These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

What kind of world would Eve be without internet anonymity?

First post
Author
Hevymetal
POT Corp
#1 - 2014-03-31 17:16:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Hevymetal
With all the crazy laws being passed in various countries. What would the ramifications be if noone's real identity could remain hidden? Kinda like China already, but to a greater extent.

Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?

How much of a difference would it make in the Eve universe knowing (PlayerX) is really John Doe? How many players would continue to actually play? Would it mean the death of Eve as we know it or merely an evolution to a nicer universe?
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#2 - 2014-03-31 17:18:23 UTC
If 'EVE is real" meant we all had to play under our real life identity, this would be a whole different game.

Mr Epeen Cool
Toshiro Ozuwara
Perkone
#3 - 2014-03-31 17:19:46 UTC
Accountability and social pressure are huge forces in shaping personal behavior.

It didn't take long to locate the tracking beacon, deep inside the quarters for sleepin' They thought they could get away Not today, it's not the way that this kid plays

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#4 - 2014-03-31 17:19:56 UTC
People would know what a nice guy I am in RL, and my reputation would be ruined.





Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#5 - 2014-03-31 17:22:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Hevymetal wrote:
With all the crazy laws being passed in various countries. What would the ramifications be if noone's real identity could remain hidden? Kinda like China already, but to a greater extent.

Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?

How much of a difference would it make in the Eve universe knowing (PlayerX) is really John Doe? How many players would continue to actually play? Would it mean the death of Eve as we know it or merely an evolution to a nicer universe?


So you think forcing people to use their real names would make for a nicer community?

I see someone has not spent so much as 5 seconds on Facebook.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#6 - 2014-03-31 17:22:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
Whatever happened to the Moon Mining investor guy who made a FanFest presentation, and actually revealed his Toon Name onstage ????

ed: (may have been asteroid mining, can't remember)

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Hevymetal
POT Corp
#7 - 2014-03-31 17:28:51 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Hevymetal wrote:
With all the crazy laws being passed in various countries. What would the ramifications be if noone's real identity could remain hidden? Kinda like China already, but to a greater extent.

Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?

How much of a difference would it make in the Eve universe knowing (PlayerX) is really John Doe? How many players would continue to actually play? Would it mean the death of Eve as we know it or merely an evolution to a nicer universe?


So you think forcing people to use their real names would make for a nicer community?

I see someone has not spent so much as 5 seconds on Facebook.


Not at all. Just wondering others opinions.

What is this "Facebook" thing you speak of?
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#8 - 2014-03-31 17:32:05 UTC
Judging by my various inboxes, I'd be dead several times over and my corpse thoroughly desecrated. And not like, cut off an ear for a trophy desecrated, either, the serious stuff.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Masuka Taredi
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2014-03-31 17:37:16 UTC
I don't think it would change anything. Tbh it's a game. If someone was angry enough at what is happening in game to do something in real life to the person that annoyed them. Then they have some issues to sort through.
Meilandra Vanderganken
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2014-03-31 17:39:14 UTC
Hevymetal wrote:


Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?


Hell yeah, miners are nothing but talk IN GAME, let alone they'/d actually do something IRL. Lol


But all kidding aside, I'd stop playing the game.

Kiryen O'Bannon
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#11 - 2014-03-31 17:41:03 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Hevymetal wrote:
With all the crazy laws being passed in various countries. What would the ramifications be if noone's real identity could remain hidden? Kinda like China already, but to a greater extent.

Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?

How much of a difference would it make in the Eve universe knowing (PlayerX) is really John Doe? How many players would continue to actually play? Would it mean the death of Eve as we know it or merely an evolution to a nicer universe?


So you think forcing people to use their real names would make for a nicer community?

I see someone has not spent so much as 5 seconds on Facebook.


He didn't assert that. He asked a question. I see someone just cannot stop distorting things.

Eternal Father, King of birth, /Who didst create the heaven and earth, /And bid the planets and the sun/ Their own appointed orbits run; /O hear us when we seek thy grace /For those who soar through outer space.

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#12 - 2014-03-31 17:49:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:


He didn't assert that. He asked a question. I see someone just cannot stop distorting things.


No, it's legitimate.

I unsubbed from Facebook about 3 years ago. The experience was horrific.

And the idiocy was caused by people I had known since the age of 13. My very high school graduating class folks, if you can believe that.

They were using FB to organize our reunion (1983), and about half of them (this is Texas) got involved in the stupid Tea Party Nonsense.

My good lord....the hatred and scumbaggery these people revealed. And they would just not stop with the incessant propaganda.

People will always distort Internet groups of any kind towards their own agenda.

I can never ever be in a room with those people again.


Internet anonymity or non-anonymity.....it all turns out exactly the same.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#13 - 2014-03-31 17:52:21 UTC
Hevymetal wrote:
With all the crazy laws being passed in various countries. What would the ramifications be if noone's real identity could remain hidden? Kinda like China already, but to a greater extent.

Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?

How much of a difference would it make in the Eve universe knowing (PlayerX) is really John Doe? How many players would continue to actually play? Would it mean the death of Eve as we know it or merely an evolution to a nicer universe?



Well now, let's see. What this question clearly pre-supposes are consequences for doing something online that someone doesn't like.

Now let's assume that Player A - the non-sociopath has said or done something that makes he and Player B - the sociopath in antagonism.

Which player is at greater risk of something really unpleasant happening to him in real life, do you think? The normal person or the dead-eyed sadistic nutbar?

Oh I know, let's obviate this unpleasant train of thought by maybe not thoughtlessly advocating vigiliante justice, maybe?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Captain Stupid
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2014-03-31 17:55:09 UTC
My wife says there is no difference between my name here and real life. Blink
Pok Nibin
Doomheim
#15 - 2014-03-31 18:00:55 UTC
You pose an interesting idea, I guess. Once, during a basketball game, I threw an elbow on a guy that broke his glasses in two across his face. Sure, I was charged with a foul, then a technical foul. The guy was more shocked than mad. In fact, my mom was the maddest person in the crowd over that. She started yelling at me and the entire gym fell silent. Spooky. But, only one of many such incidents in a long set of years playing various sports. Why mention it?

Well, I figure the guy probably had every right to drive over to my house call me out on the front porch and punch me in the nose. Had he done that, or tried, I wouldn't have been shocked. Even though we lived just a few miles apart, the thought never entered the guy's mind. Never entered mine either. I didn't sit in the house tremblin' that this power forward was comin' for me. I think it'd be stupid to think so. What was done on the court, stayed on the court...or field...diamond...

Maybe if I'd taken a pistol out there and shot him. Or, had some of my friends mug him on the way to the locker room at half time, that'd be a different story. Thing was, nobody ever thought like that, either. The game is the game. Off the field is off the field. The two don't mix. I guess you're askin' if that's true for EVE. It would be for me. Other players? Probably not. See, there's not a lot of sportsmanship in EVE. There's not a lot of discipline, and really (face it), EVE has become something any fool can do. Ask them. They're all over the place now.

I look at it like, in this world of random violence and crime, my home security has to be at a certain level not to be a fool myself. If anyone comes to my door uninvited, that's what they'd be looking at. In all likelihood, it's not something a rational person would want to be looking at. If anyone's that dumb...well, there you go. I'd recommend EVE players follow a general rule of thumb in life itself. Don't go knockin' on a door if you don't know what's behind it. Some surprises are not fun.

The right to free speech doesn't automatically carry with it the right to be taken seriously.

Anslo
Scope Works
#16 - 2014-03-31 18:05:05 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Hevymetal wrote:
With all the crazy laws being passed in various countries. What would the ramifications be if noone's real identity could remain hidden? Kinda like China already, but to a greater extent.

Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?

How much of a difference would it make in the Eve universe knowing (PlayerX) is really John Doe? How many players would continue to actually play? Would it mean the death of Eve as we know it or merely an evolution to a nicer universe?



Well now, let's see. What this question clearly pre-supposes are consequences for doing something online that someone doesn't like.

Now let's assume that Player A - the non-sociopath has said or done something that makes he and Player B - the sociopath in antagonism.

Which player is at greater risk of something really unpleasant happening to him in real life, do you think? The normal person or the dead-eyed sadistic nutbar?

Oh I know, let's obviate this unpleasant train of thought by maybe not thoughtlessly advocating vigiliante justice, maybe?

Or maybe you could not try and make negative assumptions on the OPs intent. He's just asking a gods damn question jeesh.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Dave stark
#17 - 2014-03-31 18:07:45 UTC
nothing would change. if you want to harass me IRL for what i do in game, there's a solution for that.

besides, lack of anonymity would work both ways.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#18 - 2014-03-31 18:14:20 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Hevymetal wrote:
With all the crazy laws being passed in various countries. What would the ramifications be if noone's real identity could remain hidden? Kinda like China already, but to a greater extent.

Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?

How much of a difference would it make in the Eve universe knowing (PlayerX) is really John Doe? How many players would continue to actually play? Would it mean the death of Eve as we know it or merely an evolution to a nicer universe?



Well now, let's see. What this question clearly pre-supposes are consequences for doing something online that someone doesn't like.

Now let's assume that Player A - the non-sociopath has said or done something that makes he and Player B - the sociopath in antagonism.

Which player is at greater risk of something really unpleasant happening to him in real life, do you think? The normal person or the dead-eyed sadistic nutbar?

Oh I know, let's obviate this unpleasant train of thought by maybe not thoughtlessly advocating vigiliante justice, maybe?

Or maybe you could not try and make negative assumptions on the OPs intent. He's just asking a gods damn question jeesh.



His question is laden with what is called an implicit assumption.

Like when someone - perhaps full of good intentions - says "Well what if we tried to reduce the Federal deficit by eliminating welfare spending" when every dollar the US spends on welfare generates 2.4 dollars in GNP, and saves a large but unknown amount of spending on defending against the starving ramaging hordes who would simply take the food and goods they need, because no one is willing to starve to improve interest rates.. The intention is good, the assumption is understandable on a superficial level, but a moment's thought reveals the huge error.

I hope you see the analogy.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#19 - 2014-03-31 18:15:46 UTC
Pok Nibin wrote:
You pose an interesting idea, I guess. Once, during a basketball game, I threw an elbow on a guy that broke his glasses in two across his face. Sure, I was charged with a foul, then a technical foul. The guy was more shocked than mad. In fact, my mom was the maddest person in the crowd over that. She started yelling at me and the entire gym fell silent. Spooky. But, only one of many such incidents in a long set of years playing various sports. Why mention it?

Well, I figure the guy probably had every right to drive over to my house call me out on the front porch and punch me in the nose. Had he done that, or tried, I wouldn't have been shocked. Even though we lived just a few miles apart, the thought never entered the guy's mind. Never entered mine either. I didn't sit in the house tremblin' that this power forward was comin' for me. I think it'd be stupid to think so. What was done on the court, stayed on the court...or field...diamond...

Maybe if I'd taken a pistol out there and shot him. Or, had some of my friends mug him on the way to the locker room at half time, that'd be a different story. Thing was, nobody ever thought like that, either. The game is the game. Off the field is off the field. The two don't mix. I guess you're askin' if that's true for EVE. It would be for me. Other players? Probably not. See, there's not a lot of sportsmanship in EVE. There's not a lot of discipline, and really (face it), EVE has become something any fool can do. Ask them. They're all over the place now.

I look at it like, in this world of random violence and crime, my home security has to be at a certain level not to be a fool myself. If anyone comes to my door uninvited, that's what they'd be looking at. In all likelihood, it's not something a rational person would want to be looking at. If anyone's that dumb...well, there you go. I'd recommend EVE players follow a general rule of thumb in life itself. Don't go knockin' on a door if you don't know what's behind it. Some surprises are not fun.


I know where your coming from lol. I too live in one of those states where "gun control" means "hold it with 2 hands, you're more accurate that way" :) .

And sure, we know there are people online who can't separate in game from out. We see it every day on these forums.

But i think some people have it backwards. The game might be nicer, but it wouldn't be because the predators went way, it would be because the prey wouldn't come at all. IMO it's really the so called "nice guy" gamers that need and use the anonymity of the internet, the so called sociopaths don't give a flying flip if someone knows who they are or not.

IMO it's why you don't see very many self identified high sec player or carebears running for the CSM (for example) while the same CSM is stocked with "griefiers" and members of the legendary and all powerful Null Sec Cartels (lol) who give their real names out as a condition of running.

So yea, EVE would be nicer is people had to use their real identities because the only people left would be the kinds who wouldn't be some incredibly oversensitive to imaginary losses that 'griefing' would be pointless.
Anslo
Scope Works
#20 - 2014-03-31 18:17:08 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Anslo wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Hevymetal wrote:
With all the crazy laws being passed in various countries. What would the ramifications be if noone's real identity could remain hidden? Kinda like China already, but to a greater extent.

Would most Eve players remain sadistic psychos or would their attitudes and playstyles change? Would you still gank and pod that helpless miner knowing he could very well track you down in real life?

How much of a difference would it make in the Eve universe knowing (PlayerX) is really John Doe? How many players would continue to actually play? Would it mean the death of Eve as we know it or merely an evolution to a nicer universe?



Well now, let's see. What this question clearly pre-supposes are consequences for doing something online that someone doesn't like.

Now let's assume that Player A - the non-sociopath has said or done something that makes he and Player B - the sociopath in antagonism.

Which player is at greater risk of something really unpleasant happening to him in real life, do you think? The normal person or the dead-eyed sadistic nutbar?

Oh I know, let's obviate this unpleasant train of thought by maybe not thoughtlessly advocating vigiliante justice, maybe?

Or maybe you could not try and make negative assumptions on the OPs intent. He's just asking a gods damn question jeesh.



His question is laden with what is called an implicit assumption.

Like when someone - perhaps full of good intentions - says "Well what if we tried to reduce the Federal deficit by eliminating welfare spending" when every dollar the US spends on welfare generates 2.4 dollars in GNP, and saves a large but unknown amount of spending on defending against the starving ramaging hordes who would simply take the food and goods they need, because no one is willing to starve to improve interest rates.. The intention is good, the assumption is understandable on a superficial level, but a moment's thought reveals the huge error.

I hope you see the analogy.


Sadly I do....aah Amurrica...

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

123Next pageLast page