supply of Ice, and other mechanics changes that increase the use of ice, may cause prices to increase in some parts of the economy. However those price increases would not be caused by inflation.

How much those prices increase, or could increase, is where inflation matters.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Muffet McStrudel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2014-04-03 13:50:35 UTC
Easy. Force people to pay for accounts with cash and not isk.

Funny, we didn't have either a huge lag or inflation problem years ago. Not until CCP wanted to increase the number of subs. Nobody in their right mind would pay for 20 cash accounts per month at $15 per account. However, plenty of people are willing to multibox 20 miners or ratters to do this.

That's the solution to both problems. Que the tears please ...
Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#35 - 2014-04-03 19:17:27 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
mynnna wrote:

It just so happens that CFC space is home to the entire nullsec supply of nitropes bearing ices.


This is the main reason (and one I did not tell in my posts above) why I am usually opposed to blind null sec buffs and improvements.
Because sov is badly designed and thus it's possible for one organization to take control and form a self cartel on a key resource.

(Edit: read it well, I am not blaming you, you are really playing the game by its rules. THOSE are flawed not you)

First it was R64 then Technetium now nitrogen isotopes. You guys (and those who came before you) are GREAT at having earned all that space and are GREAT at manipulating everything and everyone (CSM and who knows who else) into giving you preferred access to the best resources.

But is it good for EvE, when a lone organization can perform a positive feedback process where they become more and more powerful? Positive feedbacks are not bad just for class A hi-fi amplifiers, they are also detrimental to MMOs long term health.

Hi sec noobs are just that: a fragmented and thus powerless bunch of players who can't harm the game because they don't steer all as one, they aren't coordinated to focus and hit like an hammer. You can find the 27B Raven dude but he's irrelevant, which for a MMO is not so bad.

On the other side there are the mega corps like yours that not only get the (deserved) prize for winning the game but also get mechanics that further self-fuel and amplify your power making it harder and discouraging for new "conquerors" to join the game.

This is the "wealth and power divide" that forms the "established elite" that has brought so bad to many MMOs.


I don't like this helpless stuff. I am all in on cheaper ice isotopes and derivatives of this trade until the summer expansion hits. Goons cannot crash these prices but if they do they will crash prices of their own assets.

Trading is not personal. Bigger entities are not as nimble as smaller ones. So there is no reason to hate them or feel helpless. The thing to do is to front run them and that is what I intend to do. There should be supernormal profits in this endeavor and that is what I want to try.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#36 - 2014-04-03 23:33:39 UTC
Rthor wrote:

I don't like this helpless stuff. I am all in on cheaper ice isotopes and derivatives of this trade until the summer expansion hits. Goons cannot crash these prices but if they do they will crash prices of their own assets.

Trading is not personal. Bigger entities are not as nimble as smaller ones. So there is no reason to hate them or feel helpless. The thing to do is to front run them and that is what I intend to do. There should be supernormal profits in this endeavor and that is what I want to try.


Broaden your perspective. It's not just about you or me, but about the game in the long term. Today you make a profit, tomorrow you get a permanently manipulated economy in the hands of 2-3 mega-overlords.
Irken Slushk
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2014-04-04 00:52:52 UTC
As someone who has played the game a long time, read the forums regularly and watched the political landscape evolve I agree with VV. As VV states a couple posts up, the Goons do deserve credit for what they have done and are still doing but as VV has said is it healthy for the entire game to be manipulated by a select few individuals?
Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
#38 - 2014-04-04 01:31:57 UTC
Irken Slushk wrote:
As someone who has played the game a long time, read the forums regularly and watched the political landscape evolve I agree with VV. As VV states a couple posts up, the Goons do deserve credit for what they have done and are still doing but as VV has said is it healthy for the entire game to be manipulated by a select few individuals?


So maybe you should be the benevolent dictator and say how things should be the best for the game? I am sure you are qualified to be the dictator of this game You know what is healthy for the game after all.

Possibly I do not understand this whole occupy wall street thing but is this generation all about complaining about stuff and sulking away or doing something about it all?

I mean I am going to do very well with or without goons but you guys are going to petition CCP for free stuff or something?
Anni Hil-Ator
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#39 - 2014-04-04 01:56:49 UTC
I'm kind of a noob, but it seems to me that CCP want to keep selling PLEX. And if people keep buying PLEXs to convert into ISK... prices for items will undoubtedly get more expensive. Especially since many of the people buying PLEXs probably won't be too interested in mining or manufacturing.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#40 - 2014-04-04 05:04:24 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Rthor wrote:

I don't like this helpless stuff. I am all in on cheaper ice isotopes and derivatives of this trade until the summer expansion hits. Goons cannot crash these prices but if they do they will crash prices of their own assets.

Trading is not personal. Bigger entities are not as nimble as smaller ones. So there is no reason to hate them or feel helpless. The thing to do is to front run them and that is what I intend to do. There should be supernormal profits in this endeavor and that is what I want to try.


Broaden your perspective. It's not just about you or me, but about the game in the long term. Today you make a profit, tomorrow you get a permanently manipulated economy in the hands of 2-3 mega-overlords.


I'm flattered you think so highly of myself & my associates. Unfortunately for the dystopian future you seem to like to imagine to excuse away your helplessness, we're generally too lazy to "permanently manipulate" the economy.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Previous page123Next page